News Update - English,
Turkish, Spanish, French
[ April 2006 ]
( English - Türkçe - Español - Français )
OIC's Istanbul meeting to call
West to act against Islamophobia
According to The New Anatolian, The Organization of the Islamic
Conference's (OIC) Parliamentary Union will meet in Istanbul this
week and discuss making a call on Western countries to act against
Islamophobia and extend their anti-defamation laws to ensure respect for
Islam.
There would also be discussion of protection of sanctities and supporting
principles of democracy and human rights. The Union also aims to increase
awareness on Islam and to create a channel of productive cooperation and
coordination with international institutions to enrich dialog.
The meetings are expected to discuss political, economic, and cultural
developments influencing the Muslim nation and some organizational matters.
A main focus is establishing smooth contact and strong representation with
western and non-Muslim parliaments and countering terrorism.
The Fourth Conference of OIC Member States Parliament Speakers will begin on
Wednesday (April 12th) with the participation of parliamentary delegations
from 48 member countries. One of the key visitors at the conference will be
Iran's Majlis (Parliament) speaker Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel, who's also
expected to have a bilateral meeting with the host of the conference, his
Turkish counterpart Bulent Arinc. The Iranian side is attaching great
importance both to the conference and meeting with Arinc to secure the
support of Turkey and the participating Muslim countries for its
controversial nuclear program.
During preparatory meetings of experts on Saturday and Sunday the committees
agreed to include several propositions on the conference's agenda and joint
declaration.
According to the agreed text, "Banning Islamophobia and insults on Muslims'
sanctities as well as a call on the United Nations and its Security Council
to issue a resolution against sacrilege of the Prophet Mohammed and Islamic
sects" will be high on the conference's agenda.
"The destructive impact of the West’s dual approaches towards issues in the
Islamic world, in particular the Middle East, on constructive ties and
exchanges between Islamic and Western states" and "emphasis on equal rights
for all nations to access modern technology and its free use for peaceful
purpose" are the other topics to be addressed.
The OIC's support for an end to the isolation of Turkish Cypriots will also
be discussed by its members.
Monday , 10 April 2006
www.turkishweekily.net
Islamophobia tops agenda at OIC Istanbul meeting
Wednesday, April 12, 2006 ANKARA – Turkish Daily
News
Debates over Islamophobia will constitute the most
important part of the Fourth Conference of the Organization of the Islamic
Conference (OIC) Parliaments' Union meeting scheduled for today in Istanbul,
said Parliament Speaker Bülent Arınç on Tuesday.
“This issue, which was proposed as an agenda item by our
country during the executive committee meeting [of the OIC], has been
brought onto the agenda of the Istanbul conference with the enormous support
of countries such as Iran, Algeria, Kuwait and Morocco,” Arınç said in a
speech he made prior to the opening of the conference.
“I believe that participating countries will have
a chance during the conference to put an emphasis on Islamic values, which
are against intolerance and discrimination, and they will be able to debate
in an atmosphere where dialogue between civilizations will be the main
focus,” he added.
Arınç said the Istanbul meeting of the OIC has become
important following the debates regarding the cartoon crisis that was first
sparked by the publication of Prophet Mohammed caricatures in a Danish
newspaper in September.
“Islamic countries will give important messages to the
entire world during the conference and draw attention to the clash of
civilizations,” he added.
Arınç expressed pleasure about the OIC meeting being
held in Istanbul, which he said was the capital of civilizations as it
combines the two continents and the two cultures.
The parliament speaker also said the Turkish Republic of
Northern Cyprus (KKTC) was still an observer at the OIC's Istanbul meeting
with the title “Turkish Cypriot Muslim Community.”
Arınç said Turkey had taken the initiative for a title
change of the KKTC during OIC meetings and held out hope that Turkey's
efforts would bear fruit in the coming days, which he said would amount to
support for the Turkish Cypriots.
He also said a final declaration would be issued at the
end of the conference at Istanbul's Conrad Hotel. President Ahmet Necdet
Sezer and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan are expected to attend the
meeting today.
OIC's Istanbul meeting to call
West to act against Islamophobia
The New Anatolian / Istanbul
April 11, 2006
The Organization of the Islamic Conference's (OIC)
Parliamentary Union will meet in Istanbul this week and discuss making a call
on Western countries to act against Islamophobia and extend their
anti-defamation laws to ensure respect for Islam.
The Fourth Conference of OIC Member States Parliament Speakers will begin on
Wednesday with the participation of parliamentary delegations from 48 member
countries. One of the key visitors at the conference will be Iran's Majlis
(Parliament) speaker Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel, who's also expected to have a
bilateral meeting with the host of the conference, his Turkish counterpart
Bulent Arinc. The Iranian side is attaching great importance both to the
conference and meeting with Arinc to secure the support of Turkey and the
participating Muslim countries for its controversial nuclear program.
During preparatory meetings of experts on Saturday and Sunday the committees
agreed to include several propositions on the conference's agenda and joint
declaration.
According to the agreed text, "Banning Islamophobia and insults on Muslims'
sanctities as well as a call on the United Nations and its Security Council to
issue a resolution against sacrilege of the Prophet Mohammed and Islamic
sects" will be high on the conference's agenda
"The destructive impact of the West's dual approach towards issues in the
Islamic world, in particular the Middle East, on constructive ties and
exchanges between Islamic and Western states" and "emphasis on equal rights
for all nations to access modern technology and its free use for peaceful
purpose" are the other topics to be addressed.
The OIC's support for an end to the isolation of Turkish Cypriots will also be
discussed by its members.
Large Saudi Delegation Heading for
Euro-Arab Talks
K.S. Ramkumar, Arab News
JEDDAH, 13 April 2006 — A large Saudi delegation is taking part in the
first Euro-Arab Dialogue Forum set at the Arab World Institute in
Paris from April 26-28. The theme of the forum is “Prospects and
contents of a Euro-Arab strategic partnership.”
“It’s a strong diplomatic gesture that falls within the continuity of the
state visit of French President Jacques Chirac to Saudi Arabia in early
March,” Saleh Bakr El-Tayar, secretary-general of the Franco-Arab Chamber of
Commerce, said yesterday.
“(Chirac’s) visit confirmed the ‘convergence of view’ between France and
the Kingdom and calls for more partnerships,” El-Tayar added.
During his trip, Chirac spoke in favor of the dialogue, and suggested that
the France and the Kingdom should make a joint effort to thwart the attempts
that stir up fanaticism and share the values for promoting better
understanding.
The first Euro-Arab Dialogue Forum was launched as a new instrument to
strengthen the relations between Europe and the Arab world. The forum,
officially launched on Feb. 8 in Cairo by Arab League Secretary-General Amr
Moussa, is co-organized by the General Union of Chambers of Commerce, Industry
and Agriculture for Arab Countries and the Arab World Institute.
Within the scope of 14 workshops, the forum will look into issues related
to global changes and their repercussions for Europe and the Arab world, the
image of the “other” in Arab and European media, Euro-Arab cooperation
mechanisms in economy knowledge, future of Euro-Arab relations, role of the
common cultural heritage in supporting the alliance of civilizations and
cooperation in the energy sector.
Some other issues to be deliberated are the role of the private sector
supporting social development; youth education and development policies;
economy and partnership — development perspectives; toward a new Arab world;
European from Arab origins — their role in supporting cooperation between the
shores of the Mediterranean; experiences of non-governmental cooperation; and
investment constraints and opportunities.
The delegation will include representatives of ministries of foreign
affairs, higher education, culture, information and commerce and industry.
Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed, president of the Council of Saudi Chambers of Commerce
and Industry, with some members from Riyadh, Jeddah and Dammam chambers, and
Saleh Al-Zahrani, a member of the security commission of the Consultative
Committee, are also expected to participate.
Young Muslims, Danes rap on cartoons
Dubai (dpa) - The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has organised a landmark meeting
between young Danes and Muslims to engage in a dialogue in the aftermath of
publication in a Danish paper of caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed, the
local news agency WAM reported.
The meeting is bringing together Muslim youth from all over the world to
engage in active and meaningful dialogue with young Danes from the Danish
Youth Council - Denmark's largest youth organization with over 70 affiliates,
said WAM.
Among the thorny issues that the 60 delegates will be tackling over the
weekend are discussions about freedom of expression, integration, the
so-called clash of civilizations, the perils of inter-cultural dialogue and
what role the media can play in hindering or facilitating global
understanding.
The initiative, "The Search for Mutual Understanding", has been organized by
the Tabah Foundation under the direction of noted scholar and teacher Habib
Ali al-Jifri, and the youth and training Ta'aheel consultancy.
"This is an opportunity for genuine cultural, intellectual and spiritual
exchange," said Tabah Foundation's Amienoella Abderoef.
The agency said the presence and participation of the venerable Syrian scholar
and globally respected Islamic theologian Dr Said Ramadan al-Buti makes the
gathering particularly poignant.
The forum will conclude with a declaration by participants on Monday 17 April.
Last September, a Danish paper published the offending cartoons of Mohammed
depicting him in one of them as a terrorist.
www.bangkokpost.com
Statement on Atrocities Against Defenseless Palestinian
PeopleApril 10, 2006 IRNA
OIC-Israel-Ihsanoglu
Secretary General of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC)
Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu said here on Monday that the Zionist regime's
atrocities against the defenseless Palestinian people set an instance of
state terrorism.
Ihsanoglu in his statement voiced strong concern over massacre of the
Palestinian people, demolition of their houses and imposition of economic
sanctions against them and said they are examples of Israel's atrocities.
He said occupiers' measures are in full contradiction with the fourth
Geneva convention and world's humanitarian regulations.
He called on the permanent UN Security Council members, the UN Secretary
General Kofi Annan and the Quartet Committee to immediately step in and
prevent continued crimes against the Palestinian people.
He stressed ending occupation of the Palestinian lands and formation of
an independent Palestinian state with Qods being its capital.
He said there is no way for restoration of stability and security in the
Middle East but implementation of the related UN resolutions.
The Zionist regime of Israel has over the past few days stepped up
attacks on the oppressed Palestinian people, detaining several civilians
without any justification.
It has also martyred more than 16 civilians, injuring tens of others.
Zionist regime's artillery has also pounded the Palestinian regions north
of Gaza over the past 24 hours.
Iraq and the legacy of Abraham
James Carroll The Boston Globe
MONDAY, APRIL 10, 2006
Judaism, Christianity, and
Islam are referred to as Abrahamic religions, a description aiming to head
off the clash of civilizations by emphasizing a common connection to the
patriarch whose name means "father of multitudes."
BOSTON Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are referred to as
Abrahamic religions, a description aiming to head off the clash of
civilizations by emphasizing a common connection to the patriarch whose name
means "father of multitudes."
Yet Jews, Christians and Muslims are more than mere cousins. The imaginative
breakthrough represented in the story of Abraham offers a first measure of the
meaning of human existence. If his descendants were more fully in touch with
that meaning, Iraq would be a different place today, and the religions would
not be on the cusp of war.
Abraham's story comes to us from Genesis. What makes it important is all that
precedes it. The Bible begins as a set of creation myths, narratives about
Adam, Eve, Cain, Abel, Noah, the Flood, the tower of Babel - anecdotes that
few contemporary readers take in any literal sense. They are stories from the
era of "once upon a time," and they define the concern of the Creator as
extending to the entire scope of creation.
But at the end of the 11th chapter of Genesis, something new happens, a shift
from the universal to the specific, from timelessness to "that time then";
from never-never land to a particular locale - a bridge of land between the
Tigris and Euphrates rivers.
One day on our calendar, a specific individual, whom scholars believe actually
to have existed, became the subject of the biblical text. That was the true
beginning of the world-view we take for granted.
"Leave your country, your family and your father's house for the land I will
show you," God said to this person. "I will make you a great nation. I will
bless you and make your name famous, so it will be used as a blessing."
The call of Abraham marks the beginning of human historical consciousness, a
direct consequence of the revolutionary affirmation that God meets human
beings by meeting one human being at one time and at one place. The God who
addresses Abraham in effect orders him to leave the realm of the purely
mythical for "the land I will show you."
Here is the difference between Abraham's God and the gods of Ur or Egypt: This
God acts not out of time, but in it; not in the other world, but in this one;
not in heaven, but on earth. This Creator is invested in creation not in
general, but in particular.
Therefore history - what happens here and now - is of ultimate significance.
This means that the value of mere abstractions must be measured against the
real-world consequences of their implementation.
The war in Iraq today was launched without regard for such consequences, and
we see the result. The genius insight of Genesis is that when God is
understood as the God of history, then history - what happens in time among
human beings - takes on absolute value. The ideal, therefore, must always be
measured against the real.
The death of each man, woman and child who has died in Iraq across the last
three years equals, in the eyes of the God who called Abraham by name, the
death of all that exists. Each person is of infinite worth. If war makers had
calculated their decisions on this scale, they would have found another way to
proceed. War must be a last resort, not a first reaction.
But the story of Abraham makes another point. In addition to being the God of
history, this God is the God of freedom. Not freedom in the shallow rhetoric
of American politics, but freedom that defines each human choice as having as
much significance as the very acts of God.
Abraham's call, with the fate of multitudes at stake, meant nothing until
Abraham said yes to it. But the possibility of that yes presumed the
possibility of its opposite. God, in freedom, initiates. Abraham, in freedom,
responds. But as subsequent verses of Genesis make clear, Abraham's will and
God's are not identical, and that is the way this God wants things to be.
A God of freedom invites a response, but does not coerce it. Why? Because in
this way the God of history makes humans responsible for history.
Jews, Christians and Muslims bear the weight of this precious legacy, embodied
in our common ancestor. History matters absolutely. So does each human life.
And so does every human choice. Absolute responsibility follows. That this
wisdom first showed itself in the landscape across which war now rages is
another reason to end it.
European imams aim to link Islamic, Western values
Monday, April 10, 2006
The meeting is clouded by an attack on an Islamic
cemetery being built in a suburb of Vienna. The building shell of the prayer
room was set on fire at the weekend. Its outside walls were smeared with
graffiti saying: 'Will be blown up'
VIENNA - Reuters
European imams meeting in Vienna have pledged to work harder to prove that
Islam is compatible with democracy and that the majority of Muslims living in
the West support human rights, free speech and pluralism.
More than 130 prayer leaders from across the continent, whose meeting was
sponsored by Austria as current European Union president, agreed Islamic
theologians in Europe must do more to establish that their faith does not clash
with Western values.
Their declaration published on Sunday amounted to a catalogue of home-grown
moderate views that Western politicians have been urging Muslim leaders to draw
up as a bulwark against radical Islamist ideologies coming from the Middle East.
But an attack on an Islamic cemetery being built in Vienna reminded them of
the hostility Muslims meet throughout Europe.
"Muslims in Europe are making history," said Mouddar Khouja, a senior
official of the Islamic Community in Austria, which organized the two-day
meeting where several speakers urged "new thinking" to develop a theological
basis for Islam in Europe.
He said European imams were issuing fatwas (religious edicts) dealing with
modern challenges, such as condemning terrorism, instead of leaving the field
open to radical Middle Eastern preachers who glorify violence on the Internet.
"We have shown how to protect ourselves from fatwas from other countries,"
he said. "We have fatwas from imams living in Europe and they speak for
themselves."
Imams, who lead Friday prayers in mosques, play an important role in Islam
because the faithful often ask their advice on what the faith allows or forbids
Muslims to do.
This is routine in Muslim majority countries, but Muslims in Europe face
new challenges as minorities in non-Islamic societies. They also have fewer
Islamic scholars and little or no tradition of Muslim life in the West to refer
to.
Theology is part of the solution:
This Conference of European Imams aimed to strengthen moderate voices
sometimes drowned out in Muslim discussions by radical anti-Western preachers
whose sermons and writings on the Internet inspire small groups of radical
Muslims in Europe.
It stressed that Muslims might better adapt to Europe, which some of them
see as corrupt and immoral, if imams stressed in their sermons that core Western
values of democracy and freedom meshed with their own Islamic faith.
"Imams, as teachers and preachers, have a duty to emphasize to their
congregations to play a positive role ... in addressing the plagues of Europe --
hate, bigotry, racism, extremism and terrorism," said British imam Abduljalil
Sajid.
The meeting was clouded by an attack on an Islamic cemetery being built in
a suburb of Vienna. The building shell of the prayer room was set on fire at the
weekend. Its outside walls were smeared with graffiti saying: "Will be blown
up."
"The graffiti shows this was an anti-Islamic attack," said Omar al-Rawi,
head of integration affairs at the Austrian Islamic Community. A similar attack
on a mosque happened after another Islam conference last November.
The imam meeting's declaration urged Muslim theologians to point out
chapter and verse how Islam fits with Western values.
"Theological arguments have a good chance of leading to lasting changes in
attitudes," it said. "These should be seen as part of the solution and fostered
in public discussion."
Among practical steps they sought were Islamic arguments against immigrants
isolating themselves in self-made ghettos, refusing to integrate or rejecting
the separation of church and state in Western democracies.
Imams should also show that violations of women's rights -- through forced
marriages, female circumcision and "honor killings" -- were rooted in traditions
from outside Europe and not justified by Islam, they said.
"We need some new thinking," said Ayatollah Sayed Abbas Ghaemmagami, head
of the Imam Ali Islamic Center in Hamburg, a leading Shiite center in Europe.
"Today we are in dire need of a social model that is just and realistic
(and can) arrive at solutions to the problems that prevent integration and
peaceful living together," he said.
© 2005 Dogan Daily News Inc.
www.turkishdailynews.com.tr
Drive for democracy stalls in
Arab world
By Hassan M. Fattah The New York Times
MONDAY, APRIL 10, 2006
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates Steps toward democracy in the Arab
world, a crucial American goal that just months ago was cause for optimism -
with elections held in Iraq, Egypt and the Palestinian areas - are slowing,
blocked by delays in reform efforts, legal maneuvers and official changes of
heart throughout the Middle East.
The political rise of Islamists, the chaos in Iraq along with the newfound
Shiite power there with its implication for growing Iranian influence, and the
sense among some rulers that they can wait out the end of the Bush
administration have put the brakes on democratization, analysts and officials
say.
"It feels like everything is going back to the bad old days, as if we never
went through any changes at all," said Sulaiman al-Hattlan, editor in chief of
Forbes Arabia and a prominent Saudi columnist and reformist. "Everyone is
convinced now that there was no serious or genuine belief in change from the
governments, it was just a reaction to pressure by the international media and
the U.S."
In Egypt, the government of Hosni Mubarak, which allowed a contested
presidential election last year, has delayed municipal elections for two years
after the Muslim Brotherhood made big gains in parliamentary elections late
last year, despite the government's violent efforts to stop the group's
supporters.
In Jordan, where King Abdullah has made political reform and democratization a
mandate, reformers believe their situation has been weakened with a national
agenda for change that has been put on the back burner.
Plans for parliamentary elections in Qatar were postponed a third time, to
2007, in violation of the country's Constitution, activists say, while civil
groups say that laws permitting the emergence of civil society organizations
have stymied their development instead.
In Yemen, the government has cracked down on the media ahead of presidential
elections later this year, jailing journalists who are considered overcritical
of the regime.
In Saudi Arabia, King Abdullah has refused calls that the country's
consultative council be elected, while the arrest of Muhsin al-Awaji, a
government critic, last month raised questions about how far the country's
newfound openness would go. And in Syria, promises for reforms have been
followed by a harsh crackdown on the opposition.
U.S. officials do not deny that there have been setbacks in the promotion of
democracy in the Middle East, but they say that recent negative trends do not
discredit their approach.
"Democratic development isn't always linear," said a senior State Department
official, insisting on anonymity in commenting for this article. "It's a
process that takes time, is evolutionary and requires strong consistent
support, which is what our policy is all about."
Arab nation-states in the Middle East are largely led by monarchies and
authoritarian regimes, many of which have been unable to keep up with
explosive population growth and development needs.
After the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks on the United States, the Bush
administration made democratization of the Middle East a strategic goal to
answer the extremism that had taken root in many parts of the region, and Arab
regimes, prodded also by emboldened opposition movements, made some moves
toward reform.
But Arab rulers now emphasize that change is a slow process, or simply focus
on economic reform instead.
With many economies booming, especially in the oil-rich Gulf, governments are
in no hurry to bring about political change. At last month's Arab League
summit, there was no mention of an Arab reform program launched in Tunis in
2004.
The slowdown comes at a critical time for the Bush administration, which is
increasingly seen as weakened both at home and abroad by its occupation of
Iraq. Many Arab rulers appear to be betting that the American public is losing
its appetite for major, costly interventions, and that this will give them a
freer hand.
"Iraq has allowed people to say, 'forget the American style of reform,'" Taher
al Adwan, editor in chief of the Amman-based Arab al Yawm newspaper, said.
"The Americans are not able to present anything to the reformers to encourage
them."
In Egypt - one of the United States' closest allies in the Middle East and
recipient of about $2 billion a year in military and financial aid - Mubarak
promised during his re-election campaign last summer to further amend the
Constitution and allow room for other political parties to grow. So far there
has been virtually no movement on either front.
The government continues to restrict the creation of new opposition parties,
and judges who questioned the integrity of the recent parliamentary elections
have become the focus of criminal probes.
In December, when an Egyptian court sentenced the political opposition leader
Ayman Nour to five years in prison on charges that were widely seen as
politically motivated, Washington responded harshly, calling for his release.
But Washington offered only mild disapproval over the February announcement of
the delay in municipal elections.
That delay is widely seen as an effort to preserve the monopoly of Egypt's
ruling National Democratic Party on power following the Muslim Brotherhood's
success at the polls.
It was also seen as an effort to halt the Brotherhood's promotion of an
independent candidate for president in 2011.
"America had a problem with violent Islamic groups because of a lack of
democracy in the region, but when people choose non-violent Islamic groups,
they don't want to deal with it," Essam El-Erian, spokesman and senior member
of the Brotherhood, said. "Even if Islamic groups win elections and have poor
relations with the U.S., they should at least appreciate that they will not be
violent."
In Bahrain, where sectarian tensions feature prominently between the majority
Shiite population and the Sunni- dominated government, a flurry of official
maneuvers apparently intended to reduce the Shiite vote has preceded municipal
and parliamentary elections expected later this year.
In the tiny nation of 700,000, often held up as a model of reform and
democratization, opposition figures say that elections, if they happen at all
this year, will be a symbol of backtracking, not of growing democracy.
But government officials accuse the opposition of fanning sectarian tensions
for political gain and point to the expected participation of opposition
groups as a sign that conditions are improving.
"The question many people are asking is this: Did reform slow down, or did it
just never happen?" said Toby Craig Jones, who recently completed a tour as an
analyst with the International Crisis Group based in Bahrain. "This was never
an example of real reform. It's an example of controlled reform."
When King Abdullah of Jordan entrusted a group of 26 prominent Jordanians to
map out a reform agenda for his kingdom in February 2005, the stated objective
was a plan for comprehensive reform and democratization efforts.
But when the group presented the 2,500-page document to the king more than
nine tumultuous months later, its reception was unusually subdued.
"For some reason, it was not publicized, it was not advertised, and it's got
into the hands of very few people," said Taher al-Masri, a member of the
drafting committee and, for a brief time, prime minister of Jordan. "We went,
we took a picture, and that was it," he said of the ceremony.
The effort sparked a contentious battle between Jordan's elite Western-
educated reformers, who were accused of debating issues behind closed doors,
and entrenched forces in the Parliament, who sought to have greater say in the
program.
Reformers like Marwan Muasher and others - dubbed "the digitals" for their
hip, high-tech ways - were quickly accused of serving an American agenda
rather than seeking real reform.
Michael Slackman and Abeer Allam contributed reporting from Cairo for this
article, Suha Maayeh from Amman, Jordan, and Steven R. Weisman from
Washington.
Cartoon politics
Monday, March 27, 2006 Turkish Daily News
The controversy over the Danish caricatures of Prophet
Mohammed, and the perception of Islam that resurfaced in some European circles
in the name of freedom of expression, has turned into a global wave of violent
protests throughout the 'Muslim world.' Demonstrations turned into ransacking of
diplomatic missions and violent clashes with human casualties. However, there
was a parallel agenda of the protests besides religion per se, that is less
recognized by those who find it expedient to rely on the thesis of 'clash of
civilizations.'
DOĞU ERGİL
The controversy over the Danish caricatures of Prophet Mohammed, and the
perception of Islam that resurfaced in some European circles in the name of
freedom of expression, has turned into a global wave of violent protests
throughout the “Muslim world.” Demonstrations turned into ransacking of
diplomatic missions and violent clashes with human casualties. However, there
was a parallel agenda of the protests besides religion per se, that is less
recognized by those who find it expedient to rely on the thesis of “clash of
civilizations.” This thesis foresees a bifurcated world where the civilized,
progressive and affluent side of the world lives the way they do because they
deserve it by way of their superiority. The remaining part of the world that is
not civilized may live in its squalor, backwardness and tyranny of ignorance by
their own choice, and because they also deserve it. The first world feels no
responsibility for the second, and hence expends no effort to understand why its
sentiments and view of the first does not match their naiveté and
irresponsibility.
First of all, what is crudely called the “Muslim world” has been the
hunting ground of Western colonialism and expansionism in the previous centuries
that left behind a legacy of exploitation, impoverishment and a wounded psyche,
at the core of which is resentment, humiliation and feeling of inferiority. This
is an explosive mixture in that if the culprit or former oppressor does not
extend its hand and heart in the post-colonial era to its former colonized
subjects, and does not help to repair the damage done during many centuries of
domination and humiliation, the national identities in the former colonies
become nothing but renouncement of anything associated with their former
colonizers. The West seems never to grasp this reality because it is a hard and
bitter pill to swallow. Because of this, it becomes all the more difficult to
understand the real reasons and local agendas that have aggravated this crisis,
which fundamentally is a mechanism to vent the reservoir of pre-existing
resentment towards the West.
The Egyptian demonstrators condemn the insolence of the West. With a strong
group in parliament, the Muslim Brothers is a challenge to the secular
government of Mr. Hosni Mubarak. Besides the West, they want to direct their
protest against the regime they strive to replace, and the incumbent government
in turn feels the need to show that they are also capable of playing on popular
sentiments, so that there is no need for a more radical group to be in power.
These internal tensions are easily channeled against a common target. The Iraqi
demonstrators want the withdrawal of Danish troops, and Afghan tribesman that
have links with the old (dis)order want NATO soldiers out of their country. What
better excuse is there for these groups to express their political agenda in a
public forum when there is so little legitimate opportunity to do so otherwise?
Iran, Syria and the pro-Syrian Lebanese Sunnis are undoubtedly unhappy with
Western pressure on them. They do not want to see Western dominance once again
on their home soil. With the example American invasion of Iraq, which they see
as a revival of western imperialism, anti-western and anti-American sentiment
has reached boiling point.
Despite these facts, in most of the Western media the ongoing dispute has
typically been treated as a further sign of the fanaticism of Muslims. But the
tempest did not arise out of nowhere. First, it arose out of ignorance of the
local context of these conflicts, which are mostly not about religion as much as
they are about power struggles within Muslim societies. Secondly, religious
nationalism exacerbated by the Bush administration's decision to invade Iraq has
raised suspicions that it can do the same all over the region. The ensuing
turmoil that threatens almost every party in the Middle East and the Muslim
World interprets this as an aggression to their being (identity, territory and
sovereignty). It is not just about the cartoons.
After the cartoons were published on Sept. 30, Danish Prime Minister Anders
Fogh Rasmussen refused to meet with ambassadors from Muslim countries and
lectured Muslims on their need to tolerate the caricatures. This attitude was
exactly what the Muslims (or anyone outside the Western political reality)
abhorred: encroachment and disrespect of the liberty to define yourself rather
than being defined by the imperial West. This is exactly the source of
bitterness in their collective memory that is still remembered vividly in the
form of Christian missionaries preaching to local people exactly how barbaric
they thought the Muslim faith was. Or signs hanging on the doors of European
clubs in India only a century ago that said, "Dogs and Indians not allowed." In
short, the overly critical opinion of the Muslim crowds has little to do with
piety and more to do with history and its lingering legacy.
The whole affair is a cost-free bandwagon on which everyone can jump on in
search of greater legitimacy among Muslim publics. There is no downside in the
Muslim world to defending Prophet Mohammed from Western insults. Pro-Western
politicians can use it to burnish their nationalist image, while others use it
to show how respectful they are to religion to cover their weaker flank against
the religious political parties who are threatening their ruling positions.
If the conservative, Christian West shows no ability (or willingness) to
respect conservative Muslims' need to value his or her own beliefs, the West
will find itself less able to speak to the Muslim world, and less able to defend
freedom of expression. What will be the end result? Clash of faiths and values
started by those who dread it most!
European Muslim leaders seek course to close divide with West
‘There’s kind of a psychological warfare now between East and West, and
Europe is at the center of it,’ says Mustafa Ceric, leader of Bosnia’s Muslim
community
ANKARA - TDN with AP Sunday, April 9, 2006
The agenda for a high-level meeting of European imams touched on politics,
job creation and the role of women, but at heart there was really one issue --
how to create a distinct identity for European Muslims.
The two-day gathering of 150 imams that kicked off on Friday in
Vienna worked toward a final statement that tries to carve a path between
secular Europe and the conservative Islam of the Arab world.
A declaration by the head of Bosnia's Islamic community that was
circulating Friday among European mosques illustrated the balancing act for the
continent's more than 33 million Muslims.
The document called on European Muslims to fully accept Western norms of
openness and publicly reject groups promoting violence. But, it added, Europe
must come to grips with Islam's presence with measures such as aiding
Islamic-oriented education and allowing Islamic law some jurisdiction over
family matters.
“There's kind of psychological warfare now between East and West and Europe
is at the center of it,” said Mustafa Ceric, leader of Bosnia's Muslim community
and author of the “Declaration of European Muslims” issued earlier this year.
Finding a way for Islam to thrive peacefully in Europe is a task that's
being made increasingly difficult by groups such as the British National Party
and Austria's Freedom Party that claim the continent's way of life is under
threat.
Those questions grew louder with the 2004 slaying of Dutch filmmaker Theo
Van Gogh by a suspected Muslim extremist and probes into radical preachers such
as Abu Hamza al-Masri, who was convicted in February of fomenting racial hatred
and inciting followers to kill non-Muslims during six years as imam at London's
Finsbury Park Mosque.
The Madrid and London bombings only hardened views and, last year, polls
across the European Union showed widespread reservations about the decision to
keep mostly Muslim Turkey on track for possible membership in coming decades.
The debate took on a critical urgency during the violent Muslim backlash to
Prophet Mohammed caricatures first published by a Danish newspaper. What began
as a stand for free expression turned into a grim lesson of a divided world.
Both the West and Muslim worlds felt they were under siege from the other.
Ceric, who could not attend the Vienna meeting because of a scheduling
conflict, planned to have an aide present his document. It urged European
Muslims to embrace modern views and change “a bad global image to a good global
image of Muslims,” but also blamed the West for fanning prejudices against Islam
following the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
He made a clear distinction between Muslims in the United States and
Europe, where economic and social systems are more rigid and Islamic communities
are often caught in a cycle of few jobs and few opportunities.
In France -- with Europe's largest Muslim population of about 5 million, or
at more than 8 percent -- it boiled over into weeks of rioting last year in poor
suburbs where many North and West African immigrants live with their French-born
children. The number of Muslims in the United States could reach as high as 6
million, or roughly 2 percent of the population.
“I am more optimistic about Muslims in America,” Ceric told The Associated
Press. “Europe has a historical predicament, and it will take a great effort on
all sides to change it.”
There are some signs of progress:
Centers have been established in France and the Netherlands to train new
imams with a European perspective. Recently in Denmark, state broadcasters
allowed for the first time a Muslim woman co-hosting a television talk show to
wear a headscarf. On Monday, the powerful Greek Orthodox Church said it would
not oppose efforts to open the first mosque in Athens since the end of Ottoman
rule more than 170 years ago.
“The biggest challenge is to recognize the identity of Muslims as
Europeans. We are aiming for integration, to learn the national languages, to
participate in society on every level,” said Mouddar Khouja, a top adviser with
the Islamic Community in Austria, a group overseeing Muslims in the country and
an organizer of the imam conference. Austria currently holds the presidency of
the EU.
Rashied Omar, a South African imam currently leading a program on conflict
and religion at the University of Notre Dame, urged both Muslims and Christians
to understand that their religious traditions can encourage intolerance and
violence.
“I'm worried about the future,” he said, “unless we come together and say,
‘We are all complicit in this madness.'”
OIC Efforts for Global Peace Win
Accolades
Maha Akeel, Arab News
www.arabnews.com
JEDDAH, 4 April 2006 — In recognition of the Organization of the Islamic
Conference’s commitment and fruitful contribution to global peace and security
and for strengthening multilateral cooperation around the world, the Goi Peace
Foundation, a Japan-based non-profit organization, awarded the pan-Islamic body
its “Peace Pole” yesterday.
Patrick Uwe Petit, the European representative of the foundation, presented
the award to OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu at the organization’s
headquarters in Jeddah.
Petit said that the award was in recognition of “OIC’s outstanding commitment
to the creation of a culture of peace and building a global alliance of
solidarity among Muslim nations as well as for safeguarding the dignity and
independence of all Muslim people.”
He said that in Europe some institutions and people have unfortunately failed
to understand the policy of co-existence.
The foundation decided to commend the OIC for launching the idea of dialogue
among civilizations in 1998 and Petit praised Ihsanoglu for his distinguished
leadership and for making the organization a well-respected and global voice for
peace on earth.
The OIC now joins a global alliance of distinguished recipients of the “Peace
Pole” award, such as the United Nations secretariat, UNESCO, the UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights, the Arab League, the African Union and the
Association of Southeast Asian Nations. The Peace Poles are silent reminders of
peace on earth. They carry a universal message and prayer in various languages:
“May peace prevail on earth.”
The OIC, which groups 57 Muslim countries, was established in Rabat, Morocco,
on Sept. 25, 1969.
The idea of the Peace Pole came to the Japanese philosopher and humanist
Masahisa Goi in the aftermath of World War II. In 1955, the Peace Pole Project
was launched in Japan and it spread around the world and today more than 200,000
Peace Poles have been planted in more than 180 countries.
In 1999, the Goi Peace Foundation was established in Tokyo to promote global
efforts toward a culture of peace. The mission of the foundation is to bring
together people and organizations united in their hearts toward a common goal of
peace on earth.
Spanish FM: Europe Must Respect
Muslims
By JAN M. OLSEN (AP)
04.03.2006
Spain's foreign minister said Monday that the
European Union must take the Muslim world more seriously following the uproar
over cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad.
Miguel Angel Moratinos called the uproar "one of the
worst crises the European Union has faced in recent years."
The 12 drawings, which were reprinted in several
European countries, prompted angry mobs to attack Western embassies in Muslim
countries, including Lebanon, Iran and Indonesia.
The cartoons, which included a drawing of the prophet
with a bomb-shaped turban, were seen as highly insulting by many followers of
Islam, which is interpreted as barrring even respectful images of Muhammad for
fear of prompting idolatry.
"The cartoon crisis has shown that we have to pay more
attention to that part of the world," Moratinos told reporters during a visit to
Denmark, where the cartoons were first published.
"All of Europe must take the question of the Muslim
countries more seriously," he said. "It does not mean we have bad relations with
them, but we have to be more engaged in the Muslim world."
Many Muslim leaders have criticized the Danish
government for not taking a stronger stance against the newspaper
Jyllands-Posten, which published the cartoons in September. The government has
said it cannot interfere with, or be held responsible for, the actions of
Denmark's free press.
Moratinos and his Danish counterpart, Per Stig Moeller,
spoke later Monday at a public forum on how to improve relations between the
Muslim world and the West.
Moratinos told the crowd of about 150 people at
Copenhagen's Royal Library that European countries must preserve their
traditions of free speech, "but it has to be exercised with responsibility."
Moeller said the cartoon crisis illustrated a "growing
gap between the West and the Muslim worlds."
He urged both sides to increase mutual respect, and
refrain from stereotyping each other to reduce the risk of more serious
conflicts.
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan will travel to Sudan to attend
the Arab League Summit from March 28 to 29. Prime Minister Erdogan is expected
to speak at the summit on the issue of "Alliance of Civilizations", as well as
hold a series of bilateral talks with his counterparts.
Erdogan is scheduled to meet President Umar Ahmad Al-Bashir of Sudan and First
Vice President Salva Kiir and Prime Minister. Turkish state ministers Besir
Atalay and Mehmet Aydin will accompany Prime Minister Erdogan during his visit.
>>
Arab Summit: Erdogan warns EU of dangers of anti-Muslim
laws
In move to warn US and EU about implementing anti-Muslim laws, in a key speech
to support Alliance of Civilizations initiative Erdogan says such legislation
creates dangerous fault line that threatens peace in societies
Touching on Muhammed cartoon crisis, Erdogan stresses freedom of expression
should have some limits and urges all members of different religions to stop
struggling to dominate the other
Warning the U.S. and the European Union about the consequences of formulating
new laws against Muslims, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan yesterday
said that such legislation creates a dangerous fault line which threatens peace
in societies.
Delivering a speech at a conference entitled "Dialogue among Civilizations" held
on the sidelines of the Arab League summit held in Sudan, Erdogan complained
about the way religions continue to struggle to dominate each other.
Beginning his speech with "Bismillahirrahmanirrahim", a traditional way for Arab
leaders to begin a speech, Erdogan touched on the crisis that emerged between
the West and the Muslim world over the publication of the Prophet Muhammed
cartoons in various European newspapers. He stressed that freedom of expression
should have some limits. "The Muslim approach to other religions is as follows:
Both Jesus Christ and Muhammed are our prophets," said the Turkish prime
minister, stressing that Muslims expect the same approach from followers of
other religions.
Underlining that the world shouldn't be deceived by those who seek a "clash of
civilizations," Erdogan also called for cooperation in fighting terrorism.
Concerning sharing of intelligence, Erdogan urged the international community to
be more open on the issue.
"There's been a cold war between values," said the prime minister, warning that
the consequences might be devastating.
Highlighting that competition in the arms race now accounts for $1 billion,
Erdogan asked, "So where's your commitment to strengthening world peace? Those
with the greatest power said that but these commitments remain mere words.
They're still searching for market strategies to sell their products to poor
countries."
During his speech Erdogan also touched on developments in Iraq, saying, "Turkey
wants to see a democratic Iraq with territorial integrity which can preserve
political unity and stability and establish peaceful relations with its
neighbors."
www.ABHaber.com 29.03.2006
www.thenewanatolian.com
Danish Muslims sue newspaper that printed prophet cartoons
3/30/2006 www.usatoday.com
COPENHAGEN, Denmark (AP) — A group of 27 Danish Muslim organizations have
filed a defamation lawsuit against the newspaper that first published the
carricatures of Islam's Prophet Muhammad, their lawyer said Thursday.
The lawsuit was filed Wednesday, two weeks after
Denmark's top prosecutor declined to press criminal charges, saying the
drawings that sparked a firestorm in the Muslim world did not violate laws
against racism or blasphemy.
Michael Christiani Havemann, a lawyer representing the
Muslim groups, said lawsuit sought $16,100 in damages from Jyllands-Posten
Editor in Chief Carsten Juste and Culture Editor Flemming Rose, who supervised
the cartoon project.
"We're seeking judgment for both the text and the
drawings which were gratuitously defamatory and injurious," Havemann said.
The lawsuit was filed in the western city of Aarhus,
where Jyllands-Posten is based.
The newspaper published the 12 cartoons on Sept. 30,
saying it was challenging self-censorship among artists afraid to offend
Islam. The drawings were later reprinted in other Western media, mostly in
Europe, in the name of free speech and news value.
The Danish newspaper apologized for offending Muslims
after violent protests erupted throughout the Islamic world, but stood by its
decision to print the drawings, citing freedom of speech.
Erdoğan warns of East-West split
Wednesday, March 29, 2006
The prime minister also criticizes 'discriminatory'
laws toward Muslims in Europe and warns such laws threaten peace
ANKARA - Turkish Daily News
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan warned yesterday that the world
was on the verge of splitting along a “fault line” that was poised to get
wider, especially between the West and the Islamic world, and claimed that
extremists on both sides were exploiting that situation.
“There is an understanding, on one side, that excludes everything and
everyone… There are terrorist organizations on the other side that claim they
come on the scene on behalf of religious or cultural values… The two sides
ignore common values and help the situation evolve into a crisis,” Erdoğan was
quoted as saying during the summit of the Arab League in the Sudanese capital
of Khartoum.
“It is obvious that such tendencies based upon ‘clash of civilizations'
scenarios pose a threat to world peace and drags us into a dark hole,” Erdoğan
said in his speech titled, “Alliance of Civilizations.”
The prime minister emphasized it is compulsory today to display the will
of a joint struggle against the current situation but complained that no
progress has been made so far in that regard.
“We must take action as soon as possible to ‘stop' that situation. We
must go after our hopes, not fears,” he said. “We must seek ways of letting
logic and common sense reign.”
Erdoğan said, “With its multi-faceted relations, rich history and
cultural assets, my country feels a special responsibility to actively
participate in efforts to maintain dialogue and mutual understanding between
different cultures.”
Together with another Mediterranean country Spain, Turkey co-sponsors the
U.N.-led Alliance of Civilizations initiative, urging national and
international action to overcome prejudice, misperceptions and polarization
between cultures and civilizations -- particularly between Islam and the
West.
“New circumstances that we face require international cooperation and
solidarity more than ever,” Erdoğan stressed and said the current situation
today showed that the U.N. initiative launched in 2005 was timely and a very
appropriate step.
The prime minister also criticized “discriminatory” laws toward Muslims
in Europe and warned that such laws were threatening peace.
“We do not want a clash between civilizations but there are those in the
world who do. There are attempts to portray Muslims as members of a religion
associated with terrorism. We should not and will not fall into that trap,”
Erdoğan said.
He complained that there has been a different approach toward Islam
following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks against the United States and said
the term “Islamic terror” has been used since then.
“It is wrong to associate Islam with terrorism. Islam is a religion of
peace,” Erdoğan said. “How can you associate such a religion with terrorism?”
He added, “Islamophobia is a humanity crime in the same way as
anti-Semitism.”
Drawing attention to the Prophet Mohammed caricatures first published in
Denmark in September and then in a number of Western newspapers, Erdoğan said
the process started with the reprinting of the prophet drawings urged the
world to take urgent measures.
“It is not possible to consider the caricatures within the framework of
the freedom of expression,” he said.
Erdogan Attends Dialogue Of Civilizations Conference
Published: 3/28/2006
KHARTUM - ''We don't want clash of civilizations. But there are people who
want it. There are some who want to show Muslims as if they were members of a
religion involved in terrorism. We should not fall into this trap and we
won't,'' Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has indicated.
Erdogan, who arrived in Sudan on Monday to attend the Arab League Summit,
delivered a speech at a conference entitled, ''Dialogue of Civilizations''.
Recalling that cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad offending the Islam were
published in European newspapers consecutively, Erdogan indicated that the
developments that have started with this process urged countries to take
measures.
''It is impossible to consider these cartoons within the scope of freedom
of expression,'' he stressed.
Noting that after 9/11 attacks in the United States, the expression of
''Islamic terror'' started to be used, Erdogan underlined, ''it is wrong to
mention Islam and terror together. Islam is the religion of peace.''
Erdogan stressed that they were exerting efforts to solve this problem
through alliance of civilizations.
''It is impossible to know where and when terrorism will occur,'' Erdogan
noted.
Stating that there was need for international cooperation to fight
terrorism, he said, ''countries should share intelligence with each other.''
Recalling that Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Zapatero and he launched
the project on ''Alliance of Civilizations'', Erdogan indicated that this
project was supported by many countries and organizations worldwide.
Erdogan noted that Turkey's EU accession was very important for the
dialogue among civilizations.
''We are working to globalize the peace,'' Erdogan added.
Erdogan seeks stronger Arab
support for Iraq's unity
Erdogan will deliver a speech at the opening meeting of the
two-day summit on the issue of "Alliance of Civilizations," where he will
call for dialogue among the West and the Muslim World.
The New Anatolian / Ankara with AP
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan will leave for Sudan
today to attend a Arab League summit where he will call on Arab countries to
take a stronger role and involvement in Iraq to avoid the country falling into a
civil war.
Before his visit, Turkish authorities sent 30,000 tons of food aid to the
troubled Darfur region of Sudan as a gesture, The New Anatolian learned.
Erdogan will deliver a speech at the opening meeting of the two-day summit on
the issue of "Alliance of Civilizations," where he will call for dialogue among
the West and the Muslim World.
The Turkish prime minister, accompanied by State Ministers Besir Atalay and
Mehmet Aydin, is also expected to hold a series of bilateral talks with his
counterparts. Erdogan is scheduled to meet Sudanese President Umar Ahmad Al-Bashir
and the country's First Vice President Salva Kiir and prime minister.
Diplomatic sources told The New Anatolian on Sunday that the Iraq issue will top
Erdogan's meetings on the margins of the summit. Erdogan will stress that
neighboring countries and the Arab League should make more efforts and work
together to end the country's political deadlock. He will also ask to give a
clear message to Iraqis that its neighbors and the Arab League supports the
political process in Iraq.
The Arab League summit comes at a time when most Arab countries fear that
Iranian Shiite influence is dominating the country.
On Saturday, Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari harshly criticized Arab
governments for doing little to help Iraqis, and said they should offer debt
relief and reopen diplomatic missions in Baghdad. Zebari warned that if Arab
countries did not take those steps, they were leaving a void that Iran might
fill.
Iraq's Shiite leaders have frequently expressed bitterness over Arab nations'
slowness in showing support for the country's new leadership, suggesting the
Arab League -- whose 22 members are majority Sunnis -- is biased toward Iraq's
Sunni minority, which enjoyed power during the rule of ousted leader Saddam
Hussein.
But the strong criticism was striking coming from Zebari, a Kurd who as foreign
minister has played the role of point man with Arab nations.
Several Arab diplomats, speaking on condition of anonymity Sunday, told the
Associated Press that a squabble broke out Saturday between Zebari and the
foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates over proposed
talks between the United States and Iran on how to stabilize Iraq.
Zebari confirmed only that some Arab officials had expressed concerns over
Iran's influence in Iraq and complained about the planned Iranian-U.S. meetings.
The other Arab diplomats, who spoke anonymously because the talks were private,
said the Saudi and Emirates ministers complained that Arabs were being left in
the dark about the talks. One diplomat who attended the sessions said Arab
leaders want to know what the dialogue's objectives were, and whether Arab
interests would be ignored.
A draft resolution on Iraq to be adopted by the leaders "emphasizes the Arab
role in the future of Iraq." It also calls for support for a reconciliation
conference the Arab League is trying to put together among Iraq's Shiite, Sunni
and Kurdish leaders in June. But there has been no confirmation that conference
will take place.
Zebari said the Arab complaints are unfounded. "We told them time and again that
they should be present in Iraq and never abandon it," he told The Associated
Press.
The Arab worries over Iran's influence come at a time when Iraqi politicians
have been struggling to form a government amid disputes among the Shiite parties
that dominate Parliament and Sunni Arab and Kurdish leaders.
March 28, 2006
Pope urges dialogue of civilizations
Tuesday, March 28, 2006
Turkey trip to help West-Islam dialogue
ANKARA - Turkish Daily News
A senior Vatican cardinal said yesterday that Pope Benedict XVI would use
his trip to predominantly Muslim Turkey, scheduled for Nov. 28-30, to promote
greater dialogue between Islam and the West.
“This is one of the main problems today, to come to a relationship with
Islam that will not be a clash of civilizations but a dialogue between
civilizations,” Cardinal Walter Kasper, head of the Council for Christian Unity,
said in an interview with the Reuters news agency.
“Of course, nobody wants a clash of cultures. It would be disastrous for
the whole world,” Kasper said, adding that he expected the pope to speak on
relations with Islam at meetings with the Turkish government in Ankara before
going to Istanbul.
Prior to becoming pope, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger gave a controversial
interview arguing that Europe's roots are Christian and that a Muslim country
would not fit in.
EU-Turkey integration important for regional, world peace: official
Ali Babacan, Turkish State Minister and chief negotiator for talks on
Turkey's entry into the European Union (EU), said on Tuesday that
Turkey-EU integration was of utmost importance for regional and world peace.
Babacan made the remarks when speaking at a conference on " Administrative
Structures Adopted in Line with EU Negotiations", which was held in Ankara and
sponsored by the World Bank Institute.
He said that Turkey's entry into the pan-Europe bloc would contribute to
the EU's stability and security.
"Concepts like meeting of civilizations, alliance of civilizations and
peace of civilizations, will be more important for the world from now on,"
said Babacan, underlining that it was necessary to create an environment in
the EU in which various religions and cultures can coexist.
Turkey started entry talks with the EU last October. The negotiations are
expected to last at least a decade and Turkey, dominated by Muslims, is
required to carry out reforms in various fields in order to meet EU demands.
Babacan said that Turkey-EU screening process on 35 chapters would be
completed in 2006. He also underscored the importance of non-governmental
organizations' participation in the process.
Turkey and the EU have completed introductory screening on 15 chapters and
detailed screening on 13 chapters so far.
The screening process will go on with financial services chapter during
March 29-30.
Source: Xinhua March 28, 2006
http://english.people.com.cn
UN ready to help Arab world overcome ‘many
formidable challenges’ – Annan
28 March 2006 – In a wide-ranging review of the
“many formidable challenges” facing the Arab world, Secretary-General Kofi Annan
today reaffirmed
the United Nations commitment to help resolve issues ranging from sectarian
violence in Iraq to the Israeli-Palestinian impasse to the continued killings,
rape and displacement in Sudan.
“You gather during a period of continued turbulence in the Arab world and the
surrounding region,” he said in a message to the Arab League summit in Khartoum,
Sudan, delivered by Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs Ibrahim
Gambari.
Mr. Annan stressed the need for dialogue and cooperation in overcoming
continuing strife on each of the following issues:
Iraq: after last month’s “heinous” bombing of the Shiite shrine in
Samarra, a fully inclusive government is needed more urgently than ever to
counter sectarian violence. The UN will continue to promote inter-communal
dialogue and maintain its efforts, as circumstances permit, to assist
reconstruction and economic development.
Israeli-Palestinian conflict: an affirmation by the new Palestinian
cabinet of the Arab Peace Initiative would be a first welcome step towards the
reaffirmation of Palestinian commitment to the principles of non-violence,
recognition of Israel’s right to exist and acceptance of the UN-backed Road Map
peace plan for a two-state solution. Israel, too, must be reminded, in light of
continued creation of facts on the ground, that peace cannot be imposed
unilaterally.
Lebanon: the country’s friends and neighbours have a crucial role to
play in helping it consolidate its independence and sovereignty and the UN
stands ready to help Lebanon and Syria to cultivate productive, friendly ties
based on the explicit assurances of respect for each other’s sovereignty,
security and independence.
Somalia: the UN will continue to provide political, moral and material
support for the transitional process as the Horn of Africa country continues to
cope with violence, the weakness or non-existence of governing institutions, and
a lack of national consensus on the future. “I hope Arab states will actively
seek opportunities to give both humanitarian and development aid,” Mr. Annan
said.
Sudan: aspects of the situation remains deeply troubling with actions
falling short of expectations on several fronts following last year’s peace
accord in the south, while in Darfur “people continue to be killed, raped and
driven from their homes by the thousands.” Mr. Annan hailed African Union
agreement to support in principle the transition from its mission in Darfur to a
larger, more mobile UN operation.
Cultural rifts: the publication of cartoons depicting the Prophet
Muhammad that many found deeply offensive has led to “an apparent deepening of
the already troubling rift between communities and nations of different beliefs
and cultures,” Mr. Annan said. The Alliance of Civilizations initiative
that he has launched with the support of Spain and Turkey is intended to
generate a concerted effort to bridge divides, combat extremism and overcome
prejudices, misconceptions, and polarizations which potentially threaten world
peace.
UN reform: he thanked the Arab countries for supporting the process
and noted that important steps have already been taken such as setting up a new
Peace-building Commission, a Democracy Fund, a much improved emergency response
fund, and a new, stronger Human Rights Council.
Can
Turkey bridge the gap between Islam and the West?
By improving ties with Iran and Syria, Turkey aims to help mediate tensions.
By Yigal Schleifer | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor
March 29, 2006 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0329/p04s01-wome.html
ISTANBUL, TURKEY - After decades of keeping the
Arab and Muslim countries of the Middle East at arm's length, Turkey is trying
to strengthen relations with its neighbors while at the same time recasting
itself as a mediator in the region.
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan delivered a speech at the opening of the
Arab League summit in Khartoum, Sudan, where Turkey for the first time was given
the status of "permanent guest" by the organization.
The prime minister's appearance at the summit - the first time a Turkish
leader has done so - is the latest in a string of eyebrow-raising foreign policy
moves: In February, a top Hamas official visited the capital, Ankara; soon
after, Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jafaari made a bridge-building trip; and
the Turkish government recently announced that it was planning to host firebrand
Shiite Iraqi cleric Moqtada al-Sadr for an official visit - since put on hold.
While the moves have ruffled feathers from Israel and Iraq to the US and
European Union (EU) - which Turkey hopes to join - analysts say these aren't so
much blunders as a reflection of a significant change in Turkey's Middle East
foreign policy.
"Turkey wants to be a message-bringer from the Islamic world to the West,"
says Huseyin Bagci, a professor of international relations at Ankara's Middle
East Technical University (METU). "The government really believes that it can be
a bridge between East and West, and this is the foreign policy."
The Turkish government offered to act as a kind of mediator between the EU
and the Islamic world regarding the controversial cartoons of the prophet
Muhammad. Turkey has also suggested its ties to the West and its improving
relations with Iran could help it act as a go-between in the diplomatic crisis
over Tehran's disputed nuclear program.
"We have historical links to the region, to the Middle East at large," says a
senior Turkish foreign ministry official. "Turkey also has another important
quality in this regard, which is that it has relations with everybody [in the
region]. We can effectively pass on messages. We have trust on both sides of
various conflicts."
But critics warn that this new policy is flawed and carries with it the risk
of alienating Turkey's Western allies. The Ankara visit of exiled Hamas
political leader Khaled Mashaal was strongly denounced by both Israel, the only
Middle Eastern country with which Turkey has a military alliance, and by members
of US Congress. Meanwhile, some of Turkey's efforts to upgrade its relations
with Syria have been viewed by Western diplomats as counterproductive to efforts
to contain the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
"You can see a split between the people who run the foreign ministry and the
people who run foreign policy for the [governing Justice and Development Party],
and that's really a struggle for the future course of Turkish foreign policy,"
says a Western diplomat based in Ankara, who asked not to be named because of
the sensitivity of the issue. "This is a rather new phenomenon that has crept up
over the last few months."
"Where [Turkey's new policy] doesn't work is that if you are going to become
an intermediary, what you do has to have some support outside of one of the
parties," says Henri Barkey, chairman of the international relations department
at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania. "This doesn't bring results if you don't
have that support, it makes you irrelevant."
It can also impact Turkey's interests, Professor Barkey says. "There are a
lot of congressmen who have been very supportive of Turkey but will now [after
the Mashal visit] not lift a finger when something comes up that Turkey cares
about," he says.
Adds Barkey: "I don't think anyone in Washington expects [Turkey] to
downgrade trade relations with Iran or Syria. I don't think anyone faults the
Turks for having better relations than we have with Iran or Syria. But when
there is an international consensus on something, that is a line that shouldn't
be crossed."
Other critics suggest that while based on good intentions, Turkey's policy
presumes other countries are acting in good faith, which may not be the case.
"It seems like a well-meaning policy but it fails when checked against the real
politick of the Middle East," says Soner Cagaptay, director of the Turkish
Research Program at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. "The policy
works so long as the other side needs Turkey."
But Bagci says events in the Middle East have left Turkey with few options
other than to pursue a revised regional policy. "The 21st century is going to be
a new era where East and West try to understand each other in a different way
and Turkey is a window of opportunity for the West to enter the Islamic world in
a different way."
Zapatero to visit Turkey in summerWednesday, March 29,
2006
FATMA DEMİRELLİ
ANKARA - Turkish Daily News
Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero will visit Turkey in
the summer to reciprocate a visit by his Turkish counterpart, Recep Tayyip
Erdoğan, in November of last year, a Spanish official here said yesterday.
Alberto Navarro, Spain's state secretary for European Union affairs, also
reiterated his country's support at a meeting with a group of journalists for
Turkey's efforts to join the EU, explaining that there were profound
political, strategic and economic reasons, as well as moral and ethical ones,
to do so.
Spanish support for Turkey's EU bid is backed by the two countries' joint
efforts to defuse tension between the Muslim world and the West, which has
peaked with a crisis over publication in European newspapers of caricatures
lampooning the Prophet Mohammed.
Erdoğan visited Spain in November to jointly open a three-day meeting
with Zapatero on the U.N.-backed Alliance of Civilizations initiative.
Navarro, who met yesterday with state minister and Turkey's chief
negotiator for EU talks Ali Babacan, Foreign Ministry Undersecretary Ali
Tuygan and head of the Prime Ministry's Secretariat-General for EU Affairs,
Oğuz Demiralp, during a visit to Ankara, said Turkish membership would be an
asset for the 25-nation bloc politically and in economic terms and also added
that Spain, which went through a difficult accession process, saw Turkey as a
“mirror” of its own experience.
“Twenty years ago, Spain was a completely different country than it is
now,” he said, explaining that the Spanish economy had grown considerably and
the domestic political climate and stability had also improved a lot.
Dangers of saying ‘no' to Turkey:
But the Spanish official also warned that Turkish officials should take
note of an ongoing debate in the EU on the limits of enlargement.
In June, EU heads of state and government will meet at a summit to debate
the “borders of Europe” and the bloc's absorption capacity, a discussion that
is likely to have significant ramifications on Turkey's EU accession
prospects.
Navarro said Spain did not favor opening debates on the borders of Europe
and assured that Spain would remain committed to supporting Turkey's EU drive
but urged Turkish authorities to continue with reforms, describing integration
with the EU as a never-ending story.
“Spain is the most committed supporter of Turkey's EU membership,” he
said. “A debate on the borders of Europe is a bad debate because there is no
clear-cut answer here. If we say Turkey should never join the EU because it is
not part of Europe, then Turkey would look back to Iran, Russia, China.”
Asked whether he agreed if there was a slowdown in Turkish reforms,
Navarro responded with optimism, saying, “So far, it is going well.”
No Spanish support for political criteria
reference:
Turkey formally opened accession negotiations with the EU on Oct. 3 but
actual talks on the chapters, or policy areas into which the bloc's
regulations are divided, are yet to start.
On one of the chapters, education and culture, some EU countries, led by
France, press for inclusion of a reference to the bloc's political criteria
for entry in a letter inviting Turkey to state its negotiating position so
that negotiations on this chapter can begin, a demand rejected by Turkey,
which says negotiations on this chapter should be technical and fear such a
reference could give opponents of Turkish membership a tool to block the talks
at any stage of the process.
Navarro said Spain was opposed to such reference, explaining that this
has not been mentioned in the case of past candidates, which means it would be
“discrimination” against Turkey if the political criteria are mentioned in the
letter.
Hamas visit constructive:
Asked to comment on how a surprise visit of a delegation from Palestinian
radical group Hamas to Ankara last month was received in Europe, Navarro said
it was a constructive step.
The EU refuses talks with election winner Hamas because it is on the
bloc's list of terrorist organizations.
Erdogan Speaks At Arab League Summit
Published: 3/29/2006
www.turkishpress.com
KHARTOUM - ''Today we are witnessing that the existing fault line between
the West and the Islamic World have tendency to deepen,'' Turkish Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Tuesday. At the opening of Arab League
Summit in Khartoum, PM Erdogan delivered a speech on ''Alliance of
Civilizations''.
Erdogan said hardliners at the extreme ends of the spectrum exploited
this situation thoughtlessly. ''On the one side there is an understanding
excluding everybody and everything... and on the other side we see terrorist
organizations claiming that they came on the scene in the name of religious
or cultural values... Both parties disregard common values and try to
provoke crises,'' he said.
In his speech Erdogan expressed his belief that the summit would have
serious contribution to the peace, welfare and security of the region, and
noted that the summit took place at a critical moment when dynamics (that
will give shape to the future of the region) started to be accelerated.
Erdogan said outcome of the summit would make important contribution to
the course of the development in the region, and noted that Turkey has a
cultural closeness to and joint history with the Arab world. ''To this end,
contributing to the stability, security and prosperity of the Arab world is
among our primary goals,'' he added.
-''END OF COLD WAR''-
''The international climate emerged after the end of cold war facilitated
solidarity among countries and improved multilateral relations. However we
should admit that it brings some new risks and threats with. Particularly
terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, smuggling and
organized crimes started to gain global dimensions,'' recalled Erdogan.
''Unfortunately, we cannot say that we live in a more secure world when
compared with two decades ago. Both the classical areas of clashes and the
new asymmetric threats closely and directly threaten all of us. This fact,
imposed by globalization, is a security concern for everybody. Mankind in
the end learned with very sorrowful experiences what would cost the double
standard of 'my terrorist is good, your terrorist is bad'. Unfortunately,
humanity suffered a lot from this disaster. Turkey also suffered a lot from
this scourge. For years we tried to explain this and make our voice heard.
We said a terrorist can not have religion, race and color. Terrorism is a
phenomenon whose target is unknown. Recent painful incidents proved that
target of terrorism is the humanity as a whole. The conditions we are facing
requires international cooperation and solidarity more than ever.''
''Where we stand today, displaying a firm will for a joint fight against
the terrorism is mandatory. Unfortunately, it is hard to affirm that a
noteworthy progress has been made up to now,'' he indicated.
''Turkey wishes to see a prosperous Iraq having secured its territorial
integrity and stability, preserved its political unity, and that is at peace
with its neighbors,'' Erdogan said.
Erdogan said, ''this project aims to establish a comprehensive
cooperation in global plan by highlighting mutual values of different
cultures. We consider differences among us as elements enriching the
civilization.''
-INITIATIVE IS TIMELY AND APPROPRIATE-
''Where we stand today, it is clearly seen that Alliance of Civilizations
initiative is timely and appropriate. Recent cartoon crisis revealed that
the issue should be handled without losing common sense. Freedom of thought
and expression are indispensable elements of civilization,'' Erdogan said.
''The cartoon crisis also proved that there are more steps to be taken on
this issue. Otherwise, we should all have to bear the negative impact of
this event,'' Erdogan remarked and noted that respect to freedom of belief
and values is among the fundamental principles of civilization.
Erdogan said there were two important matters that may add momentum to
efforts aiming to boost mutual dialogue and cooperation. ''Those are
resolution of Arab-Israeli conflict and reaching stability soon in Iraq'' he
said.
-PALESTINIAN ELECTIONS AND MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS-
Erdogan went on: ''We wish the new Palestinian Parliament and the
Government to work in coordination with President Mahmoud Abbas to meet some
expectations of the international community. Enlivening of peace process on
the basis of the road map should be the primary target of everybody.''
Erdogan emphasized that elements threatening the internal stability of
Iraq continued to be high on the agenda, and noted that he believed that
attacks on mosques and shrines are ''acts of provocation aiming to cause
confrontation between religious sects.''
''Easing tension between sects and halting vicious circle of violence in
Iraq before they reach an irreversible point, is crucial. Forming a broad
based government representing all segments of the society will be in the
best interest of the Iraqi people and is good for the stability of the
region,'' he indicated.
Erdogan said the reforms which Arab League initiated are timely and
appropriate. ''The more we respect universal values like democracy, human
rights, gender equality, supremacy of law, transparency and pluralism, the
more we may contribute to regional and global peace'' he concluded.
Arab League futility
The Boston Globe - International Herald Tribune
MARCH 31, 2006
The Arab League summit meeting this week in the
Sudanese capital, Khartoum, appeared to validate the group's reputation for
idle chatter and obtuse decisions.
If the site of the summit was not callous enough - the host government is
the perpetrator of an ongoing genocide in Darfur - the participants made
things worse by rejecting a proposal to supplement 7,000 ineffectual African
Union monitors in Darfur with a substantial United Nations peacekeeping
force. In so doing, the league's 22 members were accepting the cynical line
of Sudan's genocidal ruler, Omar al-Bashir, who characterized the plan for a
UN peacekeeping force in Darfur as a violation of Sudan's sovereignty.
This gesture of solidarity with the forces behind mass murder, systematic
rape and the ethnic cleansing of non-Arab African tribal groups in Darfur
cast a pall on everything else that was said, or left unsaid, by the
dignitaries - mostly autocrats - in attendance in Khartoum.
The summit's pledge of solidarity with the Palestinians, in conjunction with
a repetition of the 2002 Arab League offer of peace with Israel in return
for a withdrawal from all Arab lands, belongs under the rubric of idle
chatter. The vapidity of the members' stance was evident in their refusal to
increase last year's commitment to contribute $55 million per month to the
Palestinian Authority. The Palestinians are asking for $170 million.
But the summit's most dramatic - and pathetic - failing was its effort to
address the twin specters of sectarian warfare and Iranian influence in
Iraq. In a barely veiled lament at the prospect of U.S.-Iranian talks about
Iraq's future, the Arab League's secretary general, Amr Moussa, said:
"Any solution for the Iraqi problem cannot be reached without Arabs and Arab
participation. Any result of consultations without Arab participation will
be considered insufficient and will not lead to a solution."
This was a coded way of expressing deep Arab fears that the United States
and Iran are preparing to subtract Iraq from the Arab world, allowing it to
be absorbed into a swelling sphere of Iranian influence. At the summit's
closing session, Iraq's foreign minister told the other Arab states that
they shared the blame for what is happening today in Iraq because of their
indifference to decades of Saddam Hussein's "authoritarian rule and wars."
And he rightly said they had an obligation now to help Iraq in "isolating
terrorism and drying up the sources that finance its activities."
It is in the interest of the Arab states to heed this plea, because the
jihadists now wreaking havoc in Iraq will likely be coming after them next.
Free speech should soar above insult and injury
The real clash of ideas is within each culture -
over who best represents us
GIG HARBOR, WASH. – It's
disturbing to watch bad ideas grow legs. In the deadly firestorm ignited by
the Danish cartoons caricaturing Islam, one bad idea - the "clash of
civilizations" - seems to have found its feet. The agenda shaping up for
this clash - free speech versus Islam - is driven by another bad idea: the
"right to offend." Free speech is to represent the best of Western
civilization and the Enlightenment, with its most extreme test - and biggest
gun - proudly trundled forth: insult and provocation.
As if! As if Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo, invasion and occupation of
Iraq, and other varieties of "regime change" the West envisions for the Arab
world were not offense enough. And how bizarre that offensiveness is held up
as civilized, rather than seen as fueling the clash.
Descending to the bait, defenders of offensiveness weigh in across the
spectrum. On the left, Art Spiegelman, cartoonist for The New Yorker,
asserts in The Nation, "There has to be a right to insult," even if it stirs
discomfort. Aligning on the right, William Bennett and Alan Dershowitz
castigate Western media for "betraying" their "duty" to republish the Danish
cartoons. Meanwhile, contrarian Christopher Hitchens derides "the babyish
tantrums" of the Islamic world and "this sickly babble about 'respect.'"
More such ilk doubtless will air in Round 2, when Iran's largest
newspaper publishes the "winners" of its Holocaust cartoon contest, and an
Israeli paper does likewise with its anti-Semitic contest. The media will
again agonize about republishing - and the West's insult-artists can crow
again about taking the blows and, unlike those 'babyish' Muslims, not
burning down a Starbucks.
This is so sandbox, so sticks-and-stones, and in these tinderbox times so
dangerous, like strapping on a suicide belt. Rights come with
responsibilities, and it's time to talk about the responsible use of free
speech.
Starting with this question to the insult-artists: And your higher point
is...?
What's lost in this slugfest, drowned out by extremists, are the voices
of moderate, responsible, democracy-promoting Muslims. A recent Washington
Post-ABC News poll shows a majority of Americans now think Muslims are
disproportionately prone to violence.
A Muslim who spoke out was the editor of the Jordanian paper Shihan who
posed this question: "Muslims of the world, be reasonable. What brings more
prejudice against Islam - these caricatures or pictures of a hostage-taker
slashing the throat of his victim?" For his bravery he was fired. Instead of
insult, how about defending this speech of reason?
And how about reviewing the clashing civilizations' agenda? While the
West insists free speech be on the docket, Islamic thinkers would offer
another item: power.
As Rami Khouri, respected editor at large of Beirut's Daily Star, claims:
"This is not primarily an argument about freedom of the press.... It is
about Arab-Islamic societies' desire to enjoy freedom from Western and
Israeli subjugation, diplomatic double standards, and predatory neocolonial
policies." Orhan Pamuk, the Turkish author shortlisted for the Nobel, writes
that people in the West "are scarcely aware of this overwhelming feeling of
humiliation that is experienced by most of the world's population."
And to this history of insult we would add more insult? As to insult, a
test for the defenders of the right to offend: Presumably you have exercised
your free speech to the maximum protesting the bonafide offenses of Abu
Ghraib and Guantánamo, this near-unforgivable insult of torture that America
has visited on the Arab world? It's my Voltairean right to ask and your
responsibility to answer. (Mr. Bennett and Mr. Dershowitz fail this test:
While citing the media for not republishing the Danish cartoons, they
excoriate them for publishing the images of Abu Ghraib.)
Provocation, insult, giving offense: When the target is deserving, these
are powerful tools, and the West has a glorious history of using them.
Henrik Ibsen outraged audiences with his play "A Doll's House" when Nora
slammed the door on her infantilized existence - and forever altered our
consciousness about woman's place. With his Letter from Birmingham City
Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. argued the case against the Establishment that
the Negro could no longer wait for freedom but must claim it now - and
unlocked the prison for all of us. This is the highest - and most
responsible - use of the right to offend: to enhance human dignity.
But in these last decades this right, which Voltaire in the 18th century
wielded so forcefully against tyranny and intolerance, has degraded in the
West to mere offensiveness, with no higher purpose but to shock and
titillate, leaving us empty products like "The Vagina Monologues" and, most
recently, the Oscar-winning song "It's Hard Out Here for a Pimp." What
impoverishment of the Enlightenment!
Just as Islam risks hijacking by extremists, Western civilization faces
similar risk - from free-speech extremists - and what we are losing is
meaning, mattering, beauty, wit, a sense of the sacred. The real clash is
within each civilization - within the West and within Islam. And the real
agenda is about representation: Who finally represents us - the best in us
or the extreme? The insult-artists, those who brandish the right to offend,
fail on all levels: They do not represent the best of the West, nor
enlightened free speech, and they do not point the way to better relations
with the Muslim world. For them, expression of a small, splenetic self is
all.
Responsible speech cares - about the world, others, consequences. It is
capable of self-critique. And, by definition, it is answerable, accountable.
As such, we need lots more of it - on all sides. Arab leaders and the Arab
press should stop their anti-Semitic, anti-infidel rants. Our president
should desist from insulting entire peoples as part of an "axis of evil";
evangelist Franklin Graham should stop referring to Islam as "a wicked
religion"; and our insult-artists should grow up.
Only through responsible speech can we transform the clash of
civilizations into a round table. And, ultimately, only through responsible
use can we retain that most precious of rights: free speech.
• Carla Seaquist, a playwright, is author of "Who Cares?: The
Washington-Sarajevo Talks" and is working on a new play, "Prodigal."
America & Spain: Renewing a Strategic Partnership
Speech: US State Department
Kurt Volker, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and
Eurasian Affairs
Remarks at the CSIS/Real Instituto Elcano Conference on U.S.-Spain Bilateral
Relations
Washington, DC April 3, 2006
Thank you Robin for your kind introduction. It is great to see so many
friends here personal friends, friends of the United States, friends of Spain,
friends of democracy, and human development, and justice.
And it is an honor for me to speak to a distinguished audience like this. I
was not born into a diplomatic family. I was fifteen before my first trip
abroad and that was just to go a hundred miles or so into Canada to go skiing.
Indeed, to that point, no one in my family had traveled abroad much, and no
one expected to. I was the odd one out, opting to be an exchange student in
Sweden, then studying in France, and eventually taking up foreign policy for a
living.
Like many non-Hispanic Americans, the first foreign language I studied was
Spanish. My family had pointed out it was "easier than French" and "could be
useful" if I go to far away places like Miami. Although I can stumble through
a short conversation and still read the newspapers, I never became fluent. I
instead learned French, Swedish, and Hungarian so much for going the easy
route.
My first trip to Spain was to Barcelona, about a dozen years ago. My wife
had gone to college there a dozen years before that, and we met up with her
old friends and explored the city mostly after midnight, as I think is typical
for Barcelona. I remember well the architecture of Gaudi, the paintings of
Dali, the Quatro Gatos café, which Hemmingway frequented. I have now been back
to Spain many times, though these days mostly to Madrid.
The ties between America and Spain run exceptionally deep. It starts early:
every American elementary school child studies Christopher Columbus and learns
of how he set sail under the Spanish crown to discover America. For families
with young children, Ferdinand and Isabella are household words.
And it goes on from there. Spain has played a pivotal role in our history
for more than five centuries. Spanish place names from Florida to California
give testament to that history.
Last week, I was in San Francisco, known for it's Chinatown and Italian
neighborhoods, as well as its famous "Mission District." The "Mission" in
question is Mission de San Francisco de Asis, one of the northernmost outposts
of the Spanish, and then Mexican, settlement of the Pacific Coast.
Spanish culture continues to be reflected in our architecture, traditions,
and cuisine and not just in our southern and western states. It is a daily
part of American life not only from our historical ties, but from direct links
with Spain, and from millions of Hispanic Americans and Hispanic immigrants
from 17 Latin American countries who share our Spanish heritage. Forty million
Americans claim some Hispanic ancestry a number nearly equal to the population
of Spain. Some 30 million Americans speak Spanish, and Spanish is the most
widely taught foreign language in U.S. schools.
The Hispanic vote has become a critical factor in American politics,
especially in our presidential elections. Hispanic-Americans are concentrated
in nine states which together control 75% of the electoral votes a candidate
needs to win the presidency. This influence is likely to increase, as
Hispanic-Americans now constitute the largest ethnic minority in the United
States, and the number of Hispanics becoming American citizens continues to
grow rapidly.
The volume of people-to-people connections between the U.S. and Spain is
astounding. Beyond the enormous amount of travel for business and tourism,
over 20,000 American students studied in Spain in the 2004-05 academic year,
and over 3,500 Spanish students studied in the U.S. The United States is
Spain's biggest market outside of the European Union, with nearly $16.9
billion of goods and services sold to the United States last year. Imports
from the United States were $8.6 billion, so we know where the balance of
trade lies.
More than 600 U.S. companies employ some 200,000 workers in Spain, having
been drawn there by Spain's successful efforts to reduce taxes, privatize
state-owned companies, and liberalize the main sectors of the economy. Over
200 Spanish companies have subsidiaries in the U.S., especially in the
construction and banking industries.
My point in reciting all these statistics is that the relationship between
our countries between Spain and the United States is not a trickle, but a
firehose bursting at the seams. It is only natural that as free market
democracies with shared history, culture, and personal connections, our direct
contacts are vast and growing exponentially.
Today, I have been asked to give a snapshot of how we in the Administration
look at the U.S.-Spanish relationship. And the first point is what I just said
between our countries, and our peoples, we are so intertwined it defies
description.
But following on from there, I was delighted to see that the agenda for
today's program covers Afghanistan, Democracy in the Middle East, and Latin
America.
And that has it exactly right: the measure of a relationship particularly
among mature democracies in the age of globalization is not the contacts
between our peoples. That connection is so vibrant and deep that it is more
accurate to think of ourselves as part of a single community, rather than of
distinct and separate partners.
Instead, the real measure is how effective we are at working together to
advance our shared values freedom, democracy, market economy, rule of law,
human rights in the wider world.
Here again, I am delighted to point out the positive steps that the United
States and Spain are taking jointly in the world.
It may come as a surprise, but I believe the most important place where the
United States and Spain are working together is Afghanistan. Here, far from
Spain and even further from America, the United States and Spain are working
together to strengthen a fledgling democracy; to nurture a people who have
suffered from two and a half decades of war; to bring education to women and
girls; and to bring tolerance and development to a divided society. Spain
leads a Provincial Reconstruction Team and commands a Forward Support Base in
Afghanistan, and alongside the United States, Germany and Italy is one of the
largest contributors of military forces to the common effort in Afghanistan.
The Spanish PRT has made a substantial commitment of development resources
and has welcomed a U.S. Foreign Service Officer to work side-by-side with his
Spanish colleagues at their facility in Qala-ye Now in Western Afghanistan.
Americans and Spaniards have lost their lives in the effort to help the
Afghan people. 17 Spanish soldiers died in a helicopter crash last summer, and
62 others were killed as their transport plane crashed on the way home to
Spain in 2003. Yet Spain's commitment to helping the Afghan people has not
wavered.
The other area I would cite, where Spain has been a world leader, is the
fight against terrorism, both domestically and globally. We watch with hope
that the ETA terrorist group will truly take decisive steps to end its
campaign of bombings, kidnappings, and killings. There can be no excuse for
such cowardly acts, and forgiveness cannot come easily; yet there can also be
no reaction but welcome when such acts are ended permanently.
Spain has fought domestic terrorism for four decades, and shares with the
U.S. the experience of Al-Qaeda attacks on its own soil. Spain was the first
country to convict a terrorist linked to the 9/11 bombings in this country and
has helped break up networks that send extremists to Iraq as suicide bombers.
And Spain has, of course, vigorously investigated and prosecuted the 3/11
bombers.
This was the impetus for Spanish forces to join the United States and other
coalition forces in Iraq. Spain was among four countries, including the U.S.,
UK, and Portugal, to take part in the Atlantic Summit of 2003, where our
positive vision for Iraq an Iraq anchored on democracy, secure in its borders,
free from tyranny was articulated. Spain was an early contributor of military
forces aimed at providing security and stability for the Iraqi people.
We are grateful for this important Spanish contribution. At the same time,
we recognize the impact of public opinion and election promises, and we
accepted Spain's decision to withdraw Spanish forces, though we wish it had
been better coordinated. I know the conventional wisdom speaks otherwise, but
Iraq per se was not a major divisive issue between the United States and
Spain.
Indeed, even after the withdrawal of Spanish troops from Iraq, our military
cooperation has remained excellent. The United States continues to use Spanish
air bases to provide critical airlift support for operations in Afghanistan
and the Middle East, and Spain continues to play a major role in Afghanistan,
provide demining training to Iraqi security forces, and make financial
contributions to Iraqi reconstruction.
Not only has Spain been a partner in the military effort to fight tyranny,
whether in Afghanistan or Iraq, but also in the effort to build democracy,
economic opportunity, and social development in the Broader Middle East.
Spain is, of course, the birthplace of the "Barcelona Process," the EU's
effort to support democratic and economic reform in the Middle East, which
celebrated it's10-year anniversary in Barcelona last November. And Spain is a
contributor to the U.S. and European collective effort to support democratic
change through the Broader Middle East initiative.
Foreign Minister Moratinos attended the Forum for the Future meeting in
Bahrain last November, and Spain is a contributor to the Foundation for the
Future an effort to support NGO's in the region through a non-government
foundation. And Spain has been an active player in supporting democratic
reform close to home, in Morocco, Tunisia and Algeria.
Spain has long been particularly interested in Israeli-Palestinian issues
and was the first EU country to support the Rafah crossing agreement.
Spain has also co-sponsored with Turkey the Alliance of Civilizations
initiative, which promotes greater mutual understanding between modern Islam
and modern Christianity.
Finally, America and Spain share a unique heritage and destiny in Latin
America Spain for its historical and cultural legacy and its modern ties of
culture and commerce; America for its proximity and its vital political,
economic, trade, and security connections.
Here again, America and Spain share the same objectives: we long to see a
hemisphere that is free, democratic, prosperous through market economics,
sharing its wealth throughout society, and secure from threats whether
internal, such as narco-trafficking, or external.
Spain's successful transition to democracy following the death of Franco
has been an inspiration for freedom-loving people throughout the hemisphere.
Spain's rapid economic development, especially since it joined the European
Union in 1986, has enabled many of its leading companies to seek trade and
investment opportunities in Latin America.
Each of us has taken a keen interest in Latin America's development. Over
the course of the 1990's, Spain devoted almost 44 percent of its global aid
budget to Latin America and the Caribbean, the highest percentage among all EU
donors.
In just the last two years, Spain has increased foreign aid to Latin
America from about $400 million in 2004 to more than $600 million in 2005. On
February 1, the Spanish Secretary of State for the Economy announced that
Spain will write off bilateral debt from Bolivia, Peru, and Guatemala in
exchange for those countries' implementing education projects. And just a few
weeks ago Spain announced plans for a volunteer service, fashioned after the
Peace Corps, that will promote development in Latin America.
On the U.S. side, we have entered into Millennium Challenge Account
compacts with Honduras and Nicaragua, totaling $380 million and hope that
Bolivia and El Salvador will conclude compacts later this year.
The Millennium Challenge Account is different from traditional assistance
in that it allows beneficiary countries to decide how, and even how much, to
invest in their development, but requires that the projects chosen produce
measurable results. It is available only to countries that have embraced
political and economic reform and invested in their people. This is based on
the understanding that aid is effective when it buttresses sound economic
policies, and often squandered without such policies.
For countries close to meeting the eligibility criteria, we also have the
MCA threshold program to help them implement reforms in policy areas where
they fall short. An MCA threshold program for Paraguay, valued at $35 million,
was approved in February, to help improve the business climate and fight
corruption. Guyana is also eligible for a threshold program, which we hope
will be approved later this year. Total U.S. aid to Latin America last year
amounted to $1.7 billion a figure that has doubled under President Bush.
The U.S. has concluded Free Trade Agreements with 11 countries that account
for about 85% of our trade within the Western Hemisphere. We are in
negotiations with two more. The total value of U.S. foreign direct investment
in Latin America and the Caribbean stood at about $326 billion at the end of
2004, with new investment that year totaling $25 billion.
The picture I have drawn is one of Spain and the United States enjoying a
vibrant bilateral connection, while working together in key areas, from
Afghanistan to Iraq to democracy promotion to Latin America. This is indeed a
strong and effective relationship.
But I would be misleading if I did not also note that there have been
differences.
By far the most troubling is a populist anti-Americanism or at least
anti-American policy-ism in Spain. We see it in graffiti, in street protests a
few years ago, in public opinion surveys, in media, public, and at times
political party commentary about the United States. It is not the dominant
view, but it is a persistent undercurrent. And I should add that it is not
limited to Spain, but is a phenomenon across much of Europe.
What such anti-American views fail to acknowledge is everything I have just
said. That America and Spain and, indeed, America and Europe are part of a
single democratic civilization. That we cooperate throughout the world. That
we are united by ties of history, culture, and values.
America could never be anti-Spanish, because to be so would mean we are
anti-us. So it is saddening to see evidence of anti-Americanism in Spain.
We bear our share of the responsibility, in that American foreign policy is
often misconstrued as at odds with our core values as a democracy. We must do
a better job in our own public presentation of our policies, linking them
clearly to our shared values.
There are also areas where despite the United States and Spain sharing
common objectives our tactics for achieving them can place us in opposing
camps.
No where is this more evident than in Cuba. We all know that Cuba needs
democracy. We all support the aspirations of the Cuban people. But Cuba is an
area where our policies have often come into conflict, whether over the rights
of those whose property was confiscated by the communist regime, or over the
efficacy of economic sanctions, or over the best way to support democratic
dissidents, to whom the future of Cuba rightly belongs.
Given our shared history, cultural, values, and our respective unique roles
in Latin America, I believe that there remains enormous potential in
U.S.-Spanish unity on Latin America, and I look forward to the day when U.S.
and Spanish policies on Cuba are as one.
Venezuela is another case. Increasingly, the United States and Spain stand
together in favor of the rights of the Sumate human rights activists. We urge
that the reversal of democracy in Venezuela be brought to an end, and that
true democracy, openness, tolerance, and peaceful relations with neighbors be
re-established as the norm.
It is for this reason that Spain's decision to sell military ships and
aircraft to Venezuela, unarmed but able to be armed, is so troubling. Over
many months, we stressed our opposition to the sale, based on our concern that
President Chavez is engaged in a massive arms buildup that threatens regional
stability. We noted that our policy on arms sales to Venezuela would likely
prevent us from authorizing the transfer of U.S.-made components as part of
these defense items. Yet Spain went ahead with the sale.
This incident was especially disappointing since it gives Chavez an
opportunity to exploit a perceived difference between U.S. and Spanish views
of his increasingly anti-democratic regime.
As the two leading international players in Latin America, and as genuine
market democracies with shared human values, the United States and Spain have
enormous potential to act as a clear voice of conscience in Venezuela. Thus
far, that potential has not been realized.
Relationships are never static, and differences, even between the closest
of friends, are not unusual. Indeed, relationships between states are measured
not in what they are, but what they do.
Our relationship with Spain is not a glass egg to be put on a shelf and
left to gather dust, but a vital partnership with the potential to achieve
great things. And I firmly believe there is potential out there, yet to be
realized.
When we work together on the basis of our shared values to face common
challenges, there is no limit to what we can accomplish. That is the kind of
partnership the United States wants with Spain, and we will continue to do our
part to make that more vital partnership a reality.
Thank you, and I look forward to your comments and questions.
İSTANBUL- TBMM Başkanı Bülent Arınç, Türkiye’nin, “medeniyetler arası
çatışma” tezine karşı başlattığı “medeniyetler arası ittifak” atağı ile
bütün dünyada ilgi odağı olduğunu bildirdi. Arınç, İslam Konferansı Örgütü
Parlamento Başkanları (İKÖPAB) Konferansı’na ilişkin Conrad Otel’de basın
toplantısı düzenledi. Konferansa şu an itibariyle 17 ülke meclis başkanı, 8
başkan vekili, 7 heyet başkanı olmak üzere toplam 47 ülkeden 436 kişinin
katılacağını belirten TBMM Başkanı Arınç, ayrıca İKÖPAB 4. Konferansı için
48’i yabancı, 113’ü de Türkiye’den olmak üzere 161 medya mensubunun akredite
olduğunu söyledi. Konferansın, kültürel ve siyasi işler başlığı altında
görüşülecek en önemli konularından bir tanesinin, ‘İslamofobia’ tartışmaları
olacağını ifade eden Arınç, Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti’nin de ‘Kıbrıs
Müslüman Türk Toplumu’ adıyla bu konferansın halen gözlemcisi konumunda
bulunduğuna dikkat çekti.
İlk fotoğraf
Ferai TINÇ 29 Mart 2006
Sudan’da
yapılan Arap Birliği zirvesine Türkiye, tarihte ilk kez konuk ülke statüsünde
katıldı. Tayyip Erdoğan, dün yaptığı konuşmayla bir Arap Birliği zirvesinde
liderlere hitap eden ilk Türk Başbakanı unvanını kazandı. Rum Dışişleri Bakanı
Yakovu da, Arap desteği aramak için zirvedeydi.
ARAP Birliği’nin Sudan’da gerçekleşen 18’inci zirvesi ilklere sahne oldu.
Zirvede ilk kez bir Türk Başbakanı Araplara seslenirken, Kıbrıs Rum Yönetimi ilk
kez bir Arap Birliği Zirvesi’ne davetli olarak katıldı.
Kıbrıs Dışişleri Bakanı Yakovu’nun Arap ülkelerinin desteğini almak için lobi
yaptığı zirveye Mısır, Suudi Arabistan, Tunus gibi etkili Arap ülkelerinin
liderlerinin katılmaması Hartum buluşmasını gölgeledi.
Son ana kadar Hartum’a gelmeyeceği söylenen Libya Lideri Kaddafi ise Arap
Birliği ile ilgili önerilerinin ele alınacağı vaadini aldıktan sonra zirveye
katıldı. Buna karşın, Irak Devlet Başkanı Celal Talabani, katılması beklenirken
son anda Hartum’a gelmekten vazgeçti.
Irak, Filistin ve Darfur sorunlarının damgasını vurduğu zirvede, Başbakan Tayyip
Erdoğan, besmele çekerek başladığı konuşmasında kültürler arası diyalogdan söz
etti. Başbakan, zirve sırasında Suriye Devlet Başkanı Beşar Esad, Ürdün Kralı
Abdullah ve Filistin Devlet Başkanı Ebu Abbas ile bir araya geldi.
FİLİSTİN’E 55 MİLYON $
Arap Birliği Genel Sekreteri Mısır Dışişleri Bakanı Amr Musa, "dış
müdahaleye hayır, Sudan ve Filistin’e yardıma evet" derken Arap ülkeleri,
Filistin’e istediği yardımı sağlayamadılar. Hamas’ın davet edilmediği,
Filistin’in Devlet Başkanı Ebu Abbas ve FKÖ’lü eski dışişleri bakanı tarafından
temsil edildiği toplantıda Arap liderleri Filistin hükümetine ayda 55 milyon
dolar yardımda anlaştılar.
Zirve’ye katılan lider sayısının azlığı, Sudan hükümetinin Darfur’da krizin
yeniden tırmanmaya başladığı bir dönemde, toplantıyı kendisine verilen destek
haline getirme arayışının neden olduğu söyleniyor.
Batıda Afrikalılar ile Arap kökenli Sudanlılar arasında yıllardan beri süren
çatışmaların üç yıl önce hükümet yanlısı gerillalar ile Afrikalılar arasında
kanlı bir hale bürünmesi sonucu bölgede 2 milyon kişi yaşamını yitirdi. Bu
katliamın soykırım olarak kabul edimemesi için yoğun çaba harcayan Sudan
hükümeti, Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi’nin geçen hafta kabul ettiği
bölgeye BM barış gücünün gönderilmesi kararına karşı çıktı. Dünkü zirvede Arap
ülkelerinin desteğini almak için çalışan Sudan hükümeti, halen Darfur’da görev
yapan Afrika Birliği Barış Gücü askerlerinin bölgede kalması için parasal destek
istedi.
IRAK’A TEMSİLCİLİK
Zirve öncesi Hartum’da yapılan Arap Birliği üyesi ülkeler dışişleri bakanları
toplantısında Amerikan güçlerinin Irak’tan çekilmesi yolundaki çağrı önerisi
zirvede çok destek bulmadı. Ancak Iraklı Şii ve Kürtlerin yardım çağrısını
dikkate alan Arap Birliği Bağdat’ta temsilcilik açmaya karar verdi.
Arapların Saddam sonrası Irak’a geri dönüşleri niteliğindeki bu karar da
getirilen birçok koşul nedeniyle etkisini yitirdi.
Zirveyi izleyen Arap gazeteciler, Irak’ta hükümetin kurulması ve istikrarın
sağlanmasından sonra güvenlik koşullarının el vermesi halinde temsilcilik açma
kararının, esasında Arapların isteksizliğini gösterdiğini söylediler.
Konuşmasına besmeleyle başladı
AB aile fotoğraflarında görmeye alıştığımız Başbakan Erdoğan bu kez, Arap
Birliği’nin aile fotoğrafına girdi. Zirvedeki konuşmasına besmele ile başlayan
Erdoğan, genelde açılış törenlerinde kurdele keserken, ’hayırlı olsun’ dedikten
sonra ’besmele’ çekiyor. Ancak başbakan olarak yaptığı hiçbir resmi konuşmaya
’besmele’ ile başlamadığı da biliniyor.
Erdoğan, AB ve ABD’ye çattı
BAŞBAKAN Erdoğan, önceki akşam Sudanlı aydınların katıldığı konferansta
uygarlıklar arası diyalog konusunda bir konferans verdi. Başbakan bu konferansta
AB ve ABD’ye çattı. Avrupa ve ABD’de Müslümanlara karşı özel yasalar
çıkartıldığını belirten başbakan, bu bakışın toplumda fay hatları oluşturduğunu
söyledi. Başbakan, silahlanma yarışının bir trilyon dolarlık pazar payına
ulaştığını da vurgulayarak, "Hani biz barışı güçlendirecektik. Bunu dünyada gücü
elinde bulunduranlar söyledi. Ama lafta kaldı. Ürettiklerini az gelişmiş
ülkelere nasıl satarız, bunun pazarlıkları yapılıyor."
’Gel, Ferai Abla’
Başbakan Erdoğan, gazetecilerle resim çektirirken, "Ferai Abla, gel, sen
hepimizin ablasısın" diyerek Hürriyet yazarı Ferai Tınç’ı yanına aldı. Erdoğan,
zirvedeki görüşmelerin ardından Türk Büyükelçiliği rezidansının bahçesinde
verilen resepsiyonda ise, Hartum’daki Türk toplumu temsilcileriyle bir araya
geldi. Sudan’daki üniversitelerde okuyan türbanlı Türk kızlarıyla konuşan
Erdoğan, "Burada yeni bir yaşam yaşıyorsunuz" dedi. Öğrenciler ise "Sudanlılar
bizden Müslümanlığı öğrendikleri için memnunlar" diye konuştular. Resepsiyondaki
harem-selamlık düzen dikkat çekti.
Turquía y España
buscan en Jartum apoyo a Alianza Civilizaciones
Turquía y España defendieron hoy, al margen de la cumbre de la Liga Arabe en
Jartum, el proyecto de la ONU de la Alianza de Civilizaciones, e hicieron un
llamamiento a favor de la tolerancia y en contra del extremismo y el terrorismo.
28-03-2006
El primer ministro turco, Recep Tayip Erdogan, que auspicia
con el presidente del Gobierno español, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, la idea de
la Alianza de Civilizaciones, destacó la necesidad de rechazar todo tipo de
violencia y discriminación.
'Tenemos que comprender que el choque entre civilizaciones no
es inevitable', dijo Erdogan en un discurso que pronunció en un simposio
organizado en la capital sudanesa por el Consejo de la Convivencia Religiosa
sudanés.
Se refirió al acuerdo de paz logrado el año pasado en el sur
de Sudán tras décadas de guerra civil, y ofreció ayuda para solucionar la crisis
en Darfur, en el oeste sudanés, donde cientos de miles de personas han muerto en
un conflicto similar desatado en 2003.
En el simposio estuvo presente una delegación española, cuyo
jefe, Juan José Santos-Aguado, subrayó que 'las relaciones entre civilizaciones
y la coexistencia pacífica entre las culturas será el desafío de la comunidad
internacional en las próximas décadas'.
Lo ocurrido en los últimos meses en el mundo demuestra que la
'Alianza entre Civilizaciones es ahora necesaria más que nunca', dijo el enviado
español, aparentemente en referencia a la crisis de la caricaturas de Mahoma.
'La Alianza de Civilizaciones responde al deseo de la
comunidad internacional de adoptar nuevos mecanismos de comprensión y
cooperación entre los musulmanes y las sociedades occidentales', añadió.
Destacó la importancia de actuar en contra de 'las posturas
del fanatismo y el extremismo', cuyas actitudes 'no comparte, afortunadamente,
la inmensa mayoría'.
'Ha llegado la hora de intensificar el diálogo en favor de las
iniciativas comunes. Este es el desafío que la Alianza debe afrontar con el
apoyo de los Estados árabes y musulmanes en general, y de la Liga Arabe en
Particular', agregó.
El enviado español destacó el hecho de que la idea de la
Alianza de Civilizaciones ha ido ganando apoyo mundial desde que fuera adoptada
por la Asamblea General de la ONU, en 2005.
Asimismo agradeció, en nombre del Gobierno español, a Qatar
por haber acogido a finales de febrero pasado la reunión de Alto Nivel de la
Alianza de Civilizaciones, y apreció el apoyo de los miembros de la Liga Arabe a
la iniciativa.
La invitación dirigida por el organismo panárabe a Zapatero,
para participar en la cumbre árabe de 2005 en Argelia, y la que recibió Erdogan
este año 'es un claro mensaje que demuestra el interés y la implicación de los
miembros de la Liga Arabe' en la propuesta, concluyó.
Erdogan, por su parte, señaló que 'intercambiará puntos de
vista' sobre la iniciativa con los jefes de Estado árabes durante la cumbre que
se celebrará mañana y pasado en Jartum, y confío en que 'los resultados serán
positivos para toda la humanidad'.
Terra Actualidad - EFE
El PP lleva a cabo un "fuerte lobby" en Washington para desacreditar la
iniciativa de la Alianza de Civilizaciones
De Arístegui se entrevistó durante una semana con
senadores, congresistas y altos representantes de la Administración Bush
MADRID, 26 Mar. (EUROPA PRESS)
El Partido Popular lleva a cabo un "fuerte lobby" en Washington para
desacreditar ante las autoridades estadounidenses la iniciativa de la Alianza de
Civilizaciones lanzada por el presidente del Gobierno, José Luis Rodríguez
Zapatero, en septiembre de 2004, según indicó a Europa Press el portavoz del PP
en la Comisión de Asuntos Exteriores en el Congreso de los Diputados, Gustavo de
Arístegui.
Este último se entrevistó entre el 6 y 11 de marzo con senadores,
congresistas y altos representantes de la Administración Bush en el marco de
varios actos organizados por 'think tanks' estadounidense. En concreto, De
Arístegui destacó su entrevista con el subsecretario de Estado para Asuntos
Interamericanos, Thomas Shannon, uno de los responsables más próximos a
Condoleezza Rice.
El diputado 'popular' constató que en Estados Unidos no se diferencia la
Alianza del Diálogo de Civilizaciones cuando, a su juicio, son dos nociones "distintas"
ya que la primera supone negociar con los países árabes y musulmanes los
derechos y libertades fundamentales que son "universales, atemporales e
irrenunciables" para Occidente, mientras que el Diálogo de Civilizaciones "no
implica cesión" en este apartado.
De Arístegui lamentó que en muchos foros se vea esta Alianza propugnada
por Zapatero como "una ocurrencia vacía e inocua", cuando conlleva que ahora
estos derechos y libertades sean "negociables, limitables en el tiempo y no
universales". En este sentido, se preguntó por qué el Gobierno socialista no
denuncia la ejecución de más de 5.000 homosexuales en Irán en los últimos años.
El responsable 'popular' ya mantuvo a mediados de febrero que la
iniciativa de la Alianza de Civilizaciones es un "inmenso disparate" y pidió que
se vuelva a la noción de Diálogo de Civilizaciones que propugnó el PP y el ex
presidente del Gobierno, José María Aznar, en su última etapa de Gobierno.
"Resulta chocante que el PSOE sea incapaz de reconocer, y más aún el
Gobierno, el inmenso disparate de la Alianza de Civilizaciones. No es una
iniciativa irresponsable y vacía como dicen algunos, sino una que tiene
derivaciones y consecuencias potencialmente devastadoras", señaló entonces a
Europa Press.
El diputado del PP puntualizó que todo el mundo que ha apoyado la Alianza
de Civilizaciones, caso de Estados Unidos hace un mes, ha apoyado una "cosa
distinta" a la que está propiciando el Gobierno socialista, es decir, el Diálogo
de Civilizaciones "que es lo que muchos han apoyado".
"La Alianza, si se analiza con detenimiento, seriedad y rigor tiene como
premisa la relativización de los derechos y libertades fundamentales, puesto que
si uno se sienta a negociar la forja de una alianza con algunos actores
importantes del mundo islámico, se da cuenta de unas premisas", hizo hincapié.
De Arístegui expresó su deseo de que, además de hacer política de partido,
los dirigentes socialistas hagan "un poquito de estudio histórico-filosófico de
los temas y que además de tener ocurrencias con graves consecuencias a medio y
largo plazo, sean capaces de hacer una reflexión un poco más que un viaje de
Madrid a Nueva York para ver con qué frase con un poco gancho sale Zapatero de
la ONU".
El PP tiene un «lobby» para desacreditar la Alianza de
Civilizaciones
Miércoles, 29 de Marzo de 2006
El PP lleva a cabo un «fuerte lobby» en Washington para desacreditar ante las
autoridades estadounidenses la iniciativa de la Alianza de Civilizaciones
lanzada por el presidente del Gobierno, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, en
septiembre del 2004, según confirmó el portavoz del PP en la Comisión de
Asuntos Exteriores en el Congreso, Gustavo de Arístegui.
El diputado se entrevistó entre el 6 y 11 de marzo con senadores, congresistas
y altos representantes del Gobierno de Bush. De Arístegui destacó su
entrevista con el subsecretario de Estado para Asuntos Interamericanos, Thomas
Shannon, uno de los responsables más próximos a Condoleezza Rice.
De Arístegui lamentó que en muchos foros se vea esta Alianza propugnada por
Zapatero como «una ocurrencia vacía e inocua», cuando conlleva que ahora estos
derechos y libertades sean «negociables, limitables en el tiempo y no
universales». Y se preguntó por qué no denuncia la ejecución de más de 5.000
homosexuales en Irán.
Disparate
El responsable popular ya mantuvo a mediados de febrero que la iniciativa de
la Alianza de Civilizaciones es un «inmenso disparate» y pidió que se vuelva a
la noción de Diálogo de Civilizaciones que propugnó el PP y el ex presidente
del Gobierno, José María Aznar, en su última etapa de Gobierno.
El diputado del PP puntualizó que todo el mundo que ha apoyado la Alianza de
Civilizaciones, caso de Estados Unidos hace un mes, ha apoyado una «cosa
distinta» a la que está propiciando el Gobierno socialista, es decir, el
Diálogo de Civilizaciones «que es lo que muchos han apoyado».
«La Alianza, si se analiza con detenimiento, seriedad y rigor tiene como
premisa la relativización de los derechos y libertades fundamentales, puesto
que si uno se sienta a negociar la forja de una alianza con algunos actores
importantes del mundo islámico, se da cuenta de unas premisas», hizo hincapié.
El dirigente popular expresó su deseo de que, además de hacer política de
partido, los dirigentes socialistas hagan «un poquito de estudio
histórico-filosófico de los temas y que además de tener ocurrencias con graves
consecuencias a medio y largo plazo, sean capaces de hacer una reflexión un
poco más que un viaje de Madrid a Nueva York para ver con qué frase con un
poco gancho sale Zapatero de la ONU».
www.un.org/News/fr-press/docs/2006/SGSM10390.doc.htm
L’ONU CONTINUE DE COMPTER SUR L’APPUI DE LA
LIGUE DES ÉTATS ARABES POUR RÉGLER CERTAINS CONFLITS, DÉCLARE KOFI ANNAN AU
SOMMET DE KHARTOUM
NATIONS UNIES- Département de l’information • Service des informations
et des accréditations • New York
28/03/2006
Vous
trouverez ci-après le texte du message du Secrétaire général de l’ONU, M.
Kofi Annan, adressé au Sommet de la Ligue des États arabes, et lu par le
Secrétaire général adjoint aux affaires politiques, M. Ibrahim
Gambari, le 28 mars à Khartoum, au Soudan:
Je
présente mes sincères salutations à tous ceux qui sont à Khartoum pour le
sommet de la Ligue des États arabes.
Votre
réunion a pour toile de fond les troubles qui continuent de secouer le monde
arabe et la région avoisinante, et donc d’énormes défis pour les dirigeants
politiques que vous êtes, votre organisation et la communauté internationale.
En
Iraq, les principaux objectifs de la transition ont été atteints, mais la
situation reste instable et dangereuse. Avec l’acte innommable qui a
détruit le mausolée de Samarra le mois dernier, le danger de la violence
sectaire n’a fait que grandir. L’Organisation
des Nations Unies continue de penser que c’est un processus politique
transparent et sans exclusive qui aura le plus de chances de conduire à des
progrès sur les plans de la sécurité, des droits de l’homme, de la
démocratie et des conditions de vie. Tous les intéressés doivent donc faire
rapidement le nécessaire pour qu’un gouvernement n’excluant aucune des
parties soit formé. L’ONU continuera de promouvoir le dialogue
intercommunautaire et d’appuyer le processus de révision de la constitution,
ainsi que l’initiative qu’a prise la Ligue arabe de convoquer une Conférence
de réconciliation nationale iraquienne, autant d’éléments propres à
favoriser un consensus national. Si les circonstances le permettent, nous
continuerons aussi de contribuer à l’effort de reconstruction et de
développement économique. L’intégration de l’Iraq dans la région au sens
large est une autre priorité. Certains pays voisins sont légitimement
inquiets de la violence et de l’instabilité qui règnent actuellement, mais
ils doivent s’abstenir de toute ingérence dans les affaires intérieures du
pays et respecter son unité et son intégrité territoriale.
Le
conflit israélo-palestinien est également parvenu à un stade critique. Je
respecte la décision que le peuple palestinien a prise lors des élections
parlementaires de janvier, dont le bon déroulement fait honneur à la
démocratie palestinienne. J’espère que le nouveau gouvernement dans le
territoire occupé tiendra compte du fait que les Palestiniens aspirent à la
paix et au statut d’État, comme l’a dit le Président Abbas avec tant
d’éloquence. Si le nouveau cabinet palestinien adhère à l’Initiative de
paix arabe, on pourra s’en féliciter comme d’un premier pas vers la
confirmation de l’attachement palestinien au principe de la non-violence, la
reconnaissance du fait qu’Israël a le droit d’exister et l’acceptation des
accords et obligations souscrits antérieurement, notamment la Feuille de
route. Tout comme le Quatuor et le Conseil de sécurité ont récemment
réaffirmé l’importance de ces principes, nous devons rappeler à Israël, qui
poursuit sa politique du fait accompli, que la paix ne peut être imposée
unilatéralement, ni s’établir durablement si elle ne s’inscrit pas dans le
cadre régional du processus de paix au Moyen-Orient. Si l’objectif demeure
la coexistence de deux États –et il le faut– les deux parties doivent rester
fermes quant aux principes régissant cette solution et aux moyens d’y
parvenir.
Pour sa
part, l’ONU poursuivra l’action qu’elle mène pour qu’il soit mis un terme à
l’occupation qui dure depuis 1967 et que le conflit soit réglé conformément
aux résolutions du Conseil de sécurité. Tant que cet objectif n’aura pas
été atteint, l’Organisation continuera de s’acquitter des mandats que les
États Membres lui ont confiés pour qu’elle vienne en aide au peuple
palestinien. Nous constituons des dossiers détaillés sur les bouclages de
Gaza et de la Cisjordanie, qui sont la cause de graves difficultés et de
profondes humiliations, et nous continuerons d’insister pour qu’ils cessent.
Nous rappellerons à tous nos partenaires que le peuple palestinien ne doit
pas être puni pour la façon dont il exerce ses droits démocratiques et que
ses précieuses institutions sont les fondations sur lesquelles pourra être
bâti un État palestinien auquel il soit possible de vivre en paix avec
Israël, sans que celui-ci ait à craindre pour sa sécurité, et avec tous ses
voisins.
Le
Liban aussi se trouve à la croisée des chemins. La Ligue arabe et d’autres
acteurs régionaux ont fait œuvre utile en l’aidant à s’extraire de la guerre
civile et à sortir d’une période extrêmement sombre. Aujourd’hui, ses amis
et ses voisins doivent l’aider à asseoir son indépendance et sa souveraineté.
J’engage tous les intéressés à soutenir le programme de réforme du Premier
Ministre Siniora et le dialogue national qui
vient d’être entamé. Les rapports entre le Liban et la Syrie seront
déterminants, et j’engage les deux pays à cultiver des relations productives
et amicales fondées sur des assurances mutuelles explicites concernant le
respect de leur souveraineté, de leur sécurité et de leur indépendance.
L’ONU est prête à leur apporter toute l’assistance qu’ils jugeront bon de
demander. Par ailleurs, elle poursuit l’enquête sur l’assassinat de
l’ancien Premier Ministre Hariri et a eu des échanges avec les autorités
libanaises au sujet de leurs enquêtes concernant d’autres assassinats et
tentatives d’assassinat récemment commis sur les personnes de hauts
responsables politiques. Enfin, elle examine avec ces autorités
l’assistance dont le pays aurait besoin pour mettre sur pied un tribunal de
caractère international chargé de juger les personnes impliquées dans
l’assassinat de M. Hariri.
La
Somalie reste aux prises avec la violence, l’insuffisance des structures de
gouvernement et l’absence de consensus national quant à l’avenir. Les
dirigeants des institutions fédérales de transition ont beaucoup de mérite
d’avoir réussi à ce que la session parlementaire du mois dernier se tienne
malgré des circonstances extrêmement difficiles. Les Somaliens doivent
entretenir la dynamique en mettant particulièrement l’accent sur
l’amélioration des conditions de sécurité. Tant que la force sera le moyen
de régler les différends ou d’atteindre des objectifs politiques, les
progrès resteront fragiles et le pays ne pourra se relever. L’ONU
continuera d’appuyer le processus de transition sur les plans politique,
moral et matériel et j’espère que les États arabes rechercheront activement
des possibilités d’offrir eux aussi des secours humanitaires et une aide au
développement.
Ici au
Soudan, certain aspect de la situation restent profondément préoccupants. Depuis
que l’Accord de paix global a été signé, en janvier 2005, les parties ont
pris des mesures importantes pour l’appliquer. Mais sur plusieurs points,
ces mesures ont été décevantes. Au Darfour, les massacres, les viols et les
déplacements se poursuivent sans relâche, et les conditions de sécurité ont
empiré à cause des combats à la frontière entre les troupes tchadiennes et
l’opposition armée tchadienne. Je suis heureux que l’Union africaine, qui a
fait de vaillants efforts, ait donné son accord de principe pour qu’une
opération des Nations Unies succède à sa mission au Soudan, dans le cadre
d’un partenariat entre les deux organisations. Et je tiens à souligner
qu’il s’agit de tirer parti de la mission de l’Union africaine pour créer
une opération des Nations Unies plus grande et plus mobile. Pour que la
transition se passe bien, il faudra je crois qu’une grande partie du
personnel de l’Union africaine soit absorbé par la force des Nations Unies.
Nous devons donc nous concentrer prioritairement sur notre principal
objectif: protéger la population et permettre au personnel humanitaire de
faire son travail. Et nous devons faire pression sur les parties aux
Pourparlers de paix intersoudanais d’Abuja, dont
les progrès sont excessivement lents, pour qu’elles parviennent sans plus
tarder à un accord, notamment sur un cessez-le-feu effectivement
applicable. Enfin, nous devons étoffer la force de l’Union africaine, même
au stade actuel des choses, car ceux qui souffrent ne peuvent attendre la
transition, et faire tout ce que nous pouvons d’autre pour éviter que la
situation n’empire encore.
Les
troubles ne sont pas circonscrits à certains pays ou à des crises politiques
précises. Ces derniers mois, suite à la publication de dessins représentant
le prophète Mohamed que beaucoup ont trouvé profondément insultants, le
clivage déjà inquiétant entre groupes et nations de convictions et de
cultures différentes a semblé s’accentuer encore. L’initiative intitulée
« Alliance des civilisations », que j’ai lancée avec l’appui de l’Espagne et
de la Turquie, a pour but de mobiliser un effort concerté de part la
communauté internationale – gouvernements et société civile confondus – afin
de réduire les fractures, de combattre l’extrémisme et de surmonter les
préjugés, les idées fausses et les intransigeances qui menacent la paix dans
le monde. Je suis heureux que l’ONU et la Ligue arabe aient réussi à
trouver un terrain d’entente lorsqu’il s’agissait de réagir à certaines
crises récentes, et j’espère que vous soutiendrez sans réserve cette
initiative plus étendue.
Enfin,
je tiens à vous remercier d’appuyer la réforme de l’Organisation des Nations
Unies. Des dispositions importantes ont été prises pour mettre en œuvre le
document final du Sommet mondial de septembre dernier, auquel beaucoup
d’entre vous ont participé. Nous disposons à présent d’une Commission de
consolidation de la paix, d’un Fonds pour la démocratie, d’un fonds
d’intervention pour les urgences humanitaires nettement amélioré et,
désormais, d’un Conseil des droits de l’homme, dont les membres seront élus
le 9 mai et qui se réunira pour la première fois le 19 juin. Nous avons
aussi dans le texte issu du Sommet une magnifique déclaration de l’intention
des États de mener « en temps voulu une action collective résolue, par
l’entremise du Conseil de sécurité » pour protéger les populations si leur
gouvernement ne le fait pas. Je viens enfin de saisir les États Membres
d’une nouvelle série de propositions visant à moderniser la gestion de
l’Organisation. Mais tous ces changements ne porteront leurs fruits que si
les États Membres s’engagent véritablement à les rendre effectifs et à
donner à l’ONU les moyens de changer réellement la vie de ceux qui, partout
dans le monde, ont besoin d’elle et attendent son aide.
Sur
tous ces plans, je continuerai de compter sur votre appui dans les mois à
venir. Et dans l’esprit de ce partenariat, je souhaite sincèrement que
votre sommet soit une réussite.
Annan à Zapatero : « l'Alliance des
civilisations est plus nécessaire que jamais »
6 avril 2006 – En visite en
Espagne, Kofi Annan, Secrétaire général des Nations Unies a rencontré le
Premier ministre espagnol, José Luis Zapatero. Il a salué l'Alliance des
civilisations, groupe de Haut Niveau mis en place sous l'égide de l'ONU après
proposition conjointe de la Turquie et de l'Espagne.
Ce groupe de travail, qui doit faire des propositions dans un an, « doit
contribuer à rapprocher les civilisations occidentales et islamiques, ce qui
est le défi d'aujourd'hui » a souligné José Luis Zapatero au cours de la
conférence de presse qui a suivi la rencontre. « Les développements de ces
derniers mois ont montré clairement qu'il nous faut améliorer le dialogue des
civilisations et que cette initiative ne pouvait venir à un meilleur moment »
a renchéri Kofi Annan.
José Luis Zapatero a par ailleurs annoncé l'augmentation importante des
contributions volontaires de son pays aux différents programmes des Nations
Unies.
Au total, l'Espagne va augmenter ses contributions de quelque 100 millions
d'euros, les augmentations allant pour chacun des programmes de 50 à 100 %. «
Cet engagement vise à donner à l'Espagne la place qui convient à la huitième
puissance économique du monde » a-t-il souligné.
Les deux hommes ont également évoqué le Sahara occidental. Le Premier
ministre espagnol a rappelé sa disponibilité dans cette « délicate mission ».
Le Secrétaire général, qui doit remettre ce mois-ci un rapport au
Conseil de sécurité sur la
question a rappelé qu'il a rencontré la semaine dernière à New York le leader
du Front Polisario.
« Le Conseil de sécurité devra être prudent : il faut dégager une solution
qui soit applicable par les deux parties sans imposer quoique ce soit, car il
n'est pas en position d'imposer », a-t-il ajouté.
http://www.un.org/apps/newsFr/storyF.asp?NewsID=12166&Cr=annan&Cr1=
Parlement Européen
TV 5 Monde (Communiqués de presse) -
Paris,France
... M. Borrell a expliqué que « notre but est d'établir une «
alliance des civilisations »
Les Présidents J.Borrell (PE) et F.Mebazaa (Chambre des députés tunisienne)
La session plénière de l'Assemblée parlementaire euroméditerranéenne (APEM)
s'est tenue, cette semaine, à Bruxelles. Les députés de 35 pays ont abordé les
questions d'intérêt commun aux deux rives de la Méditerranée : le processus de
paix israélo-palestinien, la liberté d'expression, le respect des croyances
religieuses et le développement. Cette session a marqué la fin de la
présidence de l'Assemblée par le Parlement européen.
Lors de la réunion, Josep Borrell, le Président du Parlement européen, a
déclaré qu'il « ne comprenait toujours pas toutes les complexités de la
Méditerranée qui concentre tous les problèmes de l'humanité ». Mais, il est «
plus que jamais convaincu que les relations de l'Europe avec le monde musulman
constituent le défi majeur auquel l'Europe sera confrontée dans les années qui
viennent », expliquant que la région méditerranéenne est d'une part « très
dynamique » et d'autre part « devient de plus en plus fragile ».
Important forum de discussion
L'APEM fait partie du processus de Barcelone, qui a été lancé en 1995, et elle
envisage de jouer un rôle important dans le rapprochement des citoyens des
deux rives de la Méditerranée. Son objectif est de remplacer une atmosphère de
confrontation par une atmosphère de dialogue. Elle constitue un important
forum de discussion approfondie, et offre, peut-être, aux représentants
palestiniens et israéliens, la seule opportunité de se rencontrer sur un pied
d'égalité. Forte de ses 240 membres, l'APEM réunit des députés du Parlement
européen, des parlements nationaux de l'UE et des parlements des 10 pays
partenaires de l'UE autour de la Méditerranée (Algérie, Égypte, Israël, Liban,
Jordanie, Maroc, Autorité palestinienne, Syrie, Tunisie et Turquie).
M. Borrell a expliqué que « notre but est d'établir une « alliance des
civilisations » au moment même où certains tentent de promouvoir une «
confrontation des civilisations ». La création de la « Fondation
euroméditerranéenne Anna Lindt pour le dialogue entre les cultures » est un
exemple d'action importante dans ce sens. Cette fondation encourage le
dialogue entre les cultures et contribue à la visibilité du partenariat
euroméditerranéen, par des échanges intellectuels, culturels et de la société
civile.
La crise des caricatures
Lorsque la crise relative aux caricatures danoises du prophète Mahomet a
éclaté, le comité exécutif de l'APEM fut le premier organe conjoint européen
et arabe à s'exprimer sur le sujet d'une seule voix. L'APEM a vivement
condamné, cette semaine, « toute offense aux valeurs religieuses » et a
demandé aux gouvernements de « garantir le respect des croyances religieuses
(...) et d'encourager les valeurs de tolérance, de liberté et de diversité des
cultures ». Dans le même temps, elle a fait valoir que la liberté d'expression
constituait une composante essentielle d'une société démocratique, pluraliste,
tolérante et ouverte.
Le processus de paix israélo-palestinien
Le conflit israélo-palestinien est un autre sujet clé de la coopération
euroméditerranéenne. La déclaration finale de l'APEM demande à la future
Autorité palestinienne de respecter la Déclaration Beyrouth 2002 de la Ligue
arabe qui appelle à la paix avec Israël. Les parlementaires d'Euromed ont
appelé les Palestiniens et les Israéliens à tenir les engagements qu'ils ont
pris et à poursuivre le processus de paix. L'APEM a affirmé qu'elle
s'efforcera de « maintenir et de renforcer le dialogue israélo-palestinien »,
en son sein.
Président de l'APEM depuis mars 2005, Josep Borrell transmet maintenant la
présidence à Fouad Mebazaa, Président de l'Assemblée nationale tunisienne. La
prochaine réunion aura lieu à Tunis. « J'espère que ce sera une opportunité
pour continuer à développer nos idées sur les principes de base qui
sous-tendent le futur des relations euroméditerranéennes », a déclaré M.
Borrell.