Pope - Islamic World Crisis (3)
September 2006
News Update (3) - English, Turkish, Spanish, French
Hectic Schedule Lined Up for Turkish Foreign Minister Gül in New York
Sunday, September 17, 2006 ANKARA - Turkish
Daily News
Foreign Minister Abdullah Gül will apparently have a busy schedule in New
York, where he will represent Turkey at the 61st U.N. General Assembly,
as he is scheduled to have talks with several leaders on the sidelines of the
annual gathering.
Gül will depart today to participate in the assembly, which will open on
Tuesday, the Foreign Ministry announced in a written statement late on Friday.
He will deliver a speech at the assembly on Friday where he will explain
Turkey's views regarding the international agenda.
Among the names on Gül's New York list are U.N. Secretary-General Kofi
Annan; Kemal Derviş, head of the U.N. Development Program (UNDP); Ekmeleddin
İhsanoğlu, secretary-general of the Organization of the Islamic Conference
(OIC); and Amr Moussa, secretary-general of the Arab League.
Gül will also hold talks with his counterparts from more than 40
countries, including U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and
ministers of the European Union member countries.
The Cyprus issue and Turkey's firm policy towards lifting the
international isolation of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (KKTC)
are expected to top the agenda of talks between Gül and Annan.
The annual gathering in New York will also offer an opportunity for Gül
to seek support for Ankara's bid for a temporary seat on the U.N. Security
Council.
Turkey has already managed to garner support from some 80 countries for
its bid to secure a two-year seat for 2009-2010. The election of new members
to the 15-nation Security Council will be held during the autumn session of
the U.N. General Assembly in 2008. If elected, this will be the first time
Turkey has taken a seat on the council since 1961.
Upon Ankara's request, the U.N. headquarters will also host meeting
between the foreign ministers of the countries neighboring Iraq. Gül
will head this meeting as well as a Jammu-Kashmir contact group. Gül,
together with his Spanish counterpart, Miguel Angel Moratinos, will host a
breakfast meeting within the framework of the U.N.-led Alliance of
Civilizations -- co-sponsored by Turkey and Spain. Following this meeting,
the two ministers will hold trilateral talks with Annan. On Sept. 23, Gül will
attend the second Meskhetian Turks Festival in Philadelphia.
He will later travel to Washington, D.C., to accompany Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who is scheduled to kick off an official visit
to the United States on Sept. 29.
Turkey trip seen as chance for Pope to make amends
By Gareth Jones Reuters Monday, September 18, 2006
ANKARA (Reuters) - Pope Benedict should use a planned trip to Turkey
in November to rebuild ties with the Muslim world, badly strained by his
comments that portrayed Islam as a religion tainted by violence, analysts
say.
Some say Benedict should even rethink his opposition to Turkish
membership of the European Union as a way of helping to narrow the gap
between the Western and Islamic worlds and thus reducing the risk of a
"clash of civilizations."
Benedict is due to make his first trip as Pope to a Muslim land on
November 28-30. Ankara has said it wants the trip to go ahead despite Muslim
anger that has only partially been quelled by the Pope's expressions of
regret over the hurt he has caused.
"It is better that he come. It can help repair relations. The fact that
he will be in Turkey can help Muslims see he is a man of goodwill," said
Mehmet Dulger, head of the Turkish parliament's foreign affairs committee.
Dogu Ergil of Ankara University echoed this view.
"His trip will provide a window of opportunity to rephrase what he said,
to show that he does not accept the negative stereotypes of Islam often
found in the Western world," he said.
Even before his latest remarks on Islam, Turks were distrustful of
Benedict, who before becoming Pope said Turkey as a non-Christian country
would not fit into the EU.
"The Pope should come here but he should give a message that he now
supports Turkey's efforts to join the European Union," said Cengiz Aktar of
Istanbul's Bahcesehir University.
"He should make clear he sees this bid as part of the answer to the
'clash of civilizations'," he said, referring to U.S. scholar Samuel
Huntington's best-selling book. But Aktar added he was not optimistic the
Pope would make such a gesture.
Ankara began EU entry talks last year but is not expected to join for
many years, if ever. Support for the EU has fallen in Turkey amid a feeling
that the bloc is making too many demands and that it does not really want to
admit a Muslim country.
Hasan Unal of Ankara's Bilkent University said it was telling that EU
politicians opposed to Turkey's EU membership, such as German Chancellor
Angela Merkel, had rushed to defend the Pope in the present row.
PROTESTS
Benedict's visit is expected to trigger protests by Turkish nationalists
and Islamists long distrustful of the Vatican and now fearful his comments
herald a new Christian "crusade."
"Official Turkey cannot afford to disinvite the Pope, but the government
will not stop popular protests that will help to show that his thinking
about Islam is unacceptable in this part of the world," said Ankara
University's Ergil.
In his lecture, Benedict quoted remarks by a 14th century Byzantine
emperor -- ruling from modern-day Istanbul -- that everything the Prophet
Mohammad had brought was evil.
Underlining Turks' anger, the state Anatolian news agency reported on
Monday that a Turkish citizen in the western town of Bursa had asked state
prosecutors to investigate the Pope's remarks and possibly to file charges.
Independent member of parliament Emin Sirin, a nationalist, told Reuters
the Pope should definitely cancel his trip.
"I am ashamed to see a Pope in the 21st century express views reminiscent
of the 14th century ... Hizbollah, Hamas, (Iranian President Mahmoud)
Ahmadinejad could not find a better ally than this Pope for the
radicalization of Islam," he said.
Pope Sorry About Muslim Reaction, Urges
Dialogue
By REUTERS September 17, 2006
VATICAN CITY, Sept 17 (Reuters) - Pope Benedict said on Sunday he was
"deeply sorry" at the anger caused by his remarks on Islam and said a quote
he used from a medieval text about holy wars did not reflect his personal
thoughts.
"...I am deeply sorry for the reactions in some countries to a
few passages of my address at the University of Regensburg, which were
considered offensive to the sensibility of Muslims," he told pilgrims at his
Castelgandolfo summer residence.
"These in fact were a quotation from a medieval text, which do not in any
way express my personal thought. I hope this serves to appease hearts and to
clarify the true meaning of my address, which in its totality was and is an
invitation to frank and sincere dialogue, with mutual respect," he said.
Western press declares
Pope’s visit to Turkey in danger
Following Pope Benedict XVI’s controversial remark about “historical Muslim
violence”, the Catholic leader’s planned 2006 visit to Turkey was brought to
the agenda at a press conference yesterday by western journalists with
questions about whether the visit would still take place.
Ali Bardakoğlu, the Director of
Religious affairs in Turkey, called the Pope’s remarks “insolent” and demanded
a formal apology, which received vast coverage across the foreign press. A
Justice and Development Party member, Salih Kapusuz, likened the Pope to
Hitler and Mussolini.
Pope Benedict XVI’s remarks incited protest from India to
Syria, Egypt to Indonesia.
September 18, 2006
www.hurriyet.com.tr/english/5096209.asp?gid=74
Muslim Turkey Rules Out
Canceling Pope's Visit, Anatolia Says
By Mark Bentley
Sept. 17 (Bloomberg) -- The Turkish government said a visit by Pope
Benedict XVI to Turkey in November will proceed as planned, describing the
pontiff's remarks about Islam as ``unfortunate,'' the state-run Anatolia
news agency reported.
Canceling the pope's trip to Turkey on Nov. 28, the first by a leader
of the Roman Catholic Church in more than 25 years, is ``out of the
question,'' Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul said in Ankara today,
according to Anatolia.
The pope today apologized in person for causing offense to Muslims with
comments he made in a university lecture implicitly linking Islam to
violence. He made the apology during the traditional Angelus blessing, his
first public appearance since the Sept. 12 speech in Germany that led to
protests worldwide from Muslim groups.
Joseph Ratzinger before he was elected pope in April last year opposed
Turkey's membership of the European Union, saying the nation belongs to
another continent. Membership talks began on Oct. 3 last year. Turkey's
supporters in the EU say its accession is needed to help prevent a clash
of civilizations.
For Anatolia's Web site see
http://www.anadoluajansi.com.tr
Vatıcan's striking report
on Turkey: There is no secularism in Turkey!
"Religious affairs and state affairs are not entirely separate from one
another" says the report of official historian of Vatican says in his
report.
As
Pope Benedict XVI.'s words are being discussed and his possible visit is
on the hot issue; Giovanni Sale, the official historian of Vatican, has
presented his report on Turkey which is full of striking claims and
statements.
The name of the report is "Christians in the Ottoman Empire and Modern
Turkish Republic". It was prepared upon the request of the Prime-Ministry
of Vatican to-be-presented to Pope, following the murder of the priest
Santoro in Trabzon.
In the section titled "From Atatürk to Erdoğan: Modern Turkey", it is
remarked that, Turkey, "claiming to be a secular Republic, has, in fact,
an ambiguity of the political and religious affairs". The report
emphasizes that "the secularism model imitated from France has nothing to
do with the liberal doctrine and enlightment". As for Atatürk, it is
mentioned that "he eliminated the religious affairs from the public
affairs and he took the religious affairs under the state control, in the
process of transforming Turkey into a secular country, unlikely from
Europe, which separated the authorities of the religious and political
powers". Moreover, it is remarked that, "more fund is dedicated to the
budget of Religious Affairs Directorate than the Ministry of Industry".
Publish Date: 17.09.2006
http://english.sabah.com.tr/A824DE3C51BF419AB6DC944F1B7E8935.html
The rituals of the “clash of civilisations” are by now well established.
Somebody somewhere in the west “insults Islam” – Salman Rushdie writes a
book; a Danish paper publishes a cartoon; the Pope makes a speech – and
the demonstrators take to the streets. What better way to prove that
Islam is a religion of peace than to burn the Pope in effigy?
For
years, secular, westernised Turkey was regarded as largely immune from
this sort of zealotry. But some of the fiercest reaction to the Pope’s
recent speech came from Turkey. Before the pontiff issued his apology,
Salih Kapusuz, the deputy leader of the ruling AKP party, likened him to
Hitler and Mussolini.
This is ominous – and not just because the Pope is due to visit
Turkey in November. For those politicians who are struggling to improve
relations between Islam and the west, Turkey has long been the great
hope – the demonstration that a largely Muslim country can also be
secular, democratic and at ease with the west.
As a result, Turkey’s bid to join the European Union has taken on
iconic status. President George W. Bush has said that including Turkey
in the EU would “be a crucial advance in relations between the Muslim
world and the west”. Leading Turkish politicians often make the same
argument. But Turkey’s bid to join the EU is in trouble. A dispute over
its relations with Cyprus – now a member of the Union – is threatening
to escalate to the point where EU negotiations are suspended. Olli Rehn,
the European commissioner charged with overseeing the whole process, has
talked of the possibility of a “train wreck” later this year.
Even if Turkish and EU leaders somehow manage to finesse the Cyprus
question, the Turkish effort to join the Union will still be in deep
trouble. The EU is suffering from “enlargement fatigue” and cannot
summon up much enthusiasm for admitting a very large, relatively poor
Muslim nation – most of whose land mass is in Asia. At a time when the
integration of Muslims into western Europe is highly sensitive, the idea
of allowing free movement of people from Turkey is a tough sell. All 25
EU countries must agree to let Turkey in. But in the most recent
Euro-barometer opinion polls, 15 of 25 current EU members were opposed
to the idea.
This souring within the EU has provoked a counter-reaction. Many
Turks feel angry and humiliated when a leading politician such as
France’s Nicolas Sarkozy declares that they can never be members of the
EU. Even pro-European Turks complain that they are being asked to make
painful concessions over issues such as Cyprus, as part of a
“negotiation process” that looks increasingly like a charade. In Turkey,
where support for EU membership was running at more than 70 per cent
three years ago, it is now down below 50 per cent in some polls.
Given this mutual disillusionment, might it be sensible to call the
whole thing off? It is arguable that Turkey’s application to join the EU
is now actually proving counter-productive because it is forcing the two
sides to confront each other in ways that stir up public opinion.
Perhaps they should just accept that Turkey is never going to join the
EU – and strive for the kind of “privileged partnership” that Angela
Merkel, the German chancellor, and others have sometimes spoken of.
The idea that Turkey’s secular pro-western orientation is dependent
on the country’s application to join the EU is certainly debatable.
After all, Turkey’s decisive turn towards the west took place in the
1920s – long before the EU was even established. The country’s economy
is growing quickly. It is already a member of important western clubs
such as Nato. Does so much really hang on Turkey’s bid to join the EU?
Many Turkish and European observers argue passionately that it does.
Islamism and anti-western sentiment are gaining ground both in Turkish
politics and in society at large. More women are wearing headscarves and
public opinion is far from immune to the radicalism that is sweeping
large parts of the Islamic world. The “transatlantic trends” opinion
poll, published this month, showed that Iran is now more than twice as
popular in Turkey as the US. Last year, a Turkish translation of
Mein Kampf made the bestseller lists.
The AKP government is often described as “mildly Islamist”. But some
western diplomats worry that “rejection by Europe” would encourage the
government to turn towards the Arab world in foreign policy and to
pursue a more radical form of Islamism at home. That, in turn, might
provoke a coup by a military that regards itself as the guarantor of
Turkish secularism.
A stress on Turkey’s potential instability cuts both ways. It might
encourage European leaders to keep talking, but it will not necessarily
make the country a more attractive long-term partner for the EU. It is
like telling a man: “Your fiancée is on the point of madness, you must
marry her immediately or she will have a nervous breakdown.” A chap
might justifiably hesitate at the altar.
The political logic, therefore, points to a long engagement. Even if
Turkey never joins the EU, the application process is already acting as
a spur to economic and political reforms that are making Turkey a freer
and richer society. Restrictions on freedom of speech are being eased,
minority rights are being strengthened, government finances are
improving. “None of this is irreversible yet,” pleads a western
diplomat, “but in a few years it will be.” Some suggest that even if
Turkey never joins the EU, the application process will be crucial in
transforming the country.
It is a sophisticated argument – perhaps a little too sophisticated.
It is equally possible to argue that the longer the whole process is
spun out, the more bitter the disillusionment will be when it comes to
an end. How would Turks feel if, after a decade-long negotiation, their
membership was blocked by the promised referendums in France and
Austria? And surely it will ultimately be deep social forces within
Turkey that determine the country’s relationship with Islam – rather
than any external constraint from Brussels?
A better reason to press ahead is that it is simply too soon for
pro-European Turks to despair. There is no guarantee their application
will end in success; but equally there is no guarantee it will end in
failure. As long as the Turkish government sincerely believes it is in
the country’s interests to pursue EU membership, it is in Europe’s
interests to keep talking.
For his blog, go to
www.ft.com/rachmanblog
Comment on this column
Copyright The Financial Times Limited
2006
Financial Times: Türkiye’de
darbe olabilir! |
İngiltere'de
yayımlanan günlük ekonomi ve siyaset gazetesi Financial Times'ta çıkan "Boğaz'ın
kıyısında medeniyetler çatışması" başlıklı yazıda, "Türkiye'nin AB
başvurusunun garantisi olmayacağı belirtilirken, her an kendini laiklik
garantisi gören ordunun müdahale edebileceği yorumu yapıldı.
TÜRKİYE'DE ORDU MÜDAHALE EDEBİLİR!
Gazetede "buna karşılık kendini laikliğin garantisi olarak gören ordunun
müdahaleye kalkışabileceği" iddiasına da yer verdi.
"Türkiye'nin AB üyeliği hiçbir zaman gerçekleşmese bile, sürecin
Türkiye'de özgürlük ve zenginlikleri artıracağını" da kaydeden yazar,
sürecin başlı başına bir transformasyon yaratacağına dair görüşlere dikkat
çekti.
Gideon Rachman tarafından kaleme alınan makalede, "Türk hükümeti, AB
üyeliği hedefinin peşinden gitmenin ülke çıkarlarına uygun olduğunu
düşündüğü sürece, görüşmeleri sürdürmek Avrupa'nın çıkarına olacaktır"
görüşüne yer verildi.
Papa ile ilgili olarak ortaya çıkan sert eleştirilere dikkat çekerek
makalesine başlayan yazar, laik ve Batılı Türkiye'den de bu konuda sivri
açıklamalar çıktığını belirtti.
İslam ile Batı arasındaki ilişkileri geliştirmek isteyen siyasetçiler için
Türkiye'nin hep büyük bir umut oluşturduğuna işaret edilen yazıda, ABD
Başkanı George Bush'un da Türkiye'nin AB üyeliğinin İslam ile Batı
arasındaki ilişkilerin geliştirilmesinde önemli bir avantaj sağlayacağına
dikkati çektiği bildirildi.
Aynı yorumların Türk siyasetçiler tarafından da yapıldığı belirtilen
yazıda, "ancak Türkiye'nin AB sürecinin askıda olduğu” iddia edildi.
Kıbrıs meselesinin görüşmelerin askıya alınması riskini ortaya çıkardığı
öne sürülen yazıda, "Kıbrıs meselesi bir şekilde çözülse de Türkiye'nin
birliğe katılma çabası yine de sorunlarla boğulacak. Zira AB genişleme
sancıları çekiyor" denildi. 19 Eylül 2006
Pope seeks to calm anger of
Muslims
By Ian Fisher The New York Times / International
Herald Tribune MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2006
ROME Pope Benedict XVI sought
Sunday to extinguish days of anger and protest among Muslims by issuing an
extraordinary personal apology for remarks he made referring to Islam as "evil
and inhuman."
"I am deeply sorry for the reactions in some countries to a few passages of my
address," the 79-year-old pope told pilgrims at the summer papal palace,
Castel Gandolfo, under increased security, "which were considered offensive."
"These were in fact quotations from a medieval text, which do not in any way
express my personal thought," he said in Italian, according to the official
English translation. "The true meaning of my address in its totality was and
is an invitation to frank and sincere dialogue, with great mutual respect."
He made his apology amid much worry in the church about violence and any
erosion of the status of the papacy as a neutral figure for peace among
faiths. In Somalia on Sunday, the Italian Foreign Ministry reported, an
Italian nun was shot and killed. The day before, five churches were firebombed
in the West Bank and one in Iraq.
Church experts said it appeared to be the first time a pope had made such a
direct apology.
"This is really, really abnormal," said Alberto Melloni, professor of history
at the University of Modena who has written several books on the Vatican.
"It's never happened as far as I know."
Beyond the anger among Muslims, the comments have also provoked a complicated
debate in Italy and among Catholics, on issues including the fallibility of
the pope; whether he realized the reaction he would provoke; and whether the
pope's speeches, which he usually writes himself, are properly vetted by a
Vatican under bureaucratic transition.
For many conservatives, fearful of terror attacks in the name of Islam and
rising Muslim immigration in Europe, the remarks of the pope, despite his own
denial that he meant to criticize, amounted to a rare public discussion of a
sensitive question: whether, in fact, Islam is at the moment more prone to
violence.
Silvio Berlusconi, the former prime minister of Italy, said Saturday that the
comments amounted to "an opening, a positive provocation. And so for this
reason he is a great pope, with a great intelligence."
The pope made his own public apology after two other clarifications from
senior Vatican officials since the speech, which was delivered last Tuesday at
Regensburg University in Germany, where the pope used to teach theology. The
speech was largely a scholarly address criticizing the West for submitting
itself too much to reason and walling God out of science and philosophy.
But he began the speech by recounting a conversation on the truths of
Christianity and Islam that took place between a 14th-century Byzantine
Christian emperor, Manuel II Paleologus, and a Persian scholar.
"He said, I quote, 'Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there
you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by
the sword the faith he preached,'" the pope said.
He also briefly discussed the Islamic concept of jihad, which he defined as
"holy war," and said that violence in the name of religion was contrary to
God's nature and to reason.
At the same time, though without mentioning Islam specifically, he suggested
reason as the basis for "that genuine dialogue of cultures and religions so
urgently needed today."
In the speech, he did not say whether he agreed with the quotations he cited
about violence and Islam, but on Sunday he distanced himself from them.
It was not immediately clear whether this apology would tamp down the anger,
which recalled the furor this year after European newspapers published
cartoons unflattering to the Prophet Muhammad.
In Egypt, a senior member of the Muslim Brotherhood, which had criticized the
pope, initially said that the remarks represented a "good step toward an
apology." Later statements from the group, however, seemed to cast doubt on
whether it accepted the apology fully.
In Gaza, the Palestinian prime minister, Ismail Haniya, sought to tamp down
violence by denouncing attacks on a half dozen churches there and in the West
Bank. In Bethlehem, the birthplace of Jesus Christ and home to many Arab
Christians, police presence was higher than usual.
"The Christian brothers are a part of the Palestinian people, and I heard the
highest Christian authority in Palestine denouncing the statements against
Islam and against Muslims," Haniya told reporters.
Protest continued around the Muslim world Sunday.
In Iran, several hundred theological students were given the day off to
protest in Qum, the nation's center for religious study, as the Vatican envoy
in Teheran was summoned for official complaint about the remarks. Several
radical Iraqi groups posted threats on the Internet against the Vatican and
Christians generally.
In Mogadishu, the capital of the former Italian colony of Somalia, an Italian
nun died after being shot several times in an ambush in a hospital in which a
Somali bodyguard was also killed. It was unclear whether the attack was
retribution for the pope's remarks, though the Vatican issued a reaction.
The Reverend Federico Lombardi, the chief Vatican spokesman was quoted by the
ANSA news agency as calling the killing "horrible." "We hope it remains an
isolated incident," he said.
While anger remained high in Turkey, the nation's foreign minister, Abdullah
Gul said Sunday that he expected a trip Benedict planned there in November to
go ahead. But he called the pope's remarks "really regrettable."
The Vatican's new secretary of state, Cardinal Tarcisco Bertone, also said
Sunday that he expected the pope to visit Turkey. "For the time being, there
is no reason" why he should not, he told the ANSA news agency.
The furor, which has brought the first major crisis in Benedict's 17-month
papacy, has also set off a round of second guessing in the Vatican and among
church experts about exactly what happened.
First among the questions, which the pope denied Sunday, was whether he in
fact meant to make a statement about Islam and violence. Second was whether he
realized the extent of the reaction.
But what was more concrete, experts said, was that the issue raised questions
both about how the church operates under this new pope and to what extent his
statements are checked and balanced diplomatically, now that he is no longer
an academic but the leader of the world's one billion Roman Catholics.
Benedict is used to writing his own speeches, and several Vatican officials
said he had written the address given Tuesday, one of the most significant of
the papacy, by himself.
The officials, speaking privately because of the sensitivity of the issue,
said that there was concern in the Vatican before he delivered it, both about
the reaction and about how the press would portray the passages relating to
Islam.
That concern was relayed up the chain of command, the officials said, but it
is not clear if the pope heard it.
At a time when the Vatican has just changed its second-in-command and its
foreign minister, many experts also said that it does not have enough experts
on Islam to gauge reaction to any papal statements.
"They have nobody to really ask," said the Reverend Thomas Michel, secretary
for inter-religious dialogue for the Jesuit order of priests. "Whoever looked
at it and let that go through is someone who doesn't understand Muslims at
all."
In February, Benedict reassigned the Vatican's senior Arabist, Archbishop
Michael Fitzgerald, the head of inter-religious dialogue, to Cairo as the
Vatican envoy there.
The move was seen at the time as a sign of Benedict's skepticism about the
value of dialogue with Muslims.
"I think one may say, if it is not too impolite, that it is time to bring back
Monsignor Fitzgerald," said Melloni, the professor at the University of Modena.
Aide Says Pope 'Regrets' Comments on Islam
By Frances D'Emilio Associated Press Sunday, September 17,
2006; A18VATICAN CITY, Sept. 16 -- Pope Benedict XVI "sincerely
regrets" offending Muslims with his reference to an obscure medieval text
that characterizes some of the teachings of Islam's founder as "evil and
inhuman," a senior Vatican official said in a statement Saturday.
But the comment stopped short of the apology demanded by Islamic leaders
around the world, and anger among Muslims remained intense. Palestinians
attacked five churches in the West Bank and Gaza over the pope's remarks in
a speech Tuesday to university professors in his native Germany.
In a broader talk rejecting any religious motivation for violence,
Benedict cited the words of a 14th-century Byzantine emperor who
characterized some of the teachings of the prophet Muhammad as "evil and
inhuman," particularly "his command to spread by the sword the faith he
preached."
The pontiff did not endorse that description, but he did not question it,
and his words set off a firestorm of protests across the Muslim world.
The new Vatican secretary of state, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, said the
pope's position on Islam is unmistakably in line with Vatican teaching that
says the church "esteems" Muslims.
Benedict "thus sincerely regrets that certain passages of his address
could have sounded offensive to the sensitivities of the Muslim faithful and
should have been interpreted in a manner that in no way corresponds to his
intentions," Bertone said in the statement.
Bertone said the pontiff sought in his speech to condemn all religious
motivation for violence, "from whatever side it may come." But the pope's
words only appeared to fan outrage.
Bertone's statement, released by the Vatican press office, failed to
satisfy critics.
Mohammed Bishr, a senior member of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, said
the statement "was not an apology" but a "pretext that the pope was quoting
somebody else as saying so and so."
"We need the pope to admit the big mistake he has committed and then
agree on apologizing, because we will not accept others to apologize on his
behalf," Bishr said.
Morocco recalled its ambassador to the Vatican on Saturday to protest the
pope's "offensive" remarks, and Afghanistan's parliament and the Foreign
Ministry demanded that the pope apologize.
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan insisted the pope apologize,
saying he had spoken "not like a man of religion but like a usual
politician." Benedict plans to go to Turkey in November in what would be his
first papal visit to a Muslim nation.
Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I, spiritual leader of the world's 200
million Orthodox Christians, issued a statement saying he was "deeply"
saddened by the tensions sparked by the pope's comments.
"We have to show the determination and care not to hurt one another and
avoid situations where we may hurt each others' beliefs," the Istanbul-based
Patriarchate said.
In the West Bank, Palestinians used guns, firebombs and lighter fluid in
attacks on four churches, leaving church doors charred and walls scorched by
flames and pocked with bullet holes. Nobody was reported injured. A Greek
Orthodox church in Gaza City also was attacked.
A group calling itself "Lions of Monotheism" told The Associated Press by
phone that the attacks were a protest of the pope's remarks on Islam.
The grand sheik of Cairo's al-Azhar mosque, the Sunni Arab world's most
powerful institution, condemned the pope's remarks as "reflecting
ignorance."
Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, whose Southeast Asian
country has a large Muslim population, demanded that Benedict retract his
remarks and not "take lightly the spread of outrage that has been created."
Coptic Pope Shenouda III, head of Egypt's Coptic Orthodox Church,
criticized Benedict, saying, "Any remarks which offend Islam and Muslims are
against the teachings of Christ," according to the pro-government newspaper
al-Ahram.
British Muslims sought to calm the situation, praising the Vatican
statement on behalf of the pope.
"We welcome his apology and we hope now we can work together and build
bridges. At the same time we would condemn all forms of violent
demonstration," Muhammad Umar, chairman of Britain's Ramadhan Foundation, a
youth organization, told Sky News.
But Muhammad Abdul Bari, secretary general of the Muslim Council of
Britain, said the pontiff needed to repudiate the views of the emperor he
quoted in order to restore relations between Muslims and the Roman Catholic
Church.
Remarks by Pope Prompt Muslim Outrage, Protests
14th-Century Quote Refers to 'Evil' Islam
By Anthony Shadid Washington Post Foreign Service
Saturday, September 16, 2006; A01
BEIRUT, Sept. 15 -- A medieval reference in an academic lecture by Pope
Benedict XVI unleashed a wave of denunciations, outrage and frustration
across the Muslim world Friday, with officials in Turkey and Pakistan
condemning the pontiff, Islamic activist groups organizing protests and a
leading religious figure in Lebanon demanding that he personally
apologize.
The reception to the pope's speech in Germany on Tuesday was a reminder
of the precarious, suspicious state of affairs between a West that often
views Islam as a faith in need of reform and a Muslim world that feels
besieged in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Some of the criticism
evoked the Crusades; others accused the Vatican of joining a Western-led
war on Islam.
"We ask him to offer a personal apology -- not through his officials --
to Muslims for this false reading" of Islam, said Grand Ayatollah Mohammed
Hussein Fadlallah, one of the world's leading Shiite Muslim clerics, who
lives in Beirut.
The pope began his lecture at the University of Regensburg by quoting
from a 14th-century dialogue between the Byzantine emperor, Manuel II
Paleologos, and a Persian scholar. In a passage on the concept of holy
war, Benedict recited a passage of what he called "startling brusqueness,"
in which Manuel questioned the teachings of Islam's prophet, Muhammad.
"Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will
find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the
sword the faith he preached," Benedict quoted the emperor as saying.
The pope neither explicitly endorsed nor denounced the emperor's words,
but rather used them as a preface to a discussion of faith and reason. The
Vatican said the pope did not intend the remarks to be offensive to
Muslims.
"It was certainly not the intention of the Holy Father to undertake a
comprehensive study of the jihad and of Muslim ideas on the subject, still
less to offend the sensibilities of Muslim faithful," Vatican spokesman
Federico Lombardi told Vatican Radio.
But the reaction was quick, and though it was largely peaceful, it
evoked the storm of violent protests that erupted in most Muslim countries
after a Danish newspaper published a series of cartoons a year ago that
lampooned Muhammad. In some ways, the denunciations seemed even more
pronounced, given the pope's stature and authority over the world's 1.1
billion Roman Catholics.
Pakistan's parliament adopted a resolution Friday condemning the pope
for what it called derogatory comments and seeking an apology. The Foreign
Ministry summoned the Vatican's ambassador to express regret over
Benedict's remarks.
In Turkey, where Benedict planned to visit in November in his first
trip as pope to a Muslim country, the deputy leader of Turkish Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's Islamic-inspired party called Benedict's
remarks the result of ignorance or a provocation.
"He has a dark mentality that comes from the darkness of the Middle
Ages. He is a poor thing that has not benefited from the spirit of reform
in the Christian world," Salih Kapusuz told state media. "It looks like an
effort to revive the mentality of the Crusades."
Even the country's secularist opposition party demanded the pope
apologize before his visit to Turkey, which has long been one of the least
ostensibly religious of Muslim countries. News agencies reported that
another party led a demonstration outside the largest mosque in the
capital, Ankara, and about 50 people placed a black wreath outside the
Vatican's diplomatic mission.
About 100 people protested in Egypt, the Arab world's most populous
country, where demonstrators chanted, "Oh Crusaders, oh cowards! Down with
the pope!" Mohammed Sayed Tantawi, the sheik of al-Azhar University, a
leading seat of religious scholarship, said the pope's remarks indicated
"clear ignorance of Islam," and the Muslim Brotherhood, one of the Middle
East's largest and oldest Islamic groups, called on Muslim governments to
sever relations with the Vatican if the pope does not apologize.
Thousands of Palestinians protested Friday night in Gaza City after
Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, who belongs to the Islamic
Resistance Movement, or Hamas, said the pope's lecture had offended
Muslims everywhere.
"This is another Crusader war against the Arab and Muslim world,"
Ismail Radwan, a Hamas official, told the crowd.
The criticism of the pope's remarks was often twofold: at the reference
of the prophet Muhammad's legacy as "evil and inhuman" and at the idea
that Islam was spread by the sword. Much of the conversion that followed
the prophet's life in the 7th century was a gradual, centuries-long
process that left a remarkable degree of diversity -- albeit faded -- in
parts of the Muslim world.
In Iraq, where religious differences have fueled much of the country's
crippling violence, a Catholic representative warned that the pope's
remarks were being distorted to "sow a crisis of chaos and enmity between
the one family of Christians and Muslims."
A statement posted at mosques in Anbar province, a center of the
insurgency, warned that a previously unknown group would begin killing
Iraqi Christians in three days unless the pope apologized. In Basra, a
bomb exploded at the Assyrian Catholic Church on Friday evening, causing
damage but no injuries, according to a church leader who said the attack
stemmed from the pope's remarks.
Across Iraq's sectarian Sunni-Shiite Muslim divide, clerics called the
remarks another campaign against Islam. "Last year, and in the same month,
the Danish cartoons assaulted Islam," Sheik Salah al-Ubaidi, a
representative of Moqtada al-Sadr's radical Shiite movement, said in the
group's stronghold of Kufa.
Special correspondent Saad Sarhan in Najaf, Iraq, contributed to
this report.
Vatican Says Pope Benedict Regrets
Offending Muslims
ROME, Sept. 16 — A top
Vatican official said Saturday that Pope Benedict XVI “deeply
regretted” that a speech he made this week “sounded offensive to the
sensibility of Muslim believers.”
The statement, by Cardinal Tarcisio
Bertone, the new Vatican secretary of state, was made as denunciations
from Muslim leaders over the speech continued for a third day around the
world.
And in the West Bank town of Nablus on Saturday, a day after street
protests and grenades were thrown at a church in the Gaza Strip, two
churches were lightly damaged in fire bombings. A group calling itself the
“Lions of Monotheism” said the attacks were in reaction to the pope’s
remarks.
The Vatican statement stopped short of the direct personal apology from
Benedict that many Muslims have been demanding. Still, the statement tried
to tamp down rising anger among Muslims about the speech, in which
Benedict quoted a 14th-century Byzantine emperor as calling Islam “evil
and inhuman.”
Cardinal Bertone, named the second-in-command at the Vatican on Friday,
said that the pope’s comments had been interpreted in a way that
“absolutely did not correspond to his intentions.” He said that Benedict,
whose stance on Islam has generally been more skeptical than that of his
predecessor,
John Paul II, respected Islam and believed strongly in dialogue among
faiths.
The quotations, Cardinal Bertone said, were part of a scholarly address
aimed at refuting a “religious motivation for violence, no matter where it
comes from.”
On Tuesday, at Regensburg University in Germany, Benedict delivered a
long, scholarly address on reason and faith in the West. But he began his
speech by recounting a conversation on the truths of Christianity and
Islam that took place between a 14th-century Byzantine Christian emperor,
Manuel II Paleologus, and a Persian scholar.
“The emperor comes to speak about the issue of jihad, holy war,” the
pope said.
“He said, I quote, ‘Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new,
and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command
to spread by the sword the faith he preached,’ ” the pope said.
While making clear that he was quoting someone else, Benedict did not
say whether he agreed or not. He also briefly discussed the Islamic
concept of jihad, which he defined as “holy war,” and said that violence
in the name of religion is contrary to God’s nature and to reason.
He also suggested reason as the basis for “that genuine dialogue of
cultures and religions so urgently needed today.”
Nonetheless, Muslims around the world called the speech provocative,
especially coming from the leader of the world’s billion Roman Catholics.
In Jordan, the state-owned daily newspaper Al Rai said called the
pope’s statements “shocking.” It said the pope should apologize “so as to
ease the fears of Muslims who sense they are becoming the target of an
orchestrated campaign.”
Prime Minister
Nuri Kamal al-Maliki of
Iraq called on Iraqis to refrain from violent protest over the
remarks, urging people not to “carry out actions that will harm our
Christian brothers here,” according to his spokesman, Ali Dabbagh.
Mr. Dabbagh said he had heard only one unofficial and unconfirmed
report of any violence in Iraq related to anger over the pope’s comments.
That episode involved a church in Basra, but he said he had no details.
“The pope misinterpreted Islam,” he said. “The most important thing is
that such incidents should not be converted into violence in Iraq.”
Morocco recalled its ambassador to the Vatican over the remarks,
according to the official MAP news agency.
And the president of Yemen, Ali Abdullah Saleh, threatened to sever
diplomatic ties unless Benedict apologized.
In Somalia, a radical cleric was reported to have urged Muslims to
“hunt down” the pope for remarks that he called “barbaric.”
“Whoever offends our Prophet Muhammad should be killed on the spot by
the nearest Muslim,” the cleric, Sheik Abubakar Hassan Malin, told
worshipers in Mogadishu on Friday, Agence France-Presse reported.
But in
Turkey, amid questions about the pope’s planned visit in November, the
main English-language newspaper, The Daily News, urged an end to the
criticism.
While denouncing his comments, the paper said, “We just disagree with
this vendettalike approach of continuing to abuse the pope after his
spokesman made a statement saying that he respected Islam and did not
intend to offend Muslims.”
The newspaper was printed before Cardinal Bertone spoke Saturday and
was referring to a Vatican statement released on Thursday.
Security around the pope’s residence at Castel Gandolfo, near Rome,
would be strengthened for the pope’s Sunday blessing, Agence France-Presse
quoted the Italian ANSA news agency as saying. “Meticulous” security
checks over an extended area were planned.
Richard A. Oppel Jr. contributed reporting from Baghdad.
Some Muslim Leaders Want Pope to
Apologize
ROME, Sept. 15 — Pope Benedict XVI drew rising anger on Friday over
comments he made Tuesday about Islam, as Muslim leaders around the world
accused him of dividing religions and demanded an apology.
In Britain, Gaza, Iraq, Syria and Indonesia, Muslim leaders
registered their protest. The Parliament in
Pakistan passed a resolution against the pope’s statements, and the
government later summoned the
Vatican envoy to express official displeasure. In Lebanon, Grand
Ayatollah Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah, the most senior Shiite cleric,
demanded “a personal apology — not through his envoys.”
And emotion spilled over in
Turkey, which Benedict is scheduled to visit in November, as a top
official in the Islamic-rooted ruling party said that the pope was
“going down in history in the same category as leaders such as
Hitler and Mussolini.”
“He has a dark mentality that comes from the darkness of the Middle
Ages,” the official, Salih Kapusuz, deputy leader of Turkey’s governing
party, was quoted as saying on the state-owned Anatolia news agency. “It
looks like an effort to revive the mentality of the Crusades.”
Reaction to the pope’s remarks — in which he quoted a description of
Islam in the 14th century as “evil and inhuman” — has presented Benedict
with the first full-blown crisis of his papacy.
Some in Turkey have questioned whether he should make the visit, the
pope’s first to a Muslim country. Many Muslims are also comparing his
comments to the unflattering cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad that had
stoked deep anger among Muslims earlier this year.
The Vatican did not release an official comment on Friday. On
Thursday, as Benedict returned from a six-day trip to Germany, his chief
spokesman said that he had not intended to “offend the sensibility of
Muslim believers.”
Other top Vatican officials also sought to tamp down the anger.
“I am convinced the pope did not mean to assume a position against
Islam,” a top German cardinal, Walter Kasper, told the Italian daily
newspaper La Repubblica.
Archbishop Dominique Mamberti, a French prelate with experience in
the Islamic world, was appointed on Friday as the Vatican’s new foreign
minister. He told Agence France-Press: “The dialogue between different
civilizations, cultures and religions — which nobody can hide from —
will be one of the great questions which I will tackle in my new job.”
In a major speech on Tuesday at Regensburg University, Benedict
delivered a long, scholarly address on reason and faith in the West. But
he began his speech by recounting a conversation on the truths of
Christianity and Islam that took place between a 14th-century Byzantine
Christian emperor, Manuel II Paleologus, and a Persian scholar.
“The emperor comes to speak about the issue of jihad, holy war,” the
pope said.
“He said, I quote, ‘Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new,
and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his
command to spread by the sword the faith he preached,’ ” the pope said.
While making clear that he was quoting someone else, Benedict did not
say whether he agreed or not. He also briefly discussed the Islamic
concept of jihad, which he defined as “holy war,” and said that violence
in the name of religion is contrary to God’s nature and to reason.
He also suggested reason as the basis for “that genuine dialogue of
cultures and religions so urgently needed today.”
Benedict, a respected theologian, is said to write many speeches
himself, and some in the Italian news media speculated that the Vatican
would be forced into a more stringent review of his statements.
The controversy came as a new Vatican hierarchy was being put in
place. In addition to appointing a foreign minister, the pope installed
as secretary of state — the highest position after the pope — Cardinal
Tarcisco Bertone, 71, an Italian and longtime colleague of the pope’s.
Salman Masood contributed reporting from Islamabad,
Pakistan.
The Pope’s Words
There is more than enough religious anger in the world. So it is
particularly disturbing that Pope Benedict XVI has insulted Muslims,
quoting a 14th-century description of Islam as “evil and inhuman.”
In the most provocative part of a speech this week on “faith and
reason,” the pontiff recounted a conversation between an “erudite”
Byzantine Christian emperor and a “learned” Muslim Persian circa 1391.
The pope quoted the emperor saying, “Show me just what Muhammad
brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and
inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he
preached.”
Muslim leaders the world over have demanded apologies and
threatened to recall their ambassadors from the Vatican, warning that
the pope’s words dangerously reinforce a false and biased view of
Islam. For many Muslims, holy war — jihad — is a spiritual struggle,
and not a call to violence. And they denounce its perversion by
extremists, who use jihad to justify murder and terrorism.
The Vatican issued a statement saying that Benedict meant no
offense and in fact desired dialogue. But this is not the first time
the pope has fomented discord between Christians and Muslims.
In 2004 when he was still the Vatican’s top theologian, he spoke
out against Turkey’s joining the European Union, because Turkey, as a
Muslim country was “in permanent contrast to Europe.”
A doctrinal conservative, his greatest fear appears to be the loss
of a uniform Catholic identity, not exactly the best jumping-off point
for tolerance or interfaith dialogue.
The world listens carefully to the words of any pope. And it is
tragic and dangerous when one sows pain, either deliberately or
carelessly. He needs to offer a deep and persuasive apology,
demonstrating that words can also heal.
Italian nun killed in Somalia
The Associated Press
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2006
MOGADISHU, Somalia Gunmen
killed an Italian nun and her bodyguard Sunday at the entrance of the hospital
where she worked, officials said - an attack some feared could be linked to
Muslim anger toward Pope Benedict XVI.
The nun, known as Sister Leonella, was shot in the back four times by two
gunmen armed with pistols, said a doctor at the hospital, Mohamed Yusef.
The shootings occurred at midday Sunday at a hospital for women and children
run by the international SOS- Kinderhof organization in northern Mogadishu,
witnesses and hospital officials said.
One person has been arrested and a search was under way for a second man, said
Yusuf Mohamed Siad, head of security for the Islamic Courts Union now
controlling the capital.
Leonella, who was believed to be about 60, had been working at the hospital
since 2002, colleagues said.
Like many foreigners, she traveled with a bodyguard in Somalia, a Horn of
Africa nation that sank into anarchy after warlords overthrew the country's
longtime dictator in 1991.
In recent months, Islamic fundamentalists have seized control of the capital
and much of the south of Somalia, imposing strict religious rule.
The Islamic Courts Union is credited with bringing a semblance of order to the
country, but many in the West fear it will evolve into a Taliban-style regime.
Several witnesses attributed Sunday's shooting to the furor over a speech that
Pope Benedict made in Germany on Tuesday in which he quoted a medieval text
calling the Prophet Muhammad's teachings "evil and inhuman."
"I am sure the killers were angered by the pope's speech in which he attacked
our prophet," said Ashe Ahmed Ali, one of many people who witnessed the
shooting.
Earlier Sunday, a leading Muslim cleric in Somalia condemned the pope for
offending Muslims.
"The pope's statement at this time was not only wrong but irresponsible as
well," Nor Barud, deputy leader of the Somali Muslim Scholars Association,
said at a news conference in Mogadishu. "Both the pope and the Byzantine
emperor he quoted are ignorant of Islam and its noble prophet."
Benedict apologized Sunday for his remarks, saying the text he quoted did not
reflect his own opinions.
Siad, the Islamic Courts' head of security, said the motive for the shooting
was unclear. "They could be people annoyed by the pope's speech, which angered
all Muslims in the world, or they could have been having something to do with
SOS," he said. "We will have to clarify this through our investigation."
A Vatican spokesman called Leonella's slaying "a horrible episode," the
Italian news agency ANSA said.
"Let's hope that it will be an isolated fact," the Reverend Federico Lombardi
said, expressing hopes for an end to the Muslim anger over the pope's speech.
The Vatican is "following with concern the consequences of this wave of hate,
hoping that it does not lead to grave consequences for the church in the
world," he was quoted as saying.
Leonella had helped to teach and look after children, said a colleague who
gave his name as Dr. Teckle.
"She was a dedicated and organized teacher," he said. Her body was being flown
to Nairobi before being returned to Italy, he said.
A Somali doctor who knew Leonella said she had worked for 38 years in Nairobi
and Mogadishu.
"She was welcome here in Mogadishu," Asha Omar Ahmed said on Italy's Sky TG24
TV. "She had just conducted a lesson and was going home. She was opening the
gate when she was shot."
Peacekeeping Grows, Strains U.N.
Group's Troop Numbers Across Globe to Hit New High
By Colum Lynch Washington Post Staff Writer Sunday, September 17,
2006; A17
UNITED NATIONS -- The United Nations is set to field its largest
peacekeeping enterprise in its 61-year history, with more than 100,000
troops and police to be deployed by year's end in missions around the world.
The number could climb -- past 115,000 -- if Sudan accepts a new
peacekeeping mission for Darfur, and costs for the forces could surpass $7
billion a year, more than double the $3 billion spent in 2000.
The unprecedented growth in peacekeeping operations is placing strains on
the United Nations' capacity to respond to emerging crises in various parts
of the world and is draining the pool of available troops both for the world
body and for NATO. Global leaders will address those issues this week at
annual appearances before the U.N. General Assembly. "When you look around
the world today, we are stretched," U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan told
reporters last week as he highlighted major themes for the session.
The latest surge in U.N. peacekeeping surpasses the previous peak, in the
early 1990s, when more than 80,000 troops served in more than a dozen
international missions, including major operations in Cambodia, Bosnia and
Somalia.
It also marks the end of a retreat in funding for new missions by the
United States, which was reluctant to approve risky and costly undertakings
in Rwanda and other conflict zones after the deaths in 1993 of more than 18
U.S. Army Rangers at the hands of Somali militias. The United States still
refuses to place its ground troops under U.N. command.
John R. Bolton, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said that the
Bush administration continues to have misgivings about the organization's
fitness to effectively manage its peacekeeping operations but that a
proliferation of crises has forced U.S. support. "The requirements to
establish or change existing peacekeeping missions are dictated by
circumstances in the world, and that's why we have responded as we have,"
Bolton said.
The U.N. Security Council last month authorized an increase of more than
40 percent in the overall size of the peacekeeping force, including 1,600
police officers for East Timor and 13,000 additional troops for Lebanon,
where the United Nations is trying to prevent a resumption of fighting
between Israel and Hezbollah. The council also authorized more than 22,000
peacekeepers for Darfur, where government-backed militias are believed
responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians and the
displacement of more than 2 million people.
The Sudanese government, however, has refused to allow the United Nations
to send peacekeepers to Darfur and has ably played on Western fears of
entering a military quagmire. "The Sudanese have been very clear in
exploiting some of these issues, saying, 'If you want to have another Iraq,
come,' and this scared away some governments," Annan said.
U.N. officials have expressed concern that creation of these large
missions carries risks for some of the organization's less visible
operations, particularly in African countries such as Ivory Coast and Congo.
"The risk that there is going to be political neglect is high,"
Jean-Marie Guéhenno, the U.N.'s undersecretary for peacekeeping, said in an
interview. "Darfur could be a victim of that overstretch."
According to a paper by Security Council Report, a private monitoring
group, "There is simply no precedent in the United Nations for an increase
in operations of this magnitude in the space of twenty days." The paper
added: "It will present huge management challenges for the United Nations,
which has been struggling to improve its capacity to manage the growth in
peacekeeping operations."
The United Nations' critics in Congress have highlighted its failure to
stamp out corruption in spending programs and to rein in sexual abuses
against minors in several peacekeeping missions. The House has passed
legislation threatening to cut off funding to the organization if it fails
to prove it can better manage its costs.
"I can't say we go into this with a great deal of confidence, but we go
into this with a sense that this has got to be done," Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.)
said of the new missions in Lebanon and Sudan. "The bottom line is right now
there aren't a lot of choices."
The Bush administration has struggled to contain U.N. peacekeeping costs
by ending or scaling back existing operations to make way for new ones. That
strategy backfired in East Timor, where violence erupted between military
factions after U.N. troops pulled out. The United States and other Security
Council members responded last month by approving a new force of 1,600 U.N.
police for East Timor.
Despite its initial reservations about the virtues of U.N.
nation-building, the Bush administration has led efforts to reinforce
existing operations and create new ones for Haiti, Liberia, Sudan and
Lebanon. It has repeatedly approved operations in countries where it has few
national interests.
"You still have this rhetoric about the United Nations being a broken,
fractured, incompetent and undependable organization," said James Dobbins, a
senior foreign policy emissary for the Clinton and Bush administrations and
author of a recent study by the Rand Corp. on U.N. peacekeeping. However,
"There is no doubt that the Bush administration . . . embraces the concept
of nation-building to a degree the Clinton administration couldn't have
gotten away with it."
Dobbins credits the United Nations with providing some of the most
inexpensive peacekeeping services in the world, saying it costs $45,000 a
year to fund a U.N. peacekeeper, compared with $200,000 to deploy one NATO
soldier. He also said the organization relies on a small number of military
planners and headquarters staff members to launch a mission. "Four hundred
to 600 people are managing the largest expeditionary force in the world
other than that of the United States. It's bigger than NATO and the European
Union put together," he said.
Tensions Overshadow Gains in Afghanistan
Civil Conflict Could Reignite as Stability Remains
ElusiveBy Pamela Constable Washington Post
Foreign Service Saturday, September 16, 2006; A18
KABUL, Afghanistan, Sept. 15 -- Despite scattered gains by
international troops fighting Taliban insurgents in the country's south,
Afghan and foreign analysts here have voiced concern that a recent peace
initiative is backfiring and that lapsed Afghan militias could be drawn
into the conflict unless it is quickly quelled and replaced by aid and
protection.
NATO and U.S. military officials here said this week that an intensive
two-week operation against Taliban fighters in Kandahar province had been
a tactical success, killing more than 500 insurgents and forcing others to
retreat. Afghan and foreign forces also retook a district in neighboring
Helmand province that had been seized twice by the Taliban.
But these pockets of progress on the battlefield are part of a larger,
murkier political map. As other Afghan militias begin defensively
rearming, ethnic tensions have risen, raising the specter of the kind of
civil conflict that devastated the country in the early 1990s.
A call for additional troops by NATO's senior commander has so far
drawn only one positive response, Poland's offer of 1,000 personnel.
Military officials here say pro-government forces need to win key areas
soon and to begin delivering aid and security if they are to halt the
slide in public support.
"We can't just keep fighting endless battles without having something
to offer the next day," a senior Western military official said. "We have
killed a lot of Taliban, but they are not running out of foot soldiers,
and for every one we kill, we create new families that hate us."
On Sept. 5, Pakistan's president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, announced a
peace pact with domestic Taliban forces operating in the tribal areas of
Pakistan along the Afghan border. The next day, he traveled here to
promote the agreement and to try to ease tensions with Afghan President
Hamid Karzai, saying the two leaders should work together to fight the
Taliban and terrorism.
Under the peace deal, Taliban groups in Pakistan pledged not to cross
the border to attack in Afghanistan. But since Sept. 5, assaults on Afghan
and foreign forces near the Pakistani frontier have continued.
Musharraf, meanwhile, infuriated Afghan officials by making comments in
Europe this week that equated members of the Taliban with Pashtuns, the
largest Afghan ethnic group, and suggested they were more dangerous than
al-Qaeda.
"Associating the Pashtuns with the Taliban is an affront to a community
who is eager to establish security and sustainable stability all over
Afghanistan," the Afghan Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement.
The ministry expressed "profound regret over Pres. Musharraf's attempt to
attribute a murderous group and the enemy of peace to one of the ethnic
groups living on the both sides of the Durand line."
The Durand Line, arbitrarily drawn by the British in 1893 to separate
Afghanistan from what is now Pakistan, is a perennial irritant for both
countries. It divides Pashtun tribal lands and is not accepted by many
Afghans.
Many Afghans say they suspect that Musharraf's deal with Taliban forces
in his own country is an attempt to wash his hands of a domestic problem
and push it across the border into Afghanistan. At the same time, they
say, he has gratuitously insulted a neighbor that had hosted him just days
before.
Musharraf has stood by his pact and denied intending to give offense.
He and Karzai are scheduled to meet separately with President Bush in
Washington this month. The Bush administration strongly backs both rulers
and is eager to patch up their tense relations. Since the overthrow of
Afghanistan's Taliban rulers in late 2001, the United States has made a
major investment in troops and money in an effort to bring stable and
democratic rule to the region as an antidote to Islamic extremism.
Inside Afghanistan, persistent and widening attacks by anti-government
insurgents have provided ethnic militia leaders in both the north and
south with an excuse to regroup and potentially rearm their forces, many
of which were disbanded after 2001 under an ambitious, U.N.-sponsored
program.
In the Pashtun south, where Afghan army and police forces are
underpaid, poorly equipped and scattered thinly across the conflict zone,
the government has authorized local police forces to form auxiliary
contingents, most likely drawing on idle former militiamen. In some cases,
tribal leaders have threatened to form their own defense forces.
In the north and west, dominated by the Tajik and Uzbek ethnic groups,
former Islamic militia figures who fought Soviet troops in the 1980s are
said to virtually control daily life in many areas. Despite a new program
to disarm and pacify the region, Afghan and foreign observers said some
commanders appear to be gaining further strength as the Taliban threat
draws closer and villagers seek powerful patrons to protect them.
"In the north, they ask how they can be expected to disarm if the south
is arming itself," said one Western diplomat, speaking on condition of
anonymity. Ethnic divisions are so deep in Afghanistan, the diplomat
added, that if the Karzai government were to fall, civil conflict might
resume almost immediately.
"Five years ago, the Taliban were very weak and the warlords had all
fled the country," said Sayed Daud, director of the Afghan Media Resource
Center, a nonprofit research agency. "Now the Taliban are back and the
warlords are back. They have made a lot of money, they have weapons, and
the government can't touch them."
The insurgency continues to spread beyond the south. In the past week,
fresh attacks have taken place as far apart as Ghazni province in the
east, where Taliban and NATO forces have been battling over several
villages, and Farah province in the far west, where 150 Taliban fighters
stormed the provincial capital and others shot and killed an Afghan U.N.
employee.
But the most urgent need, military officials and diplomats said, is to
contain the southern conflict, defeat the insurgents in key districts of
Kandahar and Helmand, and begin providing support to civilians there.
British and Canadian troops have fought intensely and suffered numerous
casualties since NATO took over command of the southern front from the
U.S.-led coalition on July 31. But military and diplomatic observers cited
concern that forces from other NATO countries, operating under narrower
mandates laid down by edgy governments, will not shoulder enough of the
burden.
"A great deal is at stake here for NATO. It's their first operation
outside Europe and an important test case," said one foreign observer. "If
the fighting worsens, some members may ask whether it is worth the risk,
and some may ask why they should put their soldiers in harm's way while
others are sitting in easy places."
Even more is at stake for Afghans, who felt abandoned by their Western
supporters after Soviet troops withdrew in 1989 and now fear the same
could happen again. NATO and U.S. military officials reiterated this week
that their commitment is long-term, but they also said time is running
short.
"It took us four years to learn how to operate here. NATO doesn't have
four years," a U.S. military official said. "It's not enough to kill
Taliban. We're trying to help build a government that is weak and still
fighting off the competition. That's the really hard part."
Called From Diplomatic Reserve
Former Secretary of State Leads Attempt to Salvage
Iraq MissionBy Michael Abramowitz
Washington Post Staff Writer Sunday, September 17, 2006; A23
Is Jim Baker bailing out the Bushes once again?
The former secretary of state, James A. Baker III, a confidant of
President George H.W. Bush, visited Baghdad two weeks ago to take a look
at the vexing political and military situation. He was there as
co-chairman of the bipartisan Iraq Study Group, put together by top
think tanks at the behest of Congress to come up with ideas about the
way forward in Iraq.
The group has attracted little attention beyond foreign policy elites
since its formation this year. But it is widely viewed within that small
world as perhaps the last hope for a midcourse correction in a venture
they generally agree has been a disaster.
The reason, by and large, is the involvement of Baker, 76, the
legendary troubleshooter who remains close to the first President Bush
and cordial with the second. Many policy experts think that if anyone
can forge bipartisan consensus on a plan for extricating the United
States from Iraq -- and then successfully pitch that plan to a president
who has so far seemed impervious to outside pressure -- it is the man
who put together the first Gulf War coalition, which evicted Saddam
Hussein from Kuwait in 1991.
Rep. Frank R. Wolf (R-Va.), who came up with the idea for the study
group and pushed for its formation, said he thinks the administration is
"waiting anxiously" for the group's recommendations. He cited the
"impeccable credentials" of the 10-member group, which also includes
former Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O'Connor, former New York mayor
Rudolph W. Giuliani, investment banker and Bill Clinton adviser Vernon
E. Jordan Jr., and former White House chief of staff Leon E. Panetta.
The other co-chairman is the Democratic former Indiana congressman Lee
H. Hamilton, who also co-chaired the commission that investigated the
Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
"Their recommendations will carry a lot of weight," said Wolf. "If
they come up with a unanimous opinion, the administration, Congress and
the American people will have to listen."
Baker is not revealing much of his hand. He has indicated that
recommendations will not be forthcoming until after the November
elections, in an effort to keep the group above the political fray. He
has also asked those involved in the study group -- members and staffers
alike -- not to talk to the media, so most of those interviewed for this
article spoke only on the condition of anonymity. Baker's assistant said
the co-chairman would not be available to be interviewed.
Baker has offered some hints of his thinking -- and his dismay with
the way the Iraq occupation has been handled by the administration.
"The difficulty of winning the peace was severely underestimated,"
Baker wrote in a recent memoir, citing "costly mistakes" by the
Pentagon. These included, he wrote, disbanding the Iraqi army, not
securing weapons depots and "perhaps never having committed enough
troops to successfully pacify the country."
But in an interview in the current issue of Texas Monthly, Baker
dashed the idea of "just picking up and pulling out" of Iraq. "Even
though it's something we need to find a way out of, the worst thing in
the world we could do would be to pick up our marbles and go home," he
said, "because then we will trigger, without a doubt, a huge civil war.
And every one of the regional actors -- the Iranians and everybody else
-- will come in and do their thing."
The study group appears to be struggling to find some middle ground
between such a pullout and the administration's strategy of keeping a
heavy American troop presence until the Iraqi government can maintain
security on its own.
"If this war is consumed by partisan attacks, if the choice is
presented as simply one between 'stay the course' or 'cut and run,' we
will never be able to do what is right," panel member Panetta wrote
following the group's trip to Iraq in an article for his hometown paper,
the Monterey County Herald in California.
Baker and panel members have been exploring different ideas, such as
a greater degree of regional autonomy for Kurdish, Sunni and Shiite
regions. But those familiar with the group's work said there is far from
a consensus yet on what to do. One well-placed source said panel members
came away from their trip sobered, with "a sense that we can't continue
to do what we have been doing," adding that Baker was not simply looking
to protect the administration.
"I think he basically wants to call it the way he sees it," said this
source, a critic of the administration's approach to Iraq. "He's also
been frustrated by the mistakes that have been made. In many ways, it
has damaged the legacy he established as secretary of state."
Some are skeptical that the president will be open to advice seeming
to come from one of his father's top advisers. In some ways, Bush has
distanced himself from the people and policies of the first Bush
administration -- though Baker has been called on occasion to perform
sensitive missions, such as heading the Bush campaign's efforts in the
2000 Florida recount and leading negotiations to provide debt relief to
Iraq.
The administration's more hawkish supporters, meanwhile, are nervous
about Baker's involvement, counting him as one of the "realist" foreign
policy proponents they see as having allowed threats against the United
States to grow in the '80s and '90s. Gary J. Schmitt of the American
Enterprise Institute voiced concern that the Iraq group was not
listening to those advocating a more muscular military strategy to
defeat the insurgency.
But Schmitt added: "People can worry about what Baker is going to
say, but the president has a way of doing what he is going to do. There
could be a lot of wishful thinking on the part of the older Bush crowd
that the son got into trouble and now he's going to listen to Baker the
strategist."
Publicly, the administration is supportive, though inside the foreign
policy apparatus there appears to be skepticism that the Iraq Study
Group will come up with any breakthroughs. At first, the administration
was divided about whether to cooperate with the panel. Secretary of
State Condoleezza Rice gave her support only after being assured by
officials with the federally funded U.S. Institute of Peace, under whose
aegis the group was formed, and other think tanks involved in the
project that the venture would be a forward-looking exercise and not an
examination of past mistakes, according to people familiar with the
project.
Baker himself secured the personal approval of President Bush before
signing on. "As I always do," Baker told Texas Monthly, "I said . . . I
want him to look me in the eye and tell me he wants me to do this."
Bush Untethered
President Bush seems to
maintain a deeply seated conviction that under his leadership, America is
right and does not need the discipline of rules.
The New York Times
SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2006
Watching President George W. Bush on Friday in the
Rose Garden as he threatened to quit interrogating terrorists if Congress
did not approve his detainee bill, we were struck by how often he acts as
though there were not two sides to a debate. We have lost count of the
number of times he has said Americans have to choose between protecting the
nation precisely the way he wants, and not protecting it at all.
On Friday, Bush posed a choice between ignoring the law on wiretaps, and
simply not keeping tabs on terrorists. Then he said the United States could
rewrite the Geneva Conventions, or just stop questioning terrorists. To some
degree, he is following a script for the elections: Terrify Americans into
voting Republican. But behind that seems to be a deeply seated conviction
that under his leadership, America is right and does not need the discipline
of rules. He does not seem to understand that the rules are what makes the
nation as good as it can be.
The debate over prisoners is about whether the United States can confront
terrorism without shredding its democratic heritage. The nation is built on
the notion that the rules restrain behavior, because Americans know they are
fallible. Just look at the hundreds of men in Guantánamo Bay, many guilty of
nothing, facing unending detention because Bush did not want to follow the
rules after 9/11.
Now Bush insists that in cleaning up his mess, Congress should exempt CIA
interrogators from the Geneva Conventions. "The bottom line is simple: If
Congress passes a law that does not clarify the rules - if they do not do
that - the program's not going forward," Bush said. But clarity is not the
issue. The Geneva Conventions are clear and provide ample room for
interrogating terrorists. Similarly, in the debate over eavesdropping on
terrorists' conversations, Bush says that if he has to get a warrant, he
can't do it at all. Actually, he has ample authority to eavesdrop on
terrorists, under the very law he is breaking, the 1978 Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act.
Senator Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat who is on the Senate Intelligence
Committee, has introduced a bill to affirm FISA's control over all
wiretapping. It would also give the authorities far more flexibility to
listen first and get a warrant later when it's really urgent. But the only
bill Bush wants is a co-production of Vice President Dick Cheney and Arlen
Specter, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, that gives the
president more room to ignore FISA and chokes off any court challenges.
The best thing Congress could do for America right now is to drop this issue
and let the courts decide the matter. Bush can't claim urgency; it's not as
though he has stopped the wiretapping.
Legislation is needed on the prisoner issue, although not as urgently as
Bush says. Three Republican senators, John McCain, John Warner, and Lindsey
Graham, have a bill that is far better than the White House version but it,
too, has some huge flaws that will take time to fix. It will be hard in an
election year, but if the Republicans stand firm, and Democrats insist on
the needed changes, they might just require Bush to recognize that he is
subject to the same restraints that applied to every other president of this
nation of laws.
Turkey's Iraq ProblemBy
Lenore G. Martin
September 16, 2006;
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/15/AR2006091500924_pf.html
Although the world is paying more attention to Hezbollah and the Iraq
insurgency, there's another guerrilla group that poses a severe threat to
the stability of the Middle East.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), operating from havens in northern
Iraq, has been attacking Turkish security forces in southeastern Anatolia
and occasionally civilians elsewhere. Turkey is determined to prevent a
repetition of the 1984-99 guerrilla war with the separatist PKK, in which
it suffered more than 30,000 deaths. It has mobilized a large force on its
Iraqi border and is threatening to invade northern Iraq.
A Turkish invasion would create chaos in that part of Iraq and
potentially destabilize the region. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's
response -- moving to reinvigorate a tripartite commission made up of the
governments of Turkey, Iraq and the United States -- is insufficient. The
United States needs to take much firmer action to stop the PKK guerrilla
war from undermining its Middle East policy.
In the previous guerrilla war, the PKK operated from Iran, northern
Iraq and Syria. Syria also gave sanctuary to Abdullah Ocalan, the PKK
leader. Saddam Hussein and then the British and the Americans, under their
no-fly zone, permitted Turkey to attack the PKK in northern Iraq. After
Turkish troops massed on the Syrian border, the late Syrian leader, Hafez
al-Assad, expelled Ocalan, who was eventually captured and imprisoned in
Turkey.
The PKK then declared a cease-fire but renounced it in 2004. During the
current Iraq war, the United States has prevented Turkish forces from
crossing into Iraq, contributing to Turkey's frustration and the current
crisis.
If the United States does not oppose a Turkish invasion it will face a
more chaotic situation in Iraq and the loss of a long-term relationship
with the Iraqi Kurds, who are Washington's best hope for obtaining rights
for U.S. bases in the future. If Washington opposes the invasion, it risks
further estrangement from Turkey, a state positioned to play a critical
strategic role in a region where Iran increasingly challenges the United
States for dominance.
Turkey fears Kurdish irredentism coming from an independent Kurdistan.
The Iraqi Kurds perceive a Turkish invasion as aimed at controlling
oil-rich Kirkuk, thereby denying the Iraqi Kurds an economic base for
their independence. Furthermore, Turkish intervention in Iraq would create
a terrible precedent for Syrian and Iranian intervention in the Iraqi
civil war.
What should the United States, Turkey and the Iraqi Kurds do to avert
this crisis?
Difficult as it may be for the Iraqi Kurdish leaders, they must be
willing to deny the PKK havens in northern Iraq and prevent PKK leadership
from traveling freely throughout the country.
The Turks, for their part, must more assertively address the cultural,
political and economic demands of the Kurds in southeast Anatolia, an area
suffering from high unemployment and in need of economic development. To
its credit, Turkey has already begun the process of increasing Kurdish
cultural rights. Encouraged by its European Union accession negotiations,
Turkey has passed laws giving Kurds the right to speak and publish in
Kurdish and, to a more limited extent, to broadcast and teach Kurdish.
Recognizing minority rights has been a difficult accommodation for a
state that is proud of the integration of its Kurds and their full
participation in every aspect of society, including parliament and the
cabinet. The Turkish state generally views all of its citizens simply as
Turks and believes that recognition of ethnic differences would threaten
the cohesion of its political life. On the other hand, by increasing
Kurdish cultural rights, Turkey will give greater voice in government to
its Kurds and dilute the appeal of the separatism advocated by the PKK.
For its part, the United States needs to avert a Turkish invasion of
Iraq. It must throw its full weight behind efforts to eject the PKK from
northern Iraq. Furthermore the United States needs to pressure Europe more
energetically to block the transfer of funds to the PKK, which it has
classified as a terrorist organization. It cannot rely on a tripartite
commission to stop the next guerrilla war in the Middle East.
The writer is professor of political science at Emmanuel College in
Boston and an associate at the Weatherhead Center for International
Affairs and the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Harvard. She is
co-editor of "The Future of Turkish Foreign Policy."
Israel to investigate its
handling of Lebanon conflict
By Greg Myre The New York Times / International
Herald Tribune MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2006
After a month of debate in Israel, the
government on Sunday established a committee to investigate the political and
military leadership's handling of the invasion of Lebanon.
JERUSALEM After a month of debate
in Israel, the government on Sunday established a committee to investigate the
political and military leadership's handling of the invasion of Lebanon.
In a country that expects swift and decisive military victories, many Israelis
said the military campaign in Lebanon was poorly planned and executed, and
that leaders should be held accountable. Israel was unable to halt the rocket
fire by Hezbollah, the Lebanese militia group, and has not won the return of
two soldiers captured by Hezbollah in a cross-border raid on July 12 that
ignited the month-long conflict.
The committee "will examine the political leadership and the security echelon
regarding all aspects of the campaign in Lebanon," Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
told his cabinet at the beginning of its weekly session.
The cabinet voted 20 to 2 in favor of the committee, which will be headed by a
retired judge, Eliyahu Winograd.
But dozens of protesters outside the prime minister's office demanded that the
investigation be carried out by a state commission, which they asserted would
have greater power and would be seen as more independent.
Under the arrangement approved Sunday, the government will be investigated by
a committee it has appointed. A state commission would have been appointed by
a judge of the Israeli Supreme Court.
Olmert defended the cabinet decision, saying the committee would have the
powers of a state commission, allowing it to subpoena witnesses and order
police searches.
Many Israelis, including a large number of disgruntled reserve soldiers, have
been demanding an inquiry since the fighting ended on Aug. 14.
Olmert has faced some of the harshest criticism and his popularity has
plummeted.
Critics have also called for the resignations of Defense Minister Amir Peretz
and the military's chief of staff, Lieutenant General Dan Halutz.
Major General Udi Adam, who commanded the Israeli forces in northern Israel
and southern Lebanon, submitted his resignation last week, making him the
first senior figure to quit because of the war.
With an international peacekeeping force deploying in southern Lebanon, Israel
has withdrawn from most of the positions it held at the end of the fighting,
although it still has troops in a number of places across the border.
Meanwhile, Palestinian talks on a national-unity government, which have been
marked by increasing friction, were put on hold when the president of the
Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, left on a trip that will take him to the
United Nations this week for the opening of the General Assembly.
Abbas wanted an agreement locked up so he could appeal to Western leaders to
restore financial assistance that was cut after the Islamic group Hamas came
to power after winning elections in the spring.
Abbas's Fatah movement and Hamas say they remain committed to the unity
government, but they have traded sharp words in recent days. Yasser Abed Rabbo,
a former information minister who is part of Abbas's delegation, described the
internal talks as being in a state of "crisis."
He said Hamas needed to accept previous agreements between the Palestinians
and the Israelis or a new government would not win international acceptance.
"We want clarifications from Hamas," Abed Rabbo said in a telephone interview
from Jordan, where Abbas was on Sunday. "Hamas is affecting the credibility of
the president and undermining his efforts to approach the international
community."
Hamas, in turn, said its position had not changed, and that it still refused
to recognize Israel. Western countries have demanded that the Palestinian
Authority government recognize Israel as one of the conditions for restoring
aid.
"We don't recognize Israel," Sami Abu Zuhri, a Hamas spokesman, said at a news
conference in Gaza City. "If such a position is a problem, then we consider
that an honor. We want to break the siege by the West, but the price should
not be abandoning the Palestinian interests."
Hamas officials said they believed talks with Abbas and Fatah will resume when
the president returns.
Nonaligned nations criticize
Israel
The Associated Press /
International Herald Tribune MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2006
Representatives of 118 nations in the Nonaligned
Movement condemned Israel's assault on Lebanon and supported a peaceful
resolution to the U.S.-Iran nuclear dispute. The statements came in the final
declaration over the weekend from a summit meeting that brought together some
of the world's staunchest critics of the United States.
The 92-page declaration also broadly condemned terrorism, but with exceptions
for movements for self-determination and battles against foreign occupiers.
And while declaring democracy to be a universal value, the movement said no
one country or region should define it for the world. The leaders mentioned
Venezuela and Cuba in particular as they asserted the right of every country
to determine its own form of government.
The statements, many of which contain veiled criticisms of the United States,
were approved by unanimous consent after another round of speeches Saturday
night by leaders of the movement.
"No one in the Nonaligned Movement thinks that the United States is
responsible for all the problems, but many think that it is for some," said
the Cuban foreign minister, Felipe Pérez Roque.
An ailing Fidel Castro was named president of the movement, but he stayed home
on doctors' orders while the acting Cuban president, Raúl Castro, presided
over the meeting of two-thirds of the world's nations.
Even so, the elder Castro apparently found it hard to stay in bed: The
Communist Party newspaper Granma reported Sunday that he had met during the
summit meeting's final day with at least five heads of government - his
friends Hugo Chávez of Venezuela and Evo Morales of Boliva and the leaders of
Iran, India and Malaysia.
Raúl Castro joined numerous critics of the United States who said a bellicose
Washington had made the world more dangerous.
"The United States spends one billion dollars a year in weapons and soldiers,"
he said. "To think that a social and economic order that has proven
unsustainable could be maintained by force is simply an absurd idea."
Many demanded that the United Nations take action against the veto power of
the five permanent Security Council members. Suggestions in the final
declaration included expanding the council's membership and allowing council
vetoes to be overruled by a two-thirds majority of the General Assembly.
"The U.S. is turning the Security Council into a base for imposing its
politics," President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran complained. "Why should
people live under the nuclear threat of the U.S.?"
North Korea, meanwhile, defended its nuclear weapons program, Sudan's leader
rejected a UN peacekeeping mission for the Darfur region and Ahmadinejad
insisted on Iran's right to develop nuclear energy.
The final declaration supported Iran's position while encouraging Tehran to
continue cooperating with the International Atomic Energy Agency.
The leader of the North Korean Parliament, Kim Yong Nam, said his communist
nation "would not need even a single nuclear weapon if there no longer existed
a U.S. threat," and said U.S. financial sanctions had "driven the situation
into an unpredictable phase."
The UN secretary general, Kofi Annan, agreed that the Security Council must be
more responsive to less powerful countries.
"The Security Council must reform for the sake of the developing world, and
for the sake of the United Nations itself," Annan said at the meeting. "The
perception of a narrow power base risks leading to an erosion of the UN's
authority and legitimacy - even, some would argue, its neutrality and
independence. I have in the past described this as a democracy deficit."
The Nonaligned Movement was formed in 1961 to establish a third path in a
world divided by the United States and the Soviet Union.
Cuba last acted as host to the group in Havana 27 years ago.
Muslim anger rises over pope's
speech
By Ian Fisher The New York Times
SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2006
ROME Pope Benedict XVI drew rising
anger on Friday over comments he made about Islam, as Muslim leaders around
the world angrily accused him of dividing religions and demanded an apology.
In Britain, Gaza, Iraq, Syria and Indonesia, Muslim leaders registered their
protest. The Parliament in Pakistan passed a resolution against the pope's
statements and the government later summoned the Vatican envoy to express
official displeasure.
In Lebanon, Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah, the most senior Shiite
cleric, demanded "a personal apology - not through his envoys."
And emotion spilled over in Turkey, which Benedict is scheduled to visit in
November, as a top official in the Islamic-rooted governing party said that
the pope was "going down in history in the same category as leaders such as
Hitler and Mussolini."
"He has a dark mentality that comes from the darkness of the Middle Ages," the
official, Salih Kapusuz, deputy leader of the party of Prime Minister Recep
Tayyib Erdogan, was quoted on the state-owned Anatolia news agency as saying.
"It looks like an effort to revive the mentality of the Crusades."
Reaction to the pope's remarks - in which he quoted a description of Islam in
the 14th century as "evil and inhuman" - have presented Benedict with the
first full-blown crisis of his year- and-a-half papacy. Already some in Turkey
have questioned whether he should make the planned visit, which would be the
pope's first trip to a Muslim country.
Many Muslims are also comparing his comments to the unflattering cartoons of
the Prophet Muhammad that stoked deep Muslim anger this year.
But unlike with the cartoons, the reaction has not been violent. Several bombs
reportedly exploded near a church in Gaza, though it was unclear whether they
were related to the pope's comments.
The Vatican released no official comment Friday. On Thursday, as Benedict
returned from a six-day trip to Germany, the pope's chief spokesman said that
he had not intended to "offend the sensibility of Muslim believers."
Meanwhile, other top Vatican officials also sought to tamp down the furor.
"I am convinced the pope did not mean to assume a position against Islam," a
German cardinal, Walter Kasper, told the Italian daily newspaper La Repubblica.
Archbishop Dominique Mamberti, a French prelate with experience in the Islamic
world, was appointed Friday as the Vatican's new foreign minister. He told
Agence France-Presse: "The dialogue between different civilizations, cultures
and religions - which nobody can hide from - will be one of the great
questions which I will tackle in my new job."
In a speech Tuesday at Regensburg University, where Benedict had taught
theology, the pope delivered a long, scholarly address on reason and faith in
the West.
But he began his speech recounting a conversation between the 14th-century
Byzantine Christian Emperor Manuel Paleologos II and a Persian scholar on the
truths of Christianity and Islam.
"The emperor comes to speak about the issue of jihad, holy war," the pope
said. "He said, I quote, 'Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and
there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to
spread by the sword the faith he preached.'"
Benedict did not explicitly agree with the statement nor repudiate it.
He also briefly discussed the Islamic concept of "jihad," which he defined as
"holy war," and said that violence in the name of religion was contrary to
God's nature and to reason.
But he also suggested reason as the basis for "that genuine dialogue of
cultures and religions so urgently needed today."
Benedict, a respected theologian, is said to write many speeches himself, and
some commentators in the Italian press speculated that the Vatican would be
forced into a more stringent review of his statements in the future.
The controversy came with the establishment of a new top Vatican hierarchy,
whose first job will be to contain the controversy: In addition to appointing
Mamberti as foreign minister, the pope installed a new secretary of state, the
Vatican's highest position after the pope. He is Cardinal Tarcisco Bertone,
71, an Italian and a longtime colleague of the pope's.
Amid the angry reactions, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, who met with
the pope on his trip there, defended his speech.
"Whoever criticizes the Pope misunderstood the aim of his speech," she was
quoted as saying in the Bild newspaper. "It was an invitation to a dialogue
between religions and the Pope expressly spoke in favor of this dialogue,
which is something I also support and consider urgent and necessary."
Losing Hearts and Minds:
World Public Opinion and post-9/11 US Security Policy
By Carl Conetta
Project on Defense Alternatives Briefing Memo #37
14 September 2006
Gone are the days...when 200,000 Germans marched in Berlin to show
solidarity with their American allies, or when Le Monde, the most
prestigious French newspaper, could publish a large headline, 'We Are All
Americans.'"
-- Richard Bernstein, New York Times, 11 September 2003.1
The sympathy and support for the United States that
surged worldwide in the aftermath of the 2001 attacks
2 began to ebb as soon as
US bombs began falling on Afghanistan.3
Supportive sentiments continued to recede through 2004, driven increasingly by
the Iraq war and eventually settling at levels unseen since the early 1980s.
The trend has temporarily reversed in some places at some times, either in
response to hopeful news from Iraq (such as the December 2004 elections) or in
reaction to local events (the November 2005 terrorist bombing in Jordan).
Also, there are national exceptions to the trend (Israel) and partial
exceptions (India). On balance, however, the United States today finds world
opinion substantially at odds with its foreign policy and its leadership on
most particulars.
This memo reviews the polling evidence on current world attitudes regarding
the United States and its leadership in the area of security policy. The
survey concludes by examining some of the political repercussions of these
popular attitudes, especially in the Muslim world.
Among allied nations: pro-US sentiments plummet
Polls conducted by the Pew Research Center show a precipitous decline in
positive attitudes about the United States since the year 2000 in eight of 12
countries for which multi-year comparisons can be made.4
According to the Pew polls, the proportion of the population feeling
positively toward the United States has plummeted in Great Britain from 83
percent to 56, in France from 62 percent to 39, in Germany from 78 percent to
37, and in Spain from 50 percent to 23. Japan, too, has seen a decline.
Similarly, polls by the German Marshall Fund and The Chicago Council on
Global Affairs have found a significant and uniform decline in positive
feelings toward the United States between 2002 and 2006 in the European
countries they surveyed.5
Today, in France, Germany, Italy, Great Britain, the Netherlands, and Poland
-- all of them NATO allies -- negative feelings about the United States are
almost as frequent as positive ones. In Spain, negative sentiments
predominate.
Among Muslim populations: Fear and disapproval grow
The steepest declines found by the Pew polls, however, occurred in
Indonesia, Jordan, and Turkey -- all three notable as moderate or democratic
Muslim-majority states. Positive attitudes toward the United States are shared
by only 30 percent of Indonesians and 15 percent or less of Jordanians and
Turks. Only in Nigeria have attitudes toward America notably improved since
2000. Positive attitudes in Pakistan have marginally improved since 2000 -- to
27 percent today (although this is much improved from the 10 percent level
recorded in 2002).
By contrast, China scores much better than the United States in all six
Muslim countries queried in the Pew polls. Russia also scores better than the
United States -- and usually much better -- in all but one country, Morocco.
Very low US popularity ratings in the Arab world also have been recorded in
several Zogby International polls.6
- In Egypt and Saudi Arabia the segments feeling positively toward the
United States has receded and now stands at 14 and 9 percent, respectively.
- Positive feelings have receded in Morocco and Jordan, too, although the
segments feeling positively are not as small: 33 and 34 percent,
respectively.
- In the UAE and Lebanon, the population segments feeling positively
toward the United States actually grew larger between 2000 and 2006
(although only marginally so in Lebanon). Even with this improvement,
however, only 28 percent of the UAE's population and 32 percent of Lebanon's
feel positively toward America.
Perhaps more troublesome than America's low popularity rating in Arab and
Muslim countries are widespread perceptions in these counties that the United
States might target them.7
Significant majorities of between 59 and 80 percent in Indonesia, Pakistan,
Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon believe that the United States could pose a
military threat to their homelands.
War against what?
Majorities in Turkey, Morocco, Jordan, and Pakistan have expressed doubts
about America's sincerity in the global war on terrorism (GWOT). (Majorities
in France and Germany have expressed similar doubts). Popular alternative
explanations (especially in the Muslim world) are that America actually seeks
through the GWOT to control world oil supplies, target unfriendly Muslim
governments, achieve world hegemony, and/or support Israel.8
Suspicion also runs high among Muslims in GWOT lead countries: the United
States and the United Kingdom. A BBC poll in 2002 found 70 percent of Muslims
in the United Kingdom not believing Tony Blair's assurances that the "war on
terrorism" was not actually a "war on Islam".9
In the United States, a poll conducted by Zogby International for Hamilton
College found about one-third of American Muslims perceiving the "war on
terror" as a "war on Islam."10
Since 2002, the Pew Center has routinely tracked support for the US-led
GWOT in a number of countries.
- In Britain, France, Germany, Russia, and Poland, the proportion of
citizens supporting the US effort equaled or surpassed 60 percent early in
the period. Since then, support has fallen in each country by an average of
20 percentage points.
- In some other nations, the decline has been even more significant -- for
instance: in Spain, popular support for the US effort has fallen from 63
percent to 19 percent; in Japan, from 61 to 26 percent; and in Turkey, from
30 to 14 percent.
- In Lebanon, support for the GWOT has declined modestly from 38 to 31
percent. Interestingly, support for the US effort has risen somewhat in
Indonesia (from 31 to 39 percent), Jordan (13 to 16 percent), and Pakistan
(20 to 30 percent), while remaining a minority position. The results in
Indonesia and Pakistan may partially reflect the effects of US humanitarian
aid to those countries in response to natural disasters. The Jordanian case
may reflect a reaction to the November 2005 terrorist bombing there, which
killed 57 people.
- No comparative data is available for Egypt, but in 2006 only 10 percent
of the population expressed support for the US campaign.11
Iraq rejected as an example; war seen to bolster terrorism
Turning to assessments of the Iraq war: support for the effort was weak
from the start outside of the United States and a few other countries. A 2006
poll sponsored by the BBC found that in 33 of the 35 countries surveyed the
most common opinion was that the war in Iraq has increased the threat of
terrorism.12 On average
60 percent had this view, while 12 percent thought it had decreased the
threat. The 35 countries represented a sampling of five continents and the
Middle East.
The Bush administration has viewed Iraq as pivotal to democratic transition
in the region, hoping that it would serve as a positive example of
democratization. Instead, nations in the region have come to see it as a
negative example. This is confirmed by polls conducted during 2004 and 2005 by
the University of Maryland and Zogby International in Jordan, Lebanon,
Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the UAE.13
US becoming pariah state
In light of the above, it is not surprising that a 2005 poll of 23 nations
found large percentages of citizens feeling that, on balance, the United
States was having a mostly negative influence on world affairs.14
Majorities or pluralities held this view in 16 of the 23 nations surveyed.
France and China were perceived much more positively and, in 20 of the 23
countries surveyed, there was majority support for a greater European role in
the world and a smaller American one.
Although global public sentiments regarding the United States do not
directly or immediately translate into policy change, voters in several allied
countries -- the United Kingdom, Italy, and Spain -- have punished their
governments for pro-American stances. Political effects are more evident in
Arab and Muslim countries.
Political advance of Islamic fundamentalism
Parallel with America's post-9/11 wars and counter-terror efforts, radical
Islamic parties have increased their political influence substantially in more
than a dozen nations, often campaigning explicitly against what they describe
as a "war against Islam". Winning more votes during the past five years than
ever before, such parties have advanced their positions in Bahrain, Egypt,
Kuwait, Indonesia, Jordan, Morocco, the Palestinian territories, Pakistan,
Saudi Arabia, and Turkey.
In Turkey and the Palestinian territories they now lead governments and
probably could win power in Egypt, too, should fully free elections be
conducted there. In Iraq, fundamentalist parties dominate government; in Iran,
the conservative former mayor of Tehran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, rose to
presidential office in a campaign explicitly challenging US policy. In
Lebanon, the influence and popularity of Hizbullah grew substantially during
the post-9/11 period. Even its miscalculation in raiding Israel in July 2006
has not dented its support, with one poll showing more than 80 percent of
Lebanese backing its confrontational stance.15
In Bangladesh, Islamic parties have consolidated their position in the
post-9/11 period, after winning a major role in government in October 2001.
And, in Somalia, the Supreme Islamic Courts Council has become the predominant
force in the country, although not by electoral means. US support for the
opposing Alliance for the Restoration of Peace and Counter-Terrorism and
likely US support for the Ethiopian incursion into Somalia have only rebounded
to the Courts' favor, which is attracting increasing support from warlord
groups on the basis of nationalist appeals.
A broader disaffection: the "Muslim street" and pan-Islamic action
Although popular protests in the Arab and Muslim worlds have occasioned the
wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and some of these protests were quite large,
neither the "Arab street" (nor the Muslim one) have risen up in persistent,
active opposition to US policy. But common expectations about the volatility
of the "Arab street" betray a naive view of social process. They also may
overestimate the intensity of pan-Arab and, especially, pan-Islamic
solidarity.
For most people in the Muslim world, national, tribal, or local identity
tends to be as strong or stronger than Islamic identity -- as shown in recent
Zogby polls of the Middle East.16
"Islam" may be an integral part of these national and local identities. But
the fact that national or local concerns, perspectives, and interests
predominate, means that feelings and acts of solidarity are attenuated. This
does not mean, however, that solidarity does not function; both the polling
and electoral data show that it does -- but usually in ways subtler than the
"Arab/Muslim street" trope suggests.
Obviously, repressive political conditions also limit mass expressions of
solidarity. Additionally: avenues for effective action regarding distant
events may seem lacking, which can make protest seem pointless. Nonetheless,
on occasion, the "street" does erupt in response to some "distant event" -- as
it did in May 2005 over the alleged desecration of the Quran at the US
Guantanamo prison camp and again in Fall 2005 over the Danish publication of
offensive caricatures of Mohammed.
The Guantanamo-Quran report prompted demonstrations and disturbances in
more than nine countries, resulting in the deaths of at least 15 people. In
response to the Mohammed caricatures, protests or riots occurred in at least
18 Muslim-majority nations. The largest involved more than 70,000 people. As
many as 150 were killed in cartoon related violence in Nigeria; perhaps 30
were killed in violence elsewhere.
The two sets of protests should be viewed, substantially, as "condensation
points" for anger arising from America's three post-9/11 wars. The events of
2001-2005 provided the fuel, if not the spark. Certainly, this is how some
leaders of the protests framed them. Yet, neither of these series of protests
were motivated principally by "solidarity" with Iraqis or Afghanis or anyone
else. They were instead prompted by perceived insults to Islam, which directly
engaged believers across the world. In both cases, this was the spark or
precipitating factor.
It is also noteworthy that, for the participants, the protests were not
principally meant to achieve some remote effect. Instead, they were
affirmations of devotion and identity. As such, they were inherently
"efficacious". Finally, in many countries, the demonstrations were enabled by
political authorities, perhaps for reasons of legitimation.
It may be that only direct challenges to Islam -- whether real or perceived
-- have the power to precipitate mass pan-Islamic action. Such "assaults" may
not engage a "worldwide Muslim community" as much as they constitute
it -- bringing together what is otherwise, usually disaggregated or
divided into national or tribal communities. If this is so, then there is good
reason to be concerned about the Bush administration's decision to re-invent
the "war on terror" as a war on radical Islamic movements. It may help
precipitate the threat it purports to defend against.
Recent US military strategy explicitly lists a number of defining
characteristics of Islamic extremism. Among these are adherence to such
concepts as the Caliphate, Jihad, and Islamic Law. Unfortunately, under
various interpretations, some or all of these enjoy at least mild assent among
a very substantial percentage of the world's Muslims -- the vast majority of
whom are not insurgent, violent, or even especially political. But it may not
escape their attention that important tenets of Islam, like Sharia, now figure
centrally in Pentagon threat assessment and strategy. As noted above,
substantial percentages of Muslim populations already suspect that the "war on
terrorism" is, in fact, a "war on Islam". In trying to "ideologize" the
threat, present policy inadvertently encourages such beliefs.
Conclusion: the World Against Us
Since the advent of the Afghan war, world public opinion has trended
strongly against US global leadership, both generally and, especially,
regarding national security affairs. This, as a response to a set of US policy
practices -- particularly the Iraq war and conduct of the "war on terrorism".
The political counterpart to this trend has developed unevenly -- thus,
opening gaps between some governments and their citizens. These gaps may
slowly close, as they have in Spain and Italy, materially diminishing allied
support for US policies. Otherwise, effective political resistance to US
initiatives has been sporadic, although a tipping point may come. Of course,
even sporadic opposition or passive opposition to US policies can
significantly reduce their effectiveness or increase their cost. This was made
clear by Turkish refusal to allow transit of its territory and overflights
during the opening phase of the Iraq war. This prevented the opening of an
effective northern front in that war; subsequently, the areas to the north of
Baghdad became a haven for fleeing Baathists and a redoubt for insurgents.
Pakistan, China, Russia, Germany, and France also have been able to impede
some important US policy initiatives.
Perhaps the greatest concerns about the drift of world opinion is that (1)
in the Muslim world it is increasing the political power of fundamentalist
parties and providing a more fertile environment for the activity of terrorist
organizations, while (2) also creating favorable opinion worldwide for powers
that purportedly seek to balance against the United States -- namely China and
Russia.
Notes
1. Richard Bernstein; "Two
Years Later: World Opinion; Foreign Views of US Darken after Sept. 11," New
York Times, 11 September 2003.
2. "Southeast Asian leaders
adopt anti-terror statement," Agence France Presse, 4 November 2001;
OIC Press Release, The OIC Secretary General Strongly Condemning the
Terrorist Attacks that Caused the Death of a Great Number of Innocent People
(Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: Organization of the Islamic Conference, 1 October
2001); "A country by country look at actions taken internationally as United
States plans retaliatory moves," Associated Press, 17 September 2001;
"Arabs support war against terrorism, refrain from backing military action,"
Agence France Presse, 15 September 2001; Suzanne Daley, "Russia
Condemns Attacks on the U.S. and Vows to Aid NATO," New York Times, 14
September 2001; Robert Wielaard, "Stunned EU Vows to Stand by US,"
Associated Press, 12 September 2001; and, "Palestinian leadership condemns
US attacks, denies celebrations," Agence France Presse, 12 September
2001.
3. "US-Arab relations 'in
crisis'," BBC News, 10 November 2001; "Jakarta increases pressure on US
to end bombing," The Age, 4 November 2001; Karen DeYoung, "Job of
Maintaining Coalition Toughens; World Response to Bombing Ranges From Silence
and Support to Public Protests," Washington Post, 10 October 2001, p.
17; Matthew Engel, "Muslim allies break ranks with US: Key Muslim allies Saudi
Arabia and Pakistan break ranks with US over bombing," The Guardian
(London), 16 October 2001; Arie Farnam, "Bombings hit unintended target:
European opinion," Christian Science Monitor, 14 November 2001; Paul
Mann and Michael A. Taverna, "Europe Wary Of Prolonged Bombing," Aviation
Week & Space Technology, 22 October 2001; Alissa J. Rubin, "Bombing Alters
Afghans' Views of US," Los Angeles Times, 5 November 2001; and, Kevin
Sullivan, "War Support Ebbs Worldwide; Sept 11 Doesn't Justify Bombing many
say," Washington Post, 6 November 2001.
4. America's Image
Slips, but Allies Share US Concerns Over Iran, Hamas (Washington DC: Pew
Research Center, 13 June 2006); and, US Image Up Slightly, But Still
Negative (Washington DC: Pew Research Center, June 2005).
5. Transatlantic Trends
2005 (Washington DC: German Marshall Fund, 2005); and, World Views 2002
(Washington DC and Chicago IL: German Marshall Fund and the Chicago
Council on Foreign Relations, 2002).
6. James Zogby,
Attitudes of Arabs: An In-depth Look at Social and Political Concerns of Arabs
(Washington DC: Arab American Institute and Zogby International, 2005); and,
Dafna Linzer, "Poll Shows Growing Arab Rancor at US," Washington Post,
23 July 2004, p. 26.
7. A Year After Iraq
War: Mistrust of America in Europe Ever Higher, Muslim Anger Persists
(Washington DC: Pew Research Center, March 2004).
8. A Year After Iraq
War: Mistrust of America in Europe Ever Higher, Muslim Anger Persists
(Washington DC: Pew Research Center, March 2004).
9. Robin Aitken, "Islam
Poll," Today show, BBC Radio 4, 23 December, 2002;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/reports/archive/politics/muslim_poll.pdf
10. Hamilton College and
Zogby International, Muslim America Poll (Clinton NY: Hamilton College,
20 May 2002).
11. America's Image
Slips, but Allies Share US Concerns Over Iran, Hamas (Washington DC: Pew
Research Center, 13 June 2006); and, US Image Up Slightly, But Still
Negative (Washington DC: Pew Research Center, June 2005).
12. World Public Says
Iraq War has Increased Global Terrorist Threat (Washington DC: Program on
International Policy Attitudes (PIPA), February 2006.
13. James Zogby,
Attitudes of Arabs: An In-depth Look at Social and Political Concerns of Arabs
(Washington, DC: Arab American Institute and Zogby International, 2005); and,
Shibley Telhami, Arab Attitudes Toward Political and Social Issues, Foreign
Policy, and the Media (College Park, MD: Sadat Chair for Peace and
Development, University of Maryland, October 2005).
14. In 20 of 23
Countries Polled Citizens Want Europe to Be More Influential Than US
(Washington DC: Program on International Policy Attitudes, April 2005).
15. Beirut Center for
Research and Data, Poll finds support for Hizbullah's retaliation; Opinions
diverge on sectarian lines -- but not completely (Beirut: 29 July 2006).
16. James Zogby,
Attitudes of Arabs: An In-depth Look at Social and Political Concerns of Arabs
(Washington DC: Arab American Institute and Zogby International, 2005). On the
nationalistic character of Islam, see: Olivier Roy, Globalized Islam: The
Search for a New Ummah (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004).
Citation: Carl Conetta, Losing Hearts and Minds: World Public Opinion
and post-9/11 US Security Policy, Cambridge, MA: Commonwealth Institute
Project on Defense Alternatives Briefing Memo #37, 05 September 2006.
http://www.comw.org/pda/0609bm37.html
The Vatican's secretary of state said he hopes
Pope Benedict XVI will go to Turkey despite the uproar
AP Sept. 17, 2006
VATICAN CITY — The Vatican's secretary of state said he hopes Pope
Benedict XVI will go to Turkey despite the uproar over the pontiff's
remarks about Islam and holy war, the Italian news agency ANSA reported.
"I hope that he will do" the trip, ANSA quoted Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone
as saying when asked about the pope's plans to visit predominantly Muslim
nation in late November. "Until now, there are no reasons not to make it."
The trip would be Benedict's first papal pilgrimage to a largely Muslim
country.
Bertone, the pope's apostolic vicar in Anatolia, Turkey, said participants
at a bishops' conference in Istanbul were expected to discuss the pontiff's
pilgrimage to Turkey on Monday. The trip mainly had been planned to give
Benedict the chance to meet with Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I,
spiritual leader of the world's Orthodox Christians.
But State Minister Mehmet Aydin, who oversees religious affairs in Turkey,
said the pope must offer a proper apology for comments about Islam he made in
a speech in Germany on Tuesday.
Benedict, quoting from an obscure Medieval text, had cited the words of a
Byzantine emperor who characterized some of the teachings of the Prophet
Muhammad, Islam's founder, as "evil and inhuman" — prompting outrage among
Muslims worldwide, including in Turkey.
On Sunday, Benedict said in Italy that he was "deeply sorry" about the
angry reaction to his speech, and said the text did not reflect his personal
opinion.
Aydin said the apology was not enough.
"You either have to say this 'I'm sorry," in a proper way or not say it at
all," he told reporters in Istanbul. "Are you sorry for saying such a thing or
because of its consequences?"
Eurasia Insight:
TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY MOVING AWAY FROM US POSITION – EXPERT
Joshua Kucera: 9/15/06
www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/eav091506a_pr.shtml
The moderate Islamist government in power in Turkey is steering the country
away from a pro-US foreign policy and is rapidly orienting itself with its
Muslim neighbors, a regional expert said during testimony before a
congressional committee September 14.
Soner Cagaptay, a fellow at the conservative-leaning Washington Institute
for Near East Policy, said that ever since the Justice and Development Party (AKP
in Turkish), took power in 2002, Ankara has viewed foreign policy issues
increasingly through the prism of religion.
Cagaptay spoke at a congressional hearing under the topic “Is There a Clash
of Civilizations?: Islam, Democracy, and US-Middle East Policy.” He argued
that while Turkey before 2002 could have been used as a strong example to
debunk the notions of a “clash of civilizations” between the Muslim and
western worlds, that is no longer the case.
Once steadfast allies, the United States and Turkey have experienced
bilateral tension in recent years, mainly connected with the Iraq invasion and
the subsequent imbroglio. The Bush administration became enraged with the AKP
government on the eve of the US-led blitz against Iraq in 2003, when Turkey
declined to grant temporary basing rights to US troops. [For background see
the Eurasia Insight archive]. Domestically, the AKP has been facing growing
pressure from nationalist constituencies. [For background see the Eurasia
Insight archive].
“Today … US-Turkish relations are strained on almost all Middle East
issues. From their views of terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah to
dealing with Iran and Syria, the United States and Turkey have developed
vastly disparate positions since the AKP came to power,” Cagaptay said.
The rapprochement with Turkey’s Muslim neighbors has gone both ways. Iran
has tried to gain favor lately with Ankara by adopting a tough stand against
Kurdish militants affiliated with the PKK, who are active in the mountainous
area that connects southeastern Turkey with Iran and Iraq. At the same time,
Ankara and Tehran remain divided over energy issues. [For background see the
Eurasia Insight archive].
In August, Washington took a step towards mollifying Turkey by appointing
Joseph Ralston, a retired four-star general, as a special envoy with
responsibility for “coordinating US engagement with the government of Turkey
and the government of Iraq to eliminate the terrorist threat of the PKK and
other terrorist groups operating in northern Iraq and across the Turkey-Iraq
border,” according to a State Department statement.
Cagaptay said the strategy of the AKP to orient its foreign policy toward
its Muslim neighbors is meant, at least in part, as a political strategy. “If
the Turks think of themselves as Muslims first in the foreign-policy arena,
then one day they’ll think of themselves as Muslims first in the domestic
one,” Cagaptay said.
He noted that the Turkish public tends to follow its rulers’ lead: A recent
survey showed that only 12 percent of Turks viewed the United States
positively, down from 52 percent in 2000.
Editor’s Note: Joshua Kucera is a Washington, DC,-based freelance
writer who specializes in security issues in Central Asia, the Caucasus and
the Middle East.
TURKEY – VATICAN
Pope’s trip at risk as Turkey becomes less secular
By Mavi Zambak
17 September, 2006
http://www.asianews.it/view.php?l=en&art=7232
The controversy surrounding the Pope’s
speech on the relationship between Islam and violence seems to have been
planned to bolster Turkey’s fundamentalist nationalism. Turkish Christians
call on moderate Muslims to speak out if they don’t want their country to
betray Atatürk’s legacy and democracy
Ankara (AsiaNews) – Turkey’s Christians are horrified by the reaction out
of proportion to the Pope’s university speech. Increasingly, people are
wondering whether this reaction was planned by local mass media to reignite an
anti-Christian diatribe that never truly died in the last few months. Turkish
Christians appeal to “moderate Muslims to have the courage to speak out and
show, first of all, that Muslims have not lost their mind and are still
capable to engage others in a rational dialogue without clashing and resorting
to violence and threats like months ago over the Muhammad cartoons affair.”
The Pontiff: “arrogant” leader or sharp scholar?
For an important Turkish public figure, who chose to remain anonymous
(which says a lot about the current situation), the Pope’s speech in
Regensburg was no accident. Of all the thousands of quotes the Holy Father
could choose why did he have to pick the one by Manuel II Manuel II
Palaiologos on the links between Islam and violence?
Is the Pontiff “an ignorant and arrogant provocateur” as the Turkish press
continues to characterise him today? Or is there something more? There are in
fact some who think otherwise.
As a sharp scholar and theologian, it is not possible to think that the
Holy Father did not take into account that his choice of quote would not
provoke an uproar in a world like ours, in this very global village, where
every little word, especially by a prominent leader, is scrutinised, its
resonance amplified, its meaning extrapolated and distorted by the mass media.
For the aforementioned anonymous Turkish public figure, the Pope’s choice
of quote was a deliberate litmus test ahead of his crucial trip to Turkey, the
first Muslim (and secular) state he is scheduled (perhaps) to visit. And the
Turkish government fell for it by siding with the defenders of the Islamist
camp and its profound religious identity.
Turkey threw itself head first in the media war; Turkish politicians didn’t
pull any punches. In so doing though they lost a golden opportunity to
demonstrate that their country was “truly” committed to the separation of
state and religion, to democracy and against ideological fanaticism and
political radicalism.
First act in this play was the intervention by Turkey’s minister of
Religious Affairs, Ali Bardakoglu, who, as if he had any authority in the
matter, called for the cancellation of the apostolic visit. Then Prime
Minister Erdoğan slammed the Pope for his “ugly and inappropriate” words
without looking into the overall meaning of the Pope’s speech and who failed
to see that the Pope was calling for a dialogue between faith and reason
against all forms of violence and preconceived ideology.
Under the circumstances where was Turkey’s secularism? Where are the
moderate Islamists who make Turkey so proud?
What is apparent is that a process is underway that is eroding the
foundations of the secular state founded by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. As the
Kemalist veneer is removing the ever-present but hitherto hidden religious
substratum is re-emerging.
For Bishop Luigi Padovese, vicar apostolic to Anatolia, “Turkish society is
going through a transition; it changing from a ‘solid’ to a ‘liquid state’.
Western influence—which is trickling into the country through trade, tourism,
the mass media and especially the desire of much of the population and the
government to join the European Union—is seen as a threat to Turkey’s highly
nationalistic ethos whose advocates thought they could have democracy without
pluralism, at least in its ethnic and religious dimensions. Atatürk’s
secularism is losing much of its original character under changing political
and religious circumstances. Turkish society is reverting back to a more
fanatical religiosity based that equate being Turkish with being Muslim. All
this is fuelling tensions and raising doubts about the Turkish government’s
ability to preserve the Turkish Republic’s secular, moderate and democratic
character”.
This raises another question. Is there a moderate Islam that can show the
world that an Islamic democracy is possible?
The telling silence of moderate Muslims
Is there no better time for moderate Muslims to speak up than now? Why
aren’t they distancing themselves from the sort of religious fanaticism that,
like wildfire, is spreading irrationalism in response to a quote made by the
Pope from some ancient source?
The harsh reactions by Turkish political leaders and mass media have
surprised and saddened Christian authorities in Turkey. No voice trying to
appease emotions has yet spoken out against this explosive and obnoxious
cacophony.
Mgr Padovese himself knows that there are the great “many fair-minded
people in Turkey. They should be the first to stand up against the
fundamentalists, but instead they have no voice in chapter and are silent out
of fear or as a result of intimidation”.
Unlike his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI is no globetrotter, but he must
have realised the importance of his visit to Turkey. From the beginning of his
pontificate, he stressed that ecumenical and inter-faith dialogue was one of
his priorities. For this reason, if he does go to Istanbul on November 30 to
meet Bartholomew I to discuss intra-Christian matters, and goes to Ankara to
talk to Muslims, knowing that he is facing hard-nosed Kemalists like President
Sezer and military leaders, and nationalist fringes like the Grey Wolves, he
might have expected to rely on Erdoğan (who comes from the Nur or ‘light’
movement), on Gülen whose Islam espouses clemency and mercy, and on the
growing number of Sufi movements.
It is from this kind of Islam that the Pope could have expected support
against terrorism in all its forms, and found allies backing him in defending
the principle that every life is sacred and that no intention, however,
sacred, can justify and legalise actions against another human being.
What will happen now?
Tomorrow the Bishops’ Conference of Turkey will meet in Istanbul. Its
members were supposed to discuss routine matters about the final preparations
for the Pope’s visit. Instead, they will now have to decide whether the Pope’s
visit to Turkey’s can go ahead in such a hostile climate.
One thing is certain though. The Pope’s trip is not the only thing at risk;
Turkey’s secular character is as well.
09/15/2006
TURKEY -VATICAN - Islamic nationalists in Turkey protest against visit
...
09/16/2005
TURKEY - VATICAN - Christians disappointed: Ankara has put off the
pope’s ...
07/3/2006
TURKEY - Fr Brunissen stabbed amid anti-Christian scenario ...
12/12/2004
VATICAN - The crèche is a sign of culture and faith, Pope says
09/15/2006
islam - vatican - Benedict XVI’s words spark calls for apologies and
...
Islam row puts Pope's Turkey visit in doubt
RTE.ie - Ireland
Next month's visit by Pope Benedict to Turkey, which is a predominately
Muslim country, appears to be in doubt following his remarks about Islam earlier
this ...
Turkish media focus on protests against Pope
Catholic World News - USA
Sep. 15 (AsiaNews) - The Muslim-dominated media in Turkey, which had been silent
about plans for a November visit by Pope Benedict ...
Turkish bestseller: “Who will kill the Pope in Istanbul?”
Hot Air - MD,USA
... In a little more than 300 pages, Kaya manages to weave the Turkish
Secret Service, the infamous Masonic lodge P2, and (of course) Opus Dei into his
plot line. ...
Pope's remarks "won't affect Turkish visit" say Ankara sources
Raw Story - Cambridge,MA,USA
Ankara- Remarks made by Pope Benedict XVI about Islam will not affect his
planned visit to Turkey in November, Turkish foreign ministry sources
were quoted as
Turkish PM urges pope to apologise for Islam remarks
Turkish Press - Plymouth,MI,USA
ISTANBUL - Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Saturday called
on Pope Benedict XVI to apologise for his "unfortunate, ugly" remarks on Islam
...
Turkish PM asks pope to apologize for comments on Islam
People's Daily Online - Beijing,China
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Saturday asked Pope
Benedict XVI to apologize for his recent comments on Islam, Turkey's
semi-official Anatolia
Turkey's top Muslim leader asks pope to retract comments about ...
People's Daily Online - Beijing,China
Turkey's top Muslim leader Ali Bardakoglu on Friday asked Pope Benedict
XVI to retract and make an apology for his recent comments criticizing Islam,
the semi ...
Couchepin backs Pope's Islam comments
NZZ Online - Zurich,Switzerland
... Couchepin didn't think the Pope had insulted Islam but
admitted that he had been careless ? "he spoke like a professor and forgot
...
See all stories on this topic
Nun Shot to Death; Possible Retaliation for Pope's Islam Remarks
All Headline News - USA
... Somali gunmen Sunday. The murder happened just hours after a Muslim
cleric condemned Pope Benedict XVI for his remarks on Islam.
...
See all stories on this topic
Muslims Fume at Pope's Islam Jibe
Islam Online - Doha,Qatar
WORLD CAPITALS — Pope Benedict XVI's criticism of Islam and the
Islamic concept of Jihad as unreasonable and against God's nature has sparked
furor in the ...
‘Muslims should forgive Pope’
Mumbai Mirror - India
... Firangimahali disagreed with the demand from a section of Muslims
that Pope should quit saying that it is up to the Christians to decide
about it. ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope issues explanation, not apology to angry Muslims
News 8 Austin - Austin,TX,USA
CASTEL GANDOLFO, Italy -- Pope Benedict said remarks he made last week
that have angered Muslims worldwide do not reflect his personal opinion.
...
See all stories on this topic
Pope
sorry for offending Muslims
Kenya Broadcasting Corporation -
Nairobi,Kenya
Pope Benedict XVI has apologised in person for causing offence to
Muslims in a speech in Bavaria last week. He said the medieval ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope Says Sorry Again For Offending Muslims
newswire.co.nz - Havelock Nth,Hawkes
Bay,New Zealand
Pope Benedict XVI has said sorry in person for causing offence to
Muslims in a speech in Bavaria last week. He said the medieval ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope's apology fails to placate Muslims as violence goes on
Independent - London,England,UK
... "If the Pope does not apologise, Muslims' anger will
continue until he becomes remorseful," he went on. "He should go to clerics
...
See all stories on this topic
Pope Apologizes Personally to Muslims
Deutsche Welle - Germany
... which were considered offensive to the sensibility of Muslims,"
the pope said during the traditional Angelus blessing from his summer
residence at Castel ...
Germany`s Muslims welcome Pope`s statement
Zee News - Noida,India
Berlin, Sept 17: The Central Council of Muslims in Germany on Sunday
welcomed Pope Benedict XVI`s expression of sorrow for having outraged the
Muslim world by ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope's explanation accepted by some Muslim leaders, but others say ...
San Diego Union Tribune - United States
... Germany's Central Council of Muslims welcomed the pope's
comments Sunday as “the most important step to calm the protest” and urged the
Vatican to seek ...
See all stories on this topic
Churches firebombed as Muslims demand further apology
Ireland Online - Dublin,Ireland
... Days later as word of the Pope’s speech spread, Muslims
around the world responded with anger and violence despite the Vatican’s
insistence that the Pope ...
See all stories on this topic
Benedict eager to modernise arcane world of Vatican Bank
Times Online - UK
POPE BENEDICT XVI may be thought to have enough on his plate after his
trip to Germany last week — not least placating the Muslim world over his
remarks on ...
See all stories on this topic
Church stands by pope
Daily News & Analysis - Mumbai,India
NEW DELHI: The Catholic Church in India stood by Pope Benedict XVI on
Sunday ... country, said it was never the pontiff’s intention to hurt
Muslim sentiments and ...
See all stories on this topic
I am deeply sorry: Pope
Hindustan Times - India
... On Tuesday, the pope had cited the words of a Byzantine
emperor who ... evil and inhuman” — remarks that touched off widespread
anger across the Muslim world.
See all stories on this topic
Pope sorry for Muslim reaction
DailyIndia.com - Niskayuna,NY,USA
17 (UPI) -- Pope Benedict said at his Sunday blessing from Castal
Gandolfo, Italy, he was "deeply sorry" for the anger his remarks on Islam
caused. ...
Muslim Brotherhood sees "sufficient" Pope apology
Malaysia Star - Malaysia
CAIRO (Reuters) - Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood said Pope Benedict
had apologised sufficiently on Sunday for remarks on Islam that angered many in
the Muslim world ...
Israeli chief rabbi 'very sorry' about pope's remarks on Islam
Monsters and Critics.com - Glasgow,UK
... In a September Tuesday speech, Pope Benedict caused outrage in
the Muslim world by quoting a 14th-century Christian emperor as referring
to elements of Islam
See all stories on this topic
Nun shot dead as Pope fails to calm militant Muslims
Times Online - UK
... But Muhammad Abdul Bari, general secretary of the Muslim
Council of Britain, said: “It’s certainly a welcome step that the Pope
recognises the hurt that ...
See all stories on this topic
Quote on Islam does not reflect my views: Pope
Hindu - Chennai,India
... Italian nun and her bodyguard at the entrance of a hospital where she
worked, in an attack some feared could be linked to Muslim outrage over
the Pope's remarks
See all stories on this topic
Pope says speech didn’t reflect his personal opinion
Indian Express - New Delhi,India
... on Sunday after Pope Benedict’s apology.The leader of Egypt’s
Muslim Brotherhood said the apology was sufficient and that the Islamic
political group’s ...
See all stories on this topic
Italian nun shot dead in Somalia
Jerusalem Post - Israel
... The Islamic courts are credited with bringing a semblance of
order to the ... blamed Sunday's shooting on the recent controversy over
a speech Pope Benedict XVI
See all stories on this topic
The
Moral Victory of The Pope
Brussels Journal - Brussel,Belgium
... In essence she said, in a diplomatic manner of course, that the
Islamic leaders who are demanding excuses from the Pope should either
first read the text of ...
See all stories on this topic
Benedict is right
Ynetnews - Israel
... the Pope's declaration. We may succeed, God forbid, to
convince the enlightened world we're the reason for international terror and not
the Islamic religion in ...
See all stories on this topic
Vatican Believes Pope will Still Visit Turkey
Zaman Online - Istanbul,Turkey
Despite the recent tension in the Islamic world, the Vatican believes
Roman Catholic leader Pope XVI Benedict will still pay a visit to Turkey
in November. ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope's
remarks condemned by Qatar
Bahrain News Agency - Bahrain
... told Qatar News Agency that the Pope's remarks were absolutely
rejected as they contradicted the historical human message of the Islamic
religion which was ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope’s remarks an insult, says Afghan govt
Online - International News Network -
Islamabad,Pakistan
The foreign ministry said the Pope should apologise for the remarks, a
demand ... Many misunderstandings and misperceptions in the West about
the Islamic world are ...
See all stories on this topic
Churches Firebombed by Members of the "Religion of Peace"
The Conservative Voice -
Kernersville,NC,USA
... Arab's most powerful organization, said the Pope’s apology was
not enough and demanded that the Pontiff make amends for his comments on the
Islamic religion.
See all stories on this topic
Sheik says, 'kill the Pope'
Melbourne Herald Sun - Australia
... prayers. "We call on all Islamic communities across the world
to take revenge on the baseless critic called the Pope," he said. The
...
See all stories on this topic
Pope’s remarks an insult, says Afghan govt
Online - International News Network -
Islamabad,Pakistan
... killed earlier this year in nationwide protests over cartoons
depicting the ... apologise before the Muslim umma (nation)," purported
spokesman Mohammad Hanif said ...
Muslims in uproar; Pope misunderstood: Vatican
Arab Times - Kuwait
... A row earlier this year over Danish cartoons that depicted the
Prophet Mohammad deepened the sense of a divide between Islamic culture
and the West. ...
See all stories on this topic
A question of faith and religion
Gulf News - Dubai,United Arab Emirates
... And in Lebanon, the Grand Ayatollah Mohammad Hussain Fadlallah
demanded an apology for ... He was sympathetic to their reaction to the
Danish cartoons, and he was ...
Linking Islam with terror wrong: Aziz
Islamic Republic News Agency - Tehran,Iran
... Emphasizing the need to forge unity among Muslim countries, the prime
minister said the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC)
should be transformed into ...
Open Letter to Pope Benedict from Indian Muslims
Milli Gazette - India
... A systematic attempt is afoot globally to demonise Islam and Prophet
Muhammad (pbuh) and the recent manifestation of this was the cartoon
controversy which had ...
Afghanistan: International Religious Freedom Report 2006
All American Patriots (press release) -
Taeby,NA,Sweden
... The Danish cartoon controversy, in particular, resulted in
several large demonstrations and ... in the Qur'an and the customary
practices of the Prophet Muhammad. ...
See all stories on this topic
Somalia: Somali government condemns Pope’s slander on Islam
SomaliNet - USA
... In a speech in Germany on Tuesday, the Pope quoted the 14th century
Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Palaeologus, who said: "Show me just what
Muhammad brought that ...
We cannot afford to maintain these ancient prejudices against ...
Guardian Unlimited - UK
... the popes were trying to impose celibacy on the reluctant clergy,
Muhammad was portrayed by ... Coming on the heels of the Danish
cartoon crisis, his remarks were ...
See all stories on this topic
Islamic intolerance
Jerusalem Post - Israel
... to themselves, be it in the form of Danish-commissioned caricature
or learned ... reacting to caricatures that highlighted how the Prophet
Muhammad's teachings are ...
Sep. 16, 2006: David Warren on Pope Benedict
National Review Online Blogs - New
York,NY,USA
... It is worth adding, that in expressing their blind rage thus, they
were illustrating not the Pope’s, but the Byzantine emperor’s caricature
of Islam from ...
Leaders must carry us all towards peace
The Brunei Times - Bandar,Brunei,Brunei
Darussalam
... the trauma caused by the Satanic Verses of Salman Rushdie and not so
long ago, the controversial Danish cartoon caricaturing the Holy Prophet
Mohammad SAW. ...
Spreading faith by the sword is 'evil and inhumane'
ProgressiveU.org - San Mateo,CA,USA
... A cartoon of Mohammad in a Danish magazine is hardly
grounds for rioting and burning buildings, and these actions deserve no more
respect or understanding than ...
See all stories on this topic
A question of faith and religion
Gulf News - Dubai,United Arab Emirates
... has yet to escalate to the level of the Danish cartoon
controversy, but ... And in Lebanon, the Grand Ayatollah Mohammad
Hussain Fadlallah demanded an apology for ...
ANALYSIS - Both sides feel threats in Pope-Islam row
Malaysia Star - Malaysia
... like recent controversies over the Danish cartoons of the Prophet
Mohammad or the death ... "This controversy has started out just like
the cartoon crisis," said ...
Pope sees silver lining in furor over Islam quote
CBC News - Canada
... were attacked in Palestinian areas An Italian nun was slain by gunmen
in Somalia hours after a leading Muslim cleric in Mogadishu condemned the
Pope for his ...
See all stories on this topic
Local Muslim feared pope's comment may have ended dialogue
Canada Western Catholic Reporter -
Edmonton,Alberta,Canada
Pope Benedict's comments responding to Muslim outrage over a
speech in Germany were "really helpful," says a prominent member of the local
Muslim community. ...
See all stories on this topic
Venezuela's Chavez urges pope to be more careful with his words
International Herald Tribune - France
... The pope did not issue the direct apology still demanded by
some Muslim leaders who were offended by his remarks, which quoted a text
characterizing some of ...
See all stories on this topic
Don't visit Istanbul, John Paul's attacker warns Pope
Guardian Unlimited - UK
... Agca spoke from prison amid continuing fury in the Muslim
world over Pope Benedict XVI's remarks last week that were taken as
critical of Islam. ...
See all stories on this topic
Uganda: What If the Pope Had Quoted a Nazi Writer?
AllAfrica.com - Washington,USA
The controversy consequent to the Pope's ill-judged statement about Islam
and violence may not abate easily as different Muslim populations across
the world ...
See all stories on this topic
Muslims, Catholics Meet In DC
NBC 4.com - Washington,DC,USA
... and Catholic organizations met at a news conference in Washington
Wednesday to discuss recent remarks by Pope Benedict XVI that angered the
Muslim community. ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope or dope?
Business Standard - India
The Pope has to ask himself if what he is doing in respect of Islam is
what the world needs. He has been insisting on reciprocity, which means
Muslim countries ...
See all stories on this topic
Arinday: Religious restiveness
Sun.Star - Philippines
... The pontiff's remarks vetted the anger of more Muslim enclaves
and vent their ... Of course, Pope Benedict XVI made a personal
apology which is unprecedented but ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope calls for respect and colloboration with Muslims
Independent Catholic News - London,UK
The Pope said his journey to the land of his birth had been not just "a
... importance of the subject, I quoted some words from a Christian-Muslim
dialogue from ...
See all stories on this topic
American Muslims Accept Pope’s Apology
American Muslim - Bridgeton,MO,USA
We take Pope Benedict’s apology seriously and we urge American Muslims
to take leadership positions to condemn religiously motivated violence and work
more
See all stories on this topic
MUSLIMS WON’T FORGIVE THE POPE
Free Market News Network - Pompano
Beach,FL,USA
Although Pope Benedict XVI has publicly apologised to Muslim leaders over
his remarks after he made a speech about the concept of holy war, referring to
...
See all stories on this topic
Area Catholics, Muslims seek healing over pope
Detroit Free Press - United States
... Eide Alawan, interfaith spokesman for the Islamic Center of America
in Dearborn, said Tuesday that Muslims are frustrated and hurt by the
pope's use of the ...
Pope Benedict and the Muslims
TCS Daily - Washington,DC,USA
... But it is more unfortunate to imagine that the Pope and the
Ecumenical Patriarch would attempt to find common ground in the denigration of
Muslims. ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope angers Muslims, al-Qaeda vows war on cross, but ‘Turkey
...
Catholic Online - Bakersfield,CA,USA
... some leaders of Islam responded with diplomatic caution, but many
other Muslims here and there lashed out with anger and violence. In Iraq,
the pope was burned
Text of Pope Benedict XVI's remarks
San Diego Union Tribune - United States
The official Vatican translation of Pope Benedict XVI's remarks,
delivered in Italian Sunday about his Sept. 12 speech that sparked anger among
Muslims. ...
Central Florida Muslims decry anti-pope violence
Orlando Sentinel - Orlando,FL,USA
While upset and in some cases insulted by Pope Benedict XVI's recent
remarks about the Prophet Muhammad, Central Florida Muslims are also
appalled by the ...
See all stories on this topic
Lawyer: Pope gunman warns Benedict not to travel to Turkey
International Herald Tribune - France
... Secular Turkey's ruling Islamic-rooted government accused him
of trying to revive the ... faxed to the Associated Press by his lawyer
that the pope was pressured
Some say apologies by pope are too much
International Herald Tribune - France
... If security was higher, following death threats on radical Islamic
Web sites, it was hard to see: The pope arrived at the canopy in front
St. ...
See all stories on this topic
The Pope, Violence and Dialogue
Zaman Online - Istanbul,Turkey
... and it will benefit global powers that direct military and political
operations on the “Islamic terror” dialectic. It’s true that the pope
has taken his ...
See all stories on this topic
Leading Islamic Figures Accept Pope's Apology
The Universe - Manchester,England,UK
By The Universe: Reaction to the Pope's controversial speech at
Regensburg University appears to be dying down after two major figures in the
Middle East ...
See all stories on this topic
Anger at pope ahead of Islam month of reconciliation
Monsters and Critics.com - Glasgow,UK
... the next few weeks when Muslims will abstain food and drink, will
lead to the setting-aside of the dispute between Pope Benedict XVI and
the Islamic community.
See all stories on this topic
Pope Expresses "Deep Respect" for Muslims
Zenit News Agency - Rome,Italy
... in an incomprehensively brusque way for us, presented to the
Islamic interlocutor the ... this quotation has given room to a
misunderstanding," the Pope said. ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope’s comments fail to specify Islamic radicals
Radford University The Tartan Online -
Radford,VA,USA
... preached.”. The pope further suggested that the Islamic
religion was irrational by quoting the academic, Theodore Khoury. “In ...
See all stories on this topic
I'ma Presbyterian but I back the Pope
Belfast Telegraph - United Kingdom
... that Islam is a wolf in sheep's clothing and totally agree with the
Pope in his ... a more sinister undertow that has more to do with
the greater Islamic cause of ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope says anti-Islam quotes not his own views
Reuters Canada - Toronto,Ontario,Canada
VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - Pope Benedict said on Wednesday that his use of
medieval quotes critical of Islam in a speech in Germany last week, that
infuriated ...
Pope: Islam Quote Not My Views
CBS News - New York,New York,USA
Pope Benedict XVI used his weekly audience in St Peter’s Square Wednesday
to try ... the firestorm ignited by his quote a week ago that
characterised Islam as a ...
See all stories on this topic
UCAN: Indonesian bishops apologize for pope's Islam comments
...
Catholic Online - Bakersfield,CA,USA
... UCAN) – The Indonesian Catholic bishops have issued a statement
expressing regret and apologizing to Muslims for Pope Benedict XVI's
citation on Islam in a ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope sorry over reaction to Islam speech
Reuters.uk - UK
VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - Pope Benedict said on Sunday he was "deeply
sorry" at the anger caused by his remarks on Islam and said a quote he
used from a ...
Clinton, Gingrich Both Defend the Pope
Washington Post - United States
... House Speaker Newt Gingrich, longtime foes in American politics,
forcefully defended Pope Benedict XVI on Tuesday against a wave of
Muslim criticism over a ...
See all stories on this topic
The Pope should know better than to endorse the idea of a war of ...
Guardian Unlimited - UK
... say, Catholicism the way they might attack, say, socialism - but the
Pope, of all ... For many years people in Arab and Muslim
lands have resented western meddling ...
See all stories on this topic
The Pope's Dilemma
Yahoo! News - USA
... In short, wherever Muslim sensibilities have been touched by
Western challenges, the Pope has addressed their concerns in a sensitive
and conciliatory manner.
See all stories on this topic
Militant group threatens Gaza Christians over pope's remarks
Ha'aretz - Tel Aviv,Israel
... by Islam," Hussein said. "The religion is clear, but I hold the
Vatican Pope responsible for all the anger in the Muslim street.".
See all stories on this topic
Pope Benedict Criticizes Islam
FrontPage magazine.com - Los
Angeles,CA,USA
... One hopes it is in the offing. Whatever the pope's purpose, he
prompted the near-predictable furor in the Muslim world. Religious ...
See all stories on this topic
Musharraf urges world to tackle root causes of terrorism
International Herald Tribune - France
... be veiled references to the US-led 2003 invasion of Iraq and Pope
Benedict XVI's ... "Unless we end foreign occupation and suppression of
Muslim peoples, terrorism ...
See all stories on this topic
'Pitting Christian figures against Muslims a plot'
IranMania News - Iran
... "Pope Benedict XVI has raised unreal claims, which stem from
his unawareness of Islam. His claims have been heart rending for all the world
Muslims," he added.
Only a meanminded religious leader can spread hatred
The New Nation - Bangladesh
... Islam. It is natural that Muslim anger is growing at the Pope.
Muslims demand an apology from him for his anti-Islam comments. A ...
Pope’s Speech Again Demonstrated The Fragility of Islam
Iran Press Service - Paris,France
... really unfortunate" and a setback for efforts to promote better
understanding between religions and cultures. ENDS POPE MUSLIMS
20906.
See all stories on this topic
East Valley Muslims extend hand
East Valley Tribune - Mesa,AZ,USA
... Many Muslims say the pope insulted their religion last
week by referencing old texts to describe Islam as “evil and inhuman” and
gaining converts at the ...
See all stories on this topic
Local Muslims Hope To Educate After Pope's Remarks
CBS 42 - Austin,TX,USA
Muslims around the world, and here in Austin, are offended by the
comments. Though they appreciate the Pope's apology, Muslims were
hurt by the comments. ...
See all stories on this topic
Conflict between Christians and Muslims
Louisville Courier-Journal -
Louisville,KY,USA
... Muslim world is "livid over pope's remarks," including
comparing the Pope with Hitler ... If moderate Muslims fail
to take hold and if the message of intolerance ...
See all stories on this topic
The Pope Disrupts Religious Harmony
FrontPage magazine.com - Los
Angeles,CA,USA
... ever tried to attack the glory of Islam like this Pope.
Muslims must respond in a manner which forces the Pope to
apologize.”. ...
See all stories on this topic
Vatican City: Muslims unsatisfied
The Herald - Everett,WA,USA
Despite a personal and public apology from the pope on Sunday, protests
continued Monday in the Muslim world. Many Muslims said they remained
dissatisfied with ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope row in past, PM tells Muslims
The Australian - Sydney,Australia
... has a point" in criticising Muslims for reacting to the Pope's
comments with ... But Australia's Islamic leader, Sheik Taj Din
al-Hilali, dismissed comments by his ...
See all stories on this topic
WHAT DID THE POPE THINK HE WAS DOING?
Yahoo! News - USA
Pope Benedict cannot apologize for defaming Islam, because he didn't. But
he ... of the 14th-century Byzantine emperor (issued before the final
Islamic conquest of
See all stories on this topic
The Pope's Remarks on Islam
NPR - USA
... Pope Benedict's speech was an academic address at a German
university on ... Meanwhile, governments looking to boost their
Islamic credentials are only too happy ...
See all stories on this topic
I Finally Figured It Out
RedState - Mclean,VA,USA
... And now I've seen Islamic radicals call for the death of
Pope Benedict XVI because they were offended by one of his speeches - and I
finally understand just ...
See all stories on this topic
‘Pope can use Turkey trip to calm anger’
Mumbai Mirror - India
... November could strengthen dialogue and friendship between religions
and people and help defuse the anger in Islamic world triggered by the
pope’s remarks on
See all stories on this topic
Should Vatican aides have warned the Pope?
Telegraph.co.uk - United Kingdom
... Since the exile of Archbishop Michael Fitzgerald to be the papal
envoy to Egypt, there are few high-ranking Islamic experts close to the
Pope. ...
See all stories on this topic
Call for ban on 'defamation of Islam'
Daily Telegraph - Sydney,New South
Wales,Australia
... UN General Assembly in which he took a veiled swipe at Pope
Benedict XVI ... through dialogue and understanding, the growing divide
between the Islamic and Western ...
See all stories on this topic
MISSING FROM THE POPE
Yahoo! News - USA
... There is no Islamic Council that can speak with authority in
these matters. And surely what the pope was attempting to say, or should
have been attempting to ...
See all stories on this topic
Moroccan king asks pope to respect Islam
IranMania News - Iran
... the Moroccan king said in a message to the pope, extracts of
... dialogue between religions and cultures," he said, underlining the
Islamic religious principle of ...
See all stories on this topic
Indian politician expresses shock over Pope's Islam-insulting
...
Islamic Republic News Agency - Tehran,Iran
The chief minister of the Indian administered state of Jammu and Kashmir, Ghulam
Nabi Azad on Tuesday criticized Pope Benedict XVI for making anti-Islamic
...
Pope's Islam comments cause concern; apology welcomed
Episcopal News Service - New York,NY,USA
... 16 statement issued by the Cardinal Secretary of State, Tarcisio
Bertone, who spoke of the Pope's "respect and esteem" for followers of
Islam and said that he ...
See all stories on this topic
Al-Qaeda to Pope: 'You're doomed' Irate Muslims fire up rhetoric ...
Ottawa Citizen (subscription) - Ontario,
Canada
CAIRO - Al-Qaeda in Iraq yesterday warned Pope Benedict XVI that its war
against Christianity and the West will go on until Islam takes over the
world, and ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope's Islam remarks draw local criticism
UI The Daily Iowan (subscription) - Iowa
City,IA,USA
... But Nadia Igram, the vice president of the UI Muslim Student
Association, said the pope needs to do a better job representing Islam
accurately. ...
Australian Cardinal adds to Islam-violence debate
Reuters.uk - UK
... Roman Catholics, said he was pleased there had been no violence in
Australia in reaction to Pope Benedict's use of a mediaeval quotation on
Islam and holy war.
See all stories on this topic
Fallout from Pope's Islam Speech
Here and Now - MA,USA
A group linked to Al Qaeda warns Pope Benedict XVI that he and the West
... words of a Byzantine emporer who characterized some of the teachings
of Islam as "evil ...
Pakistani parliament deems Pope Islam remarks derogatory
Radio New Zealand - Wellington,New Zealand
The Pakistani parliament has passed a resolution describing the Pope's
recent remarks about Islam as derogatory. The foreign ministry ...
Bush says pope sincere in apology on Islam
Reuters - USA
NEW YORK (Reuters) - President Bush said on Monday that Pope Benedict was
sincere in his apology for comments on Islam that have sparked outrage in
the Muslim ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope's Islam comments condemned
CNN International - USA
... apology. In Lebanon, the country's most senior Shiite Muslim cleric
demanded the pope personally apologize for insulting Islam. "We
...
Pope's Islam comments sadden Archbishop
ABC Regional Online - Australia
The Pope has been forced to apologise to Muslims for causing offence in a
university lecture he delivered last week, implicitly linking Islam to
violence. ...
Bush believes Pope sincere in apology on Islam
Reuters - USA
... George W. Bush said on Monday that Pope Benedict was sincere
in his apology for comments on Islam that have sparked outrage among
Muslims, a US official said. ...
See all stories on this topic
Anger mounts in Muslim world over pope's Islam remarks (Roundup)
Monsters and Critics.com - Glasgow,UK
... keen to 'cultivate an attitude of respect and dialogue toward other
religions and cultures, obviously toward Islam too' and that what the
pope took exception ...
Muslims react violently. Big surprise.
RedState - Mclean,VA,USA
... Reuters) - Al Qaeda militants in Iraq vowed war on "worshippers of
the cross" and protesters burned a papal effigy on Monday over Pope
Benedict's comments on ...
See all stories on this topic
Muslims seek better apology from Pope
Irish Examiner - Cork,Ireland
... The group said Muslims would be victorious and addressed the
pope as “the worshipper of the cross” saying “you and the West are doomed
as you can see ...
See all stories on this topic
British Muslims Threaten Pope: Islam will Conquer Rome
Jawa Report - Arlen,TX,USA
... Joee reports that the Islamists were chanting "Pope Benedict
you will pay, the Mujhidin are coming your way" and "Pope Benedict watch
your back". ...
His call to reconcile faith and reason shared by Muslims too
TODAYonline - Singapore
BY NOW, most Muslims would consider themselves no strangers to
controversy. Pope Benedict XVI's recent comment in Germany is the latest
to a long list of ...
See all stories on this topic
German Muslims welcome Pope's clarification
Expatica - Netherlands
BERLIN - The Central Council of Muslims in Germany welcomed Sunday's
clarification by Pope Benedict XVI as "an important step" towards calming
the protests ...
Iraqi Muslims protest Pope remarks, burn flags
Jerusalem Post - Israel
Hundreds of Iraqis demonstrated in the southern city of Basra on Monday against
Pope Benedict XVI's recent comments about Islam. ...
See all stories on this topic
Supreme Leader: Pope's Remarks Inciting Crisis between Muslims
...
Fars News Agency - Tehran,Iran
... words, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution called on the
world Muslims to pay due attention to the policies underlying the
Pope's statements, adding ...
Russia’s Putin Calls for Restraint in Pope-Muslims Conflict
MOSNEWS - Russia
... After violent protests from Muslims worldwide, demanding an
apology, Pope Benedict said he was deeply sorry Muslims had been
offended by his use of the ...
See all stories on this topic
Papal apology for Muslims
Calgary Sun - Canada
By AP. VATICAN CITY -- Pope Benedict said yesterday he is "deeply sorry"
his remarks on Islam and violence offended Muslims. But ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope's remarks offend Chinese
China Daily - China
The head of China's Muslim community yesterday expressed deep anger over
remarks made by Pope Benedict on September 12, when he cited the words of
a 14th ...
See all stories on this topic
'Day of Rage': Anger Not Jihad
ABC News - USA
As Muslim Leaders Worldwide Call for a 'Day of Rage' Over the Pope's
Comments, Do They Mean Violence? Muslims hold posters during ...
See all stories on this topic
Gaza’s Christians fear for safety
Indian Express - New Delhi,India
... Attacks on an ancient church in the Gaza Strip following the Pope
Benedict XVI ... left them worried about their fragile status in this
conservative Muslim society.
See all stories on this topic
Scotland Yard probes threats against the pope
Independent Online - Cape Town,South
Africa
... a London protest at which calls were reportedly made for Pope
Benedict XVI ... a number of complaints" about the reported comments by a
leading Muslim extremist at ...
See all stories on this topic
Vatican experts say Pope 'unrepentant'
Independent - London,England,UK
As protests against the Pope continued to rumble around the Muslim
world yesterday, Catholics began asking themselves if this highly intelligent
man can really ...
See all stories on this topic
Strike in Valley over Pope's remarks
Hindu - Chennai,India
... of the Muslim community have been hurt by blasphemous and
offensive comments about Islam. We register our strong protest and condemn
Pope Benedict XVI's
See all stories on this topic
Pope’s ‘sorry’ fails to stem anger
Mumbai Mirror - India
... Malaysia, which chairs the 57-member Organisation of the Islamic
Conference, has expressed hopes that the pope’s comments do “not reflect
a new trend for ...
See all stories on this topic
RP haven for Christian-Muslim unity
ABS CBN News - Philippines
... For instance, the recent row arising from the speech of the Pope
refers to a quotation from Islamic literature justifying violence. ...
Pell angers Muslims with defence of Pope's comments
ABC Online - Australia
The Archbishop of Sydney has backed the Pope's speech made in Germany
last week ... "I'm not sure, I would welcome some clarification from our
Islamic friends," he ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope's Islamic stumble baffles the experts
Eureka Street -
Melbourne,Victoria,Australia
... However, this kind of speculation hardly touches the mainstream of
the Islamic tradition, which ... close to what Paul says in Romans
1, quoted by the Pope in his .
Iran accuses Pope of brewing Crusader War
Iran Focus - Iran
... accused the Pope of beginning a “Crusader War” against Islam,
despite the pontiff’s public apology on Sunday over his recent remarks on the
Islamic faith ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope's Turkey visit 'still on' despite Muslim anger
Irish Examiner - Cork,Ireland
Catholic bishops met in Istanbul today and decided the Pope’s visit to
Turkey in November should go ahead despite anger in the Islamic world
over his ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope setting up debate with Islam, says commentator
ABC Online - Australia
Those are just some of the reactions from extremists in the Islamic world
after a speech by the Pope late last week which discussed the Muslim
religion. ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope's lecture also shakes Catholic theologians
Monsters and Critics.com - Glasgow,UK
Regensburg, Germany - Last week's lecture by Pope Benedict XVI that
provoked angry protests in the Islamic world has also triggered a cry of
protest in the ...
See all stories on this topic
Bishops defend Pope from attack on speech
Tempo - Manila,Philippines
... Quitorio said the Pope cited the Surah 2,256 that says: “There
is no ... It noted that the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF)
continues to seek greater ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope's comments on Islam hit 'civilization clash' fault line
Christian Science Monitor - Boston,MA,USA
... Qaradawi also linked the pope's comments to President Bush's
recent statement that America is at war with "Islamic Fascists," saying
the pope is "giving ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope says remarks on Islam misunderstood
Houston Chronicle - United States
... Malaysia _ which chairs the world's largest Muslim bloc, the
Organization of the Islamic Conference _ earlier had demanded
the pope offer a full apology and ...
See all stories on this topic
What Game is Ahmadinejad Playing Today?
NewsBlaze - Folsom,CA,USA
... seats were vacant during Ahmadinejad's 30-minute address, in which he
called for the Non-Aligned Movement, the Organization of the Islamic
Conference and the ...
See all stories on this topic
President Ahmadinejad Delivers Remarks to the UNGeneral Assembly
Washington Post - United States
... In the interim, the nonaligned movement, the organization of
the Islamic conference, and the African continent should each have
a representative as a permanent
Insults and Anger: Muslims, Catholics, and Jews
About - News & Issues - New York,NY,USA
... The Organization of the Islamic Conference said
in a statement that it "...regrets the quotations cited by the pope on the Life
of the Honorable Prophet ...
Religious Leader's Serious Mistake
Право Выбора - Баку,Azerbaijan
... Organization of the Islamic Conference published
a statement, regretting "concerning the Pope's statement and other
falsifications, outraging Islam." The OIC ...
See all stories on this topic
Wave of Muslim Attacks on Palestinian Authority Churches
Arutz Sheva - Israel
... annual conference of the Islamic Movement, held in the
Israeli Arab city of Umm El-Fahm on Friday, the head of the northern branch of
the organization, Sheikh
Will
Muslims Buy Jyllands-Posten?
Brussels Journal - Brussel,Belgium
Last week, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, the Secretary-General of the Organization
of the Islamic Conference (OIC), called upon wealthy Muslims to
influence the ...
OIC Ministers of Information Hammer Out Seven Resolutions
Al-Jazeerah.info - Dalton,GA,USA
The ministers of information of the 57-member Organization of the
Islamic Conference concluded their discussions yesterday at the
Seventh Session of the ...
OIC Ministers of Information Hammer Out Seven Resolutions
Al-Jazeerah.info - Dalton,GA,USA
... We wanted this session to be different in having only few resolutions
with specific timelines and mechanism for implementation,” said OIC
Secretary-General ...
Mirwaiz can attend OIC now
Kashmir Live - India
... Hurriyat Chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq received his passport today
just in time for him to make it to the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC)
in the US. ...
OIC Responds to Pope
Zaman Online - Istanbul,Turkey
The Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) convened to discuss whether
there was a change in the function of the Papacy. OIC Secretary ...
See all stories on this topic
OIC to name day to help devastated states
IranMania News - Iran
LONDON, September 11 (IranMania) - Officials of the Organization of the Islamic
Conference (OIC) member states, in a meeting, decided to assign a day for
...
Khaleda tells IUT convocation: Untrue campaign against Islam needs ...
The New Nation - Bangladesh
... Director General of OIC Dr Razley bin Mohd Nordin read out the
speech of OIC Secretary General and Chancellor of IUT Prof Dr Ekmeleddin
Ihsanoglu at the ...
OIC Must Stand by Member States: Sudanese Minister
Arab News - Jeddah,Saudi Arabia
JEDDAH, 16 September 2006 — During discussions leading to the adoption of the
final communiqué issued by the seventh Islamic Information Ministers Conference
...
OIC Charter of Children’s Rights Endorsed
Arab News - Jeddah,Saudi Arabia
JEDDAH, 19 September 2006 — The Council of Ministers yesterday endorsed the
Kingdom’s admission to the OIC Charter of Children’s Rights in Islam and
...
Hurriyat Chief to take part in OIC meeting in New York
Islamic Republic News Agency - Tehran,Iran
The Mirwaiz has been invited to the OIC meeting, scheduled to be held on
the sidelines of the 61st session of UN General Assembly on September 21 and 25,
by ...
Malaysia Is Prepared To Assist OIC In Its Media Plans
Bernama - Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia
... the main resolutions adopted in the just-concluded Islamic Conference
of Information Ministers (Icim) of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC)
here. ...
See all stories on this topic
OIC Information Ministers convened in Saudi Arabia
Kazinform - Astana,Kazakhstan
ASTANA. September 15, 2006. KAZINFORM - The 7th session of Information Ministers
of Organization of the Islamic Conference was held ...
OIC deplores smear campaign
Peninsula On-line - Qatar
... The 57-nation Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC),
the world’s largest Muslim body, said quotations used by the Pope represented a
“character ...
Muslims Seek Detailed Apology From Pope
Forbes - USA
... Malaysia - which chairs the world's largest Muslim bloc, the
Organization of the Islamic Conference - had demanded the pope
offer a full apology and retract ...
See all stories on this topic
Violent Muslim Reaction Justifies Pope's Stated Concerns, Cardinal ...
CNSNews.com - Alexandria,VA,USA
... In Geneva, the Organization of the Islamic
Conference asked the UN's Human Rights Council to make time during its
current session to address "religious ...
PRESS CORPS CONFRONTS BUSH ON TORTURE, IRAQ
Pacifica Radio - USA
... The 57-nation organization of the Islamic conference
called it a "smear campaign," and public protests have broken out in many Muslim
areas. ...
Muslim world desperately tries to improve its image with mass ...
Pravda - Moscow,Russia
Organization of Islamic Conference has always played a
noticeable part in the international relations. Observers are no longer
surprised ...
Unresolved Middle East issues and steps Islam wants to take
Jakarta Post - Jakarta,Indonesia
... secretary-general of the Muslim World League, Dr. Abdullah Atturki,
the secretary-general of the Organization of the Islamic
Conference (OIC), Ekmeleddin ...
Kazakh Foreign Minister held number of meetings in New York
Kazinform - Astana,Kazakhstan
... dialogue and cooperation for peace, take part in ministerial meetings
of member states of Asian Cooperation Dialog and Organization of the
Islamic Conference. ...
See all stories on this topic
Security Council is unjust and manipulated by some States, Iranian ...
UN News Centre
... In the interim, he said, the Non-Aligned Movement, the
Organization of the Islamic Conference and Africa should each
have a permanent, veto-wielding ...
See all stories on this topic
Malaysia says Pope‘s apology acceptable
The Benton Crier - Benton,Iowa,USA
Malaysia, which chairs the 57-member Organization of the Islamic
Conference, the world‘s biggest Muslim bloc, had demanded that the pope
offer a full apology ...
Islamic Conference Urges Tourism in Lebanon and Palestine
All Headline News - USA
Beirut, Lebanon (AHN) - The head of the Organization of the Islamic
Conference said that Muslim countries should encourage tourism in Lebanon
following the 34
See all stories on this topic
109 Million Tourists to Muslim Countries
The Media Line - New York,NY,USA
... and bird flu, WTO chief Francesco Frangialli told a meeting of
tourism ministers from member states of the Organization of Islamic
Conference which convened ...
Enough of
the UN
New York Sun - New York,NY,USA
... This holds true particularly for the largest single bloc amongst them
— the 56-member Organization of the Islamic Conference. ...
See all stories on this topic
OIC secretary general condemns Israeli aggression
Interfax-Religion - Moscow,Russia
Baku, September 11, Interfax - Secretary General of the Organization of
the Islamic Conference (OIC) Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu has condemned the
Israeli aggression ...
Iran proposes plans to boost tourism ties among Islamic states
Islamic Republic News Agency - Tehran,Iran
... by head of Iran's delegation to the Fifth Meeting of Ministers and
Officials of Tourism Industry from Organization of the Islamic
Conference Member States ...
Muslim Americans reflect on Sept. 11, 2001, how they were treated ...
Iowa State Daily - Ames,IA,USA
... Full-page ads were run and statements from organizations such as the
Organization of the Islamic Conference, which represented 56
Muslim countries issued the
Azerbaijan leader urges Muslim world to unite against terrorism
RIA Novosti - Moscow,Russia
... Aliyev, whose country is hosting the fifth session of tourism
ministers of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC),
said that the Muslim world had ...
President
Ilham Aliyev: Islamic solidarity is more important now
Azeri Press Agency - Azerbaijan
... “We are actively participating in the Organization of the
Islamic Conference and offered organizing several events. The OIC will
...
See all stories on this topic
Azeri Ministry of Culture & Tourism and ISESCO signed Co-operation ...
TREND Information - Baku,Azerbaijan
The document was signed within the framework of the 5th Conference of the
Tourism Ministers of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC),
Trend reports.
See all stories on this topic
OIC to name day to help devastated states
IranMania News - Iran
LONDON, September 11 (IranMania) - Officials of the Organization of the
Islamic Conference (OIC) member states, in a meeting, decided to assign a
day for ...
See all stories on this topic
ADDRESS BY PRESIDENT OF AZERBAIJAN ILHAM ALIYEV
AzerTag - Azerbaijan
The events of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC)
held in Azerbaijan further strengthening relations between the country and the
organization. ...
See all stories on this topic
Djibouti Supports Iran's Nuclear Rights
Fars News Agency - Tehran,Iran
... statement also stressed the need for further activities by regional
formations and organizations, such as the Organization of the Islamic
Conference (OIC), the ...
Islamic Regimes Defy United Nations
CNSNews.com - Alexandria,VA,USA
... level meeting on Darfur next Monday, and it has invited the Sudanese
government, the Arab League and the Organization of the Islamic
Conference to participate. ...
See all stories on this topic
UN Watch: Council a ‘disappointment’
Jewish Telegraphic Agency - New
York,NY,USA
In its three months, Hillel Neuer, UN Watch’s executive director said, “the
council, dominated by the Organization of the Islamic Conference,
devoted 100 ...
FM: Nuclear Issue Never Solved through Illogical, Illegal Measures
Fars News Agency - Tehran,Iran
... Pointing to the two countries' membership in the United Nations, the
Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), and the Non-Aligned
Movement (NAM), Mottaki ...
Misuari asks permission to attend summit
Manila Bulletin - Philippines
... his lawyers, Yaser B. Lumbos and Ombra Jainal, said the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia, through the Secretary General of the Organization of
Islamic Conference, Prof. ...
See all stories on this topic
Symposium: The Death of Multiculturalism?
FrontPage magazine.com - Los
Angeles,CA,USA
... Today’s immigrants are not in this type of situation, and certainly
not the Muslims who have 56 countries within the Organization of the
Islamic Conference. ...
See all stories on this topic
Istanbul hosts global conference on dialogue
Turkish Daily News (subscription) -
Ankara,Turkey
... Secretary-General Amr Moussa, Israeli Vice Prime Minister Shimon
Peres and Secretary-General of the Organization of the Islamic
Conference (OIC) Ekmeleddin
Musiad To Host Two International Organizations
Turkish Press - Plymouth,MI,USA
... Executives from the Islamic Chamber of Commerce and Industry,
Islamic Development Bank, Organization of the Islamic
Conference (OIC), several ministers
PM Aziz: We Should Not Allow Acts Of Violence And Terrorism To ...
Turkish Press - Plymouth,MI,USA
... Istanbul's Dolmabahce Palace on the occasion of inauguration of the
headquarters of the Youth Forum of the Organization of the Islamic
Conference (OIC), Prime ...
See all stories on this topic
50 Foreign Firms to Attend Istanbul Business Fair
Zaman Online - Istanbul,Turkey
... guests include the Islamic Chamber of Commerce and Industry,
the Islamic Development Bank (IDB), the Organization of the
Islamic Conference (OIC), ministers ...
Google Alert for: Clash of Civilizations
A clash of civilizations
Montreal Gazette (subscription) -
Montreal,Quebec,Canada
... of Islam. It is nothing less than a clash of
civilizations. Before 9/11, no one could have imagined the audacity of
such attacks. ...
Muslim Voices Against Terrorism Drowned in Clash of Civilizations
...
American Muslim - Bridgeton,MO,USA
... against terrorism in all forms, their voices are simply drowned out
by those (Muslim and non-Mulim) who are determined to bring about a clash
of civilizations.
Harbinger of the clash of civilizations
Ha'aretz - Tel Aviv,Israel
The principal contemporary significance of German-Jewish philosopher Franz
Rosenzweig is in his theories of a Judeo-Christian alliance that reduced Islam
to
"Clash of civilizations" can be avoided, St. Egidio leader says
Catholic World News - USA
Paris, Sep. 15 (CWNews.com) - Speaking at a seminar in Paris on relations
between Europe and the Arab world, the founder of the St. ...
Neocon pope
Online Journal - Silver Springs,FL,USA
... XVI apparently made the dubious decision to catapult the Vatican
into the fray of the fraudulent discourse on the "clash of
civilizations." Propagated by ...
Who is winning in the “Clash of Civilizations”?
Center For American Progress -
Washington,D.C.,USA
... th , the House International Relations Subcommittee on the Middle
East and Central Asia held a hearing yesterday entitled “Is there a Clash
of Civilizations? ...
Albright refutes 'clash of civilizations' claim
Daily Colonial - Washington,DC,USA
... Albright refuted a claim made by President Bush last Monday that
the current conflicts in the world are a “clash of civilizations,”
instead calling them ...
Turkey urges Iraq to take concrete measures against PKK
People's Daily Online - Beijing,China
... minister also asked Iraq to end armed and political activities of the
PKK and other groups backing it, and prevent terrorists from infiltrating
Turkey from Iraq ...
See all stories on this topic
Gul Seeks Support for Turkey's UN Security Council Membership
Zaman Online - Istanbul,Turkey
Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul has continued his round of shuttle
diplomacy to seek support from his counterparts on Turkey's temporary UN
Security ...
See all stories on this topic
IMF Chairman Praises Turkey's Economic Performance
Zaman Online - Istanbul,Turkey
Rodrigo Rato, chairman of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), gave his
assessments on developments in Turkey’s economy. Stating ...
See all stories on this topic
Turkish Culture Minister: Political Dialogue Development Important ...
TREND Information - Baku,Azerbaijan
... us, as the political dialogue development is important along with the
strengthening of economic ties between the Turkic states”, stated Turkish
Culture and ...
See all stories on this topic
Turkish PM urges Iraq to clamp down on Kurd rebels
Reuters AlertNet - London,England,UK
ANKARA, Sept 20 (Reuters) - Turkey's prime minister has written to his Iraqi
counterpart urging swift action against Turkish Kurdish rebels, his
office said on ...
See all stories on this topic
Turkish
Deputy Prime Minister: Laying down conditions to ...
Azeri Press Agency - Azerbaijan
... He declared that the Turkish people are ready to stand
face-to-face with their past and offered discussions with Armenia if it can do
the same,” Turkish ...
[NEWS IMPRESSION] Turkish FM Begins Contact with Greek Counterpart
Zaman Online - Istanbul,Turkey
... Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul, who traveled to New
York early to attend meetings and has nearly 50 appointments on his agenda,
started talks with his
See all stories on this topic
Turkish Muslims say Pope's apology falls short, warn him he's not ...
Victoria Times Colonist -
Victoria,BC,Canada
ANKARA, Turkey (AP) -- Muslims in Turkey, Iraq and the Palestinian territories
demanded yesterday that Pope Benedict make a clear apology for his remarks on
...
See all stories on this topic
GERMANY: TURKISH MUSLIM LEADERS SLAM POPE'S 'FRONTAL ATTACK' ON
...
AKI - Rome,Italy
Berlin, 15 Sept. (AKI) - Pope Benedict XVI has offended Muslims in Germany's
Turkish community by his remarks during a recent trip to Germany
that questioned
Pope has his back to the wall
Sabah - Turkey
Turkish Prime Minister Erdoğan said "Pope must apologize officially
... The Prime Minister of Germany, Angela Merker, on the other hand,
defended the Pope by saying ...
See all stories on this topic
Business World Takes Another Step to Unite Turkey and Eurasia
Zaman Online - Istanbul,Turkey
... Troska stated the Turkish market had the second biggest
potential after Germany and said they sold more vehicles in Turkey than
in the UK, Spain, France and ...
Turkish Premier asks a better apology from Pope Benedict XVI
ABHaber - Brüksel,Belgium
... said last Tuesday in a speech during a visit to his native Germany.
... However the statement stopped short of appeasing Muslim anger, as
Turkish Prime Minister ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope disses Islam,
invokes Byzantine emperor who fought Turks
World War 4 Report - Brooklyn,NY,USA
... The BBC reports that "Turks see Benedict as a Turkophobe and
commentators call his words just before the holy month of Ramadan 'ill-timed and
ill-conceived ...
Why Turks Initiated the Muslim Anger at Pope Bendict's speech
Blogger News Network - USA
... and Turkey. The century old animosities between muslim invaders
Turks) and the Ottoman empire is still on their minds. They are ...
The Turkish role in Lebanon, a work in progress
Daily Star - Lebanon - Beirut,Lebanon
On September 5, the Turkish Parliament voted 340 to 192, along strictly
partisan lines, in favor of sending troops to Lebanon to join the UNIFIL
contingent ...
Rajab Tayyib
Erdogan: Turkish world will continue its steps on ...
Azeri Press Agency - Azerbaijan
The 10th Friendship, Brotherhood and Cooperation Congress of Turkish-speaking
States and Communities started in Kemer, Antalya, APA’s Turkey bureau ...
See all stories on this topic
Turkish Soldiers to Go to Lebanon in Late October
Zaman Online - Istanbul,Turkey
Turkish Soldiers are expected to go to Lebanon to serve as part of the UN
Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) in late October. According ...
See all stories on this topic
No
letter sent to the Pope by Turkish FM: spokesman
NTV MSNBC - Turkey
ANKARA - Turkey�s Foreign Ministry has denied media reports that Turkish
Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul has sent a letter to letter to Pope Benedict XVI
...
See all stories on this topic
Turk official seeks papal apology for Islam remark
Malaysia Star - Malaysia
ANKARA (Reuters) - Turkey's top religious official was quoted on Thursday as
saying Pope Benedict should apologise for comments he made about Islam and
should ...
Turk PM Says Pope Must Withdraw Islam Remarks
Mediafax - Bucuresti,Romania
Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan, joining a chorus of Muslim protest, said
on Saturday Pope Benedict should withdraw "ugly" comments he made about Islam
See all stories on this topic
Solidarity of Turk States may help strengthen Each Other – Azeri ...
TREND Information - Baku,Azerbaijan
The solidarity of Turk countries may help strengthen each other. We want
the Turk world to be united and the unity to be sustainable ...
See all stories on this topic
Turkish PM calls for establishing Turkish-speaking states ...
People's Daily Online - Beijing,China
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan called on Monday for the
establishment of a Turkish- speaking states community, semi-official
Anatolia news agency ...
See all stories on this topic
Turkey will be the most strategic asset of Europe
Sabah - Turkey
During a meeting which was administered by UN Development Program president
Kemal Derviş, Chief negotiator Babacan has made a speech and said Turkey
will be ...
See all stories on this topic
Saudi,Iran,Turkey worried about Iraq woes spill over
Reuters AlertNet - London,England,UK
JEDDAH, Saudi Arabia, Sept 18 (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia and fellow Iraq
neighbours Iran and Turkey voiced concern on Monday that Iraqi sectarian
and ethnic ...
See all stories on this topic
Tough Time For EU Relations
Turkish Press - Plymouth,MI,USA
... the direction of Turkey’s political strategy, except for a few
Turkish researchers and ... Up to now the Jewish lobby has
been able to close the asymmetry which ...
At UN, Bush to focus on democracy in Middle East
Journal of Turkish Weekly - Ankara,Turkey
... Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who is scheduled to address
the General Assembly on Tuesday, was expected to lobby for Iran's right
to develop nuclear ...
SPEECH BY PRESIDENT OF AZERBAIJAN ILHAM ALIYEV AT 10TH CONGRESS OF ...
AzerTag - Azerbaijan
... We are opposed by Armenians, an insidious and organized lobby,
with huge financial ... recognize Turkey’s borders and reject offers of
the Turkish government
Pope's unfortunate comments
Turkish Daily News (subscription) -
Ankara,Turkey
... This he did despite the strong Armenian lobby and the
certainty of the French ... the past 20 years as the leaders that made
their mark on Turkish-French relations
VATICAN: POPE'S VISIT TO TURKEY TAKES SHAPE
AKI - Rome,Italy
... Benedict XVI's controversial remarks linking Islam and violence
continued to reverberate around the Muslim world, his planned three-day visit to
Turkey at the ...
Turkish Foreign Minister in the US for talks
NTV MSNBC - Turkey
NEW YORK - Turkey�s Foreign Minister is in the US to attend the United Nations
General Assembly, where he is expected to lobby for one of the vacant non
...
See all stories on this topic
Google Alert for: Caricatures Mohammad/Caricatures
Muhammad/Cartoon Mohammad/Cartoons Mohammad/ Cartoon Muhammad...
The pope & the Byzantine emperor
Jerusalem Post - Israel
... Muhammad), 2002 (when Jerry Falwell called Muhammad a
terrorist), 2005 (the fraudulent Koran-flushing episode), and February 2006 (the
Danish cartoon incident
See all stories on this topic
Muslim Violence and the Pope's Remarks
ChronWatch - Alamo,CA,USA
... A Dane drew a cartoon about Mohammed, and deadlyriots and
Embassy burnings by Muslims were the ... “He said, I quote, ‘Show me just
what Muhammad brought that ...
Ratings at Root of NBCs AntiChristian Madonna Broadcast Says ...
WDC Media News - Los Angeles,CA,USA
... not "preach to kids" or show Bible verses at the conclusion of each
cartoon. ... that it was not necessary to show those editorial
depictions of Muhammad in order
Tightrope of tolerance begins to fray
Sydney Morning Herald - Sydney,New South
Wales,Australia
... of violent Muslim protesters as it did during the Danish cartoon
controversy? ... by a quote from a 14th-century Byzantine emperor saying
Muhammad brought "things ...
Getting reasonable about faith
Chicago Tribune - United States
... A year ago, Danish newspaper cartoon depictions of Muhammad
sparked international riots. Now the pope's quote, ripped from its context
...
An
Apologist for Muslim Rage
Human Events - Washington,DC,USA
... s recent remarks on Islam threaten to eclipse last winter’s
Cartoon Rage in ... author of the popular books Islam: A Short
History and Muhammad: A Biography of
The pope missed how central religion is to Muslims
Daily Star - Lebanon - Beirut,Lebanon
... referring to Manuel: "He said, I quote, 'Show me just what
Mohammad brought that was ... If this issue passes away soon, as the
Danish cartoons controversy did, we ...
Khatami tones down rhetoric at Harvard
Jewish Advocate (subscription) -
Boston,MA,USA
... about an Iranian exhibition that features Holocaust-denial
cartoons, Khatami acknowledged ... he is a direct descendant of the
Prophet Mohammad – smiled often
Pope’s Speech Again Demonstrated The Fragility of Islam
Iran Press Service - Paris,France
... 1391, the pope quoted the emperor saying, “Show me just what
Mohammad brought that was ... of those that erupted after a Danish
newspaper printed cartoons of the ...
See all stories on this topic
Briefly: 4 Muslim protesters wounded by police
International Herald Tribune - France
... from entering the village when the shooting began, said Mohammad
Mustafa, who ... an online media editor facing criminal prosecution for
publishing cartoons of the ...
Review of the Arab press
United Press International - USA
... It insisted the pope's comments, and before it the cartoons
insulting Prophet Mohammad, are directly linked to comments by President
George Bush, British Prime
Pope Backlash Deals Blow to Interfaith Ties
Los Angeles Times - CA,USA
... In Lebanon, where bloody demonstrations erupted early this year over
a Danish newspaper's caricatures of the prophet Muhammad, a
Christian-Muslim dialogue
See all stories on this topic
Pope and Islam: Some Muslims Call For Dialogue
The Moderate Voice - USA
... XVI’s entire Regensburg speech instead of focusing on a single
sentence about Muhammad taken out ... The paper goes on to say
that the 'Danish cartoon row should ...
Wanted: Modern, Not Medieval, Interfaith Dialogue
Beliefnet.com - New York,NY,USA
... Muhammad remains anathema, an emotional reaction unchecked by
authority is virtually assured. Perhaps the world did not know this before the
Danish cartoon ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope’s speech could use a little context
ChronicleHerald.ca - Halifax,Nova
Scotia,Canada
... had said, among other things, that the Islamic prophet Muhammad’s
teachings ... of many non-Muslims that this "crisis" – like the
cartoon controversy – was ...
See all stories on this topic
The
Church – Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution?
Brussels Journal - Brussel,Belgium
... depicting Muhammad. This was, down to the last comma, exactly
the way Muslims would treat the persecuted non-Muslims in their own countries.
The cartoon Jihad ...
The pope's apology
Chicago Tribune - United States
... will be heard, as they were when cartoon riots started. Many
of those leaders called the violence inconsistent with the teachings of
Muhammad and counter to ...
See all stories on this topic
More calls for dialogue in a Muslim world angered by Pope
AsiaNews.it - Italy
... entire Regensburg speech instead of focusing on a single sentence
about Muhammad taken out ... The paper goes on to say that the
“Danish cartoon row should have ...
See all stories on this topic
Disturbing cartoon and troubling questions
Spero News - USA
... The cartoon comes at a time when many in Rome and elsewhere in
the ... in conflict with the Turkish Muslims, who expressed a negative
judgment on Muhammad and jihad ...
See all stories on this topic
New group blog: Burning Issues
Jerusalem Post - Israel
... For quoting from a critique of Mohammad in the course of a
lengthy ... Which party, as with last year's "cartoon wars," is
highlighting the despicable abuse of ...
Both sides feel threats in Pope-Islam row
Times of Malta - Valletta,Malta
... crisis - like recent controversies over the Danish cartoons of the
Prophet Mohammad or the ... This controversy has started out just
like the cartoon crisis," said ...
Valley rejects Pope’s apology, shuts
Financial Express - Bombay,India
... A similar thing happened during the Denmark cartoon
controversy. ... University quoted a 12th century emperor and said that
what new Prophet Mohammad has given to ...
German Chancellor defends Pope amid Muslim fury
Daily News & Analysis - Mumbai,India
... century Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Palaeologus, who said everything
Mohammad brought was ... the risk that the protests that there
were over the cartoon row could ...
Is the Pope a Catholic?
Spiked - London,UK
... Just as the reaction to the Danish cartoons featuring
Mohammad began in the West and was broadcast to the Muslim world, so it
seems a safe bet that the Pope ...
See all stories on this topic
Both sides feel threats in Pope-Islam row
Times of Malta - Valletta,Malta
... The crisis - like recent controversies over the Danish cartoons
of the Prophet Mohammad or the death sentence for an Afghan convert to
Christianity - reveals a ...
Al Qaeda vows “jihad” over Pope’s speech
Express Outlook - Port-Louis,Mauritius
... This was in contrast to Chinese reticence over last year’s
publication of cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad in a Danish paper
that sparked violent Muslim ...
See all stories on this topic
Vatican clarifies Pope's speech to calm down uproar
di-ve.com - Malta
... Emperor Manuel II Palaeologus, who wrote that everything Mohammad
brought was ... following the publication in European newspapers of
cartoons lampooning Prophet ...
Protests point to problems on both sides
The Brunei Times - Bandar,Brunei,Brunei
Darussalam
... When there are foreign troops in Afghanistan, the Muhammad
caricatures, the support of Western states for the Israeli occupation of
Palestinian lands, violence
See all stories on this topic
Pope's 'apology' fails to quell Muslim anger
Kuwait Times - Kuwait
... supreme leader Ali Khamenei compared the pope's remarks to
caricatures published in a Danish newspaper last year deemed insulting to
the Prophet Muhammad.
See all stories on this topic
OIC Ambassadors Group To Dispel Misconceptions About Islam In ...
Bernama - Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia
... anger and dissatisfaction among the Muslims globally such as the
recent speech by Pope Benedict XVI and before that the caricatures of
Prophet Muhammad. ...
Why no Muslim anger over Darfur violence?
Cape Argus (subscription) - Cape
Town,South Africa
THE HEADLINES say "Muslim fury at caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad";
"Muslim fury at Pope's 'insult' ". When are we going to ...
Pope’s comments draw criticism from campus students
Diamondback Online - College Park,MD,USA
... Unlike the controversy early this year surrounding the decision of
many international newspapers to print cartoons depicting the Muslim
prophet Mohammad in a
Al Qaeda Threatens Pope
FOX News - USA
... the paper apologized for making fun of the Muslim prophet Mohammad
earlier this year. Online editors removed two of the offending cartoons —
including one ...
Both sides feel threats in pope-Islam row
Turkish Daily News (subscription) -
Ankara,Turkey
... The crisis -- like recent controversies over the Danish cartoons
of the Prophet Mohammad or the death sentence for an Afghan convert to
Christianity -- reveals ...
Mixed Arab reaction to papal apology
Bangkok Post - Thailand
... for mobilising Muslims against Denmark over a series of cartoons
depicting the ... On Sunday, leader-at-large of the Muslim Brotherhood,
Mohammad Mahdi Akef, said ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope launches battle for Europe
Daily Pioneer - New Delhi,India
... As in the case of the offensive Danish cartoons, the speech
has ... most Islamic nations, and repeated provocations against Prophet
Mohammad, Europe's radicalised ...
Benedict tacitly apologized, let's move on
Daily Star - Lebanon - Beirut,Lebanon
... we saw this past spring, when Muslims throughout the world angrily
demonstrated against cartoons published in a Danish newspaper defaming
the Prophet Mohammad. ...
See all stories on this topic
When
Saying Sorry Isn't Enough
The Blanket - Belfast,Ireland
... western media and political classes to both the Danish cartoons
and, now ... Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Palaeologus' view that "…
everything Mohammad brought was ...
The Pope
discovers the trouble with faith
The Herald - Glasgow,Scotland,UK
... struggle to find any justification for such behaviour in the
teachings of Muhammad. ... reminded me of nothing so much as the
anti-Semitic caricatures published in ...
See all stories on this topic
Al-Qaida in Iraq warns pope that Islam will prevail as protesters ...
International Herald Tribune - France
... Danish paper. The caricatures, which Muslims saw as insulting
Muhammad, sparked large, violent protests across the Islamic world.
...
See all stories on this topic
In Defense of Pope Benedict
Antiwar.com - Redwood City,CA,USA
... The current controversy is being compared to the tasteless
caricatures of Muhammad that appeared in many European newspapers,
but the reality is quite different ...
Pope remarks promote inter-religious discord: Leader
MehrNews.com - Tehran,Iran
... a wave of anger in the Islamic world, came after caricatures
published in a Danish newspaper last year deemed insulting to the Prophet
Muhammad (S) set off ...
Violence Defies Benedict's Message
CBS News - New York,New York,USA
... Is it nonetheless true, as Muhammad Umar, chairman of the
Ramadhan Foundation in ... that "last year and in the same month the
Danish cartoon assaulted Islam." The ...
See all stories on this topic
Pope Benedict did not insult Islam
renewamerica.us - Washington,D.C.,USA
... The words were, 'Show me just what Muhammad brought that was
new, and there you will ... Take up arms!' or worse, as in the 'cartoon'
saga a few months ago, they ...
See all stories on this topic
Brunei imams accept Pope's apology
The Brunei Times - Bandar,Brunei,Brunei
Darussalam
... repeat his mistake, especially insensitive comments about the Prophet
Muhammad and Islam ... people against the Danish newspaper after
they printed a cartoon of our ...
`All of this is a lie' but `do they know it?'
Chicago Tribune - United States
... The hallways at the Holocaust International Cartoon Contest,
an exhibit of anger, art ... as a response to the publication of cartoons
of the Prophet Muhammad by
Muslim world demands personal apologies from the Pope
Pravda - Moscow,Russia
... Prophet Muhammad with those remarks. Spiritual leaders of
Muslims in Iraq and Lebanon drew a parallel between the pope's speech and the
notorious cartoon ...
See all stories on this topic
House Editorial: And we quote, ‘enough is enough’
JMU The Breeze - VA,USA
... He said, I quote, ‘Show me just what Muhammad brought that
... context is wrong, all liberal education is wrong — a sentiment the
Danish cartoon fiasco further ...
See all stories on this topic
Anti-Muslim Harassment Complaints Jump 30 Percent
Washington Post - United States
... free copies of the Koran and copies of a PBS documentary about the
prophet Muhammad earlier this year after deadly rioting about the Danish
cartoon controversy ...
Rushdie, Hirsi Ali, the Pope -- Who's Next?
Spiegel Online - Berlin,Germany
... the Danish editor who a year ago published a series of Muhammad
caricatures in his ... that erupted in the Muslim world in the wake of
the cartoon controversy have ...
Faith in each other
Guardian Unlimited - UK
... in protests after the publication of Danish caricatures of
Muhammad, which after ... For one thing, any Islamist caricature
linking the Vatican with George Bush's
Pope's words likely to bring back "offending cartoon" row
EiTB - Euskadi,Spain
... In the speech, the Pope referred to criticism of the Prophet
Mohammad by 14th century Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Palaeologus. The ...
See all stories on this topic
World leaders at UN to tackle host of global problems
As the 61st annual session of the United Nations
General Assembly opened Tuesday, world leaders gathered in New York are set to
tackle a host of complex issues, including violence in Darfur, Iran's
nuclear ambitions, and global poverty and health. While each of the UN's 192
member states will be allowed to make a 15-minute speech, diplomats say much of
the key work will take place in the many meetings along the sides of the summit.
Read
the official site.
ABC
News /Associated Press
(9/19)
Wirth, Coleman address UN's challenges: United Nations Foundation President
Timothy E. Wirth and U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., analyzed on PBS the UN's
chances for meeting its various challenges to be discussed at the just-opened
annual summit. While the UN's weakness is that it can do very little
without the approval of the major powers, "I think the effectiveness and the
indispensability of the [UN] is very, very clear," Wirth said.
PBS
(9/18)
UN HRC urged to probe Pope's Islam remarks
The
United Nations' Human Rights Council should look into Pope Benedict's recent
remarks on Islam to examine if they were religiously intolerant, Islamic
countries requested Monday. The pope has adequately apologized for offending
Muslims with his remarks, but it still makes sense for the human rights body to
probe how the comments fit into the larger question of religious tolerance,
Pakistan's ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva, Masood Khan, said.
Bloomberg /ClipSyndicate
(9/18),
International Herald Tribune /Associated Press
(9/18)
Editorial: America's moral authority at stake
The
U.S. Congress should not give in to President George W. Bush's insistence that
in order to fight the war on terror the lawmakers should legalize secret prisons
and "alternative" interrogation methods that could pave the way for torture, the
Financial Times writes in this editorial. Giving Bush these short-sighted tools
would "undermine America's moral authority in the longer term -- and could help
inspire a whole new generation of terrorists," the paper argues.
Financial Times (London) (free content)
(9/18)
Annan: Iraq in "grave danger" of civil war
United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan warned that Iraq is in "grave
danger" of civil war, urging the country's government to foster a greater sense
of unity. Annan also called on the international community for support, claiming
failure would be imminent without sufficient backing of Iraqi interests.
Bloomberg /ClipSyndicate
(9/19),
USA
TODAY /Associated Press
(9/18)
Annan sees troubled world but also progress and hope
United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan warned
of global instability, economic disorder and a disregard for human rights in his
final annual address to world leaders, but he also noted progress and hope in
such areas as development. Opening the annual General Assembly debate on
Tuesday, Annan called for unity among nations, as the 192 UN member states
prepared to face an ambitious agenda. "I remain convinced that the only answer
to this divided world must be a truly United Nations," Annan said.
USA
TODAY/Associated Press
(9/19)
Bush reaches out to Muslims in UN speech
U.S.
President George W. Bush reached out to Muslims in his speech to the United
Nations General Assembly Tuesday, saying he respects Islam and is seeking peace
with Iran. While focusing mostly on the Mideast in his speech, Bush also
addressed the continuing violence in Sudan's Darfur region, saying, "my nation
has called these atrocities what they are: genocide."
Read
the transcript of Bush's speech. APTN/ClipSyndicate
(9/20),
Los
Angeles Times (free registration)
(9/20)
Ahmadinejad on the offensive: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad took
a swing at the UN's Security Council in his speech to the General Assembly
Tuesday, criticizing it for threatening Iran with sanctions over its nuclear
program. His speech came as it is growing clearer that the commercial trade
between Iran and Europe, China and Russia may be a big hurdle to the imposition
of any sanctions, The Wall Street Journal reports.
Financial Times (London) (free content)
(9/20),
The
Wall Street Journal (subscription required)
(9/20)
Alianza de Civilizaciones es el nombre por el que se conoce la
propuesta realizada por el
Presidente del Gobierno español
José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero en la 59ª
Asamblea General de la ONU, el
21 de septiembre de
2004. Dicha propuesta defiende una alianza entre
Occidente
y el
mundo árabe y
musulmán
con el fin de combatir el
terrorismo
internacional por otro camino que no sea el
militar. Esta
idea recupera la propuesta que seis años antes hacía también ante la ONU el
presidente de la república islámica de
Irán,
Muhammad Jatami, de desarrollar un "Diálogo
entre civilizaciones", por lo cual se consideró
2001 como el año
oficial y se estableció una agenda de trabajo.
El programa propuesto tiene como puntos fundamentales la cooperación
antiterrorista, la corrección de desigualdades económicas y el diálogo cultural.
Antes de ser asumido por la ONU, la propuesta consiguió el patrocinio del
Primer Ministro de Turquía,
Recep Tayip Erdogan, así como el respaldo de una veintena de países de
Europa,
Latinoamérica, Asia
y África,
además de la
Liga Árabe.
En febrero de 2006, por medio de una carta de la Secretaria de Estado
Condoleezza Rice, el Gobierno de
Estados Unidos declaraba también su disposición a apoyar la iniciativa.
Tras la adopción de la iniciativa, el
Secretario General de Naciones Unidas
Kofi Annan
estableció un grupo de dieciocho personalidades de alto nivel (entre las que se
incluyen el presidente
iraní
Muhammad Jatami, el
Premio Nobel de la Paz de
1984
Desmond
Tutu y el director de la
Unesco
Federico Mayor Zaragoza) para presentar un plan de acción a finales del año
2005.
El
20 de octubre de 2005, las Naciones Unidas proclamaron otra resolución
[1] en la que llamaban a la comunidad internacional a hacer un mayor
esfuerzo para promocionar la cultura de la paz y el diálogo entre civilizaciones.
En
abril de 2006, la Alianza de Civilizaciones
lanzó un sitio web en
inglés y
árabe
con el fin de coordinar los esfuerzos llevados a cabo en este sentido.
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alianza_de_civilizaciones
http://www.councilonglobalterrorism.org/pdf/A06_265_cgt_report_final.pdf
ANÁLISIS DEL REAL INSTITUTO
La ONU en la lucha contra el terrorismo: cinco años después del 11-S (ARI)
Javier Rupérez (20/7/2006)
http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/analisis/1016.asp
Tema: Este ARI describe y comenta las iniciativas contra el
terrorismo desarrolladas en las Naciones Unidas, más concretamente en su Consejo
de Seguridad, desde los atentados del 11 de septiembre, explicando cuáles son
los problemas que están dificultando ulteriores avances en dicha materia.
Resumen: Durante los cinco años transcurridos desde el 11 de
septiembre de 2001, el Consejo de Seguridad de las Naciones Unidas –aunque en
muchas ocasiones al dictado de los acontecimientos– ha sido coherente en la
condena al terrorismo, contundente en la adopción de medidas y decidido en la
exploración del fenómeno y en la búsqueda de nuevas fronteras para
contrarrestarlo. Todo ello queda de manifiesto en las diferentes Resoluciones
aprobadas desde entonces. Por su parte, el secretario general de las Naciones
Unidas ha desarrollado una acción con progresiva intensidad. Sin embargo,
profundas divergencias de criterio acerca del terrorismo explican la incapacidad
de los Estados miembros de las Naciones Unidas para ponerse de acuerdo sobre una
Convención general contra esa amenaza a la paz y seguridad internacionales. El
peligro de una tentación burocratizadora y repetitiva, estimulada por todos
aquellos que quisieran vaciar de contenido el sistema establecido, acecha a las
tareas antiterroristas de las Naciones Unidas, a lo que debe añadirse la tensión
que existe entre los cinco miembros permanentes del Consejo de Seguridad y la
Asamblea General.
Análisis: Los atentados terroristas del 11 de septiembre de
2001 en Nueva York y Washington tuvieron como principal efecto en la opinión
pública mundial el de generar una reacción de rechazo y condena tan profunda y
generalizada como para posibilitar una sensibilidad diferente ante el fenómeno
de la violencia indiscriminada utilizada por grupos no estatales para la
consecución de determinados fines políticos. La fecha, desde ese punto de vista,
constituye una divisoria clave en la percepción internacional del terrorismo y
consiguientemente en las medidas que cupiera adoptar para luchar en contra suya
y, eventualmente, acabar con él. Esa afirmación hay que comprenderla en el
contexto de una cierta relatividad: antes de septiembre de 2001 existía el
terrorismo en sus diversas manifestaciones, y los Estados no se habían mostrado
precisamente inermes a la hora de hacerle frente; y no todo ha sido coser y
cantar en la lucha antiterrorista después de ese momento. Tampoco cabe olvidar
que el terrorismo que se reclama islamista era suficientemente conocido antes de
la destrucción de las Torres Gemelas. Pero la orgía de barbarie que Bin Laden y
sus secuaces llevan a las ciudades americanas rebasa los límites de lo hasta
entonces sufrido e impone un cambio urgente de actitud. De las manifestaciones
aisladas de terrorismo –lo que muchos consideraban simples “molestias tácticas”,
reducidas en el espacio y en la reivindicación, pocas veces aplaudidas pero
muchas comprendidas, o al menos toleradas, o quizá explicadas como resultados de
malformaciones previas nunca adecuadamente solucionadas– se transita casi sin
solución de continuidad a un intento global de destrucción donde el objetivo no
es tal o cual sociedad nacional sino mas bien el conjunto del orden
internacional existente –es una “amenaza estratégica”–. Tras el 11 de septiembre
de 2001 un escalofrío recorre la espina dorsal de la sociedad internacional.
Incluso la de aquellos de sus miembros que por razones de simpatía o afinidades
varias pudieran haber tenido la tentación de explicar lo ocurrido en términos de
la perspectiva derivada de una cierta visión del mundo. No había justificación
para la matanza, ni comprensión para los que la ordenaron y la llevaron a cabo,
ni atenuantes para los criminales y sus cómplices. Nadie, ni los más poderosos,
estaban a salvo de las embestidas. En una fracción breve de tiempo y de profunda
y angustiosa intensidad emocional la comunidad internacional cree comprender que
siendo el riesgo diferente también debe serlo la respuesta. Al tiempo que el
terrorismo se impone con desgarro en la agenda de las cuestiones internacionales
todos comprenden que la solución, si existe, debe buscarse en una voluntad
reforzada de cooperación internacional.
La ONU recoge de manera casi inmediata la demanda y el reto. El Consejo de
Seguridad, que había condenado sin paliativos los atentados del 11 de septiembre
un día después, en la Resolución 1368 (2001), adopta pocas semanas después, el
28de septiembre, la Resolución 1373 (2001), pieza central de toda la concepción
y de toda la actuación antiterrorista de la ONU después de la fatídica fecha. Es
una Resolución adoptada bajo el Capítulo VII de la Carta de las Naciones Unidas,
que por tanto contiene obligaciones jurídicamente exigibles por la Organización
internacional bajo la eventual amenaza de sanciones, y en su momento aprobada
por la unanimidad de todos los miembros del Consejo. La Resolución impone
obligaciones genéricas a los Estados miembros –las de criminalizar la
financiación del terrorismo y el mismo terrorismo– y recomienda la adopción de
una amplia serie de conductas en el ámbito de la cooperación internacional
contra el fenómeno, abarcando desde la colaboración entre servicios policiales y
de inteligencia hasta a la que tiene lugar entre los aparatos judiciales, al
tiempo que pide la firma y ratificación de los instrumentos internacionales
contra el terrorismo aprobados por la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas
(1). Estos convenios, doce en el momento de aprobarse la Resolución 1373, trece
en el momento actual, son en sí mismos un reflejo de la actividad desarrollada
en el marco de las Naciones Unidas contra el terrorismo desde los años sesenta:
todos los actos de terrorismo imaginables son recogidos en los textos de los
convenios, catálogo ilustrativo de las acciones que los Estados deben emprender
para impedir que tales actos se produzcan. Naturalmente, a esa enumeración deben
añadirse las Resoluciones del Consejo de Seguridad sobre terrorismo previas al
11 de septiembre. En 1999, el 15 de octubre, la Resolución 1267 había
establecido un sistema de prohibiciones y sanciones para personas o
instituciones relacionadas con al-Qaeda y los talibán, la lista de los cuales
figura a disposición del Comité –órgano subsidiario del Consejo– creado para
vigilar y asegurar la puesta en practica de los términos de la Resolución. Con
anterioridad, el Consejo había impuesto sanciones contra Libia por su
participación en el atentado terrorista contra un avión de la compañía americana
Pan Am que cayó en Lockerbie, Escocia, en diciembre de 1988 y también por el
atentado contra el vuelo de la compañía aérea francesa UTA, derribado en Níger
en septiembre de 1989. El Consejo también había impuesto sanciones contra Sudán
por haber dado cobijo a los responsables del atentado terrorista dirigido contra
el presidente egipcio Mubarak en junio de 1995 en Addis Abeba, con ocasión de la
cumbre de la Unidad Africana que tenía lugar en la capital etíope. En ambos
casos, y aunque los resultados de las acciones del Consejo tardaron un cierto
tiempo en producir frutos, sobre todo en el caso de Libia, la iniciativa alcanzó
casi todos los efectos deseados: Sudán entregó los sospechosos del atentado a
Egipto y Libia hizo lo propio con los presuntos autores de los dos atentados
contra aeronaves, puestos a disposición de la justicia francesa o juzgados en
Holanda de acuerdo con la legislación escocesa, amén de aceptar el pago de
indemnizaciones a las víctimas. En el recuento deben ser también tenidas en
cuenta las numerosas Resoluciones sobre el terrorismo aprobadas por la Asamblea
General desde fecha temprana en la vida de la Organización. Cubren tales
Resoluciones diferentes aspectos del terrorismo, incluyendo el tema del respeto
a los derechos humanos, y son siempre útiles para conocer el estado de ánimo de
la comunidad internacional y subrayar su utilidad en el caso de que hayan sido
aprobadas con la unanimidad de los Estados miembros. Cuando la comunidad
internacional se siente convulsionada por los ataques terroristas del 11 de
septiembre de 2001, lo menos que cabe registrar es que las Naciones Unidas, sus
Estados miembros, habían manifestado ya durante muchos años su condena y firme
repulsa en contra del terrorismo. Es evidente que lo ocurrido en esa fecha
fuerza a un replanteamiento del fenómeno del terrorismo en la vida internacional.
La primera respuesta en ese cambiante panorama es la Resolución 1373.
Como queda apuntado, la Resolución introduce un factor novedoso en el
comportamiento del Consejo de Seguridad, cual es el de imponer obligaciones
generales a los Estados miembros. En la sistemática habitual de las Naciones
Unidas, corresponde a la Asamblea General “legislar”, mientras que es atribución
del Consejo tomar decisiones sobre temas que afecten a la paz y a la seguridad
internacionales, normalmente traducidas en acciones contra sus violadores,
nominativamente identificados. La Resolución 1373 es, con carácter obligatorio,
una norma jurídica internacional dictada por el Consejo de Seguridad. No es de
extrañar que, desde su aprobación, haya recibido críticas al ser interpretada
como una “invasión” por parte del Consejo de las atribuciones en principio
confiadas a la Asamblea General, si además se tiene en cuenta que su texto
relaciona el terrorismo inequívocamente con los actos contrarios a la paz y a la
seguridad internacionales. Un texto tan robusto y contundente como el que
contiene la 1373 se explica en la atmósfera de conmoción creada por los
atentados del 11 de septiembre, añaden todos aquellos que resienten su incursión
en las responsabilidades de la Asamblea General, pero ningún miembro de la
comunidad internacional, con alguna pequeña y no demasiado significativa
excepción, ha osado públicamente oponerse al cumplimiento de sus disposiciones.
Más bien al contrario, la Resolución ha creado una dinámica decididamente
favorable a la observancia de sus normas y claramente inspiradora de la
convicción generalizada en contra del terrorismo y de sus manifestaciones. Todo
ello ha sido fomentado en la misma Resolución por la creación de otro órgano
subsidiario del Consejo, el Comité Contra el Terrorismo, que tiene como
finalidad fundamental la de comprobar el cumplimiento de los términos de la
Resolución a través de una relación continua y directa con todos los Estados
miembros que incluye eventualmente la prestación de la ayuda técnica en
beneficio de aquellos países que puedan encontrar dificultades materiales en la
aplicación de los preceptos aprobados por el Consejo. En los cinco años
transcurridos desde 2001, el Comité Contra el Terrorismo ha recibido más de
seiscientos informes de los Estados Miembros en respuesta a las cartas remitidas
por el CTC sobre el estado del cumplimiento de la Resolución. Y el aumento de
las ratificaciones de los Convenios internacionales sobre el terrorismo ha sido
notable: después de la aprobación de la Resolución 1373, las doce existentes
antes del 11 de septiembre recibieron entre un tercio y dos tercios de las
ratificaciones después del año 2001, oscilando el número total de las mismas
entre las ciento ochenta de las convenciones para la protección de las
navegación aérea y las ciento veinte de las relativas ala protección del
material nuclear o la fabricación de explosivos plásticos. La última de las
Convenciones, relativa a los actos de terrorismo realizados con armas o
componentes nucleares, fue adoptada por la Asamblea General el 13 de abril de
2005, recibió ochenta y dos firmas en el momento inicial, cuenta en el momento
actual con ciento seis y con tres países que ya la han ratificado. La nueva y
elogiable disposición para firmar y ratificar las convenciones antiterroristas
tiene indudablemente mucho que ver con el 11 de septiembre y con la Resolución
1373.
El impulso adquirido por el Consejo de Seguridad en el terreno de las medidas
contra el terrorismo ha tenido varias manifestaciones más en el curso de estos
últimos cinco años. La primera se produce poco tiempo después de la adopción de
la Resolución 1373 y constituye una clara reafirmación de la misma: es la
Resolución 1377, del 12 de noviembre de 2001, que recoge una declaración “sobre
el esfuerzo global para combatir el terrorismo”. Del mismo tenor, aunque más
extensa, y también reafirmando la validez de la 1373, es la declaración “sobre
la cuestión de la lucha contra el terrorismo” aneja a la Resolución 1456
aprobada, como la anterior, en sesión ministerial del Consejo, el 20 de enero de
2003.
El 26 de marzo de 2004 el Consejo de Seguridad adopta la Resolución 1535, que
endosa el llamado plan de revitalización de Comité Contra el Terrorismo y crea
la Dirección Ejecutiva del Comité, con la función de ayudar al mismo en el
desempeño de sus tareas. La gestión de este último texto había sido larga y
prolija. El impulso final habría de venir de otra fecha trágica: el 11 de marzo
de 2004 habían tenido lugar en Madrid los atentados terroristas contra los
trenes de cercanías que se dirigían a la estación de Atocha. La Dirección
Ejecutiva queda configurada como una “misión política especial” incluida en y
regida por las normas de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas y al servicio
del Comité y sus miembros.
Otro terrible ataque terrorista, el perpetrado contra una escuela por
independentistas chechenos en Beslan, en la Federación Rusa, en septiembre de
2004, inspira la Resolución 1566, adoptada por el Consejo el 8 de octubre de
2004 y que, sobre las anteriores, incluye algunas novedades significativas:
ofrece una definición del terrorismo; insta al Comité Contra el Terrorismo a
iniciar visitas a los Estados miembros, como medio adicional para comprobar el
grado de cumplimiento de la Resolución 1373; y crea un grupo de trabajo con la
finalidad de ampliar la lista de personas y organizaciones terroristas a otras
que no estén relacionadas exclusivamente con al-Qaeda y los talibán y de
considerar “la posibilidad de establecer un fondo internacional para indemnizar
a las victimas del terrorismo y a sus familias”. Meses antes, el 28 de abril de
2004, el Consejo había aprobado la Resolución 1540 dirigida a impedir que los
Estados suministren “cualquier tipo de apoyo a los agentes no estatales que
traten de desarrollar, adquirir, fabricar, poseer, transportar, transferir o
emplear armas nucleares, químicas o biológicas y sus sistemas vectores”.La
Resolución contempla asimismo una serie de medidas para impedir la proliferación
de las armas de destrucción masiva, colocando su ámbito más allá del estricto de
la lucha contra el terrorismo. Ello motivó que su gestación fuera lenta y
laboriosa y no por ello menos criticado el texto, al entender algunos que el
Consejo volvía a interferir en terrenos propios de la Asamblea General. La 1540,
como antes la 1267 o la 1373, crea un Comité, órgano subsidiario del Consejo,
encargado de vigilar el cumplimiento de los términos de la Resolución. Esta es
la única de la serie quinquenal examinada que no ha sido motivada o inspirada
por ataques terroristas y que quizá por ello demuestra con mas fuerza la firme
voluntad política que ha mostrado el Consejo a la hora de adoptar medidas, en
este caso preventivas, en contra del terrorismo.
La enumeración se completa con la Resolución 1624, adoptada por el Consejo el
14 de septiembre de 2005 en una de las raras sesiones que el órgano ha celebrado
en el nivel de jefes de Estado y de Gobierno –tres en toda su historia– y que
tiene de nuevo como trágica inspiración varios atentados terroristas: los
llevados a cabo en el sistema publico de transportes de Londres el 7 de julio de
ese año. La Resolución cubre dos terrenos distintos y novedosos. Por una parte,
contempla y predica acciones estatales contra “la incitación a la comisión de un
acto o actos de terrorismo”, que debe ser prohibida por ley. Por otra, realiza
un llamamiento a todos los Estados para “promover el dialogo y mejorar el
entendimiento entre las civilizaciones”. La gestión de su cumplimiento queda
confiada al Comité Contra el Terrorismo.
Como bien se observa, durante los cinco años transcurridos desde el 11 de
septiembre de 2001, el Consejo de Seguridad, cierto que en muchas ocasiones al
dictado de los acontecimientos, ha sido coherente en la condena del terrorismo,
contundente en la adopción de la correspondientes medidas y decidido en la
exploración del fenómeno y en la búsqueda de nuevas fronteras para
contrarrestarlo. Todas las Resoluciones mencionadas han sido aprobadas con el
voto unánime de los miembros de Consejo, y hay que tener en cuenta el carácter
cambiante de su composición a través de la presencia de los miembros no
permanentes para saber lo que la unanimidad significa. Las Resoluciones 1373,
1540 y 1566, además de la 1267, están situadas bajo la autoridad del Capitulo
VII de la Carta de las Naciones Unidas –“Acción en caso de amenazas a la paz,
quebrantamiento de la paz o actos de agresión”–. Sólo la 1624 rompe la norma al
situarse bajo el Capitulo VI –“Arreglo pacífico de controversias”– en un
evidente compromiso entre aquellos que querían una dura respuesta a la
“incitación del terrorismo” y los que temen la colisión de la figura con la
libertad de expresión. Pero seria erróneo concluir con ello que la 1624 “vale”
menos que las anteriores o que su mandato es menos obligatorio, aunque las
consecuencias de los respectivos y eventuales incumplimientos sean diferentes:
el Capitulo VI no incluye sanciones.
Paralelamente a la acción del Consejo, el secretario general ha venido
desarrollando la suya con progresiva intensidad. En octubre de 2001 se creó, en
el Secretariado, un “Grupo Asesor sobre las Naciones Unidas y el Terrorismo”
cuyas primeras y únicas conclusiones –el Grupo daría paso más tarde al “Equipo
Especial” para la lucha contra el terrorismo– reflejan una aproximación todavía
tentativa, aunque prefiguren algunas de las propuestas posteriores del
secretario general, fueron presentadas a la Asamblea General y al Consejo de
Seguridad el 6 de agosto de 2002. Es el mismo secretario general el que, en
septiembre de 2003 y ante la Asamblea General, convoca un Grupo de Alto Nivel
sobre “las amenazas, los desafíos y el cambio” para que evaluara los riesgos a
los que la humanidad debería hacer frente en el siglo XXI y propusiera la mejor
manera en que las Naciones Unidas pudieran proporcionar seguridad colectiva para
todos. El informe que presenta el Grupo a la Asamblea General con fecha 2 de
diciembre de 2004 constituye un poderoso y detallado análisis de los problemas a
los que se enfrenta la humanidad en el tiempo presente y del papel que las
Naciones Unidas pueden desempeñar para solucionarlos y contiene los elementos
esenciales del paquete de reformas que la Organización ha venido considerando, y
todavía sigue haciéndolo, en el curso de los últimos tiempos. En particular por
lo que se refiere al terrorismo, al que el Informe dedica su Capitulo VI, el
texto se mueve entre aguas relativamente contradictorias (condena el terrorismo,
pero al tiempo procede a la enumeración de las causas que supuestamente explican
su aparición) sin por ello rehuir los aspectos más controvertidos del fenómeno:
“La falta de consenso sobre una definición clara y bien conocida [del terrorismo]
compromete la posición normativa y moral contra el terrorismo y ha mancillado la
imagen de las Naciones Unidas”. Frente al argumento de que cualquier definición
del terrorismo debe incluir “el caso de un Estado que utiliza fuerzas armadas
contra civiles” los autores del informe consideran que “el marco jurídico y
normativo aplicable a las violaciones por parte de los Estados es mucho mas
sólido que en el caso de los actores no estatales”, para descartar la necesidad
de que ese tema sea recogido en la definición del terrorismo. Y frente a la
exigencia de que una definición del terrorismo no derogue el derecho a la
resistencia de un pueblo bajo dominación extranjera, el informe, con harta razón
por lo demás, argumenta que “el quid de la cuestión no es ese, sino el hecho de
que la ocupación de ninguna manera justifica el asesinato de civiles”. Los
autores del informe tienen incluso el coraje de proponer una posible definición
del terrorismo: “Cualquier acto, además de los ya especificados en los convenios
y convenciones vigentes sobre determinados actos de terrorismo, los Convenios de
Ginebra y la Resolución 1566 (2004) del Consejo de Seguridad, destinado a causar
la muerte o lesiones corporales graves a un civil o a un no combatiente, cuando
el propósito de dicho acto, por su naturaleza o contexto, sea intimidar a una
población u obligar a un gobierno o a una organización internacional a realizar
un acto o a abstenerse de hacerlo”.
El secretario general recogió no pocas de las conclusiones del Informe del
Grupo de Alto Nivel –llegando a endosar la definición del terrorismo que el
Grupo había propuesto– en el discurso que pronunció el 10 de marzo de 2005 en
Madrid, en un acto convocado para recordar el primer aniversario de los actos
terroristas en la estación de Atocha. Es en ese momento cuando lanza un primer
esbozo de la estrategia global de las Naciones Unidas contra el terrorismo que
resume en “las cinco des”:
• “Disuadir” a los grupos descontentos de elegir el terrorismo como táctica
para alcanzar sus objetivos.
• “Dificultar” a los terroristas el acceso a los medios para llevara cabo sus
atentados.
• Hacer “desistir” a los Estados de prestar apoyo a los terroristas.
• “Desarrollar” la capacidad de los Estados para prevenir el terrorismo.
• “Defender” los derechos humanos en la lucha contra el terrorismo.
El texto de Madrid merece lectura y recordatorio, entre otras cosas por la
contundencia con que se pronuncia el secretario general contra el terrorismo
–“no puede justificarse invocando causa alguna... es en sí mismo un ataque
directo a los derechos humanos y al Estado de Derecho”– y por el recuerdo
dedicado a todas las víctimas del terrorismo –“Debemos respetar a las víctimas.
Debemos escucharlas. Debemos hacer todo lo que podamos por apoyarlas”–.
El informe del secretario general a la Asamblea General presentado el 21 de
marzo de 2005 bajo el título “Un concepto mas amplio de libertad: desarrollo,
seguridad y derechos humanos para todos”, recoge algunos de los aspectos
esenciales del informe del Grupo de Alto Nivel, endosa algunas de sus
conclusiones, en particular la definición del terrorismo propuesta, pide a los
Estados miembros la adopción de una estrategia contra el terrorismo, insta la
finalización de un convenio internacional para la represión de los actos de
terrorismo nuclear –adoptado pocas semanas después–, pide el nombramiento de un
relator especial “sobre la compatibilidad de los medios contra el terrorismo con
las normas internacionales de derechos humanos” –también nombrado en el curso
del mismo año– e insta a los Estados miembros a concertar un convenio general
sobre el terrorismo. El Documento final de la Cumbre Mundial 2005, aprobado por
Resolución de la Asamblea General el 16 de septiembre de ese año repite la misma
petición, subraya “la importancia de asistir a las víctimas del terrorismo y de
ayudarlas, a ellas y a sus familias, a sobrellevar sus pérdidas y su dolor”, y
acoge con satisfacción los elementos de una estrategia para luchar contra el
terrorismo presentados por el secretario general, que deberían ser
posteriormente desarrolladas por la Asamblea General. Y en cumplimiento del
mandato emanado de la Cumbre 2005, el secretario general presenta a la Asamblea
General con fecha 27 de abril de 2006 el informe titulado “Unidos contra el
terrorismo: recomendaciones para una estrategia mundial de lucha contra el
terrorismo” que debería servir de base para la correspondiente decisión por
parte de la Asamblea. Es un texto directamente inspirado en las manifestaciones
anteriores del secretario general que respeta incluso la sistemática del
discurso de Madrid, que no otorga ninguna concesión ni deja resquicios a ningún
argumento que pueda ser utilizado para justificar los actos terroristas –la
resbaladiza llamada a las “causas del terrorismo” se sitúa en el prisma bien
diferente de “las condiciones que pueden ser aprovechadas por los terroristas”–
y que concentra su atención en las medidas prácticas que la cooperación
internacional, con la colaboración de las Naciones Unidas y bajo su tutela,
puede desarrollar en la lucha contra el flagelo. No hay en él ninguna mención a
la tan deseada y mencionada Convención General Contra el Terrorismo, y la
omisión no se produce por coincidencia: las discusiones que habían tenido lugar
en torno al terrorismo todos los meses precedentes, incluyendo las celebradas
sobre el mismo proyecto de convención, habían mostrado claramente las profundas
divergencias de criterio existentes sobre el tema del terrorismo y ante la
evidencia de las dificultades el secretario general opta por una aproximación
que se quiere realista. El texto evita la referencia a los temas que hasta el
momento han sido la base para las discusiones “filosóficas” –la definición, las
causas, el terrorismo de Estado, el derecho a la resistencia– para concentrarse
en medidas de cooperación internacional. En el mes de julio de 2006 todavía no
se había producido ningún acuerdo sobre esta nueva iniciativa del secretario
general y la esperanza, no por todos compartida, es que en el otoño la Asamblea
General puede llegar a finalizar algún tipo de acuerdo al respecto.
Es precisamente la incapacidad de los Estados miembros de las Naciones Unidas
para ponerse de acuerdo sobre una Convención General Contra el Terrorismo la que
bien resume la dificultad en que se encuentra la comunidad internacional para
alcanzar niveles elevados de eficacia en la lucha contra esa lacra. Las Naciones
Unidas siguen encarnando el más poderoso instrumento normativo que tiene a su
alcance la comunidad de naciones en la prosecución de un mundo más justo y
seguro y el balance que en ese terreno ofrece –incluido el que arriba queda
reflejado sobre el terrorismo– es impresionante. Pero en la gestación de las
normas y en su aplicación las Naciones Unidas poco pueden hacer sin o en contra
de la voluntad de los Estados miembros. Esa realidad, que muchas veces se olvida,
imputando a la Organización defectos que en su totalidad son patrimonio de los
que la integran –la ONU sigue siendo una organización interestatal en la que el
dogma de la soberanía nacional brilla con más fuerza que en ninguna otra parte–
es la que debe ser tenida en cuenta para analizar las imperfecciones en la lucha
antiterrorista tal como se predica, se practica y se percibe desde las Naciones
Unidas.
Todavía no existe un consenso universal sobre la prohibición de utilizar la
violencia indiscriminada por parte de agentes no estatales –es decir, los
terroristas– para alcanzar fines políticos. Bajo la capa del deleznable cinismo
reductor e igualitario que tantas veces se ha utilizado en este terreno –“mi
combatiente por la libertad es tu terrorista”– siguen existiendo, aunque muchos
de ellos no osen decir públicamente su nombre, sectores estatales que, bajo
pretextos varios, alientan, financian, permiten, premian o aplauden actividades
terroristas. La lucha contra el terrorismo, que tantas veces se ha mostrado
eficaz en ámbitos nacionales, o en internacionales limitados, y que no necesita
de la definición del terrorismo para continuar su tarea, encuentra obstáculos
serios para su plenitud si la misma naturaleza del objeto en contra del cual se
combate es radicalmente puesto en duda. Ese es el trasfondo real del problema de
la definición del terrorismo y de la incapacidad de las Naciones Unidas para
alcanzar consenso sobre una Convención General.
Pero ese no es el único dilema. En otras configuraciones de la alineación
política, algunos Estados estiman que terrorismo es sólo aquel que a ellos les
afecta, mientras que otros que sufren de los mismos métodos violentos –y
conviene recordar que lo que iguala a todos los terroristas no es la ideología
sino el método– están contemplando solo manifestaciones varias de luchas por la
autodeterminación o en contra de la tiranía. Tanto como si los primeros Estados
estimaran que los segundos se lo tienen bien merecido. Según esta óptica, habría
terrorismos malos y otros no tan malos, explicables por la aplicación de
diversas varas de medir, resultado de la famosa ley del embudo, ejemplo eminente
de la existencia de raseros varios.
Claro que también existen aquellos que, en ausencia de una definición, y
aprovechándose de la elasticidad del concepto, tienen la tentación de calificar
como terrorista a todo aquel que se mueve, sobre todo en contra del gobierno de
turno, para así rentabilizar la ola de horror que el fenómeno produce y de paso
quitarse de encima sin muchos miramientos para los derechos humanos y las
libertades fundamentales a los disidentes, opositores o críticos.
Otros, por el contrario, estiman que la lucha contra el terrorismo, por mucho
que lo diga la ONU, no es su prioridad nacional, volcados como están en
conseguir niveles aceptables de vida para sus respectivas poblaciones. Y ello,
que revela no tanto una creencia sino una realidad respetable, hace que al menos
la mitad de los Estados miembros de las Naciones Unidas no informen con
regularidad a los órganos subsidiarios del Consejo de Seguridad del cumplimiento
de sus obligaciones en este terreno. El término reporting fatigue,
cansancio de tanto informe, es uno de los más repetidos hoy en los círculos
antiterroristas del East River neoyorkino. La prestación de asistencia técnica a
los países que se encuentran con tales dificultades es una cuestión prioritaria
para los órganos competentes de la Organización, aún sabiendo de los obstáculos
que la tarea encuentra: son muchos los que todavía no comprenden que mejorar la
respuesta antiterrorista de los países que la necesitan no es sólo atender a la
seguridad sino también hacerlo en beneficio del desarrollo y de la prosperidad
–el terrorismo, sus antecedentes y sus consecuentes son terribles elementos
destructivos de vidas y haciendas–.
Pero tanta es a veces la capacidad de atracción de la asistencia técnica que
llegan algunos a confundirla con la lucha antiterrorista, como si ésta no
debiera ser fruto de una determinada voluntad política y solo objeto de una
cuidadosa atención desarrollista. El fenómeno puede llegar a producir un
desenfoque tan profundo como para hacer olvidar aquello de lo que se está
hablando. El terrorismo desaparece de la conversación.
El terrorismo, como todas las malas noticias, provoca reacciones tan
profundas en el sentimiento como cortas en el tiempo. Los Estados que en el
Consejo de Seguridad o, menos, en la Asamblea General reaccionan con prontitud y
contundencia ante los atentados terroristas y prometen, como en su momento
hiciera aquel ministro español del Interior, que van a buscar a los terroristas
“en el mismo infierno”, olvidan la urgencia de la convocatoria cuando el
nubarrón se ha disuelto y es otra la crisis a la que tienen que hacer frente.
Aún contando con la persistencia en el tiempo de los órganos creados por el
Consejo de Seguridad para obtener el cumplimiento de las correspondientes
Resoluciones, y cuya tarea no puede ser en ningún caso minusvalorada, y con la
benemérita y coherente actitud al respecto adoptada por el secretario general de
las Naciones Unidas, lo cierto es que el peligro de una tentación
burocratizadora y repetitiva, ayudada por todos aquellos que por razones varias
quisieran vaciar de contenido el sistema, acecha a las tareas antiterroristas,
posiblemente a muchas otras, de la Organización. Los órganos subsidiarios del
Consejo de Seguridad toman decisiones sobre la base de la unanimidad de sus
miembros. Se puede fácilmente comprender que así, y fuera de los momentos
excepcionales, aún tratándose de un número reducido de quince Estados, las
decisiones tardan en fraguarse y tienen de sólidas lo que también tienen de
minimalistas. No es extraño que en esas circunstancias haya Estados que
relativicen lo que la ONU les pueda aportar en su lucha contra el terrorismo y
opten por instrumentos domésticos o bilaterales.
La Resolución 1566 del Consejo de Seguridad, que abría esperanzadoras vías
para considerar la posibilidad de que la ONU administrara una lista global de
individuos y organizaciones terroristas y, al tiempo, invitaba a la creación de
un fondo internacional para ayudar a las víctimas del terrorismo y sus familias,
no ha conducido a ninguna parte. La Resolución 1624 del Consejo de Seguridad,
que ya sufrió la relativa degradación de verse situada bajo el Capitulo VI de la
Carta en vez de estarlo, como el resto de las recientes Resoluciones sobre el
terrorismo, bajo el más vigoroso Capitulo VII, debía recibir de todos los
Estados miembros –ciento noventa y dos– informes sobre su cumplimiento con la
finalidad de que el Comité Contra el Terrorismo transmita al Consejo el 14 de
septiembre de 2006, un año después de su aprobación, noticia del grado de su
cumplimiento. En julio de 2006 sólo cincuenta Estados habían cumplido con tal
compromiso.
Y no se puede olvidar que en el trasfondo de las cuestiones que tienen que
ver con el terrorismo, como en muchas otras que competen a las Naciones Unidas,
la tensión permanente entre el Consejo y la Asamblea –o más bien entre la
Asamblea y los cinco miembros permanentes del Consejo– tiene una influencia
retardataria y negativa. Se quejan los miembros de la Asamblea de la intromisión
del Consejo en esas cuestiones al tiempo que se muestran incapaces de encontrar
consensos entre ellos mismos, pero cuando el Consejo actúa con la prontitud que
le permite lo reducido de su composición y el peso con que en ella cuentan los
permanentes, la Asamblea, o algunos de sus miembros, ponen en duda la validez de
unas orientaciones que, según algunos, responderían exclusivamente a las agendas
nacionales de las grandes potencias. La atmósfera general que desprende esta
permanente situación impide también que el Consejo recurra a las sanciones o a
la amenaza de las mismas, teñidas como están de la sospecha de ser el resultado
de la imposición de los grandes o de alguno de ellos, y en consecuencia la
invocación del Capitulo VII, nunca fácil de conseguir, a la postre puede
convertirse en un alarde retórico.
Conclusión: La aportación conceptual y normativa de las
Naciones Unidas a la lucha global contra el terrorismo es impresionante e
imprescindible. Los comportamientos nacionales y la cooperación internacional
han conocido sustanciales mejoras como consecuencia del papel de las Naciones
Unidas en ese terreno. Las Naciones Unidas no pueden ni deben reemplazar el
papel de los Estados individual o colectivamente considerados en la conducción
de las acciones antiterroristas cuya legitimación, sin embargo, debe ser
contrastada con las reglas y las orientaciones producidas por la Organización.
Esas reglas están todavía inconclusas, fundamentalmente debido a la falta de
acuerdo entre los Estados Miembros para concluir una Convención General contra
el Terrorismo. Esa falta de acuerdo revela a su vez la subsistencia de
divergencias profundas en el seno de la comunidad internacional en torno a
cuestiones centrales de la misma, tales como la utilización de la violencia, la
responsabilidad de las fuerzas armadas en los conflictos internos, el derecho a
la resistencia por parte de los pueblos sometidos a dominación extranjera o los
límites de la práctica del derecho a la autodeterminación. El Consejo de
Seguridad, el secretario general, la misma Asamblea General, ha emitido normas y
orientaciones al respecto que, sin embargo, no son todavía aceptadas por todos.
A pesar de esa y de otras limitaciones, que tienen que ver fundamentalmente
con la inevitable presencia en el seno de las Naciones Unidas de ciento noventa
y dos agendas nacionales diferentes y contrapuestas, el sistema se ha sabido
dotar de una maquinaria incipiente pero ya relativamente robusta para hacer
cumplir las normas dictadas y eventualmente prestar la asistencia necesaria a
todos aquellos que la precisen. En los cinco años trascurridos desde el 11 de
septiembre de 2001, y a pesar de la evidente mejora en las capacidades
nacionales e internacionales de prevención ante y respuesta contra el terrorismo,
las manifestaciones mortíferas del mismo han seguido produciéndose. No
corresponde a ningún interés nacional concreto sino al general de la humanidad
el mantener, como lo hizo la Cumbre 2005, que el terrorismo “constituye una de
las amenazas más graves para la paz y la seguridad internacionales”. La
cooperación internacional bajo la inspiración y el mandato de las Naciones
Unidas es hoy en día el método más eficaz para enfrentarse con él. Corresponde
en última instancia e los Estados miembros el adoptar las medidas oportunas para
desarrollarlo.
Javier Rupérez
Subsecretario general y director ejecutivo del Comité contra el Terrorismo en
las Naciones Unidas, Nueva York
Nota:
(1) Convenio relativo a las infracciones y ciertos otros actos
cometidos a bordo de las aeronaves. Firmado en Tokio el 14 de septiembre de
1963, en vigor desde el 4 de diciembre de 1969.
(2) Convenio para la represión del apoderamiento ilícito de aeronaves. Firmado
en La Haya el 16 de diciembre de 1970, en vigor desde el 14 de octubre de 1971.
(3) Convenio para la represión de actos ilícitos contra la seguridad de la
aviación civil. Firmado en Montreal el 23 de septiembre, en vigor desde el 26 de
enero de 1973.
(4) Protocolo para la represión de actos ilícitos de violencia en los
aeropuertos que presten servicio a la aviación civil internacional,
complementario del Convenio para la represión de actos ilícitos contra la
seguridad de la aviación civil. Firmado en Montreal el 24 de febrero de 1988, en
vigor desde el 9 de agosto de 1989.
(5) Convenio sobre la prevención y el castigo de delitos contra personas
internacionalmente protegidas, inclusive los agentes diplomáticos. Aprobado por
la Asamblea General de la ONU el 14 de diciembre de 1973, en vigor desde el 20
de febrero de 1977.
(6) Convención internacional contra la toma de rehenes. Aprobada por la Asamblea
General de la ONU el 17 de diciembre de 1979, en vigor desde el 3 de junio de
1983.
(7) Convención sobre la protección física de los materiales nucleares. Firmada
en Viena el 3 de marzo de 1980, en vigor desde el 8 de febrero de 1987.
(8) Convenio para la represión de actos ilícitos contra la seguridad de la
navegación marítima. Hecho en Roma el 10 de marzo de 1988, en vigor desde el 1
de marzo de 1992.
(9) Protocolo para la represión de actos ilícitos contra la seguridad de las
plataformas fijas emplazadas en la plataforma continental. Hecho en Roma el 10
de marzo de 1988, en vigor desde el 1 de marzo de 1992.
(10) Convenio sobre la marcación de explosivos plásticos para los fines de
detección. Firmado en Montreal el 1 de marzo de 1991, en vigor desde el 21 de
junio de 1998.
(11) Convenio Internacional para la represión de los atentados terroristas
cometidos con bombas. Aprobado por la Asamblea General de la ONU el 15 de
diciembre de 1997, en vigor desde el 10 de abril de 2002.
(12) Convenio internacional para la represión de la financiación del terrorismo.
Aprobado por la Asamblea General de la ONU el 9 de diciembre de 1999, en vigor
desde el 10 de abril de 2002.
(13) Convenio internacional para la represión de los actos de terrorismo
nuclear. Aprobado por la Asamblea General de la ONU el 13 de abril de 2005.
Todavía no ha entrado en vigor.
Lancement de la Stratégie antiterroriste mondiale
des Nations Unies 19/9/2006
LES NATIONS UNIES LANCENT LEUR STRATÉGIE MONDIALE CONTRE LE TERRORISME
Des ministres appellent à sa pleine mise en œuvre
face au « fléau du XXIème siècle »
En marge du
débat général de l’Assemblée générale, le Vice-Secrétaire général des Nations
Unies, M. Mark Malloch Brown, a lancé cet après-midi, au nom du Secrétaire
général, M. Kofi Annan, la Stratégie mondiale contre le terrorisme des Nations
Unies. Tout en notant l’importance de l’adoption par consensus de cette
Stratégie mondiale par les 192 États Membres de l’Assemblée générale, le 8 septembre
dernier, il a souligné que c’est son application effective qui la rendra
historique.
En mars 2005, le Secrétaire
général avait lancé un appel à tous les pays pour qu’ils s’unissent derrière un
Plan d’action commun contre le terrorisme. En réponse, cette Stratégie comprend
des mesures de lutte contre le terrorisme qui, tout en protégeant les droits de
l’homme, renforceraient la capacité des États responsables et consolideraient
l’état de droit. « Nous, États Membres de l’Organisation des Nations Unies,
décidons solennellement de condamner systématiquement, sans équivoque et
vigoureusement, le terrorisme sous toutes ses formes et dans toutes ses
manifestations, quels qu’en soient les auteurs, les lieux et les buts, car il
constitue une des menaces les plus graves pour la paix et la sécurité
internationales », insiste le Plan d’action de cette Stratégie.
La Présidente de l’Assemblée
générale, Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa, a déclaré qu’il s’agissait là d’une
preuve extraordinaire de la détermination des Nations Unies « à affronter le
terrorisme de face ». La Stratégie va venir s’ajouter au cadre juridique de
l’Assemblée générale, a-t-elle indiqué, estimant que les États Membres et l’ONU
devraient travailler ensemble et de manière cohérente dans le cadre de cette
lutte. Elle a précisé que la Stratégie était un instrument qui pourrait être
mis à jour selon l’évolution du terrorisme, notamment dans le cadre de l’examen
de sa mise en œuvre tous les deux ans. Elle a par ailleurs noté qu’il restait
beaucoup à faire, insistant particulièrement sur la nécessité de finaliser le
projet de convention générale sur le terrorisme international dans les meilleurs
délais. « Ce n’est qu’en travaillant ensemble que nous pourrons nous
débarrasser du fléau que représente le terrorisme », a-t-elle affirmé.
À l’instar de la Suisse, de
nombreuses délégations se sont félicitées que l’ONU se dote d’un plan d’action
complet de lutte contre le terrorisme à l’échelle mondiale qui reconnaisse à la
fois la nécessité de s’attaquer aux causes potentielles du terrorisme, et celle
d’intensifier la coopération internationale dans ce domaine. Soulignant
qu’aucune condition ne saurait excuser ou justifier des actes de terrorisme, les
États ont en outre réaffirmé leur détermination à prendre toutes les mesures en
vue d’éliminer les conditions propices à la propagation du terrorisme,
s’agissant notamment des conflits qui perdurent, de la déshumanisation des
victimes du terrorisme sous toutes ses formes et manifestations, de l’absence de
légalité et des violations des droits de l’homme, de la discrimination ethnique,
nationale et religieuse, de l’exclusion politique, de la marginalisation
socioéconomique et de l’absence de gouvernance.
Certains Ministres des affaires
étrangères qui ont pris la parole, tels que celui du Liban et de l’Égypte, ont
aussi salué le fait que le texte confirme l’obligation des États de s’abstenir
de toute participation à des actes terroristes et qu’il reconnaisse l’occupation
d’un territoire comme l’un des facteurs propices à sa propagation. Toutefois,
la délégation du Yémen, entre autres, a regretté qu’une définition claire du
terrorisme n’ait pu être atteinte, notamment en ce qui concerne la notion de
résistance légitime à une occupation étrangère. Les États Membres, à l’exemple
de la délégation du Japon, ont par ailleurs insisté sur l’importance, dans le
cadre de la mise en œuvre de cette Stratégie, de continuer à susciter le
dialogue entre les civilisations, les cultures, les peuples et les religions,
ainsi qu’à créer les conditions d’un environnement socioéconomique ne favorisant
pas le recours au terrorisme.
« Loin de s’exclure mutuellement,
l’efficacité de la lutte antiterroriste et la protection des droits de l’homme
sont interdépendantes et complémentaires. La défense des droits de l’homme est
donc l’une des conditions essentielles du succès d’une stratégie antiterroriste »,
avait soutenu le Secrétaire général dans son rapport sur la question*, « S’unir
contre le terrorisme: recommandations pour une stratégie mondiale contre le
terrorisme ».
Les représentants des pays
suivants ont pris la parole au cours de cette réunion de haut niveau: Singapour,
Espagne, Finlande au nom de l’Union européenne, Égypte, Philippines,
Liban, Suisse, Turquie, Japon, Australie, Royaume-Uni, Fédération de
Russie, Yémen et Israël.
*A/60/285
Déclarations
Mme HAYA RASHED AL KHALIFA (Bahreïn),
Présidente de la soixante et unième session de l’Assemblée générale, a
souligné que le lancement de la Stratégie mondiale contre le terrorisme marquait
une étape importante dans la lutte des Nations Unies contre le fléau du
terrorisme, une des menaces les plus sérieuses à la paix internationale. Elle a
affirmé que cette Stratégie mondiale représentait la volonté commune des Nations
Unies à faire face au terrorisme qui, sous toutes ses formes et manifestations,
quels qu’en soient ses auteurs ou ses mobiles, doit être condamné. Exhortant
tous les États Membres à adhérer aux instruments juridiques de lutte contre le
terrorisme, elle a indiqué que la Stratégie mondiale complétait ce cadre
juridique en fournissant des mesures concrètes axées sur les résultats.
Elle a rappelé que le Plan
d’action de cette Stratégie reconnaissait la nécessité de traiter des causes
sous-jacentes pouvant mener au terrorisme, même si aucune d’entre elles ne peut
justifier de tels actes. De plus, elle a fait valoir que ce Plan d’action
contient des mesures concrètes pour mieux combattre le terrorisme, en insistant
particulièrement sur la coopération entre les États Membres et les Nations Unies
ainsi que sur le renforcement des capacités aux niveaux national et
international. Elle reconnaît aussi la nécessité de promouvoir le respect des
droits de l’homme et de la primauté du droit dans le cadre de cette lutte.
Enfin, elle a estimé que cette Stratégie mondiale devait rester un document
vivant qui sera mis à jour afin de répondre, de manière adéquate, à
l’environnement changeant ainsi qu’au développement des technologies dans ce
domaine. Il faut traduire la Stratégie en véritables actions, a-t-elle conclu,
en appelant également les pays à conclure les négociations sur le projet de
convention générale sur le terrorisme international.
M. GEORGE YEO, Ministre des
affaires étrangères de Singapour, a déclaré que le lancement de la Stratégie
mondiale contre le terrorisme des Nations Unies constituait une étape importante
dans la lutte contre ce fléau. Notant que son pays avait coprésidé les
pourparlers relatifs à la formulation de cette Stratégie, il s’est félicité de
la flexibilité et de l’esprit de compromis qui ont permis d’aboutir à ce
consensus. Il a estimé que cette Stratégie mondiale n’était qu’un élément dans
une lutte beaucoup plus large contre le terrorisme. Reconnaissant que les
discussions sur les causes latentes du terrorisme étaient souvent complexes et
controversées, il a affirmé que seul un dialogue basé sur le respect pouvait
mener à la compréhension et au compromis. Le Ministre a argué que les
terroristes utilisaient la race et la religion pour diviser et pour recruter de
nouveaux membres. Il a fait valoir l’importance de contrer cette Stratégie en
rapprochant les civilisations, notamment par le biais d’initiatives comme
l’Alliance pour les civilisations.
M. MIGUEL ANGEL MORATINOS,
Ministre des affaires étrangères et de la coopération de l’Espagne, a rendu
hommage à toutes les victimes du terrorisme à New York, Madrid, Beslan, Londres,
Bali, Charm el-Cheikh et de nombreux autres endroits du monde. « Il est
particulièrement important de condamner sans équivoque, ni condition, toute
forme de terrorisme dans un respect total des droits de l’homme », a-t-il
déclaré, appelant à mettre en place une assistance efficace aux victimes du
terrorisme.
Aux niveaux européen et
méditerranéen, l’Espagne, elle-même victime du terrorisme, cherche à développer
la coopération avec les pays voisins dans la lutte antiterroriste, a indiqué le
Ministre qui a espéré que cette Stratégie contribuerait à finaliser le projet de
convention générale contre le terrorisme. « En adoptant cette Stratégie, nous
nous sommes dotés d’un programme de travail qui nous engagera à travailler aux
niveaux national, régional et mondial », s’est-il félicité.
M. MARK MALLOCH BROWN, Vice-Secrétaire
général des Nations Unies, intervenant au nom du Secrétaire général, a
déclaré que l’Assemblée générale avait forgé une vision globale et coordonnée
pour faire face au terrorisme à tous les niveaux. Elle résulte d’une conviction
fondamentale que nous partageons tous: le terrorisme sous toutes ses formes et
quels qu’en soit ses auteurs ou ses mobiles est inacceptable et ne peut jamais
être justifié, a-t-il affirmé. Notant l’importance de l’adoption de cette
Stratégie mondiale par les 192 États Membres, il a souligné que c’est son
application effective qui la rendra historique. Il a appelé les États Membres à
traduire sans délai les engagements en réalité.
Ainsi, M. Malloch Brown a fait
valoir qu’il faudrait combattre le financement des terroristes, les empêcher
d’acquérir des armes et s’assurer qu’on ne leur accorde pas d’asile. De plus,
il a souligné qu’il faudrait aborder les conditions propices à la propagation du
terrorisme, même si aucune d’entre elles ne justifie de tels actes. M. Malloch
Brown a aussi estimé qu’il faudrait résoudre toutes les questions en suspens
liées à la future convention générale sur le terrorisme international afin que
ce texte puisse être adopté par tous les États. M. Malloch Brown a souligné
également que la lutte contre le terrorisme respecte les droits de l’homme et la
primauté du droit.
Le Vice-Secrétaire général a,
par ailleurs, mis l’accent sur l’importance de renforcer la cohérence du système
de l’ONU dans ce domaine. Il a déclaré que les États avaient désormais la
possibilité de prouver que la coopération multilatérale fonctionnait dans la
lutte contre le terrorisme. Nous avons enfin une réponse véritablement globale
à cette menace mondiale, et j’espère que vous saisirez cette occasion, a-t-il
conclu.
M. ERKKI TUOMIOJA, Ministre
des affaires étrangères de la Finlande, s’exprimant au nom de l’Union
européenne, a déclaré que le terrorisme posait une grave menace à la sécurité
des États, aux valeurs démocratiques des sociétés et aux droits et libertés des
peuples. Aucune cause ou souffrance ne peut justifier les actes terroristes,
a-t-il insisté. Notant que cette menace mondiale nécessitait une réponse
globale, il a affirmé que les Nations Unies jouaient un rôle clef dans la lutte
collective contre le terrorisme. Il a indiqué que l’Union européenne saluait la
Stratégie antiterroriste mondiale et que son adoption par consensus montrait la
ferme détermination de l’Assemblée générale à s’unir pour combattre le
terrorisme. De plus, il a estimé que l’Assemblée générale devait maintenir cet
élan, notamment afin de s’accorder sur la Convention globale sur le terrorisme.
Le Ministre finlandais a exhorté
les États Membres qui ne l’avaient pas encore fait à ratifier ou à adhérer aux
16 conventions des Nations Unies relatives à la lutte contre le terrorisme ainsi
qu’aux protocoles qui s’y rattachent et qui forment un cadre juridique pour les
mesures à prendre dans ce domaine. Il s’est félicité que cette Stratégie
mondiale reconnaisse que la promotion des droits de l’homme et de l’état de
droit est essentielle dans la lutte contre le terrorisme. En outre, il a
souligné l’importance du renforcement des capacités dans tous les États comme un
des éléments clefs de cette Stratégie mondiale. Dans une perspective de
coordination et de coopération, le Ministre a salué l’institutionnalisation du
Groupe de travail pour la mise en œuvre de la lutte antiterroriste des nations
et a affirmé que les États Membres devraient lui assurer des ressources
adéquates. Enfin, il a fait valoir que l’Union européenne continuerait à
déployer ses efforts afin de renforcer le dialogue et de promouvoir la
compréhension mutuelle entre les cultures et les civilisations.
M. AHMED ABOUL GHEIT,
Ministre des affaires étrangères de l’Égypte, a fait valoir que la Stratégie
mondiale contre le terrorisme augmentait la coopération internationale qui lie
les efforts nationaux de lutte contre le terrorisme. Notant que cette Stratégie
réaffirmait le rôle de l’Assemblée générale dans ce combat, il a rappelé que son
pays avait activement participé à ses négociations. Il s’est félicité de son
adoption par consensus, même si selon lui, certains éléments importants ne
figurent pas dans le document. L’Assemblée générale doit continuer à
l’actualiser et la développer, a-t-il suggéré. Ainsi, il a salué la décision
d’examiner sa mise en œuvre, tous les deux ans, afin d’en assurer son efficacité.
Le Ministre égyptien des
affaires étrangères a argué que le lancement de cette Stratégie mondiale contre
le terrorisme permettrait aux Nations Unies de sortir du cadre étroit adopté
pour traiter du terrorisme, puisque ce sujet n’était auparavant, qu’abordé au
sein du Conseil de sécurité et de ses Comités contre le terrorisme. De plus, il
a affirmé que ce document constituait une nouvelle approche dans la lutte contre
le terrorisme puisqu’il reconnaît l’importance de traiter des conditions
propices à la propagation de ces actes. Il a insisté sur l’engagement des États
à mettre fin à l’occupation étrangère, une des causes selon lui de cette
propagation. Il a jugé impératif d’adopter des approches courageuses et de
régler les différends qui alimentent le terrorisme, en particulier celle de
l’occupation étrangère de territoires par la force, qui prive les peuples de
leur droit à l’autodétermination. Il a également indiqué que le texte
réaffirmait l’obligation des États de s’abstenir de la participation à des actes
de terrorisme et a estimé que des mesures légales devaient être prises contre
les États qui ne la respectaient pas.
M. ALBERTO G. RUMULO,
Ministre des affaires étrangères des Philippines, a estimé que le lancement
de la Stratégie mondiale contre le terrorisme était un catalyseur qui unissait
les États pour protéger les peuples du monde. « Elle comporte de nombreux
éléments qui complètent les efforts nationaux de lutte contre le terrorisme »,
s’est-il félicité. Son pays, a-t-il assuré, réaffirme son soutien à l’adoption
d’une convention générale sur le terrorisme international qui renforcerait le
cadre juridique existant et constituerait l’épine dorsale de la lutte contre le
terrorisme, en particulier pour les pays qui ont le moins de capacités
nationales de lutte.
« Il ne suffit pas d’empêcher
les terroristes de commettre leurs actes lâches », a aussi déclaré le Ministre,
appelant à aussi s’attaquer à la pauvreté et favoriser le dialogue, notamment au
niveau des religions. Le Forum de coopération pour la paix, organisé par les
Philippines et associant responsables politiques, société civile et chefs
religieux et communautaires, s’inscrit dans cette promotion d’une culture
d’amitié et de paix entre les peuples, a-t-il souligné.
M. FAWZI SALLOUKH, Ministre
des affaires étrangères et de l’émigration du Liban, a condamné le
terrorisme sous toutes ses formes. Il a indiqué que la Stratégie mondiale
contre le terrorisme constituait une étape nécessaire pour obtenir un consensus
mais n’abordait pas toutes les préoccupations des pays. Il a toutefois estimé
qu’une des réalisations de cette Stratégie était de reconnaître, en dépit de
termes insuffisants, le droit légitime des peuples à résister une puissance
occupante. Il s’est aussi félicité que le document souligne la nécessité de
traiter des conditions propices à la propagation du terrorisme ainsi que celle
de se conformer au droit international dans les activités liées à cette lutte.
Par ailleurs, il a noté que cette Stratégie mondiale contre le terrorisme
donnait à l’Assemblée générale, organe des Nations Unies qui connaît la plus
large représentation, un rôle central dans la lutte contre le terrorisme.
Le Ministre libanais a toutefois
regretté que la Stratégie n’inclue pas certains principes de base dont une
définition du terrorisme ainsi que la condamnation du terrorisme d’État. Les
États doivent être tenus responsables de ce type d’actes et ne peuvent être au-dessus
de la loi, a-t-il soutenu. Enfin, il a salué l’examen tous les deux ans de
cette Stratégie afin qu’elle demeure un instrument efficace.
M. ULRICH LEHNER, Chef de la
Division des organisations internationales du Département fédéral des affaires
étrangères de la Suisse, s’est félicité que pour la première fois de son
histoire, l’ONU se dote d’un plan d’action complet de lutte contre le terrorisme
à l’échelle mondiale qui reconnaisse la nécessité de s’attaquer aux causes
potentielles du terrorisme et fasse preuve de la même détermination à
intensifier la coopération internationale entre polices et institutions
judiciaires. Il a également salué le fait que la Stratégie mondiale contre le
terrorisme réaffirme la complémentarité entre la lutte contre le terrorisme, le
respect de l’état de droit et la sauvegarde des droits de l’homme.
« La Suisse juge primordial que
la communauté internationale réponde de façon encore plus cohérente à la menace
terroriste », a insisté M. Lehner. Cette riposte doit recourir à tous les
moyens pour la priver de ses ressources, en portant toute l’attention nécessaire
aux victimes des actes terroristes et en rehaussant la légitimité de cette lutte
par un respect accru des droits de l’homme. Enfin, il a formulé l’espoir que
l’Assemblée générale adoptera sans tarder, renforcée par cet élan, le texte
d’une convention générale sur le terrorisme international, qui viendra compléter
les 16 conventions et protocoles sectoriels existants.
M. RAFET AKGUNAY, Vice-Ministre
des affaires étrangères de la Turquie, a estimé que le lancement de la
Stratégie mondiale contre le terrorisme était un tournant qui devrait être
reconnu par tous. « En tant que pays qui est la cible du terrorisme depuis
longtemps, nous avons tiré d’importantes leçons à propos desquelles il semble,
aujourd’hui, y avoir un consensus mondial », a-t-il affirmé, soulignant que le
terrorisme est un crime contre l’humanité qu’aucune circonstance ne peut
justifier.
Le Vice-Ministre a, en outre,
déclaré que le terrorisme était un phénomène en constante évolution qui tirait
parti de la mondialisation de toutes les manières possibles, ce qui lui
conférait un spectre de plus en plus large. « Notre lutte contre le terrorisme
doit donc être globale et multidimensionnelle », a-t-il dit, rappelant qu’aucune
nation n’avait le pouvoir de triompher, seule, du terrorisme. Les Nations Unies
sont l’instance la plus appropriée pour établir les bases d’une Stratégie
mondiale sur le sujet, a-t-il estimé, prévenant qu’un échec à travailler
ensemble ne ferait que nourrir le terrorisme. À cet égard, il a exhorté tous
les États Membres à adopter le projet de convention générale sur le terrorisme
international, « qui pourrait servir de pièce centrale de la lutte mondiale ».
M. SHINYO
TAKAHIRO (Japon) s’est félicité du lancement de la Stratégie mondiale
contre le terrorisme et du fait que, malgré leurs différences d’opinion, les
États aient adopté une approche basée sur l’action et les résultats. Nous avons
envoyé un message très clair contre le terrorisme, a-t-il précisé. Cette
Stratégie n’aurait de valeur que si elle était appliquée pleinement, a-t-il
estimé, avant d’exhorter toutes les parties à faire des efforts dans ce sens.
Il a reconnu qu’il était nécessaire de prendre en compte les conditions propices
à la propagation du terrorisme afin de créer un environnement qui ne
favoriserait pas de tels actes. Le Japon, en tenant compte de la sécurité des
personnes, travaille sur ces questions depuis longtemps, a-t-il fait valoir.
Soulignant la détermination du Japon à contribuer à la mise en en œuvre des
mesures antiterroristes, il a déclaré qu’il serait important d’assurer
l’efficacité de la Stratégie mondiale par le suivi des progrès accomplis dans
son application.
M. ALEXANDER DOWNER, Ministre
des affaires étrangères de l’Australie, au nom du Canada et de la Nouvelle-Zélande,
a souligné qu’il n’y avait pas de menace contemporaine plus importante pour la
paix et la sécurité internationales que le terrorisme, comme en témoignent les
récentes explosions en Afghanistan, en Iraq, en Somalie et en Thaïlande. Les
États sont déterminés, en vertu de cette Stratégie, à condamner fermement et
sans équivoque le terrorisme sous toutes ses formes, s’est-il félicité, y voyant
« un message d’une importance fondamentale ». Il a également réaffirmé son
appui à l’engagement de s’attaquer à tous les facteurs qui contribuent au
terrorisme mais a regretté que les idéologies extrémistes n’y aient pas été
incluses.
Les États doivent prendre des
mesures concrètes pour prévenir et combattre le terrorisme et pour renforcer
leurs capacités nationales de lutte, a poursuivi le Ministre, mais le terrorisme
a aujourd’hui une dimension mondiale et une réponse globale est donc aussi
importante. Appelant tous les États à s’accorder sur une convention générale
sur le terrorisme international afin de s’assurer que tous les actes terroristes
tombent sous le coup du droit international, il a estimé que, par l’adoption de
cette Stratégie mondiale, l’Assemblée générale a montré qu’elle peut agir de
manière décisive sur les questions internationales contemporaines ».
M. KIM HOWELLS, Ministre
d’État pour les affaires étrangères et du Commonwealth du Royaume-Uni, a
estimé que le terrorisme était une attaque contre les valeurs fondamentales de
l’ONU: la primauté du droit, la protection des civils et les principes de
respect mutuel entre les peuples de différentes religion et cultures. Il s’est
donc félicité que les États Membres se soient accordés pour condamner le
terrorisme et pour montrer leur détermination face à cette menace. Il s’est
réjoui que la Stratégie mondiale contre le terrorisme se base sur les
recommandations faites par le Secrétaire général et a appuyé l’élan visant à
mobiliser le système de l’ONU dans cet effort. Notant le travail qui reste à
accomplir, il a, entre autres, souligné l’importance de dissuader les gens à
avoir recours au terrorisme et de renforcer la capacité des États à protéger
leurs citoyens.
Le Ministre a, en outre, mis
l’accent sur la nécessité de partager les meilleures pratiques. L’ONU peut
aider les États à développer leur législation nationale en la matière ainsi que
des partenariats avec la société civile, a-t-il ajouté, en affirmant que les
gouvernements ne pouvaient, à eux seuls, remporter la lutte contre le terrorisme.
S’agissant des mesures visant à faire obstacle aux activités terroristes, il a
particulièrement insisté sur les obligations liées aux déplacements. Enfin, il
a argué que cette condamnation commune du terrorisme n’était qu’un premier pas.
Il faut maintenant travailler ensemble pour garantir la pleine mise en œuvre de
ce Plan d’action, a-t-il conclu.
M.
ALEXANDER YAKOVENKO, Vice-Ministre des affaires étrangères de la Fédération
de Russie, a estimé que l’adoption par consensus de la Stratégie des Nations
Unies contre le terrorisme était un pas important pour l’Assemblée générale,
très symbolique alors que l’on rendait actuellement hommage aux victimes du 11 septembre 2001
et de la tragédie de Beslan. Il s’est réjoui de voir des initiatives de la
Russie reprises dans ce document, notamment l’interdiction de l’incitation au
terrorisme et la coopération renforcée avec la société civile, ainsi que
l’encouragement au dialogue entre les civilisations et les religions. La
Stratégie renforce le caractère multilatéral de la lutte antiterroriste, a-t-il
également assuré.
M. AHMED HASSAN MOHAMED (Yémen)
a estimé que la Stratégie antiterroriste adoptée aujourd’hui était le résultat
de discussions ardues qui représentait un premier pas dans la bonne direction,
d’autant que le Yémen a été l’une des victimes les plus anciennes du terrorisme.
De nombreuses propositions ont été faites contre la diffusion de ce fléau, mais
le représentant a regretté que la notion de terrorisme d’état ne figure pas dans
le document, ainsi que l’absence d’une définition de la distinction entre
terrorisme et résistance légitime. Il a également souligné que l’élimination de
la pauvreté, le droit au développement et la nécessité de ne pas offenser les
religions et les textes sacrés devraient figurer dans le document. « Il ne faut
pas relier le terrorisme à une religion quelle qu’elle soit », a enfin souligné
le représentant.
M. DANIEL CARMON (Israël)
a souligné que le terrorisme est un problème mondial qui ne pourra être vaincu
qu’au niveau mondial. Il s’est félicité que la Stratégie mondiale contre le
terrorisme souligne que les actes terroristes, quels qu’en soient les auteurs ou
les mobiles, ne peuvent être justifiés sous aucun prétexte. Il a cependant
regretté que la Stratégie, telle qu’elle a été adoptée et lancée aujourd’hui, ne
comporte plus certaines dispositions.
« Israël est la cible d’attaques
terroristes constantes lancées par le Hezbollah et le Hamas », a indiqué le
Représentant, accusant la Syrie et l’Iran de parrainer ce terrorisme. Toutefois,
il a réaffirmé que le terrorisme ne reconnaît aucune frontière et menace tous
les individus directement. Plus que jamais notre monde est divisé entre les
modérés et les extrémistes qui se soutiennent mutuellement dans leurs activités
terroristes et incitent les jeunes à la haine, par des livres et des moyens
éducatifs, ce qui n’est pas moins dangereux que le terrorisme lui-même, a estimé
M. Carmon. L’incitation à la violence va faire naître la génération future du
terrorisme, a-t-il prévenu. Le Représentant s’est déclaré convaincu que, sans
excuse donnée à un quelconque acte terroriste, la communauté internationale peut
mettre fin au terrorisme.