News  Update  - English,  Turkish,  Spanish,  French

[ April 2006 ]

( English - Türkçe - Español - Français )


 

OIC's Istanbul meeting to call West to act against Islamophobia


According to The New Anatolian, The Organization of the Islamic Conference's (OIC) Parliamentary Union will meet in Istanbul this week and discuss making a call on Western countries to act against Islamophobia and extend their anti-defamation laws to ensure respect for Islam.

There would also be discussion of protection of sanctities and supporting principles of democracy and human rights. The Union also aims to increase awareness on Islam and to create a channel of productive cooperation and coordination with international institutions to enrich dialog.

The meetings are expected to discuss political, economic, and cultural developments influencing the Muslim nation and some organizational matters. A main focus is establishing smooth contact and strong representation with western and non-Muslim parliaments and countering terrorism.

The Fourth Conference of OIC Member States Parliament Speakers will begin on Wednesday (April 12th) with the participation of parliamentary delegations from 48 member countries. One of the key visitors at the conference will be Iran's Majlis (Parliament) speaker Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel, who's also expected to have a bilateral meeting with the host of the conference, his Turkish counterpart Bulent Arinc. The Iranian side is attaching great importance both to the conference and meeting with Arinc to secure the support of Turkey and the participating Muslim countries for its controversial nuclear program.

During preparatory meetings of experts on Saturday and Sunday the committees agreed to include several propositions on the conference's agenda and joint declaration.

According to the agreed text, "Banning Islamophobia and insults on Muslims' sanctities as well as a call on the United Nations and its Security Council to issue a resolution against sacrilege of the Prophet Mohammed and Islamic sects" will be high on the conference's agenda.

"The destructive impact of the West’s dual approaches towards issues in the Islamic world, in particular the Middle East, on constructive ties and exchanges between Islamic and Western states" and "emphasis on equal rights for all nations to access modern technology and its free use for peaceful purpose" are the other topics to be addressed.

The OIC's support for an end to the isolation of Turkish Cypriots will also be discussed by its members.
 

Monday , 10 April 2006  www.turkishweekily.net

Islamophobia tops agenda at OIC Istanbul meeting

Wednesday, April 12, 2006 ANKARA – Turkish Daily News

  Debates over Islamophobia will constitute the most important part of the Fourth Conference of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) Parliaments' Union meeting scheduled for today in Istanbul, said Parliament Speaker Bülent Arınç on Tuesday. 

  “This issue, which was proposed as an agenda item by our country during the executive committee meeting [of the OIC], has been brought onto the agenda of the Istanbul conference with the enormous support of countries such as Iran, Algeria, Kuwait and Morocco,” Arınç said in a speech he made prior to the opening of the conference.

  “I believe that participating countries will have a chance during the conference to put an emphasis on Islamic values, which are against intolerance and discrimination, and they will be able to debate in an atmosphere where dialogue between civilizations will be the main focus,” he added. 

  Arınç said the Istanbul meeting of the OIC has become important following the debates regarding the cartoon crisis that was first sparked by the publication of Prophet Mohammed caricatures in a Danish newspaper in September.

  “Islamic countries will give important messages to the entire world during the conference and draw attention to the clash of civilizations,” he added.

  Arınç expressed pleasure about the OIC meeting being held in Istanbul, which he said was the capital of civilizations as it combines the two continents and the two cultures.

  The parliament speaker also said the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (KKTC) was still an observer at the OIC's Istanbul meeting with the title “Turkish Cypriot Muslim Community.” 

  Arınç said Turkey had taken the initiative for a title change of the KKTC during OIC meetings and held out hope that Turkey's efforts would bear fruit in the coming days, which he said would amount to support for the Turkish Cypriots.

  He also said a final declaration would be issued at the end of the conference at Istanbul's Conrad Hotel. President Ahmet Necdet Sezer and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan are expected to attend the meeting today.   

 

OIC's Istanbul meeting to call West to act against Islamophobia

The New Anatolian / Istanbul 
April 11, 2006

The Organization of the Islamic Conference's (OIC) Parliamentary Union will meet in Istanbul this week and discuss making a call on Western countries to act against Islamophobia and extend their anti-defamation laws to ensure respect for Islam.

The Fourth Conference of OIC Member States Parliament Speakers will begin on Wednesday with the participation of parliamentary delegations from 48 member countries. One of the key visitors at the conference will be Iran's Majlis (Parliament) speaker Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel, who's also expected to have a bilateral meeting with the host of the conference, his Turkish counterpart Bulent Arinc. The Iranian side is attaching great importance both to the conference and meeting with Arinc to secure the support of Turkey and the participating Muslim countries for its controversial nuclear program.

During preparatory meetings of experts on Saturday and Sunday the committees agreed to include several propositions on the conference's agenda and joint declaration.

According to the agreed text, "Banning Islamophobia and insults on Muslims' sanctities as well as a call on the United Nations and its Security Council to issue a resolution against sacrilege of the Prophet Mohammed and Islamic sects" will be high on the conference's agenda

"The destructive impact of the West's dual approach towards issues in the Islamic world, in particular the Middle East, on constructive ties and exchanges between Islamic and Western states" and "emphasis on equal rights for all nations to access modern technology and its free use for peaceful purpose" are the other topics to be addressed.

The OIC's support for an end to the isolation of Turkish Cypriots will also be discussed by its members.


Large Saudi Delegation Heading for Euro-Arab Talks
K.S. Ramkumar, Arab News

JEDDAH, 13 April 2006 — A large Saudi delegation is taking part in the first Euro-Arab Dialogue Forum set at the Arab World Institute in Paris from April 26-28. The theme of the forum is “Prospects and contents of a Euro-Arab strategic partnership.”

“It’s a strong diplomatic gesture that falls within the continuity of the state visit of French President Jacques Chirac to Saudi Arabia in early March,” Saleh Bakr El-Tayar, secretary-general of the Franco-Arab Chamber of Commerce, said yesterday.

“(Chirac’s) visit confirmed the ‘convergence of view’ between France and the Kingdom and calls for more partnerships,” El-Tayar added.

During his trip, Chirac spoke in favor of the dialogue, and suggested that the France and the Kingdom should make a joint effort to thwart the attempts that stir up fanaticism and share the values for promoting better understanding.

The first Euro-Arab Dialogue Forum was launched as a new instrument to strengthen the relations between Europe and the Arab world. The forum, officially launched on Feb. 8 in Cairo by Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa, is co-organized by the General Union of Chambers of Commerce, Industry and Agriculture for Arab Countries and the Arab World Institute.

Within the scope of 14 workshops, the forum will look into issues related to global changes and their repercussions for Europe and the Arab world, the image of the “other” in Arab and European media, Euro-Arab cooperation mechanisms in economy knowledge, future of Euro-Arab relations, role of the common cultural heritage in supporting the alliance of civilizations and cooperation in the energy sector.

Some other issues to be deliberated are the role of the private sector supporting social development; youth education and development policies; economy and partnership — development perspectives; toward a new Arab world; European from Arab origins — their role in supporting cooperation between the shores of the Mediterranean; experiences of non-governmental cooperation; and investment constraints and opportunities.

The delegation will include representatives of ministries of foreign affairs, higher education, culture, information and commerce and industry. Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed, president of the Council of Saudi Chambers of Commerce and Industry, with some members from Riyadh, Jeddah and Dammam chambers, and Saleh Al-Zahrani, a member of the security commission of the Consultative Committee, are also expected to participate.


Young Muslims, Danes rap on cartoons

Dubai (dpa) - The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has organised a landmark meeting between young Danes and Muslims to engage in a dialogue in the aftermath of publication in a Danish paper of caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed, the local news agency WAM reported.

The meeting is bringing together Muslim youth from all over the world to engage in active and meaningful dialogue with young Danes from the Danish Youth Council - Denmark's largest youth organization with over 70 affiliates, said WAM.

Among the thorny issues that the 60 delegates will be tackling over the weekend are discussions about freedom of expression, integration, the so-called clash of civilizations, the perils of inter-cultural dialogue and what role the media can play in hindering or facilitating global understanding.

The initiative, "The Search for Mutual Understanding", has been organized by the Tabah Foundation under the direction of noted scholar and teacher Habib Ali al-Jifri, and the youth and training Ta'aheel consultancy.

"This is an opportunity for genuine cultural, intellectual and spiritual exchange," said Tabah Foundation's Amienoella Abderoef.

The agency said the presence and participation of the venerable Syrian scholar and globally respected Islamic theologian Dr Said Ramadan al-Buti makes the gathering particularly poignant.

The forum will conclude with a declaration by participants on Monday 17 April.

Last September, a Danish paper published the offending cartoons of Mohammed depicting him in one of them as a terrorist.
www.bangkokpost.com


Statement on Atrocities Against Defenseless Palestinian People

April 10, 2006  IRNA OIC-Israel-Ihsanoglu

Secretary General of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu said here on Monday that the Zionist regime's atrocities against the defenseless Palestinian people set an instance of state terrorism.

Ihsanoglu in his statement voiced strong concern over massacre of the Palestinian people, demolition of their houses and imposition of economic sanctions against them and said they are examples of Israel's atrocities.

He said occupiers' measures are in full contradiction with the fourth Geneva convention and world's humanitarian regulations.

He called on the permanent UN Security Council members, the UN Secretary General Kofi Annan and the Quartet Committee to immediately step in and prevent continued crimes against the Palestinian people.

He stressed ending occupation of the Palestinian lands and formation of an independent Palestinian state with Qods being its capital.

He said there is no way for restoration of stability and security in the Middle East but implementation of the related UN resolutions.

The Zionist regime of Israel has over the past few days stepped up attacks on the oppressed Palestinian people, detaining several civilians without any justification.

It has also martyred more than 16 civilians, injuring tens of others.

Zionist regime's artillery has also pounded the Palestinian regions north of Gaza over the past 24 hours.


Iraq and the legacy of Abraham

James Carroll The Boston Globe
MONDAY, APRIL 10, 2006

Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are referred to as Abrahamic religions, a description aiming to head off the clash of civilizations by emphasizing a common connection to the patriarch whose name means "father of multitudes."

BOSTON Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are referred to as Abrahamic religions, a description aiming to head off the clash of civilizations by emphasizing a common connection to the patriarch whose name means "father of multitudes."

Yet Jews, Christians and Muslims are more than mere cousins. The imaginative breakthrough represented in the story of Abraham offers a first measure of the meaning of human existence. If his descendants were more fully in touch with that meaning, Iraq would be a different place today, and the religions would not be on the cusp of war.

Abraham's story comes to us from Genesis. What makes it important is all that precedes it. The Bible begins as a set of creation myths, narratives about Adam, Eve, Cain, Abel, Noah, the Flood, the tower of Babel - anecdotes that few contemporary readers take in any literal sense. They are stories from the era of "once upon a time," and they define the concern of the Creator as extending to the entire scope of creation.

But at the end of the 11th chapter of Genesis, something new happens, a shift from the universal to the specific, from timelessness to "that time then"; from never-never land to a particular locale - a bridge of land between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.

One day on our calendar, a specific individual, whom scholars believe actually to have existed, became the subject of the biblical text. That was the true beginning of the world-view we take for granted.

"Leave your country, your family and your father's house for the land I will show you," God said to this person. "I will make you a great nation. I will bless you and make your name famous, so it will be used as a blessing."

The call of Abraham marks the beginning of human historical consciousness, a direct consequence of the revolutionary affirmation that God meets human beings by meeting one human being at one time and at one place. The God who addresses Abraham in effect orders him to leave the realm of the purely mythical for "the land I will show you."

Here is the difference between Abraham's God and the gods of Ur or Egypt: This God acts not out of time, but in it; not in the other world, but in this one; not in heaven, but on earth. This Creator is invested in creation not in general, but in particular.

Therefore history - what happens here and now - is of ultimate significance. This means that the value of mere abstractions must be measured against the real-world consequences of their implementation.

The war in Iraq today was launched without regard for such consequences, and we see the result. The genius insight of Genesis is that when God is understood as the God of history, then history - what happens in time among human beings - takes on absolute value. The ideal, therefore, must always be measured against the real.

The death of each man, woman and child who has died in Iraq across the last three years equals, in the eyes of the God who called Abraham by name, the death of all that exists. Each person is of infinite worth. If war makers had calculated their decisions on this scale, they would have found another way to proceed. War must be a last resort, not a first reaction.

But the story of Abraham makes another point. In addition to being the God of history, this God is the God of freedom. Not freedom in the shallow rhetoric of American politics, but freedom that defines each human choice as having as much significance as the very acts of God.

Abraham's call, with the fate of multitudes at stake, meant nothing until Abraham said yes to it. But the possibility of that yes presumed the possibility of its opposite. God, in freedom, initiates. Abraham, in freedom, responds. But as subsequent verses of Genesis make clear, Abraham's will and God's are not identical, and that is the way this God wants things to be.

A God of freedom invites a response, but does not coerce it. Why? Because in this way the God of history makes humans responsible for history.

Jews, Christians and Muslims bear the weight of this precious legacy, embodied in our common ancestor. History matters absolutely. So does each human life. And so does every human choice. Absolute responsibility follows. That this wisdom first showed itself in the landscape across which war now rages is another reason to end it.
 


European imams aim to link Islamic, Western values

Monday, April 10, 2006

The meeting is clouded by an attack on an Islamic cemetery being built in a suburb of Vienna. The building shell of the prayer room was set on fire at the weekend. Its outside walls were smeared with graffiti saying: 'Will be blown up'

VIENNA - Reuters

  European imams meeting in Vienna have pledged to work harder to prove that Islam is compatible with democracy and that the majority of Muslims living in the West support human rights, free speech and pluralism.

  More than 130 prayer leaders from across the continent, whose meeting was sponsored by Austria as current European Union president, agreed Islamic theologians in Europe must do more to establish that their faith does not clash with Western values.

  Their declaration published on Sunday amounted to a catalogue of home-grown moderate views that Western politicians have been urging Muslim leaders to draw up as a bulwark against radical Islamist ideologies coming from the Middle East.

  But an attack on an Islamic cemetery being built in Vienna reminded them of the hostility Muslims meet throughout Europe.

  "Muslims in Europe are making history," said Mouddar Khouja, a senior official of the Islamic Community in Austria, which organized the two-day meeting where several speakers urged "new thinking" to develop a theological basis for Islam in Europe.

  He said European imams were issuing fatwas (religious edicts) dealing with modern challenges, such as condemning terrorism, instead of leaving the field open to radical Middle Eastern preachers who glorify violence on the Internet.

  "We have shown how to protect ourselves from fatwas from other countries," he said. "We have fatwas from imams living in Europe and they speak for themselves."

  Imams, who lead Friday prayers in mosques, play an important role in Islam because the faithful often ask their advice on what the faith allows or forbids Muslims to do.

  This is routine in Muslim majority countries, but Muslims in Europe face new challenges as minorities in non-Islamic societies. They also have fewer Islamic scholars and little or no tradition of Muslim life in the West to refer to.

Theology is part of the solution:

  This Conference of European Imams aimed to strengthen moderate voices sometimes drowned out in Muslim discussions by radical anti-Western preachers whose sermons and writings on the Internet inspire small groups of radical Muslims in Europe.

  It stressed that Muslims might better adapt to Europe, which some of them see as corrupt and immoral, if imams stressed in their sermons that core Western values of democracy and freedom meshed with their own Islamic faith.

  "Imams, as teachers and preachers, have a duty to emphasize to their congregations to play a positive role ... in addressing the plagues of Europe -- hate, bigotry, racism, extremism and terrorism," said British imam Abduljalil Sajid.

  The meeting was clouded by an attack on an Islamic cemetery being built in a suburb of Vienna. The building shell of the prayer room was set on fire at the weekend. Its outside walls were smeared with graffiti saying: "Will be blown up."

  "The graffiti shows this was an anti-Islamic attack," said Omar al-Rawi, head of integration affairs at the Austrian Islamic Community. A similar attack on a mosque happened after another Islam conference last November.

  The imam meeting's declaration urged Muslim theologians to point out chapter and verse how Islam fits with Western values.

  "Theological arguments have a good chance of leading to lasting changes in attitudes," it said. "These should be seen as part of the solution and fostered in public discussion."

  Among practical steps they sought were Islamic arguments against immigrants isolating themselves in self-made ghettos, refusing to integrate or rejecting the separation of church and state in Western democracies.

  Imams should also show that violations of women's rights -- through forced marriages, female circumcision and "honor killings" -- were rooted in traditions from outside Europe and not justified by Islam, they said.

  "We need some new thinking," said Ayatollah Sayed Abbas Ghaemmagami, head of the Imam Ali Islamic Center in Hamburg, a leading Shiite center in Europe.

  "Today we are in dire need of a social model that is just and realistic (and can) arrive at solutions to the problems that prevent integration and peaceful living together," he said.

© 2005 Dogan Daily News Inc. www.turkishdailynews.com.tr


Drive for democracy stalls in Arab world
By Hassan M. Fattah The New York Times
MONDAY, APRIL 10, 2006

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates Steps toward democracy in the Arab world, a crucial American goal that just months ago was cause for optimism - with elections held in Iraq, Egypt and the Palestinian areas - are slowing, blocked by delays in reform efforts, legal maneuvers and official changes of heart throughout the Middle East.

The political rise of Islamists, the chaos in Iraq along with the newfound Shiite power there with its implication for growing Iranian influence, and the sense among some rulers that they can wait out the end of the Bush administration have put the brakes on democratization, analysts and officials say.

"It feels like everything is going back to the bad old days, as if we never went through any changes at all," said Sulaiman al-Hattlan, editor in chief of Forbes Arabia and a prominent Saudi columnist and reformist. "Everyone is convinced now that there was no serious or genuine belief in change from the governments, it was just a reaction to pressure by the international media and the U.S."

In Egypt, the government of Hosni Mubarak, which allowed a contested presidential election last year, has delayed municipal elections for two years after the Muslim Brotherhood made big gains in parliamentary elections late last year, despite the government's violent efforts to stop the group's supporters.

In Jordan, where King Abdullah has made political reform and democratization a mandate, reformers believe their situation has been weakened with a national agenda for change that has been put on the back burner.

Plans for parliamentary elections in Qatar were postponed a third time, to 2007, in violation of the country's Constitution, activists say, while civil groups say that laws permitting the emergence of civil society organizations have stymied their development instead.

In Yemen, the government has cracked down on the media ahead of presidential elections later this year, jailing journalists who are considered overcritical of the regime.

In Saudi Arabia, King Abdullah has refused calls that the country's consultative council be elected, while the arrest of Muhsin al-Awaji, a government critic, last month raised questions about how far the country's newfound openness would go. And in Syria, promises for reforms have been followed by a harsh crackdown on the opposition.

U.S. officials do not deny that there have been setbacks in the promotion of democracy in the Middle East, but they say that recent negative trends do not discredit their approach.

"Democratic development isn't always linear," said a senior State Department official, insisting on anonymity in commenting for this article. "It's a process that takes time, is evolutionary and requires strong consistent support, which is what our policy is all about."

Arab nation-states in the Middle East are largely led by monarchies and authoritarian regimes, many of which have been unable to keep up with explosive population growth and development needs.

After the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks on the United States, the Bush administration made democratization of the Middle East a strategic goal to answer the extremism that had taken root in many parts of the region, and Arab regimes, prodded also by emboldened opposition movements, made some moves toward reform.

But Arab rulers now emphasize that change is a slow process, or simply focus on economic reform instead.


With many economies booming, especially in the oil-rich Gulf, governments are in no hurry to bring about political change. At last month's Arab League summit, there was no mention of an Arab reform program launched in Tunis in 2004.

The slowdown comes at a critical time for the Bush administration, which is increasingly seen as weakened both at home and abroad by its occupation of Iraq. Many Arab rulers appear to be betting that the American public is losing its appetite for major, costly interventions, and that this will give them a freer hand.

"Iraq has allowed people to say, 'forget the American style of reform,'" Taher al Adwan, editor in chief of the Amman-based Arab al Yawm newspaper, said. "The Americans are not able to present anything to the reformers to encourage them."

In Egypt - one of the United States' closest allies in the Middle East and recipient of about $2 billion a year in military and financial aid - Mubarak promised during his re-election campaign last summer to further amend the Constitution and allow room for other political parties to grow. So far there has been virtually no movement on either front.

The government continues to restrict the creation of new opposition parties, and judges who questioned the integrity of the recent parliamentary elections have become the focus of criminal probes.

In December, when an Egyptian court sentenced the political opposition leader Ayman Nour to five years in prison on charges that were widely seen as politically motivated, Washington responded harshly, calling for his release. But Washington offered only mild disapproval over the February announcement of the delay in municipal elections.

That delay is widely seen as an effort to preserve the monopoly of Egypt's ruling National Democratic Party on power following the Muslim Brotherhood's success at the polls.

It was also seen as an effort to halt the Brotherhood's promotion of an independent candidate for president in 2011.

"America had a problem with violent Islamic groups because of a lack of democracy in the region, but when people choose non-violent Islamic groups, they don't want to deal with it," Essam El-Erian, spokesman and senior member of the Brotherhood, said. "Even if Islamic groups win elections and have poor relations with the U.S., they should at least appreciate that they will not be violent."

In Bahrain, where sectarian tensions feature prominently between the majority Shiite population and the Sunni- dominated government, a flurry of official maneuvers apparently intended to reduce the Shiite vote has preceded municipal and parliamentary elections expected later this year.

In the tiny nation of 700,000, often held up as a model of reform and democratization, opposition figures say that elections, if they happen at all this year, will be a symbol of backtracking, not of growing democracy.

But government officials accuse the opposition of fanning sectarian tensions for political gain and point to the expected participation of opposition groups as a sign that conditions are improving.

"The question many people are asking is this: Did reform slow down, or did it just never happen?" said Toby Craig Jones, who recently completed a tour as an analyst with the International Crisis Group based in Bahrain. "This was never an example of real reform. It's an example of controlled reform."

When King Abdullah of Jordan entrusted a group of 26 prominent Jordanians to map out a reform agenda for his kingdom in February 2005, the stated objective was a plan for comprehensive reform and democratization efforts.

But when the group presented the 2,500-page document to the king more than nine tumultuous months later, its reception was unusually subdued.

"For some reason, it was not publicized, it was not advertised, and it's got into the hands of very few people," said Taher al-Masri, a member of the drafting committee and, for a brief time, prime minister of Jordan. "We went, we took a picture, and that was it," he said of the ceremony.

The effort sparked a contentious battle between Jordan's elite Western- educated reformers, who were accused of debating issues behind closed doors, and entrenched forces in the Parliament, who sought to have greater say in the program.

Reformers like Marwan Muasher and others - dubbed "the digitals" for their hip, high-tech ways - were quickly accused of serving an American agenda rather than seeking real reform.

Michael Slackman and Abeer Allam contributed reporting from Cairo for this article, Suha Maayeh from Amman, Jordan, and Steven R. Weisman from Washington.
 


Cartoon politics

Monday, March 27, 2006 Turkish Daily News

The controversy over the Danish caricatures of Prophet Mohammed, and the perception of Islam that resurfaced in some European circles in the name of freedom of expression, has turned into a global wave of violent protests throughout the 'Muslim world.' Demonstrations turned into ransacking of diplomatic missions and violent clashes with human casualties. However, there was a parallel agenda of the protests besides religion per se, that is less recognized by those who find it expedient to rely on the thesis of 'clash of civilizations.'

DOĞU ERGİL

  The controversy over the Danish caricatures of Prophet Mohammed, and the perception of Islam that resurfaced in some European circles in the name of freedom of expression, has turned into a global wave of violent protests throughout the “Muslim world.” Demonstrations turned into ransacking of diplomatic missions and violent clashes with human casualties. However, there was a parallel agenda of the protests besides religion per se, that is less recognized by those who find it expedient to rely on the thesis of “clash of civilizations.” This thesis foresees a bifurcated world where the civilized, progressive and affluent side of the world lives the way they do because they deserve it by way of their superiority. The remaining part of the world that is not civilized may live in its squalor, backwardness and tyranny of ignorance by their own choice, and because they also deserve it. The first world feels no responsibility for the second, and hence expends no effort to understand why its sentiments and view of the first does not match their naiveté and irresponsibility.

  First of all, what is crudely called the “Muslim world” has been the hunting ground of Western colonialism and expansionism in the previous centuries that left behind a legacy of exploitation, impoverishment and a wounded psyche, at the core of which is resentment, humiliation and feeling of inferiority. This is an explosive mixture in that if the culprit or former oppressor does not extend its hand and heart in the post-colonial era to its former colonized subjects, and does not help to repair the damage done during many centuries of domination and humiliation, the national identities in the former colonies become nothing but renouncement of anything associated with their former colonizers. The West seems never to grasp this reality because it is a hard and bitter pill to swallow. Because of this, it becomes all the more difficult to understand the real reasons and local agendas that have aggravated this crisis, which fundamentally is a mechanism to vent the reservoir of pre-existing resentment towards the West.

  The Egyptian demonstrators condemn the insolence of the West. With a strong group in parliament, the Muslim Brothers is a challenge to the secular government of Mr. Hosni Mubarak. Besides the West, they want to direct their protest against the regime they strive to replace, and the incumbent government in turn feels the need to show that they are also capable of playing on popular sentiments, so that there is no need for a more radical group to be in power. These internal tensions are easily channeled against a common target. The Iraqi demonstrators want the withdrawal of Danish troops, and Afghan tribesman that have links with the old (dis)order want NATO soldiers out of their country. What better excuse is there for these groups to express their political agenda in a public forum when there is so little legitimate opportunity to do so otherwise? Iran, Syria and the pro-Syrian Lebanese Sunnis are undoubtedly unhappy with Western pressure on them. They do not want to see Western dominance once again on their home soil. With the example American invasion of Iraq, which they see as a revival of western imperialism, anti-western and anti-American sentiment has reached boiling point.

  Despite these facts, in most of the Western media the ongoing dispute has typically been treated as a further sign of the fanaticism of Muslims. But the tempest did not arise out of nowhere. First, it arose out of ignorance of the local context of these conflicts, which are mostly not about religion as much as they are about power struggles within Muslim societies. Secondly, religious nationalism exacerbated by the Bush administration's decision to invade Iraq has raised suspicions that it can do the same all over the region. The ensuing turmoil that threatens almost every party in the Middle East and the Muslim World interprets this as an aggression to their being (identity, territory and sovereignty). It is not just about the cartoons.

  After the cartoons were published on Sept. 30, Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen refused to meet with ambassadors from Muslim countries and lectured Muslims on their need to tolerate the caricatures. This attitude was exactly what the Muslims (or anyone outside the Western political reality) abhorred: encroachment and disrespect of the liberty to define yourself rather than being defined by the imperial West. This is exactly the source of bitterness in their collective memory that is still remembered vividly in the form of Christian missionaries preaching to local people exactly how barbaric they thought the Muslim faith was. Or signs hanging on the doors of European clubs in India only a century ago that said, "Dogs and Indians not allowed." In short, the overly critical opinion of the Muslim crowds has little to do with piety and more to do with history and its lingering legacy.

  The whole affair is a cost-free bandwagon on which everyone can jump on in search of greater legitimacy among Muslim publics. There is no downside in the Muslim world to defending Prophet Mohammed from Western insults. Pro-Western politicians can use it to burnish their nationalist image, while others use it to show how respectful they are to religion to cover their weaker flank against the religious political parties who are threatening their ruling positions.

  If the conservative, Christian West shows no ability (or willingness) to respect conservative Muslims' need to value his or her own beliefs, the West will find itself less able to speak to the Muslim world, and less able to defend freedom of expression. What will be the end result? Clash of faiths and values started by those who dread it most!  


European Muslim leaders seek course to close divide with West

‘There’s kind of a psychological warfare now between East and West, and Europe is at the center of it,’ says Mustafa Ceric, leader of Bosnia’s Muslim community

ANKARA - TDN with AP Sunday, April 9, 2006

  The agenda for a high-level meeting of European imams touched on politics, job creation and the role of women, but at heart there was really one issue -- how to create a distinct identity for European Muslims.

  The two-day gathering of 150 imams that kicked off on Friday in Vienna worked toward a final statement that tries to carve a path between secular Europe and the conservative Islam of the Arab world.

  A declaration by the head of Bosnia's Islamic community that was circulating Friday among European mosques illustrated the balancing act for the continent's more than 33 million Muslims.

  The document called on European Muslims to fully accept Western norms of openness and publicly reject groups promoting violence. But, it added, Europe must come to grips with Islam's presence with measures such as aiding Islamic-oriented education and allowing Islamic law some jurisdiction over family matters.

  “There's kind of psychological warfare now between East and West and Europe is at the center of it,” said Mustafa Ceric, leader of Bosnia's Muslim community and author of the “Declaration of European Muslims” issued earlier this year.

  Finding a way for Islam to thrive peacefully in Europe is a task that's being made increasingly difficult by groups such as the British National Party and Austria's Freedom Party that claim the continent's way of life is under threat.

  Those questions grew louder with the 2004 slaying of Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh by a suspected Muslim extremist and probes into radical preachers such as Abu Hamza al-Masri, who was convicted in February of fomenting racial hatred and inciting followers to kill non-Muslims during six years as imam at London's Finsbury Park Mosque.

  The Madrid and London bombings only hardened views and, last year, polls across the European Union showed widespread reservations about the decision to keep mostly Muslim Turkey on track for possible membership in coming decades.

  The debate took on a critical urgency during the violent Muslim backlash to Prophet Mohammed caricatures first published by a Danish newspaper. What began as a stand for free expression turned into a grim lesson of a divided world. Both the West and Muslim worlds felt they were under siege from the other.

  Ceric, who could not attend the Vienna meeting because of a scheduling conflict, planned to have an aide present his document. It urged European Muslims to embrace modern views and change “a bad global image to a good global image of Muslims,” but also blamed the West for fanning prejudices against Islam following the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

  He made a clear distinction between Muslims in the United States and Europe, where economic and social systems are more rigid and Islamic communities are often caught in a cycle of few jobs and few opportunities.

  In France -- with Europe's largest Muslim population of about 5 million, or at more than 8 percent -- it boiled over into weeks of rioting last year in poor suburbs where many North and West African immigrants live with their French-born children. The number of Muslims in the United States could reach as high as 6 million, or roughly 2 percent of the population.

  “I am more optimistic about Muslims in America,” Ceric told The Associated Press. “Europe has a historical predicament, and it will take a great effort on all sides to change it.”

There are some signs of progress:

  Centers have been established in France and the Netherlands to train new imams with a European perspective. Recently in Denmark, state broadcasters allowed for the first time a Muslim woman co-hosting a television talk show to wear a headscarf. On Monday, the powerful Greek Orthodox Church said it would not oppose efforts to open the first mosque in Athens since the end of Ottoman rule more than 170 years ago.

  “The biggest challenge is to recognize the identity of Muslims as Europeans. We are aiming for integration, to learn the national languages, to participate in society on every level,” said Mouddar Khouja, a top adviser with the Islamic Community in Austria, a group overseeing Muslims in the country and an organizer of the imam conference. Austria currently holds the presidency of the EU.

  Rashied Omar, a South African imam currently leading a program on conflict and religion at the University of Notre Dame, urged both Muslims and Christians to understand that their religious traditions can encourage intolerance and violence.

  “I'm worried about the future,” he said, “unless we come together and say, ‘We are all complicit in this madness.'”


OIC Efforts for Global Peace Win Accolades
Maha Akeel, Arab News www.arabnews.com

JEDDAH, 4 April 2006 — In recognition of the Organization of the Islamic Conference’s commitment and fruitful contribution to global peace and security and for strengthening multilateral cooperation around the world, the Goi Peace Foundation, a Japan-based non-profit organization, awarded the pan-Islamic body its “Peace Pole” yesterday.

Patrick Uwe Petit, the European representative of the foundation, presented the award to OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu at the organization’s headquarters in Jeddah.

Petit said that the award was in recognition of “OIC’s outstanding commitment to the creation of a culture of peace and building a global alliance of solidarity among Muslim nations as well as for safeguarding the dignity and independence of all Muslim people.”

He said that in Europe some institutions and people have unfortunately failed to understand the policy of co-existence.

The foundation decided to commend the OIC for launching the idea of dialogue among civilizations in 1998 and Petit praised Ihsanoglu for his distinguished leadership and for making the organization a well-respected and global voice for peace on earth.

The OIC now joins a global alliance of distinguished recipients of the “Peace Pole” award, such as the United Nations secretariat, UNESCO, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the Arab League, the African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. The Peace Poles are silent reminders of peace on earth. They carry a universal message and prayer in various languages: “May peace prevail on earth.”

The OIC, which groups 57 Muslim countries, was established in Rabat, Morocco, on Sept. 25, 1969.

The idea of the Peace Pole came to the Japanese philosopher and humanist Masahisa Goi in the aftermath of World War II. In 1955, the Peace Pole Project was launched in Japan and it spread around the world and today more than 200,000 Peace Poles have been planted in more than 180 countries.

In 1999, the Goi Peace Foundation was established in Tokyo to promote global efforts toward a culture of peace. The mission of the foundation is to bring together people and organizations united in their hearts toward a common goal of peace on earth.


Spanish FM: Europe Must Respect Muslims
By JAN M. OLSEN (AP) 04.03.2006

Spain's foreign minister said Monday that the European Union must take the Muslim world more seriously following the uproar over cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad.

Miguel Angel Moratinos called the uproar "one of the worst crises the European Union has faced in recent years."

The 12 drawings, which were reprinted in several European countries, prompted angry mobs to attack Western embassies in Muslim countries, including Lebanon, Iran and Indonesia.

The cartoons, which included a drawing of the prophet with a bomb-shaped turban, were seen as highly insulting by many followers of Islam, which is interpreted as barrring even respectful images of Muhammad for fear of prompting idolatry.

"The cartoon crisis has shown that we have to pay more attention to that part of the world," Moratinos told reporters during a visit to Denmark, where the cartoons were first published.

"All of Europe must take the question of the Muslim countries more seriously," he said. "It does not mean we have bad relations with them, but we have to be more engaged in the Muslim world."

Many Muslim leaders have criticized the Danish government for not taking a stronger stance against the newspaper Jyllands-Posten, which published the cartoons in September. The government has said it cannot interfere with, or be held responsible for, the actions of Denmark's free press.

Moratinos and his Danish counterpart, Per Stig Moeller, spoke later Monday at a public forum on how to improve relations between the Muslim world and the West.

Moratinos told the crowd of about 150 people at Copenhagen's Royal Library that European countries must preserve their traditions of free speech, "but it has to be exercised with responsibility."

Moeller said the cartoon crisis illustrated a "growing gap between the West and the Muslim worlds."

He urged both sides to increase mutual respect, and refrain from stereotyping each other to reduce the risk of more serious conflicts.


Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan will travel to Sudan to attend the Arab League Summit from March 28 to 29. Prime Minister Erdogan is expected to speak at the summit on the issue of "Alliance of Civilizations", as well as hold a series of bilateral talks with his counterparts.

Erdogan is scheduled to meet President Umar Ahmad Al-Bashir of Sudan and First Vice President Salva Kiir and Prime Minister. Turkish state ministers Besir Atalay and Mehmet Aydin will accompany Prime Minister Erdogan during his visit.
>>

Arab Summit: Erdogan warns EU of dangers of anti-Muslim laws

In move to warn US and EU about implementing anti-Muslim laws, in a key speech to support Alliance of Civilizations initiative Erdogan says such legislation creates dangerous fault line that threatens peace in societies

Touching on Muhammed cartoon crisis, Erdogan stresses freedom of expression should have some limits and urges all members of different religions to stop struggling to dominate the other

Warning the U.S. and the European Union about the consequences of formulating new laws against Muslims, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan yesterday said that such legislation creates a dangerous fault line which threatens peace in societies.

Delivering a speech at a conference entitled "Dialogue among Civilizations" held on the sidelines of the Arab League summit held in Sudan, Erdogan complained about the way religions continue to struggle to dominate each other.

Beginning his speech with "Bismillahirrahmanirrahim", a traditional way for Arab leaders to begin a speech, Erdogan touched on the crisis that emerged between the West and the Muslim world over the publication of the Prophet Muhammed cartoons in various European newspapers. He stressed that freedom of expression should have some limits. "The Muslim approach to other religions is as follows: Both Jesus Christ and Muhammed are our prophets," said the Turkish prime minister, stressing that Muslims expect the same approach from followers of other religions.

Underlining that the world shouldn't be deceived by those who seek a "clash of civilizations," Erdogan also called for cooperation in fighting terrorism.

Concerning sharing of intelligence, Erdogan urged the international community to be more open on the issue.

"There's been a cold war between values," said the prime minister, warning that the consequences might be devastating.

Highlighting that competition in the arms race now accounts for $1 billion, Erdogan asked, "So where's your commitment to strengthening world peace? Those with the greatest power said that but these commitments remain mere words. They're still searching for market strategies to sell their products to poor countries."

During his speech Erdogan also touched on developments in Iraq, saying, "Turkey wants to see a democratic Iraq with territorial integrity which can preserve political unity and stability and establish peaceful relations with its neighbors."

www.ABHaber.com  29.03.2006 www.thenewanatolian.com 


Danish Muslims sue newspaper that printed prophet cartoons

3/30/2006  www.usatoday.com

COPENHAGEN, Denmark (AP) — A group of 27 Danish Muslim organizations have filed a defamation lawsuit against the newspaper that first published the carricatures of Islam's Prophet Muhammad, their lawyer said Thursday.

The lawsuit was filed Wednesday, two weeks after Denmark's top prosecutor declined to press criminal charges, saying the drawings that sparked a firestorm in the Muslim world did not violate laws against racism or blasphemy.

Michael Christiani Havemann, a lawyer representing the Muslim groups, said lawsuit sought $16,100 in damages from Jyllands-Posten Editor in Chief Carsten Juste and Culture Editor Flemming Rose, who supervised the cartoon project.

"We're seeking judgment for both the text and the drawings which were gratuitously defamatory and injurious," Havemann said.

The lawsuit was filed in the western city of Aarhus, where Jyllands-Posten is based.

The newspaper published the 12 cartoons on Sept. 30, saying it was challenging self-censorship among artists afraid to offend Islam. The drawings were later reprinted in other Western media, mostly in Europe, in the name of free speech and news value.

The Danish newspaper apologized for offending Muslims after violent protests erupted throughout the Islamic world, but stood by its decision to print the drawings, citing freedom of speech.


Erdoğan warns of East-West split

Wednesday, March 29, 2006
The prime minister also criticizes 'discriminatory' laws toward Muslims in Europe and warns such laws threaten peace

ANKARA - Turkish Daily News

  Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan warned yesterday that the world was on the verge of splitting along a “fault line” that was poised to get wider, especially between the West and the Islamic world, and claimed that extremists on both sides were exploiting that situation.

  “There is an understanding, on one side, that excludes everything and everyone… There are terrorist organizations on the other side that claim they come on the scene on behalf of religious or cultural values… The two sides ignore common values and help the situation evolve into a crisis,” Erdoğan was quoted as saying during the summit of the Arab League in the Sudanese capital of Khartoum.

  “It is obvious that such tendencies based upon ‘clash of civilizations' scenarios pose a threat to world peace and drags us into a dark hole,” Erdoğan said in his speech titled, “Alliance of Civilizations.” 

  The prime minister emphasized it is compulsory today to display the will of a joint struggle against the current situation but complained that no progress has been made so far in that regard.  

  “We must take action as soon as possible to ‘stop' that situation. We must go after our hopes, not fears,” he said. “We must seek ways of letting logic and common sense reign.” 

  Erdoğan said, “With its multi-faceted relations, rich history and cultural assets, my country feels a special responsibility to actively participate in efforts to maintain dialogue and mutual understanding between different cultures.”

  Together with another Mediterranean country Spain, Turkey co-sponsors the U.N.-led Alliance of Civilizations initiative, urging national and international action to overcome prejudice, misperceptions and polarization between cultures and civilizations -- particularly between Islam and the West. 

  “New circumstances that we face require international cooperation and solidarity more than ever,” Erdoğan stressed and said the current situation today showed that the U.N. initiative launched in 2005 was timely and a very appropriate step.

  The prime minister also criticized “discriminatory” laws toward Muslims in Europe and warned that such laws were threatening peace.

  “We do not want a clash between civilizations but there are those in the world who do. There are attempts to portray Muslims as members of a religion associated with terrorism. We should not and will not fall into that trap,” Erdoğan said. 

  He complained that there has been a different approach toward Islam following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks against the United States and said the term “Islamic terror” has been used since then.

  “It is wrong to associate Islam with terrorism. Islam is a religion of peace,” Erdoğan said. “How can you associate such a religion with terrorism?”

  He added, “Islamophobia is a humanity crime in the same way as anti-Semitism.”

  Drawing attention to the Prophet Mohammed caricatures first published in Denmark in September and then in a number of Western newspapers, Erdoğan said the process started with the reprinting of the prophet drawings urged the world to take urgent measures.

  “It is not possible to consider the caricatures within the framework of the freedom of expression,” he said.


Erdogan Attends Dialogue Of Civilizations Conference

Published: 3/28/2006

KHARTUM - ''We don't want clash of civilizations. But there are people who want it. There are some who want to show Muslims as if they were members of a religion involved in terrorism. We should not fall into this trap and we won't,'' Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has indicated.

Erdogan, who arrived in Sudan on Monday to attend the Arab League Summit, delivered a speech at a conference entitled, ''Dialogue of Civilizations''.

Recalling that cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad offending the Islam were published in European newspapers consecutively, Erdogan indicated that the developments that have started with this process urged countries to take measures.

''It is impossible to consider these cartoons within the scope of freedom of expression,'' he stressed.

Noting that after 9/11 attacks in the United States, the expression of ''Islamic terror'' started to be used, Erdogan underlined, ''it is wrong to mention Islam and terror together. Islam is the religion of peace.''

Erdogan stressed that they were exerting efforts to solve this problem through alliance of civilizations.

''It is impossible to know where and when terrorism will occur,'' Erdogan noted.

Stating that there was need for international cooperation to fight terrorism, he said, ''countries should share intelligence with each other.''

Recalling that Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Zapatero and he launched the project on ''Alliance of Civilizations'', Erdogan indicated that this project was supported by many countries and organizations worldwide.

Erdogan noted that Turkey's EU accession was very important for the dialogue among civilizations.

''We are working to globalize the peace,'' Erdogan added.


Erdogan seeks stronger Arab support for Iraq's unity

Erdogan will deliver a speech at the opening meeting of the two-day summit on the issue of "Alliance of Civilizations," where he will call for dialogue among the West and the Muslim World.

The New Anatolian / Ankara with AP

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan will leave for Sudan today to attend a Arab League summit where he will call on Arab countries to take a stronger role and involvement in Iraq to avoid the country falling into a civil war.

Before his visit, Turkish authorities sent 30,000 tons of food aid to the troubled Darfur region of Sudan as a gesture, The New Anatolian learned.

Erdogan will deliver a speech at the opening meeting of the two-day summit on the issue of "Alliance of Civilizations," where he will call for dialogue among the West and the Muslim World.

The Turkish prime minister, accompanied by State Ministers Besir Atalay and Mehmet Aydin, is also expected to hold a series of bilateral talks with his counterparts. Erdogan is scheduled to meet Sudanese President Umar Ahmad Al-Bashir and the country's First Vice President Salva Kiir and prime minister.

Diplomatic sources told The New Anatolian on Sunday that the Iraq issue will top Erdogan's meetings on the margins of the summit. Erdogan will stress that neighboring countries and the Arab League should make more efforts and work together to end the country's political deadlock. He will also ask to give a clear message to Iraqis that its neighbors and the Arab League supports the political process in Iraq.

The Arab League summit comes at a time when most Arab countries fear that Iranian Shiite influence is dominating the country.

On Saturday, Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari harshly criticized Arab governments for doing little to help Iraqis, and said they should offer debt relief and reopen diplomatic missions in Baghdad. Zebari warned that if Arab countries did not take those steps, they were leaving a void that Iran might fill.

Iraq's Shiite leaders have frequently expressed bitterness over Arab nations' slowness in showing support for the country's new leadership, suggesting the Arab League -- whose 22 members are majority Sunnis -- is biased toward Iraq's Sunni minority, which enjoyed power during the rule of ousted leader Saddam Hussein.

But the strong criticism was striking coming from Zebari, a Kurd who as foreign minister has played the role of point man with Arab nations.

Several Arab diplomats, speaking on condition of anonymity Sunday, told the Associated Press that a squabble broke out Saturday between Zebari and the foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates over proposed talks between the United States and Iran on how to stabilize Iraq.

Zebari confirmed only that some Arab officials had expressed concerns over Iran's influence in Iraq and complained about the planned Iranian-U.S. meetings.

The other Arab diplomats, who spoke anonymously because the talks were private, said the Saudi and Emirates ministers complained that Arabs were being left in the dark about the talks. One diplomat who attended the sessions said Arab leaders want to know what the dialogue's objectives were, and whether Arab interests would be ignored.

A draft resolution on Iraq to be adopted by the leaders "emphasizes the Arab role in the future of Iraq." It also calls for support for a reconciliation conference the Arab League is trying to put together among Iraq's Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish leaders in June. But there has been no confirmation that conference will take place.

Zebari said the Arab complaints are unfounded. "We told them time and again that they should be present in Iraq and never abandon it," he told The Associated Press.

The Arab worries over Iran's influence come at a time when Iraqi politicians have been struggling to form a government amid disputes among the Shiite parties that dominate Parliament and Sunni Arab and Kurdish leaders.
March 28, 2006


Pope urges dialogue of civilizations

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

Turkey trip to help West-Islam dialogue

ANKARA - Turkish Daily News

  A senior Vatican cardinal said yesterday that Pope Benedict XVI would use his trip to predominantly Muslim Turkey, scheduled for Nov. 28-30, to promote greater dialogue between Islam and the West.

  “This is one of the main problems today, to come to a relationship with Islam that will not be a clash of civilizations but a dialogue between civilizations,” Cardinal Walter Kasper, head of the Council for Christian Unity, said in an interview with the Reuters news agency.

  “Of course, nobody wants a clash of cultures. It would be disastrous for the whole world,” Kasper said, adding that he expected the pope to speak on relations with Islam at meetings with the Turkish government in Ankara before going to Istanbul.

  Prior to becoming pope, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger gave a controversial interview arguing that Europe's roots are Christian and that a Muslim country would not fit in.


EU-Turkey integration important for regional, world peace: official

Ali Babacan, Turkish State Minister and chief negotiator for talks on Turkey's entry into the European Union (EU), said on Tuesday that Turkey-EU integration was of utmost importance for regional and world peace.

Babacan made the remarks when speaking at a conference on " Administrative Structures Adopted in Line with EU Negotiations", which was held in Ankara and sponsored by the World Bank Institute.

He said that Turkey's entry into the pan-Europe bloc would contribute to the EU's stability and security.

"Concepts like meeting of civilizations, alliance of civilizations and peace of civilizations, will be more important for the world from now on," said Babacan, underlining that it was necessary to create an environment in the EU in which various religions and cultures can coexist.

Turkey started entry talks with the EU last October. The negotiations are expected to last at least a decade and Turkey, dominated by Muslims, is required to carry out reforms in various fields in order to meet EU demands.

Babacan said that Turkey-EU screening process on 35 chapters would be completed in 2006. He also underscored the importance of non-governmental organizations' participation in the process.

Turkey and the EU have completed introductory screening on 15 chapters and detailed screening on 13 chapters so far.

The screening process will go on with financial services chapter during March 29-30.

Source: Xinhua March 28, 2006  http://english.people.com.cn


 

UN ready to help Arab world overcome ‘many formidable challenges’ – Annan

 

28 March 2006 In a wide-ranging review of the “many formidable challenges” facing the Arab world, Secretary-General Kofi Annan today reaffirmed the United Nations commitment to help resolve issues ranging from sectarian violence in Iraq to the Israeli-Palestinian impasse to the continued killings, rape and displacement in Sudan.

“You gather during a period of continued turbulence in the Arab world and the surrounding region,” he said in a message to the Arab League summit in Khartoum, Sudan, delivered by Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs Ibrahim Gambari.

Mr. Annan stressed the need for dialogue and cooperation in overcoming continuing strife on each of the following issues:

Iraq: after last month’s “heinous” bombing of the Shiite shrine in Samarra, a fully inclusive government is needed more urgently than ever to counter sectarian violence. The UN will continue to promote inter-communal dialogue and maintain its efforts, as circumstances permit, to assist reconstruction and economic development.

Israeli-Palestinian conflict: an affirmation by the new Palestinian cabinet of the Arab Peace Initiative would be a first welcome step towards the reaffirmation of Palestinian commitment to the principles of non-violence, recognition of Israel’s right to exist and acceptance of the UN-backed Road Map peace plan for a two-state solution. Israel, too, must be reminded, in light of continued creation of facts on the ground, that peace cannot be imposed unilaterally.

Lebanon: the country’s friends and neighbours have a crucial role to play in helping it consolidate its independence and sovereignty and the UN stands ready to help Lebanon and Syria to cultivate productive, friendly ties based on the explicit assurances of respect for each other’s sovereignty, security and independence.

Somalia: the UN will continue to provide political, moral and material support for the transitional process as the Horn of Africa country continues to cope with violence, the weakness or non-existence of governing institutions, and a lack of national consensus on the future. “I hope Arab states will actively seek opportunities to give both humanitarian and development aid,” Mr. Annan said.

Sudan: aspects of the situation remains deeply troubling with actions falling short of expectations on several fronts following last year’s peace accord in the south, while in Darfur “people continue to be killed, raped and driven from their homes by the thousands.” Mr. Annan hailed African Union agreement to support in principle the transition from its mission in Darfur to a larger, more mobile UN operation.

Cultural rifts: the publication of cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad that many found deeply offensive has led to “an apparent deepening of the already troubling rift between communities and nations of different beliefs and cultures,” Mr. Annan said. The Alliance of Civilizations initiative that he has launched with the support of Spain and Turkey is intended to generate a concerted effort to bridge divides, combat extremism and overcome prejudices, misconceptions, and polarizations which potentially threaten world peace.

UN reform: he thanked the Arab countries for supporting the process and noted that important steps have already been taken such as setting up a new Peace-building Commission, a Democracy Fund, a much improved emergency response fund, and a new, stronger Human Rights Council.


Can Turkey bridge the gap between Islam and the West?

By improving ties with Iran and Syria, Turkey aims to help mediate tensions.

By Yigal Schleifer | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor March 29, 2006 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0329/p04s01-wome.html

ISTANBUL, TURKEY - After decades of keeping the Arab and Muslim countries of the Middle East at arm's length, Turkey is trying to strengthen relations with its neighbors while at the same time recasting itself as a mediator in the region.

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan delivered a speech at the opening of the Arab League summit in Khartoum, Sudan, where Turkey for the first time was given the status of "permanent guest" by the organization.

The prime minister's appearance at the summit - the first time a Turkish leader has done so - is the latest in a string of eyebrow-raising foreign policy moves: In February, a top Hamas official visited the capital, Ankara; soon after, Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jafaari made a bridge-building trip; and the Turkish government recently announced that it was planning to host firebrand Shiite Iraqi cleric Moqtada al-Sadr for an official visit - since put on hold.

While the moves have ruffled feathers from Israel and Iraq to the US and European Union (EU) - which Turkey hopes to join - analysts say these aren't so much blunders as a reflection of a significant change in Turkey's Middle East foreign policy.

"Turkey wants to be a message-bringer from the Islamic world to the West," says Huseyin Bagci, a professor of international relations at Ankara's Middle East Technical University (METU). "The government really believes that it can be a bridge between East and West, and this is the foreign policy."

The Turkish government offered to act as a kind of mediator between the EU and the Islamic world regarding the controversial cartoons of the prophet Muhammad. Turkey has also suggested its ties to the West and its improving relations with Iran could help it act as a go-between in the diplomatic crisis over Tehran's disputed nuclear program.

"We have historical links to the region, to the Middle East at large," says a senior Turkish foreign ministry official. "Turkey also has another important quality in this regard, which is that it has relations with everybody [in the region]. We can effectively pass on messages. We have trust on both sides of various conflicts."

But critics warn that this new policy is flawed and carries with it the risk of alienating Turkey's Western allies. The Ankara visit of exiled Hamas political leader Khaled Mashaal was strongly denounced by both Israel, the only Middle Eastern country with which Turkey has a military alliance, and by members of US Congress. Meanwhile, some of Turkey's efforts to upgrade its relations with Syria have been viewed by Western diplomats as counterproductive to efforts to contain the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

"You can see a split between the people who run the foreign ministry and the people who run foreign policy for the [governing Justice and Development Party], and that's really a struggle for the future course of Turkish foreign policy," says a Western diplomat based in Ankara, who asked not to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue. "This is a rather new phenomenon that has crept up over the last few months."

"Where [Turkey's new policy] doesn't work is that if you are going to become an intermediary, what you do has to have some support outside of one of the parties," says Henri Barkey, chairman of the international relations department at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania. "This doesn't bring results if you don't have that support, it makes you irrelevant."

It can also impact Turkey's interests, Professor Barkey says. "There are a lot of congressmen who have been very supportive of Turkey but will now [after the Mashal visit] not lift a finger when something comes up that Turkey cares about," he says.

Adds Barkey: "I don't think anyone in Washington expects [Turkey] to downgrade trade relations with Iran or Syria. I don't think anyone faults the Turks for having better relations than we have with Iran or Syria. But when there is an international consensus on something, that is a line that shouldn't be crossed."

Other critics suggest that while based on good intentions, Turkey's policy presumes other countries are acting in good faith, which may not be the case. "It seems like a well-meaning policy but it fails when checked against the real politick of the Middle East," says Soner Cagaptay, director of the Turkish Research Program at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. "The policy works so long as the other side needs Turkey."

But Bagci says events in the Middle East have left Turkey with few options other than to pursue a revised regional policy. "The 21st century is going to be a new era where East and West try to understand each other in a different way and Turkey is a window of opportunity for the West to enter the Islamic world in a different way."


Zapatero to visit Turkey in summer
Wednesday, March 29, 2006

FATMA DEMİRELLİ

ANKARA - Turkish Daily News

  Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero will visit Turkey in the summer to reciprocate a visit by his Turkish counterpart, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, in November of last year, a Spanish official here said yesterday.

  Alberto Navarro, Spain's state secretary for European Union affairs, also reiterated his country's support at a meeting with a group of journalists for Turkey's efforts to join the EU, explaining that there were profound political, strategic and economic reasons, as well as moral and ethical ones, to do so.

  Spanish support for Turkey's EU bid is backed by the two countries' joint efforts to defuse tension between the Muslim world and the West, which has peaked with a crisis over publication in European newspapers of caricatures lampooning the Prophet Mohammed.

  Erdoğan visited Spain in November to jointly open a three-day meeting with Zapatero on the U.N.-backed Alliance of Civilizations initiative.

  Navarro, who met yesterday with state minister and Turkey's chief negotiator for EU talks Ali Babacan, Foreign Ministry Undersecretary Ali Tuygan and head of the Prime Ministry's Secretariat-General for EU Affairs, Oğuz Demiralp, during a visit to Ankara, said Turkish membership would be an asset for the 25-nation bloc politically and in economic terms and also added that Spain, which went through a difficult accession process, saw Turkey as a “mirror” of its own experience.

  “Twenty years ago, Spain was a completely different country than it is now,” he said, explaining that the Spanish economy had grown considerably and the domestic political climate and stability had also improved a lot.

Dangers of saying ‘no' to Turkey:

  But the Spanish official also warned that Turkish officials should take note of an ongoing debate in the EU on the limits of enlargement.

  In June, EU heads of state and government will meet at a summit to debate the “borders of Europe” and the bloc's absorption capacity, a discussion that is likely to have significant ramifications on Turkey's EU accession prospects.

  Navarro said Spain did not favor opening debates on the borders of Europe and assured that Spain would remain committed to supporting Turkey's EU drive but urged Turkish authorities to continue with reforms, describing integration with the EU as a never-ending story.

  “Spain is the most committed supporter of Turkey's EU membership,” he said. “A debate on the borders of Europe is a bad debate because there is no clear-cut answer here. If we say Turkey should never join the EU because it is not part of Europe, then Turkey would look back to Iran, Russia, China.”

  Asked whether he agreed if there was a slowdown in Turkish reforms, Navarro responded with optimism, saying, “So far, it is going well.”

No Spanish support for political criteria reference:

  Turkey formally opened accession negotiations with the EU on Oct. 3 but actual talks on the chapters, or policy areas into which the bloc's regulations are divided, are yet to start.

  On one of the chapters, education and culture, some EU countries, led by France, press for inclusion of a reference to the bloc's political criteria for entry in a letter inviting Turkey to state its negotiating position so that negotiations on this chapter can begin, a demand rejected by Turkey, which says negotiations on this chapter should be technical and fear such a reference could give opponents of Turkish membership a tool to block the talks at any stage of the process.

  Navarro said Spain was opposed to such reference, explaining that this has not been mentioned in the case of past candidates, which means it would be “discrimination” against Turkey if the political criteria are mentioned in the letter.

Hamas visit constructive:

  Asked to comment on how a surprise visit of a delegation from Palestinian radical group Hamas to Ankara last month was received in Europe, Navarro said it was a constructive step.

  The EU refuses talks with election winner Hamas because it is on the bloc's list of terrorist organizations.
 


Erdogan Speaks At Arab League Summit

Published: 3/29/2006 www.turkishpress.com
KHARTOUM - ''Today we are witnessing that the existing fault line between the West and the Islamic World have tendency to deepen,'' Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Tuesday. At the opening of Arab League Summit in Khartoum, PM Erdogan delivered a speech on ''Alliance of Civilizations''.

Erdogan said hardliners at the extreme ends of the spectrum exploited this situation thoughtlessly. ''On the one side there is an understanding excluding everybody and everything... and on the other side we see terrorist organizations claiming that they came on the scene in the name of religious or cultural values... Both parties disregard common values and try to provoke crises,'' he said.

In his speech Erdogan expressed his belief that the summit would have serious contribution to the peace, welfare and security of the region, and noted that the summit took place at a critical moment when dynamics (that will give shape to the future of the region) started to be accelerated.

Erdogan said outcome of the summit would make important contribution to the course of the development in the region, and noted that Turkey has a cultural closeness to and joint history with the Arab world. ''To this end, contributing to the stability, security and prosperity of the Arab world is among our primary goals,'' he added.

-''END OF COLD WAR''-

''The international climate emerged after the end of cold war facilitated solidarity among countries and improved multilateral relations. However we should admit that it brings some new risks and threats with. Particularly terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, smuggling and organized crimes started to gain global dimensions,'' recalled Erdogan.

''Unfortunately, we cannot say that we live in a more secure world when compared with two decades ago. Both the classical areas of clashes and the new asymmetric threats closely and directly threaten all of us. This fact, imposed by globalization, is a security concern for everybody. Mankind in the end learned with very sorrowful experiences what would cost the double standard of 'my terrorist is good, your terrorist is bad'. Unfortunately, humanity suffered a lot from this disaster. Turkey also suffered a lot from this scourge. For years we tried to explain this and make our voice heard. We said a terrorist can not have religion, race and color. Terrorism is a phenomenon whose target is unknown. Recent painful incidents proved that target of terrorism is the humanity as a whole. The conditions we are facing requires international cooperation and solidarity more than ever.''

''Where we stand today, displaying a firm will for a joint fight against the terrorism is mandatory. Unfortunately, it is hard to affirm that a noteworthy progress has been made up to now,'' he indicated.

''Turkey wishes to see a prosperous Iraq having secured its territorial integrity and stability, preserved its political unity, and that is at peace with its neighbors,'' Erdogan said.

Erdogan said, ''this project aims to establish a comprehensive cooperation in global plan by highlighting mutual values of different cultures. We consider differences among us as elements enriching the civilization.''

-INITIATIVE IS TIMELY AND APPROPRIATE-

''Where we stand today, it is clearly seen that Alliance of Civilizations initiative is timely and appropriate. Recent cartoon crisis revealed that the issue should be handled without losing common sense. Freedom of thought and expression are indispensable elements of civilization,'' Erdogan said.

''The cartoon crisis also proved that there are more steps to be taken on this issue. Otherwise, we should all have to bear the negative impact of this event,'' Erdogan remarked and noted that respect to freedom of belief and values is among the fundamental principles of civilization.

Erdogan said there were two important matters that may add momentum to efforts aiming to boost mutual dialogue and cooperation. ''Those are resolution of Arab-Israeli conflict and reaching stability soon in Iraq'' he said.

-PALESTINIAN ELECTIONS AND MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS-

Erdogan went on: ''We wish the new Palestinian Parliament and the Government to work in coordination with President Mahmoud Abbas to meet some expectations of the international community. Enlivening of peace process on the basis of the road map should be the primary target of everybody.''

Erdogan emphasized that elements threatening the internal stability of Iraq continued to be high on the agenda, and noted that he believed that attacks on mosques and shrines are ''acts of provocation aiming to cause confrontation between religious sects.''

''Easing tension between sects and halting vicious circle of violence in Iraq before they reach an irreversible point, is crucial. Forming a broad based government representing all segments of the society will be in the best interest of the Iraqi people and is good for the stability of the region,'' he indicated.

Erdogan said the reforms which Arab League initiated are timely and appropriate. ''The more we respect universal values like democracy, human rights, gender equality, supremacy of law, transparency and pluralism, the more we may contribute to regional and global peace'' he concluded.


Arab League futility
 
MARCH 31, 2006

The Arab League summit meeting this week in the Sudanese capital, Khartoum, appeared to validate the group's reputation for idle chatter and obtuse decisions.

If the site of the summit was not callous enough - the host government is the perpetrator of an ongoing genocide in Darfur - the participants made things worse by rejecting a proposal to supplement 7,000 ineffectual African Union monitors in Darfur with a substantial United Nations peacekeeping force. In so doing, the league's 22 members were accepting the cynical line of Sudan's genocidal ruler, Omar al-Bashir, who characterized the plan for a UN peacekeeping force in Darfur as a violation of Sudan's sovereignty.

This gesture of solidarity with the forces behind mass murder, systematic rape and the ethnic cleansing of non-Arab African tribal groups in Darfur cast a pall on everything else that was said, or left unsaid, by the dignitaries - mostly autocrats - in attendance in Khartoum.

The summit's pledge of solidarity with the Palestinians, in conjunction with a repetition of the 2002 Arab League offer of peace with Israel in return for a withdrawal from all Arab lands, belongs under the rubric of idle chatter. The vapidity of the members' stance was evident in their refusal to increase last year's commitment to contribute $55 million per month to the Palestinian Authority. The Palestinians are asking for $170 million.

But the summit's most dramatic - and pathetic - failing was its effort to address the twin specters of sectarian warfare and Iranian influence in Iraq. In a barely veiled lament at the prospect of U.S.-Iranian talks about Iraq's future, the Arab League's secretary general, Amr Moussa, said: "Any solution for the Iraqi problem cannot be reached without Arabs and Arab participation. Any result of consultations without Arab participation will be considered insufficient and will not lead to a solution."

This was a coded way of expressing deep Arab fears that the United States and Iran are preparing to subtract Iraq from the Arab world, allowing it to be absorbed into a swelling sphere of Iranian influence. At the summit's closing session, Iraq's foreign minister told the other Arab states that they shared the blame for what is happening today in Iraq because of their indifference to decades of Saddam Hussein's "authoritarian rule and wars." And he rightly said they had an obligation now to help Iraq in "isolating terrorism and drying up the sources that finance its activities."

It is in the interest of the Arab states to heed this plea, because the jihadists now wreaking havoc in Iraq will likely be coming after them next.



Free speech should soar above insult and injury

 
The real clash of ideas is within each culture - over who best represents us
 
April 04, 2006 edition  www.csmonitor.com

It's disturbing to watch bad ideas grow legs. In the deadly firestorm ignited by the Danish cartoons caricaturing Islam, one bad idea - the "clash of civilizations" - seems to have found its feet. The agenda shaping up for this clash - free speech versus Islam - is driven by another bad idea: the "right to offend." Free speech is to represent the best of Western civilization and the Enlightenment, with its most extreme test - and biggest gun - proudly trundled forth: insult and provocation.

As if! As if Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo, invasion and occupation of Iraq, and other varieties of "regime change" the West envisions for the Arab world were not offense enough. And how bizarre that offensiveness is held up as civilized, rather than seen as fueling the clash.

Descending to the bait, defenders of offensiveness weigh in across the spectrum. On the left, Art Spiegelman, cartoonist for The New Yorker, asserts in The Nation, "There has to be a right to insult," even if it stirs discomfort. Aligning on the right, William Bennett and Alan Dershowitz castigate Western media for "betraying" their "duty" to republish the Danish cartoons. Meanwhile, contrarian Christopher Hitchens derides "the babyish tantrums" of the Islamic world and "this sickly babble about 'respect.'"

More such ilk doubtless will air in Round 2, when Iran's largest newspaper publishes the "winners" of its Holocaust cartoon contest, and an Israeli paper does likewise with its anti-Semitic contest. The media will again agonize about republishing - and the West's insult-artists can crow again about taking the blows and, unlike those 'babyish' Muslims, not burning down a Starbucks.

This is so sandbox, so sticks-and-stones, and in these tinderbox times so dangerous, like strapping on a suicide belt. Rights come with responsibilities, and it's time to talk about the responsible use of free speech.

Starting with this question to the insult-artists: And your higher point is...?

What's lost in this slugfest, drowned out by extremists, are the voices of moderate, responsible, democracy-promoting Muslims. A recent Washington Post-ABC News poll shows a majority of Americans now think Muslims are disproportionately prone to violence.

A Muslim who spoke out was the editor of the Jordanian paper Shihan who posed this question: "Muslims of the world, be reasonable. What brings more prejudice against Islam - these caricatures or pictures of a hostage-taker slashing the throat of his victim?" For his bravery he was fired. Instead of insult, how about defending this speech of reason?

And how about reviewing the clashing civilizations' agenda? While the West insists free speech be on the docket, Islamic thinkers would offer another item: power.

As Rami Khouri, respected editor at large of Beirut's Daily Star, claims: "This is not primarily an argument about freedom of the press.... It is about Arab-Islamic societies' desire to enjoy freedom from Western and Israeli subjugation, diplomatic double standards, and predatory neocolonial policies." Orhan Pamuk, the Turkish author shortlisted for the Nobel, writes that people in the West "are scarcely aware of this overwhelming feeling of humiliation that is experienced by most of the world's population."

And to this history of insult we would add more insult? As to insult, a test for the defenders of the right to offend: Presumably you have exercised your free speech to the maximum protesting the bonafide offenses of Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo, this near-unforgivable insult of torture that America has visited on the Arab world? It's my Voltairean right to ask and your responsibility to answer. (Mr. Bennett and Mr. Dershowitz fail this test: While citing the media for not republishing the Danish cartoons, they excoriate them for publishing the images of Abu Ghraib.)

Provocation, insult, giving offense: When the target is deserving, these are powerful tools, and the West has a glorious history of using them. Henrik Ibsen outraged audiences with his play "A Doll's House" when Nora slammed the door on her infantilized existence - and forever altered our consciousness about woman's place. With his Letter from Birmingham City Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. argued the case against the Establishment that the Negro could no longer wait for freedom but must claim it now - and unlocked the prison for all of us. This is the highest - and most responsible - use of the right to offend: to enhance human dignity.

But in these last decades this right, which Voltaire in the 18th century wielded so forcefully against tyranny and intolerance, has degraded in the West to mere offensiveness, with no higher purpose but to shock and titillate, leaving us empty products like "The Vagina Monologues" and, most recently, the Oscar-winning song "It's Hard Out Here for a Pimp." What impoverishment of the Enlightenment!

Just as Islam risks hijacking by extremists, Western civilization faces similar risk - from free-speech extremists - and what we are losing is meaning, mattering, beauty, wit, a sense of the sacred. The real clash is within each civilization - within the West and within Islam. And the real agenda is about representation: Who finally represents us - the best in us or the extreme? The insult-artists, those who brandish the right to offend, fail on all levels: They do not represent the best of the West, nor enlightened free speech, and they do not point the way to better relations with the Muslim world. For them, expression of a small, splenetic self is all.

Responsible speech cares - about the world, others, consequences. It is capable of self-critique. And, by definition, it is answerable, accountable. As such, we need lots more of it - on all sides. Arab leaders and the Arab press should stop their anti-Semitic, anti-infidel rants. Our president should desist from insulting entire peoples as part of an "axis of evil"; evangelist Franklin Graham should stop referring to Islam as "a wicked religion"; and our insult-artists should grow up.

Only through responsible speech can we transform the clash of civilizations into a round table. And, ultimately, only through responsible use can we retain that most precious of rights: free speech.

Carla Seaquist, a playwright, is author of "Who Cares?: The Washington-Sarajevo Talks" and is working on a new play, "Prodigal."
 


America & Spain: Renewing a Strategic Partnership

Kurt Volker, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs
Remarks at the CSIS/Real Instituto Elcano Conference on U.S.-Spain Bilateral Relations
Washington, DC  April 3, 2006

Thank you Robin for your kind introduction. It is great to see so many friends here personal friends, friends of the United States, friends of Spain, friends of democracy, and human development, and justice.

And it is an honor for me to speak to a distinguished audience like this. I was not born into a diplomatic family. I was fifteen before my first trip abroad and that was just to go a hundred miles or so into Canada to go skiing. Indeed, to that point, no one in my family had traveled abroad much, and no one expected to. I was the odd one out, opting to be an exchange student in Sweden, then studying in France, and eventually taking up foreign policy for a living.

Like many non-Hispanic Americans, the first foreign language I studied was Spanish. My family had pointed out it was "easier than French" and "could be useful" if I go to far away places like Miami. Although I can stumble through a short conversation and still read the newspapers, I never became fluent. I instead learned French, Swedish, and Hungarian so much for going the easy route.

My first trip to Spain was to Barcelona, about a dozen years ago. My wife had gone to college there a dozen years before that, and we met up with her old friends and explored the city mostly after midnight, as I think is typical for Barcelona. I remember well the architecture of Gaudi, the paintings of Dali, the Quatro Gatos café, which Hemmingway frequented. I have now been back to Spain many times, though these days mostly to Madrid.

The ties between America and Spain run exceptionally deep. It starts early: every American elementary school child studies Christopher Columbus and learns of how he set sail under the Spanish crown to discover America. For families with young children, Ferdinand and Isabella are household words.

And it goes on from there. Spain has played a pivotal role in our history for more than five centuries. Spanish place names from Florida to California give testament to that history.

Last week, I was in San Francisco, known for it's Chinatown and Italian neighborhoods, as well as its famous "Mission District." The "Mission" in question is Mission de San Francisco de Asis, one of the northernmost outposts of the Spanish, and then Mexican, settlement of the Pacific Coast.

Spanish culture continues to be reflected in our architecture, traditions, and cuisine and not just in our southern and western states. It is a daily part of American life not only from our historical ties, but from direct links with Spain, and from millions of Hispanic Americans and Hispanic immigrants from 17 Latin American countries who share our Spanish heritage. Forty million Americans claim some Hispanic ancestry a number nearly equal to the population of Spain. Some 30 million Americans speak Spanish, and Spanish is the most widely taught foreign language in U.S. schools.

The Hispanic vote has become a critical factor in American politics, especially in our presidential elections. Hispanic-Americans are concentrated in nine states which together control 75% of the electoral votes a candidate needs to win the presidency. This influence is likely to increase, as Hispanic-Americans now constitute the largest ethnic minority in the United States, and the number of Hispanics becoming American citizens continues to grow rapidly.

The volume of people-to-people connections between the U.S. and Spain is astounding. Beyond the enormous amount of travel for business and tourism, over 20,000 American students studied in Spain in the 2004-05 academic year, and over 3,500 Spanish students studied in the U.S. The United States is Spain's biggest market outside of the European Union, with nearly $16.9 billion of goods and services sold to the United States last year. Imports from the United States were $8.6 billion, so we know where the balance of trade lies.

More than 600 U.S. companies employ some 200,000 workers in Spain, having been drawn there by Spain's successful efforts to reduce taxes, privatize state-owned companies, and liberalize the main sectors of the economy. Over 200 Spanish companies have subsidiaries in the U.S., especially in the construction and banking industries.

My point in reciting all these statistics is that the relationship between our countries between Spain and the United States is not a trickle, but a firehose bursting at the seams. It is only natural that as free market democracies with shared history, culture, and personal connections, our direct contacts are vast and growing exponentially.

Today, I have been asked to give a snapshot of how we in the Administration look at the U.S.-Spanish relationship. And the first point is what I just said between our countries, and our peoples, we are so intertwined it defies description.

But following on from there, I was delighted to see that the agenda for today's program covers Afghanistan, Democracy in the Middle East, and Latin America.

And that has it exactly right: the measure of a relationship particularly among mature democracies in the age of globalization is not the contacts between our peoples. That connection is so vibrant and deep that it is more accurate to think of ourselves as part of a single community, rather than of distinct and separate partners.

Instead, the real measure is how effective we are at working together to advance our shared values freedom, democracy, market economy, rule of law, human rights in the wider world.

Here again, I am delighted to point out the positive steps that the United States and Spain are taking jointly in the world.

It may come as a surprise, but I believe the most important place where the United States and Spain are working together is Afghanistan. Here, far from Spain and even further from America, the United States and Spain are working together to strengthen a fledgling democracy; to nurture a people who have suffered from two and a half decades of war; to bring education to women and girls; and to bring tolerance and development to a divided society. Spain leads a Provincial Reconstruction Team and commands a Forward Support Base in Afghanistan, and alongside the United States, Germany and Italy is one of the largest contributors of military forces to the common effort in Afghanistan.

The Spanish PRT has made a substantial commitment of development resources and has welcomed a U.S. Foreign Service Officer to work side-by-side with his Spanish colleagues at their facility in Qala-ye Now in Western Afghanistan.

Americans and Spaniards have lost their lives in the effort to help the Afghan people. 17 Spanish soldiers died in a helicopter crash last summer, and 62 others were killed as their transport plane crashed on the way home to Spain in 2003. Yet Spain's commitment to helping the Afghan people has not wavered.

The other area I would cite, where Spain has been a world leader, is the fight against terrorism, both domestically and globally. We watch with hope that the ETA terrorist group will truly take decisive steps to end its campaign of bombings, kidnappings, and killings. There can be no excuse for such cowardly acts, and forgiveness cannot come easily; yet there can also be no reaction but welcome when such acts are ended permanently.

Spain has fought domestic terrorism for four decades, and shares with the U.S. the experience of Al-Qaeda attacks on its own soil. Spain was the first country to convict a terrorist linked to the 9/11 bombings in this country and has helped break up networks that send extremists to Iraq as suicide bombers. And Spain has, of course, vigorously investigated and prosecuted the 3/11 bombers.

This was the impetus for Spanish forces to join the United States and other coalition forces in Iraq. Spain was among four countries, including the U.S., UK, and Portugal, to take part in the Atlantic Summit of 2003, where our positive vision for Iraq an Iraq anchored on democracy, secure in its borders, free from tyranny was articulated. Spain was an early contributor of military forces aimed at providing security and stability for the Iraqi people.

We are grateful for this important Spanish contribution. At the same time, we recognize the impact of public opinion and election promises, and we accepted Spain's decision to withdraw Spanish forces, though we wish it had been better coordinated. I know the conventional wisdom speaks otherwise, but Iraq per se was not a major divisive issue between the United States and Spain.

Indeed, even after the withdrawal of Spanish troops from Iraq, our military cooperation has remained excellent. The United States continues to use Spanish air bases to provide critical airlift support for operations in Afghanistan and the Middle East, and Spain continues to play a major role in Afghanistan, provide demining training to Iraqi security forces, and make financial contributions to Iraqi reconstruction.

Not only has Spain been a partner in the military effort to fight tyranny, whether in Afghanistan or Iraq, but also in the effort to build democracy, economic opportunity, and social development in the Broader Middle East.

Spain is, of course, the birthplace of the "Barcelona Process," the EU's effort to support democratic and economic reform in the Middle East, which celebrated it's10-year anniversary in Barcelona last November. And Spain is a contributor to the U.S. and European collective effort to support democratic change through the Broader Middle East initiative.

Foreign Minister Moratinos attended the Forum for the Future meeting in Bahrain last November, and Spain is a contributor to the Foundation for the Future an effort to support NGO's in the region through a non-government foundation. And Spain has been an active player in supporting democratic reform close to home, in Morocco, Tunisia and Algeria.

Spain has long been particularly interested in Israeli-Palestinian issues and was the first EU country to support the Rafah crossing agreement.

Spain has also co-sponsored with Turkey the Alliance of Civilizations initiative, which promotes greater mutual understanding between modern Islam and modern Christianity.

Finally, America and Spain share a unique heritage and destiny in Latin America Spain for its historical and cultural legacy and its modern ties of culture and commerce; America for its proximity and its vital political, economic, trade, and security connections.

Here again, America and Spain share the same objectives: we long to see a hemisphere that is free, democratic, prosperous through market economics, sharing its wealth throughout society, and secure from threats whether internal, such as narco-trafficking, or external.

Spain's successful transition to democracy following the death of Franco has been an inspiration for freedom-loving people throughout the hemisphere. Spain's rapid economic development, especially since it joined the European Union in 1986, has enabled many of its leading companies to seek trade and investment opportunities in Latin America.

Each of us has taken a keen interest in Latin America's development. Over the course of the 1990's, Spain devoted almost 44 percent of its global aid budget to Latin America and the Caribbean, the highest percentage among all EU donors.

In just the last two years, Spain has increased foreign aid to Latin America from about $400 million in 2004 to more than $600 million in 2005. On February 1, the Spanish Secretary of State for the Economy announced that Spain will write off bilateral debt from Bolivia, Peru, and Guatemala in exchange for those countries' implementing education projects. And just a few weeks ago Spain announced plans for a volunteer service, fashioned after the Peace Corps, that will promote development in Latin America.

On the U.S. side, we have entered into Millennium Challenge Account compacts with Honduras and Nicaragua, totaling $380 million and hope that Bolivia and El Salvador will conclude compacts later this year.

The Millennium Challenge Account is different from traditional assistance in that it allows beneficiary countries to decide how, and even how much, to invest in their development, but requires that the projects chosen produce measurable results. It is available only to countries that have embraced political and economic reform and invested in their people. This is based on the understanding that aid is effective when it buttresses sound economic policies, and often squandered without such policies.

For countries close to meeting the eligibility criteria, we also have the MCA threshold program to help them implement reforms in policy areas where they fall short. An MCA threshold program for Paraguay, valued at $35 million, was approved in February, to help improve the business climate and fight corruption. Guyana is also eligible for a threshold program, which we hope will be approved later this year. Total U.S. aid to Latin America last year amounted to $1.7 billion a figure that has doubled under President Bush.

The U.S. has concluded Free Trade Agreements with 11 countries that account for about 85% of our trade within the Western Hemisphere. We are in negotiations with two more. The total value of U.S. foreign direct investment in Latin America and the Caribbean stood at about $326 billion at the end of 2004, with new investment that year totaling $25 billion.

The picture I have drawn is one of Spain and the United States enjoying a vibrant bilateral connection, while working together in key areas, from Afghanistan to Iraq to democracy promotion to Latin America. This is indeed a strong and effective relationship.

But I would be misleading if I did not also note that there have been differences.

By far the most troubling is a populist anti-Americanism or at least anti-American policy-ism in Spain. We see it in graffiti, in street protests a few years ago, in public opinion surveys, in media, public, and at times political party commentary about the United States. It is not the dominant view, but it is a persistent undercurrent. And I should add that it is not limited to Spain, but is a phenomenon across much of Europe.

What such anti-American views fail to acknowledge is everything I have just said. That America and Spain and, indeed, America and Europe are part of a single democratic civilization. That we cooperate throughout the world. That we are united by ties of history, culture, and values.

America could never be anti-Spanish, because to be so would mean we are anti-us. So it is saddening to see evidence of anti-Americanism in Spain.

We bear our share of the responsibility, in that American foreign policy is often misconstrued as at odds with our core values as a democracy. We must do a better job in our own public presentation of our policies, linking them clearly to our shared values.

There are also areas where despite the United States and Spain sharing common objectives our tactics for achieving them can place us in opposing camps.

No where is this more evident than in Cuba. We all know that Cuba needs democracy. We all support the aspirations of the Cuban people. But Cuba is an area where our policies have often come into conflict, whether over the rights of those whose property was confiscated by the communist regime, or over the efficacy of economic sanctions, or over the best way to support democratic dissidents, to whom the future of Cuba rightly belongs.

Given our shared history, cultural, values, and our respective unique roles in Latin America, I believe that there remains enormous potential in U.S.-Spanish unity on Latin America, and I look forward to the day when U.S. and Spanish policies on Cuba are as one.

Venezuela is another case. Increasingly, the United States and Spain stand together in favor of the rights of the Sumate human rights activists. We urge that the reversal of democracy in Venezuela be brought to an end, and that true democracy, openness, tolerance, and peaceful relations with neighbors be re-established as the norm.

It is for this reason that Spain's decision to sell military ships and aircraft to Venezuela, unarmed but able to be armed, is so troubling. Over many months, we stressed our opposition to the sale, based on our concern that President Chavez is engaged in a massive arms buildup that threatens regional stability. We noted that our policy on arms sales to Venezuela would likely prevent us from authorizing the transfer of U.S.-made components as part of these defense items. Yet Spain went ahead with the sale.

This incident was especially disappointing since it gives Chavez an opportunity to exploit a perceived difference between U.S. and Spanish views of his increasingly anti-democratic regime.

As the two leading international players in Latin America, and as genuine market democracies with shared human values, the United States and Spain have enormous potential to act as a clear voice of conscience in Venezuela. Thus far, that potential has not been realized.

Relationships are never static, and differences, even between the closest of friends, are not unusual. Indeed, relationships between states are measured not in what they are, but what they do.

Our relationship with Spain is not a glass egg to be put on a shelf and left to gather dust, but a vital partnership with the potential to achieve great things. And I firmly believe there is potential out there, yet to be realized.

When we work together on the basis of our shared values to face common challenges, there is no limit to what we can accomplish. That is the kind of partnership the United States wants with Spain, and we will continue to do our part to make that more vital partnership a reality.

Thank you, and I look forward to your comments and questions.


‘Medeniyetler ittifakı’ tezi tuttu


12 Nisan 2006 Çarşamba www.turkiyegazetesi.com

İSTANBUL- TBMM Başkanı Bülent Arınç, Türkiye’nin, “medeniyetler arası çatışma” tezine karşı başlattığı “medeniyetler arası ittifak” atağı ile bütün dünyada ilgi odağı olduğunu bildirdi. Arınç, İslam Konferansı Örgütü Parlamento Başkanları (İKÖPAB) Konferansı’na ilişkin Conrad Otel’de basın toplantısı düzenledi. Konferansa şu an itibariyle 17 ülke meclis başkanı, 8 başkan vekili, 7 heyet başkanı olmak üzere toplam 47 ülkeden 436 kişinin katılacağını belirten TBMM Başkanı Arınç, ayrıca İKÖPAB 4. Konferansı için 48’i yabancı, 113’ü de Türkiye’den olmak üzere 161 medya mensubunun akredite olduğunu söyledi. Konferansın, kültürel ve siyasi işler başlığı altında görüşülecek en önemli konularından bir tanesinin, ‘İslamofobia’ tartışmaları olacağını ifade eden Arınç, Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti’nin de ‘Kıbrıs Müslüman Türk Toplumu’ adıyla bu konferansın halen gözlemcisi konumunda bulunduğuna dikkat çekti.

 


İlk fotoğraf

Ferai TINÇ 29 Mart 2006

Sudan’da yapılan Arap Birliği zirvesine Türkiye, tarihte ilk kez konuk ülke statüsünde katıldı. Tayyip Erdoğan, dün yaptığı konuşmayla bir Arap Birliği zirvesinde liderlere hitap eden ilk Türk Başbakanı unvanını kazandı. Rum Dışişleri Bakanı Yakovu da, Arap desteği aramak için zirvedeydi.

ARAP Birliği’nin Sudan’da gerçekleşen 18’inci zirvesi ilklere sahne oldu. Zirvede ilk kez bir Türk Başbakanı Araplara seslenirken, Kıbrıs Rum Yönetimi ilk kez bir Arap Birliği Zirvesi’ne davetli olarak katıldı.

Kıbrıs Dışişleri Bakanı Yakovu’nun Arap ülkelerinin desteğini almak için lobi yaptığı zirveye Mısır, Suudi Arabistan, Tunus gibi etkili Arap ülkelerinin liderlerinin katılmaması Hartum buluşmasını gölgeledi.

Son ana kadar Hartum’a gelmeyeceği söylenen Libya Lideri Kaddafi ise Arap Birliği ile ilgili önerilerinin ele alınacağı vaadini aldıktan sonra zirveye katıldı. Buna karşın, Irak Devlet Başkanı Celal Talabani, katılması beklenirken son anda Hartum’a gelmekten vazgeçti.

Irak, Filistin ve Darfur sorunlarının damgasını vurduğu zirvede, Başbakan Tayyip Erdoğan, besmele çekerek başladığı konuşmasında kültürler arası diyalogdan söz etti. Başbakan, zirve sırasında Suriye Devlet Başkanı Beşar Esad, Ürdün Kralı Abdullah ve Filistin Devlet Başkanı Ebu Abbas ile bir araya geldi.

FİLİSTİN’E 55 MİLYON $

Arap Birliği Genel Sekreteri Mısır Dışişleri Bakanı Amr Musa, "dış müdahaleye hayır, Sudan ve Filistin’e yardıma evet" derken Arap ülkeleri, Filistin’e istediği yardımı sağlayamadılar. Hamas’ın davet edilmediği, Filistin’in Devlet Başkanı Ebu Abbas ve FKÖ’lü eski dışişleri bakanı tarafından temsil edildiği toplantıda Arap liderleri Filistin hükümetine ayda 55 milyon dolar yardımda anlaştılar.

Zirve’ye katılan lider sayısının azlığı, Sudan hükümetinin Darfur’da krizin yeniden tırmanmaya başladığı bir dönemde, toplantıyı kendisine verilen destek haline getirme arayışının neden olduğu söyleniyor.

Batıda Afrikalılar ile Arap kökenli Sudanlılar arasında yıllardan beri süren çatışmaların üç yıl önce hükümet yanlısı gerillalar ile Afrikalılar arasında kanlı bir hale bürünmesi sonucu bölgede 2 milyon kişi yaşamını yitirdi. Bu katliamın soykırım olarak kabul edimemesi için yoğun çaba harcayan Sudan hükümeti, Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi’nin geçen hafta kabul ettiği bölgeye BM barış gücünün gönderilmesi kararına karşı çıktı. Dünkü zirvede Arap ülkelerinin desteğini almak için çalışan Sudan hükümeti, halen Darfur’da görev yapan Afrika Birliği Barış Gücü askerlerinin bölgede kalması için parasal destek istedi.

IRAK’A TEMSİLCİLİK/_newsimages/1300866.jpg

Zirve öncesi Hartum’da yapılan Arap Birliği üyesi ülkeler dışişleri bakanları toplantısında Amerikan güçlerinin Irak’tan çekilmesi yolundaki çağrı önerisi zirvede çok destek bulmadı. Ancak Iraklı Şii ve Kürtlerin yardım çağrısını dikkate alan Arap Birliği Bağdat’ta temsilcilik açmaya karar verdi.

Arapların Saddam sonrası Irak’a geri dönüşleri niteliğindeki bu karar da getirilen birçok koşul nedeniyle etkisini yitirdi.

Zirveyi izleyen Arap gazeteciler, Irak’ta hükümetin kurulması ve istikrarın sağlanmasından sonra güvenlik koşullarının el vermesi halinde temsilcilik açma kararının, esasında Arapların isteksizliğini gösterdiğini söylediler.

Konuşmasına besmeleyle başladı

AB aile fotoğraflarında görmeye alıştığımız Başbakan Erdoğan bu kez, Arap Birliği’nin aile fotoğrafına girdi. Zirvedeki konuşmasına besmele ile başlayan Erdoğan, genelde açılış törenlerinde kurdele keserken, ’hayırlı olsun’ dedikten sonra ’besmele’ çekiyor. Ancak başbakan olarak yaptığı hiçbir resmi konuşmaya ’besmele’ ile başlamadığı da biliniyor.

Erdoğan, AB ve ABD’ye çattı

BAŞBAKAN Erdoğan, önceki akşam Sudanlı aydınların katıldığı konferansta uygarlıklar arası diyalog konusunda bir konferans verdi. Başbakan bu konferansta AB ve ABD’ye çattı. Avrupa ve ABD’de Müslümanlara karşı özel yasalar çıkartıldığını belirten başbakan, bu bakışın toplumda fay hatları oluşturduğunu söyledi. Başbakan, silahlanma yarışının bir trilyon dolarlık pazar payına ulaştığını da vurgulayarak, "Hani biz barışı güçlendirecektik. Bunu dünyada gücü elinde bulunduranlar söyledi. Ama lafta kaldı. Ürettiklerini az gelişmiş ülkelere nasıl satarız, bunun pazarlıkları yapılıyor."
/_newsimages/1300870.jpg
’Gel, Ferai Abla’

Başbakan Erdoğan, gazetecilerle resim çektirirken, "Ferai Abla, gel, sen hepimizin ablasısın" diyerek Hürriyet yazarı Ferai Tınç’ı yanına aldı. Erdoğan, zirvedeki görüşmelerin ardından Türk Büyükelçiliği rezidansının bahçesinde verilen resepsiyonda ise, Hartum’daki Türk toplumu temsilcileriyle bir araya geldi. Sudan’daki üniversitelerde okuyan türbanlı Türk kızlarıyla konuşan Erdoğan, "Burada yeni bir yaşam yaşıyorsunuz" dedi. Öğrenciler ise "Sudanlılar bizden Müslümanlığı öğrendikleri için memnunlar" diye konuştular. Resepsiyondaki harem-selamlık düzen dikkat çekti.


Turquía y España buscan en Jartum apoyo a Alianza Civilizaciones

Turquía y España defendieron hoy, al margen de la cumbre de la Liga Arabe en Jartum, el proyecto de la ONU de la Alianza de Civilizaciones, e hicieron un llamamiento a favor de la tolerancia y en contra del extremismo y el terrorismo.
28-03-2006


El primer ministro turco, Recep Tayip Erdogan, que auspicia con el presidente del Gobierno español, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, la idea de la Alianza de Civilizaciones, destacó la necesidad de rechazar todo tipo de violencia y discriminación.

'Tenemos que comprender que el choque entre civilizaciones no es inevitable', dijo Erdogan en un discurso que pronunció en un simposio organizado en la capital sudanesa por el Consejo de la Convivencia Religiosa sudanés.

Se refirió al acuerdo de paz logrado el año pasado en el sur de Sudán tras décadas de guerra civil, y ofreció ayuda para solucionar la crisis en Darfur, en el oeste sudanés, donde cientos de miles de personas han muerto en un conflicto similar desatado en 2003.

En el simposio estuvo presente una delegación española, cuyo jefe, Juan José Santos-Aguado, subrayó que 'las relaciones entre civilizaciones y la coexistencia pacífica entre las culturas será el desafío de la comunidad internacional en las próximas décadas'.

Lo ocurrido en los últimos meses en el mundo demuestra que la 'Alianza entre Civilizaciones es ahora necesaria más que nunca', dijo el enviado español, aparentemente en referencia a la crisis de la caricaturas de Mahoma.

'La Alianza de Civilizaciones responde al deseo de la comunidad internacional de adoptar nuevos mecanismos de comprensión y cooperación entre los musulmanes y las sociedades occidentales', añadió.

Destacó la importancia de actuar en contra de 'las posturas del fanatismo y el extremismo', cuyas actitudes 'no comparte, afortunadamente, la inmensa mayoría'.

'Ha llegado la hora de intensificar el diálogo en favor de las iniciativas comunes. Este es el desafío que la Alianza debe afrontar con el apoyo de los Estados árabes y musulmanes en general, y de la Liga Arabe en Particular', agregó.

El enviado español destacó el hecho de que la idea de la Alianza de Civilizaciones ha ido ganando apoyo mundial desde que fuera adoptada por la Asamblea General de la ONU, en 2005.

Asimismo agradeció, en nombre del Gobierno español, a Qatar por haber acogido a finales de febrero pasado la reunión de Alto Nivel de la Alianza de Civilizaciones, y apreció el apoyo de los miembros de la Liga Arabe a la iniciativa.

La invitación dirigida por el organismo panárabe a Zapatero, para participar en la cumbre árabe de 2005 en Argelia, y la que recibió Erdogan este año 'es un claro mensaje que demuestra el interés y la implicación de los miembros de la Liga Arabe' en la propuesta, concluyó.

Erdogan, por su parte, señaló que 'intercambiará puntos de vista' sobre la iniciativa con los jefes de Estado árabes durante la cumbre que se celebrará mañana y pasado en Jartum, y confío en que 'los resultados serán positivos para toda la humanidad'.

Terra Actualidad - EFE


El PP lleva a cabo un "fuerte lobby" en Washington para desacreditar la iniciativa de la Alianza de Civilizaciones

De Arístegui se entrevistó durante una semana con senadores, congresistas y altos representantes de la Administración Bush

   MADRID, 26 Mar. (EUROPA PRESS)

   El Partido Popular lleva a cabo un "fuerte lobby" en Washington para desacreditar ante las autoridades estadounidenses la iniciativa de la Alianza de Civilizaciones lanzada por el presidente del Gobierno, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, en septiembre de 2004, según indicó a Europa Press el portavoz del PP en la Comisión de Asuntos Exteriores en el Congreso de los Diputados, Gustavo de Arístegui.

   Este último se entrevistó entre el 6 y 11 de marzo con senadores, congresistas y altos representantes de la Administración Bush en el marco de varios actos organizados por 'think tanks' estadounidense. En concreto, De Arístegui destacó su entrevista con el subsecretario de Estado para Asuntos Interamericanos, Thomas Shannon, uno de los responsables más próximos a Condoleezza Rice.

   El diputado 'popular' constató que en Estados Unidos no se diferencia la Alianza del Diálogo de Civilizaciones cuando, a su juicio, son dos nociones "distintas" ya que la primera supone negociar con los países árabes y musulmanes los derechos y libertades fundamentales que son "universales, atemporales e irrenunciables" para Occidente, mientras que el Diálogo de Civilizaciones "no implica cesión" en este apartado.

   De Arístegui lamentó que en muchos foros se vea esta Alianza propugnada por Zapatero como "una ocurrencia vacía e inocua", cuando conlleva que ahora estos derechos y libertades sean "negociables, limitables en el tiempo y no universales". En este sentido, se preguntó por qué el Gobierno socialista no denuncia la ejecución de más de 5.000 homosexuales en Irán en los últimos años.

   El responsable 'popular' ya mantuvo a mediados de febrero que la iniciativa de la Alianza de Civilizaciones es un "inmenso disparate" y pidió que se vuelva a la noción de Diálogo de Civilizaciones que propugnó el PP y el ex presidente del Gobierno, José María Aznar, en su última etapa de Gobierno.

   "Resulta chocante que el PSOE sea incapaz de reconocer, y más aún el Gobierno, el inmenso disparate de la Alianza de Civilizaciones. No es una iniciativa irresponsable y vacía como dicen algunos, sino una que tiene derivaciones y consecuencias potencialmente devastadoras", señaló entonces a Europa Press.

   El diputado del PP puntualizó que todo el mundo que ha apoyado la Alianza de Civilizaciones, caso de Estados Unidos hace un mes, ha apoyado una "cosa distinta" a la que está propiciando el Gobierno socialista, es decir, el Diálogo de Civilizaciones "que es lo que muchos han apoyado".

   "La Alianza, si se analiza con detenimiento, seriedad y rigor tiene como premisa la relativización de los derechos y libertades fundamentales, puesto que si uno se sienta a negociar la forja de una alianza con algunos actores importantes del mundo islámico, se da cuenta de unas premisas", hizo hincapié.

   De Arístegui expresó su deseo de que, además de hacer política de partido, los dirigentes socialistas hagan "un poquito de estudio histórico-filosófico de los temas y que además de tener ocurrencias con graves consecuencias a medio y largo plazo, sean capaces de hacer una reflexión un poco más que un viaje de Madrid a Nueva York para ver con qué frase con un poco gancho sale Zapatero de la ONU".



El PP tiene un «lobby» para desacreditar la Alianza de Civilizaciones

Miércoles, 29 de Marzo de 2006
El PP lleva a cabo un «fuerte lobby» en Washington para desacreditar ante las autoridades estadounidenses la iniciativa de la Alianza de Civilizaciones lanzada por el presidente del Gobierno, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, en septiembre del 2004, según confirmó el portavoz del PP en la Comisión de Asuntos Exteriores en el Congreso, Gustavo de Arístegui.

El diputado se entrevistó entre el 6 y 11 de marzo con senadores, congresistas y altos representantes del Gobierno de Bush. De Arístegui destacó su entrevista con el subsecretario de Estado para Asuntos Interamericanos, Thomas Shannon, uno de los responsables más próximos a Condoleezza Rice.

De Arístegui lamentó que en muchos foros se vea esta Alianza propugnada por Zapatero como «una ocurrencia vacía e inocua», cuando conlleva que ahora estos derechos y libertades sean «negociables, limitables en el tiempo y no universales». Y se preguntó por qué no denuncia la ejecución de más de 5.000 homosexuales en Irán.

Disparate

El responsable popular ya mantuvo a mediados de febrero que la iniciativa de la Alianza de Civilizaciones es un «inmenso disparate» y pidió que se vuelva a la noción de Diálogo de Civilizaciones que propugnó el PP y el ex presidente del Gobierno, José María Aznar, en su última etapa de Gobierno.

El diputado del PP puntualizó que todo el mundo que ha apoyado la Alianza de Civilizaciones, caso de Estados Unidos hace un mes, ha apoyado una «cosa distinta» a la que está propiciando el Gobierno socialista, es decir, el Diálogo de Civilizaciones «que es lo que muchos han apoyado».

«La Alianza, si se analiza con detenimiento, seriedad y rigor tiene como premisa la relativización de los derechos y libertades fundamentales, puesto que si uno se sienta a negociar la forja de una alianza con algunos actores importantes del mundo islámico, se da cuenta de unas premisas», hizo hincapié.

El dirigente popular expresó su deseo de que, además de hacer política de partido, los dirigentes socialistas hagan «un poquito de estudio histórico-filosófico de los temas y que además de tener ocurrencias con graves consecuencias a medio y largo plazo, sean capaces de hacer una reflexión un poco más que un viaje de Madrid a Nueva York para ver con qué frase con un poco gancho sale Zapatero de la ONU».
Secrétaire général
SG/SM/10390

www.un.org/News/fr-press/docs/2006/SGSM10390.doc.htm
L’ONU CONTINUE DE COMPTER SUR L’APPUI DE LA LIGUE DES ÉTATS ARABES POUR RÉGLER CERTAINS CONFLITS, DÉCLARE KOFI ANNAN AU SOMMET DE KHARTOUM

NATIONS UNIES- Département de l’information • Service des informations et des accréditations • New York
 
28/03/2006

Vous trouverez ci-après le texte du message du Secrétaire général de l’ONU, M. Kofi Annan, adressé au Sommet de la Ligue des États arabes, et lu par le Secrétaire général adjoint aux affaires politiques, M. Ibrahim Gambari, le 28 mars à Khartoum, au Soudan:

Je présente mes sincères salutations à tous ceux qui sont à Khartoum pour le sommet de la Ligue des États arabes.

Votre réunion a pour toile de fond les troubles qui continuent de secouer le monde arabe et la région avoisinante, et donc d’énormes défis pour les dirigeants politiques que vous êtes, votre organisation et la communauté internationale.

En Iraq, les principaux objectifs de la transition ont été atteints, mais la situation reste instable et dangereuse.  Avec l’acte innommable qui a détruit le mausolée de Samarra le mois dernier, le danger de la violence sectaire n’a fait que grandir.  L’Organisation des Nations Unies continue de penser que c’est un processus politique transparent et sans exclusive qui aura le plus de chances de conduire à des progrès sur les plans de la sécurité, des droits de l’homme, de la démocratie et des conditions de vie.  Tous les intéressés doivent donc faire rapidement le nécessaire pour qu’un gouvernement n’excluant aucune des parties soit formé.  L’ONU continuera de promouvoir le dialogue intercommunautaire et d’appuyer le processus de révision de la constitution, ainsi que l’initiative qu’a prise la Ligue arabe de convoquer une Conférence de réconciliation nationale iraquienne, autant d’éléments propres à favoriser un consensus national.  Si les circonstances le permettent, nous continuerons aussi de contribuer à l’effort de reconstruction et de développement économique.  L’intégration de l’Iraq dans la région au sens large est une autre priorité.  Certains pays voisins sont légitimement inquiets de la violence et de l’instabilité qui règnent actuellement, mais ils doivent s’abstenir de toute ingérence dans les affaires intérieures du pays et respecter son unité et son intégrité territoriale.

Le conflit israélo-palestinien est également parvenu à un stade critique.  Je respecte la décision que le peuple palestinien a prise lors des élections parlementaires de janvier, dont le bon déroulement fait honneur à la démocratie palestinienne.  J’espère que le nouveau gouvernement dans le territoire occupé tiendra compte du fait que les Palestiniens aspirent à la paix et au statut d’État, comme l’a dit le Président Abbas avec tant d’éloquence.  Si le nouveau cabinet palestinien adhère à l’Initiative de paix arabe, on pourra s’en féliciter comme d’un premier pas vers la confirmation de l’attachement palestinien au principe de la non-violence, la reconnaissance du fait qu’Israël a le droit d’exister et l’acceptation des accords et obligations souscrits antérieurement, notamment la Feuille de route.  Tout comme le Quatuor et le Conseil de sécurité ont récemment réaffirmé l’importance de ces principes, nous devons rappeler à Israël, qui poursuit sa politique du fait accompli, que la paix ne peut être imposée unilatéralement, ni s’établir durablement si elle ne s’inscrit pas dans le cadre régional du processus de paix au Moyen-Orient.  Si l’objectif demeure la coexistence de deux États –et il le faut– les deux parties doivent rester fermes quant aux principes régissant cette solution et aux moyens d’y parvenir. 

Pour sa part, l’ONU poursuivra l’action qu’elle mène pour qu’il soit mis un terme à l’occupation qui dure depuis 1967 et que le conflit soit réglé conformément aux résolutions du Conseil de sécurité.  Tant que cet objectif n’aura pas été atteint, l’Organisation continuera de s’acquitter des mandats que les États Membres lui ont confiés pour qu’elle vienne en aide au peuple palestinien.  Nous constituons des dossiers détaillés sur les bouclages de Gaza et de la Cisjordanie, qui sont la cause de graves difficultés et de profondes humiliations, et nous continuerons d’insister pour qu’ils cessent.  Nous rappellerons à tous nos partenaires que le peuple palestinien ne doit pas être puni pour la façon dont il exerce ses droits démocratiques et que ses précieuses institutions sont les fondations sur lesquelles pourra être bâti un État palestinien auquel il soit possible de vivre en paix avec Israël, sans que celui-ci ait à craindre pour sa sécurité, et avec tous ses voisins. 

Le Liban aussi se trouve à la croisée des chemins.  La Ligue arabe et d’autres acteurs régionaux ont fait œuvre utile en l’aidant à s’extraire de la guerre civile et à sortir d’une période extrêmement sombre.  Aujourd’hui, ses amis et ses voisins doivent l’aider à asseoir son indépendance et sa souveraineté.  J’engage tous les intéressés à soutenir le programme de réforme du Premier Ministre Siniora et le dialogue national qui vient d’être entamé.  Les rapports entre le Liban et la Syrie seront déterminants, et j’engage les deux pays à cultiver des relations productives et amicales fondées sur des assurances mutuelles explicites concernant le respect de leur souveraineté, de leur sécurité et de leur indépendance.  L’ONU est prête à leur apporter toute l’assistance qu’ils jugeront bon de demander.  Par ailleurs, elle poursuit l’enquête sur l’assassinat de l’ancien Premier Ministre Hariri et a eu des échanges avec les autorités libanaises au sujet de leurs enquêtes concernant d’autres assassinats et tentatives d’assassinat récemment commis sur les personnes de hauts responsables politiques.  Enfin, elle examine avec ces autorités l’assistance dont le pays aurait besoin pour mettre sur pied un tribunal de caractère international chargé de juger les personnes impliquées dans l’assassinat de M. Hariri.

La Somalie reste aux prises avec la violence, l’insuffisance des structures de gouvernement et l’absence de consensus national quant à l’avenir.  Les dirigeants des institutions fédérales de transition ont beaucoup de mérite d’avoir réussi à ce que la session parlementaire du mois dernier se tienne malgré des circonstances extrêmement difficiles.  Les Somaliens doivent entretenir la dynamique en mettant particulièrement l’accent sur l’amélioration des conditions de sécurité.  Tant que la force sera le moyen de régler les différends ou d’atteindre des objectifs politiques, les progrès resteront fragiles et le pays ne pourra se relever.  L’ONU continuera d’appuyer le processus de transition sur les plans politique, moral et matériel et j’espère que les États arabes rechercheront activement des possibilités d’offrir eux aussi des secours humanitaires et une aide au développement. 

Ici au Soudan, certain aspect de la situation restent profondément préoccupants.  Depuis que l’Accord de paix global a été signé, en janvier 2005, les parties ont pris des mesures importantes pour l’appliquer.  Mais sur plusieurs points, ces mesures ont été décevantes.  Au Darfour, les massacres, les viols et les déplacements se poursuivent sans relâche, et les conditions de sécurité ont empiré à cause des combats à la frontière entre les troupes tchadiennes et l’opposition armée tchadienne.  Je suis heureux que l’Union africaine, qui a fait de vaillants efforts, ait donné son accord de principe pour qu’une opération des Nations Unies succède à sa mission au Soudan, dans le cadre d’un partenariat entre les deux organisations.  Et je tiens à souligner qu’il s’agit de tirer parti de la mission de l’Union africaine pour créer une opération des Nations Unies plus grande et plus mobile.  Pour que la transition se passe bien, il faudra je crois qu’une grande partie du personnel de l’Union africaine soit absorbé par la force des Nations Unies.  Nous devons donc nous concentrer prioritairement sur notre principal objectif: protéger la population et permettre au personnel humanitaire de faire son travail.  Et nous devons faire pression sur les parties aux Pourparlers de paix intersoudanais d’Abuja, dont les progrès sont excessivement lents, pour qu’elles parviennent sans plus tarder à un accord, notamment sur un cessez-le-feu effectivement applicable.  Enfin, nous devons étoffer la force de l’Union africaine, même au stade actuel des choses, car ceux qui souffrent ne peuvent attendre la transition, et faire tout ce que nous pouvons d’autre pour éviter que la situation n’empire encore.

Les troubles ne sont pas circonscrits à certains pays ou à des crises politiques précises.  Ces derniers mois, suite à la publication de dessins représentant le prophète Mohamed que beaucoup ont trouvé profondément insultants, le clivage déjà inquiétant entre groupes et nations de convictions et de cultures différentes a semblé s’accentuer encore.  L’initiative intitulée « Alliance des civilisations », que j’ai lancée avec l’appui de l’Espagne et de la Turquie, a pour but de mobiliser un effort concerté de part la communauté internationale – gouvernements et société civile confondus – afin de réduire les fractures, de combattre l’extrémisme et de surmonter les préjugés, les idées fausses et les intransigeances qui menacent la paix dans le monde.  Je suis heureux que l’ONU et la Ligue arabe aient réussi à trouver un terrain d’entente lorsqu’il s’agissait de réagir à certaines crises récentes, et j’espère que vous soutiendrez sans réserve cette initiative plus étendue. 

Enfin, je tiens à vous remercier d’appuyer la réforme de l’Organisation des Nations Unies.  Des dispositions importantes ont été prises pour mettre en œuvre le document final du Sommet mondial de septembre dernier, auquel beaucoup d’entre vous ont participé.  Nous disposons à présent d’une Commission de consolidation de la paix, d’un Fonds pour la démocratie, d’un fonds d’intervention pour les urgences humanitaires nettement amélioré et, désormais, d’un Conseil des droits de l’homme, dont les membres seront élus le 9 mai et qui se réunira pour la première fois le 19 juin.  Nous avons aussi dans le texte issu du Sommet une magnifique déclaration de l’intention des États de mener « en temps voulu une action collective résolue, par l’entremise du Conseil de sécurité » pour protéger les populations si leur gouvernement ne le fait pas.  Je viens enfin de saisir les États Membres d’une nouvelle série de propositions visant à moderniser la gestion de l’Organisation.  Mais tous ces changements ne porteront leurs fruits que si les États Membres s’engagent véritablement à les rendre effectifs et à donner à l’ONU les moyens de changer réellement la vie de ceux qui, partout dans le monde, ont besoin d’elle et attendent son aide.

Sur tous ces plans, je continuerai de compter sur votre appui dans les mois à venir.  Et dans l’esprit de ce partenariat, je souhaite sincèrement que votre sommet soit une réussite.


Annan à Zapatero : « l'Alliance des civilisations est plus nécessaire que jamais »

6 avril 2006 En visite en Espagne, Kofi Annan, Secrétaire général des Nations Unies a rencontré le Premier ministre espagnol, José Luis Zapatero. Il a salué l'Alliance des civilisations, groupe de Haut Niveau mis en place sous l'égide de l'ONU après proposition conjointe de la Turquie et de l'Espagne.

Ce groupe de travail, qui doit faire des propositions dans un an, « doit contribuer à rapprocher les civilisations occidentales et islamiques, ce qui est le défi d'aujourd'hui » a souligné José Luis Zapatero au cours de la conférence de presse qui a suivi la rencontre. « Les développements de ces derniers mois ont montré clairement qu'il nous faut améliorer le dialogue des civilisations et que cette initiative ne pouvait venir à un meilleur moment » a renchéri Kofi Annan.

José Luis Zapatero a par ailleurs annoncé l'augmentation importante des contributions volontaires de son pays aux différents programmes des Nations Unies.

Au total, l'Espagne va augmenter ses contributions de quelque 100 millions d'euros, les augmentations allant pour chacun des programmes de 50 à 100 %. « Cet engagement vise à donner à l'Espagne la place qui convient à la huitième puissance économique du monde » a-t-il souligné.

Les deux hommes ont également évoqué le Sahara occidental. Le Premier ministre espagnol a rappelé sa disponibilité dans cette « délicate mission ».

Le Secrétaire général, qui doit remettre ce mois-ci un rapport au Conseil de sécurité sur la question a rappelé qu'il a rencontré la semaine dernière à New York le leader du Front Polisario.

« Le Conseil de sécurité devra être prudent : il faut dégager une solution qui soit applicable par les deux parties sans imposer quoique ce soit, car il n'est pas en position d'imposer », a-t-il ajouté.

http://www.un.org/apps/newsFr/storyF.asp?NewsID=12166&Cr=annan&Cr1=


Parlement Européen
TV 5 Monde (Communiqués de presse) - Paris,France
... M. Borrell a expliqué que « notre but est d'établir une « alliance des civilisations »


Les Présidents J.Borrell (PE) et F.Mebazaa (Chambre des députés tunisienne)
La session plénière de l'Assemblée parlementaire euroméditerranéenne (APEM) s'est tenue, cette semaine, à Bruxelles. Les députés de 35 pays ont abordé les questions d'intérêt commun aux deux rives de la Méditerranée : le processus de paix israélo-palestinien, la liberté d'expression, le respect des croyances religieuses et le développement. Cette session a marqué la fin de la présidence de l'Assemblée par le Parlement européen.

Lors de la réunion, Josep Borrell, le Président du Parlement européen, a déclaré qu'il « ne comprenait toujours pas toutes les complexités de la Méditerranée qui concentre tous les problèmes de l'humanité ». Mais, il est « plus que jamais convaincu que les relations de l'Europe avec le monde musulman constituent le défi majeur auquel l'Europe sera confrontée dans les années qui viennent », expliquant que la région méditerranéenne est d'une part « très dynamique » et d'autre part « devient de plus en plus fragile ».

Important forum de discussion

L'APEM fait partie du processus de Barcelone, qui a été lancé en 1995, et elle envisage de jouer un rôle important dans le rapprochement des citoyens des deux rives de la Méditerranée. Son objectif est de remplacer une atmosphère de confrontation par une atmosphère de dialogue. Elle constitue un important forum de discussion approfondie, et offre, peut-être, aux représentants palestiniens et israéliens, la seule opportunité de se rencontrer sur un pied d'égalité. Forte de ses 240 membres, l'APEM réunit des députés du Parlement européen, des parlements nationaux de l'UE et des parlements des 10 pays partenaires de l'UE autour de la Méditerranée (Algérie, Égypte, Israël, Liban, Jordanie, Maroc, Autorité palestinienne, Syrie, Tunisie et Turquie).

M. Borrell a expliqué que « notre but est d'établir une « alliance des civilisations » au moment même où certains tentent de promouvoir une « confrontation des civilisations ». La création de la « Fondation euroméditerranéenne Anna Lindt pour le dialogue entre les cultures » est un exemple d'action importante dans ce sens. Cette fondation encourage le dialogue entre les cultures et contribue à la visibilité du partenariat euroméditerranéen, par des échanges intellectuels, culturels et de la société civile.

La crise des caricatures

Lorsque la crise relative aux caricatures danoises du prophète Mahomet a éclaté, le comité exécutif de l'APEM fut le premier organe conjoint européen et arabe à s'exprimer sur le sujet d'une seule voix. L'APEM a vivement condamné, cette semaine, « toute offense aux valeurs religieuses » et a demandé aux gouvernements de « garantir le respect des croyances religieuses (...) et d'encourager les valeurs de tolérance, de liberté et de diversité des cultures ». Dans le même temps, elle a fait valoir que la liberté d'expression constituait une composante essentielle d'une société démocratique, pluraliste, tolérante et ouverte.

Le processus de paix israélo-palestinien

Le conflit israélo-palestinien est un autre sujet clé de la coopération euroméditerranéenne. La déclaration finale de l'APEM demande à la future Autorité palestinienne de respecter la Déclaration Beyrouth 2002 de la Ligue arabe qui appelle à la paix avec Israël. Les parlementaires d'Euromed ont appelé les Palestiniens et les Israéliens à tenir les engagements qu'ils ont pris et à poursuivre le processus de paix. L'APEM a affirmé qu'elle s'efforcera de « maintenir et de renforcer le dialogue israélo-palestinien », en son sein.

Président de l'APEM depuis mars 2005, Josep Borrell transmet maintenant la présidence à Fouad Mebazaa, Président de l'Assemblée nationale tunisienne. La prochaine réunion aura lieu à Tunis. « J'espère que ce sera une opportunité pour continuer à développer nos idées sur les principes de base qui sous-tendent le futur des relations euroméditerranéennes », a déclaré M. Borrell.